Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35722656)

Spurs spent £30 million based on Lamela's one half decent season with Roma and in a hope that somehow they would get a player as good as Bale but frankly so far he has proved a unmitigated disaster and it would not surprise me if he is offloaded back to Italy on loan before the end of the current transfer window.

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35722761)

One to please thy Gunners.

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/f...t-9676328.html

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 35722829)

ye originally from RMC http://rmcsport.bfmtv.com/football/l...cu-828365.html

they say Roma are interested and your old lady ;)

---------- Post added at 19:05 ---------- Previous post was at 18:03 ----------



---------- Post added at 19:37 ---------- Previous post was at 19:05 ----------

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvV06vICEAEpnvM.jpg:large

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35722859)

You can spend and spend but that does not guarantee success everytime as some clubs panic buy.

Originally Posted by colin25 (Post 35722860)

At least you can't say that Man utd are trying to buy the title :D

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35722859)

You can spend and spend but that does not guarantee success everytime as some clubs panic buy.

Originally Posted by colin25 (Post 35722860)

At least you can't say that Man utd are trying to buy the title :D

Originally Posted by Shadow Demon UK (Post 35722869)

Or it shows United don't sell their best players. When the core of your team either retires or leaves for free towards the end of their careers (Giggs, Scholes, Vidic, Evra, Ferdinand...) the net spend is going to be high because those players need to be replaced.

Originally Posted by colin25 (Post 35722872)

got to give it to Burnley, they got past the bus :D

Originally Posted by colin25 (Post 35722870)

yes, Utd never spend money unless they need players, so different to the other clubs :D