![]() |
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
I would assume that BT will be keeping it as an exclusive.
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Quote:
http://www.btplc.com/News/Articles/S...9-DD5237069DD8 This might just be the beginning of the end for ESPN :( |
Thats a huge blow for ESPN!!!!
Interesting to see if this new BT channel will be in the XL package and in HD. Big move by BT. |
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Virgin have long been the home of "free" Premier League football. This channel will be available to Virgin on a subscription basis, I would imagine, much like ESPN currently is on Sky, but I reckon it'll only be on BT Vision and you view that you'll be able to watch it as part of your subscription-that's the new home of "free" Premier League football.
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Quote:
I have a friend whom is talking about ditching Virgin & moving to a "joint" Sky/ BT setup . Not happy about two phone line rentals etc. Me I could not care less :shocked: ---------- Post added at 09:29 ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Thought you might be interested in a snippet from the BT statement issued to BT employees which states what has been publically stated but puts an important different slant on one specific aspect namely:
"We will launch a new football-focused channel to carry the games. It will offer new interactive features when supplied over BT’s fibre network and we will look to distribute it on other platforms.” So what the above “could” mean is that while VM will have access to this new BT football focused channel (subject to negotiations of course), the "additional new interactive features" will only be available via the "BT fibre network"? If that is what eventually happens (could be reading more than is here today), could we end up with a big dispute with BT, like VM had with the Sky red button for their interactive sports features? VM are working on the strategy they are an independent carrier now, reaching agreements with content providers. Trouble with that strategy is that if the content owner (in this case football coverage) are themselves competitive carriers and want to secure an advantage (e.g. lack of F1 HD on VM is an example of that right now), then do VM have the necessary right and weight from anti-competitive legislation to force change on such providers? It will be an interesting 12 months to see have things develop with this new BT channel. |
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
To be honest even if Virgin were still content providers i.e still owned Virgin Media TV and UKTV, there wouldn't have been anything they could have done about this
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Quote:
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Quote:
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Quote:
There are a lot of sports I watch on ESPNA + ESPN has some good Rugby coverage and would HATE to lose it from the XL pack. |
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
"Firstly Virgin Media ( for the moment) is my provider of choice ,but I fail to see why ANYONE should be forced to use them if they choose not to"
The "force" comment from me was meant to be VM onto BT to at least have neutral status on what is incuded in an agreement with BT on this new channel, since without that, consumers are "forced" to subscribe to BT to gain all features of the channel. Apologies if missleading. Nobody is forcing consumers to subscribe to a channel except Sky (in the case of HD) and maybe BT now IF you want all the features with that channel. That is the situation now with the Sky F1/SP3/SP4 channels where to get all features (HD in this case), you can only get that from Sky. The additional interactive features could potentially be an new battle ground where VM loose out? We shall wait and see. |
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Quote:
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
Quote:
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
There's a difference between having access to Disney's cash, a company who don't have a desire to have a strong foothold in the broadcasting British sport in Britain, and BT's cash-a company who, through BT Vision and you view, have demonstrated a desire to be an important part of this country's communication media. Disney, and by extension ESPN, might have considerably more money than Virgin, but if the old adage that you have to speculate to accumulate is true, I would suggest that Virgin had more to gain by spending their's than Disney did. Either way, what's important is that neither ESPN or Virgin saw the value in making a serious effort to acquire these rights, and BT did.
|
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2012) Vol. 2.
There is the "interesting" aspect here of BT using its cash generated from legacy telco and business comminications to enter the media business as they certainly did not find that cash from BT Vision revenues. That is a market I suppose, just needs strong anti-competitive ligislation to make sure a fair competitive market is in place and on-content owners like VM do not get locked out. No issue on BT owning these rights now as long as they are available via subscription of course.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum