![]() |
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
Apparantly, Sky are due to release their version this year; Surely VM can't let Sky get there first on a USP that should have been VM's months ago? |
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
Although saying that, considering it's been tested recently, I'd say it'll be available sooner rather than later |
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
Given that Sky have more TV channels and are now offering fibre BB, VM need all the USP's they can get. Tivo to tivo box communication was enabled about a year ago. Why haven't VM got their finger out and got multiroom streaming emabled before now, to give them a nice USP. Given that Sky have the same functionality planned, the longer VM delay with this, the shorter lived the USP associated with it will be. This, coupled with the ipad app taking two years when Sky already have one, makes VM look incompetent in this area. VM have many, many good points, but lack of channels and slowness to deliver promised functionality are two bad ones. Just my view, as someone who is free to both praise and critisize VM. |
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
But I don't expect a specific date; I know they'll never release that. I'm complaining that Multiroom streaming and ipad have taken far too long, and that "In the coming weeks" is a meaningless statement given VM's track record for delivering things. Multiroom streaming is functionality where VM could have been way ahead of Sky; Tivo boxes could talk to each other after the 15.2 update a year ago, but VM seem to have let that time advantage slip away. |
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
But no one is arguing that things should be released before they are ready; they are arguing about the amount of time it takes VM to get to that 'ready' state. |
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
Red button was missing but if you wanted red button, you could stay on V+. Delaying the Tivo launch until red button was on there, would have made no sense; It would have not got tivo to those who wanted red button any faster, but would have delayed it, for no good reason, for those who didn't care about red button. I do think VM could have made sure that people were aware of that initial lack of red button. |
Re: General TiVo Discussion Part 3
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum