![]() |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
$44.99 pm gets you live TV and all streaming content. Link |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Presumably because live TV has the content worth watching? The poster has built a like for like package - from a streaming provider. Hardly unreasonable. $44.99 doesn't include much of the available content.
I'm going to hazard that the vast majority of TV subscribers care for the content not the delivery method. Like for like subscribers won't be any better off - this is a land grab and battle between global conglomerates. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
As i already explained Showtime, hbo, starz and cinemax are being used as a like for like for SKY Cinema. Live tv like for like for SKY entertainment plus kids plus sports plus hd, on demand as a like for like for sky boxsets. I'm not knocking streaming btw as i too believe that streaming is the future for tv. The $44.99p/m is live tv and ad supported on demand it does not include HBO, Showtime, Starz or Cinemax these are addons. Another to look at is playstation vue https://www.playstation.com/en-us/network/vue/ or sling tv . |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Building a like for like package defeats the idea of streaming. You will end up paying for channels you will never watch just as you do now with virgin and Sky.
The whole point of streaming is that you only pay for access to what you want to watch which is why I suggested earlier that most would settle for 2 or 3 streaming providers and pick up an occasional month here and there with another. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Are any of your hypothetical two or three streaming services offering the latest movie releases or premium sports? If and when they do that’s more money. You’re also forgetting, as many do, that when Sky/Virgin strike wholesale deals it’s pennies per subscriber per channel due to economies of sale. When these distributors are trying to recoup the same money from tens/hundreds of thousands of subscribers it’ll be much more expensive for those who do. Two or three subscriptions and I’d already pay more for that plus broadband than I do for Virgin. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Streaming is becoming ever more popular in the States. Interestingly, cord cutters are said to like the increased value they are getting, contrary to what some on here are predicting.
https://advanced-television.com/2019...ntent-by-2024/ |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
A study conducted by Roku.:D
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
It may be news to you, Den, but they all seem to be leaning in the same direction. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
If your search term is “digital marketing streaming is the future” then you will only see the same articles.
I don’t see you updating us on the continuing success of pay tv incumbents. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum