![]() |
Re: Cricket
A win by an innings and 71 runs is as comprehensive a win as you could imagine really.
Not only did the Aussie fans not show up, the bad weather didn't either... :D http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/9262492.stm Well done England for pressing home their advantage but we've been here before so let's hope this team really has the killer instinct so many before them have sorely missed. |
Re: Cricket
Interesting - the 70 quick runs they added yesterday proved to be the difference. Good captaincy or luck?
Anyway - well done lads - keep up the pressure. |
Re: Cricket
It was very decent of those Aussie chaps to capitulate so easily, how thoughtful of them to let me get to bed early this morning.:D
|
Re: Cricket
Yes, there's usually an element of luck in sporting events like these and there are so many variables which can affect a result in cricket. From what I saw of the highlights, so there were so many chances and near misses yesterday that, if taken, would have ended the game that much earlier.
Having said that, the technology they now use (e.g. the snickometer, hot spot camera, hawkeye) goes a long way to eradicating the sort of bad decisions (sometimes very difficult & sometimes just plain awful) which used to cost matches and indeed, series. In this respect at least, the old farts at the ICC really do put their FIFA counterparts to shame. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Strewth mate !!! :)
Rumours of the Aussies calling on Warne to come out of retirement. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...ia/9270927.stm |
Re: Cricket
|
Re: Cricket
|
Re: Cricket
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
Australia: 62-4 I love this, after 20 odd years of being beaten by an innings and 5-0 white washes it's so sweet. |
Re: Cricket
Aussies 189 for 7 now
|
Re: Cricket
9 down!
|
Re: Cricket
All in all a very good day for England. Pity they let the Aussie tail wag again though - that sort of thing can come back to haunt you. 29-0 at the close after a tricky spell late in the day is very nice.
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
On the positive side it does show that this is not a sub 300 AO wicket once you get past the new ball. I knew the Aussies had recalled Johnson for something, must have been his batting.:D |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
There was always a danger that his 60 odd with the bat would restore his confidence, a superb spell of bowling makes for a proper test match now.
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
What on earth is going on.
I woke up this morning to find England on 147 - 0, thinking, thats a fairly low score, only to find the Aussies had already been bowled out for 98. Good stuff :D http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cric...rd/default.stm |
Re: Cricket
Yep - great start. I had a good feeling when they decided to bowl but never expected that good.
|
Re: Cricket
The next session will be key. If England can build on their opening and avoid the silly shots which characterised their last batting display they ought to be able to build a big enough score to see them through - hopefully without needing to bat again.
|
Re: Cricket
Boxing day sale! 10 aussie wickets for just 98 runs! :)
|
Re: Cricket
England are 444 - 5 at the close of the second days play at the MCG, a lead of 346
Trott 141 no. Prior 75 no. :tu: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport/hi/engli.../scorecard.stm |
Re: Cricket
Ponting should have had a 100% fine & possibly a suspension.
|
Re: Cricket
Well it's looking good but we've been here before so I won't be counting any chickens just yet. Traditionally England have often lacked a killer punch so I'm hoping tomorrow will show that they've well and truly acquired one.
As regards Ponting's antics and some of the other goings on, I'm beginning to wonder if cricket should follow Rugby and adopt a yellow card system whereby unsavoury incidents on the pitch could result in a player being sent off for a period of time. Cricket can well do without this sort of thing and an instant penalty as opposed to an 'after the event' fine or ban might better focus a few minds. |
Re: Cricket
Well, another good day for England. Let's hope we can wrap this up before lunch tomorrow and then concentrate on winning the series.
|
Re: Cricket
I might stay up for this, as we have got a wicket already :) 172 - 7. Johnson out b Tremlett 6
|
Re: Cricket
It shouldn't be too late a night :)
|
Re: Cricket
Ryan Harris apparently won't bat, so we only need 2 more wickets ...
|
Re: Cricket
I can never understand how the test set up works.
I know if we can get them out before they reach 415 (98 + 415 = 513) then we win, but how do the overs come into it? If they don't reach it before 159.1 overs then we win? Or if they go over that do they force another day? |
Re: Cricket
In a test match the number of overs doesn't matter, that only comes into play in one day matches. The match must finish in five days or less though.
---------- Post added at 00:56 ---------- Previous post was at 00:53 ---------- And there it is, England Retain the ASHES!!! :D |
Re: Cricket
England have retained the ashes :)
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
Anyway, well done England on a thoroughly professional display and a great win achieved without any nastiness or dubious tactics! Apart from a small number of days in the series so far England have outplayed Australia and that's a comforting thought too. The loss in Perth was, hopefully, a blip and Sydney will see us win the series as well as retaining the Ashes. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVUCiWDLavY |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Well another good day for England. :) Trott was unlucky but Pietersen once again gave his wicket away for reasons best known to himself. He really should be thinking about all the easy runs he's been missing out on against a weak Australian attack he ought to be destroying. Collingwood needs to drop down the order at the very least - luckily for Bell he had Cook to rely on at the other end and it's ridiculous that someone in his form is reduced to batting after a guy with a series average of about 13 and relying on tail-enders for support. So 200 ahead with 3 wickets in hand. Hopefully we can add another 50-60 runs tomorrow and get stuck into the Aussies with a lead of 250 or thereabouts.
|
Re: Cricket
|
Re: Cricket
Three victories by and innings plus change... I'd call that pretty comprehensive! :D
One of the best things about this series for England has been the way in which they've kept their focus and nerve, especially in recovering from their loss in Perth. After playing so well in the first match and going one up after the second, to lose so badly could have knocked them for six (pardon the pun) but rather then crumble as have so many of their predecessors have, the team got their act together and won the next two convincingly. We all know this Australian team is far from great but, nonetheless, to win so well over there is remarkable IMHO. Well done lads and well done the Barmy Army! |
Re: Cricket
A great moment to savour :) Better than 2005, imo.
|
Re: Cricket
Hurrah and huzzah - YES! :D
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
I thought the Aussies were very poor in defeat though, the presentation at the end of the match was disgraceful. No indivdual medals, no champagne and they even forgot to give Cook his man of the series medal! I'm sure it would have been very different had the scores been reversed! |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
The rest can just :PP: :upyours: They set a plan to try and nullify Swann http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0aV54u9qj0 and it totally backfired on them when their bowlers just weren`t consistent enough. Englands on the other hand where magnificent continually putting the ball in danger areas where the batsman has to play and eventually getting a wicket. Some of the Aussies shot selection was very poor though. Massive thanks to Strauss and his boys for making this series a thoroughly memorable one :clap: |
Re: Cricket
Can Ireland do it?
---------- Post added at 17:04 ---------- Previous post was at 16:41 ---------- whoop! |
Re: Cricket
quite amazing considering how well organised and prepared England were for the Ashes compared to the shambles building up to this tournament.
Well played Ireland though - superb innings by O'Brien |
Re: Cricket
|
Re: Cricket
I like Watson, he comes across as a 'nice guy' not your typical Aussie stereotype for sure.:)
|
Re: Cricket
Great win for England today. One more win & no losses in the series & we're world number 1!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/14282488.stm |
Re: Cricket
A good start, if Zaheer Khan is unfit for Friday then I can't see them bowling us out twice.
Its about time the ICC stood firm and insisted that all test matches use full DRS though, a couple of howlers from Billy today.:rolleyes: |
Re: Cricket
The whole DRS thing is a joke. It just further proves that the Indians are running cricket not the ICC.
One of the best things to come out of this test was to see that Suart Broad still remembers how to bowl, after forgetting how against Sri Lanka. |
Re: Cricket
Fantastic day for England & all credit to India re the Bell incident! :)
|
Re: Cricket
Over 400 runs in a day, lots of incident, who says test cricket is boring.:cool:
As for the Bell episode, I do hope Paul Collinwood was watching.:rolleyes: |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Some very good results for England. I particulary like the way in which when they've wobbled the tail has well and truly wagged. Not that long ago it only took a couple of early wickets to fall and there'd be the inevitable batting collapse. This team is starting to look very good but a truer test of their quality will probably arise in the next match when some notable Indian absentees will return. Also I rather hope that wonderful batsman Sachin Tendulkar will get his 100th international century and be able to celebrate a well deserved and historic achievement.
Well done to England anyway! |
Re: Cricket
Yes a wonderful win by England and a great gesture for the good of the game by India.:clap::clap::clap:
|
Re: Cricket
Zaheer Khan out for the rest of the series and beyond. I wish England would replace Trott with Tremlett but I fear that Bopara may get the nod.:rolleyes:
England should do like the great Windies side did and hit them relentlessly with four fast bowlers. The current Indian bowling attack is so poor England should not need seven frontline batsmen given the form that Broad and Bresnan are in with the bat.:cool: Jim. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
He might be talented but his record for England is rather poor overall.
Mark Ramprakash was also talented but was equally inept at test level. Bopara has been tried and found wanting on more than one occasion.:( His last test was in 2009, he scored 1 in the first innings and 0 in the second. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Three concecutive 100's against a rather average West Indies bowling attack, followed by a series against Australia were he averaged 15.
Bopara may well come off against this current Indian side but Boycott, Botham, Gower et al are all clamouring to get their pads back on to play them as well. If Tremlett is not going to be fit as seems likely then I would like the selectors to give a new batsman a chance. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
J Taylor from Leics should be given a chance IMHO of course.;)
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
I may be wrong and if so no doubt someone will correct me but I can't think of many, or even any England cricketer that has made a really successful return to test cricket after being discarded in the last 10 years or more.
You could count Swann but he wasn't excluded for cricketing reasons alone.;) |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
Chris Tremlett? |
Re: Cricket
Naw, wouldn't say he was ever discarded. He played one test against India but due to injuries and the good form of the other bowlers didn't get much of a look in although he was selected in the squads most of the time when he was fit.
|
Re: Cricket
Quite a total by England, with thanks to a mammoth innings by Cook.
Lets hope for a tumble of Indian wickets tomorrow to put England ranked as the worlds number 1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport/hi/engli.../scorecard.stm |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
Thinking about it both Bell and Anderson could qualify. In some ways I feel sorry for Bopara, he was on a hiding to nothing today and he looked very nervous. Sadly he is unlikely to get a second innings and get replaced by Trott for the next match. Morgan, who has more or less taken Bopara's place could have been out for very little, being dropped off dolly catches twice in this match before he reached 50. Jim. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Well India in trouble already this morning as they are 40 for 3 with Dravid just losing his wicket.
|
Re: Cricket
England have become the number one team in the world, we sure showed those 8 other teams.... :D
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
But we have done well there is no doubt england under andy flower have reached the next level now,andy flower is a tough cookie i remember seeing him play at Essex and now as England coach.:) |
Re: Cricket
Another wonderful day by England in the cricket with England 457-3 with Pietersen making 175 and Bell not out on 181.
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
And Andy Flower is from where ? |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
He does not actually play for England though just coaches them. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
Incidently on a different tack we could do with Flower back at Essex to put some backbone into the side will not happen though LOL.:D |
Re: Cricket
They rely far too heavily on Zaheer, the rest of their pace attack is awful. In comparison England have so much strength in depth, theres about 5 or 6 fast bowlers who haven't played in this series for England that would walk into India's team at the moment. It will be interesting to see what happens when England tour India, on spinning wickets, because Indias lack of pace bowlers won't be such a big issue.
|
Re: Cricket
You can't put all the blame on the Indian bowlers, their four or five 'World Class' front line batsmen have also failed with the exception of Dravid early in the series.
They have yet to pass 300 in an innings this series, they have been outbowled,outbatted, outfielded, out captained and outcoached..:cool: |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Thats more like it, a 'proper' days test cricket.:)
Hopefully the one day series will be a better contest. Jim. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
This series against India turned out to be a bit of a cakewalk in the end.
Let's hope that Strauss & Co can keep us entertained as the World's no. 1 team for a few years at least. :tu: |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Im looking forward to England v SA. I do think England will beat Pakistan in the UAE(might try and get out there for that tour), and I think the India series will be very close.
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Cracking series, nice to see for once an English team dishing it out instead of taking it.
Fearsome batting, Fearsome bowling. Anderson was supreme IMO. India didnt ever look like they were up for it though, their heads dropped far too quickly in all of the tests. SA should be cracking. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
I see that the Indian media are taking the 4 - 0 whitewash in their stride.....
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/08/10.jpg http://www.mid-day.com/sports/2011/a...-whitewash.htm :) |
Re: Cricket
I think England have performed very well and deserve every shred of credit for their results. The played well and thrashed the team they were up against. That's all any team can do and having seen England teams snatch defeat from the jaws of victory so many times over the years, it was great to see a thoroughly professional outfit who took total control, kept it and never let India back in the series.
There's no doubt in my mind that India looked a bit jaded at times - a bit too much cricket possibly - but we mustn't overlook the part that the England team played in making them look lacklustre. During the first test England wobbled seriously and only the tail end got us out of real trouble. The Indians didn't look too shabby then did they. Whatever England achieved and no matter wild/exaggerrated claims the media may make about who's best etc., I don't think Strauss and Co. are going to let any of that go to their heads. They realise how tough it's going to be to hold onto top spot but won't give it up easily. |
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
Indians seem to take everything to the extremes, they're either the best side ever and have the best players ever or the worst team in the history of the game. Talk about an overreaction.
|
Re: Cricket
Quote:
|
Re: Cricket
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum