![]() |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:17 ---------- Previous post was at 15:12 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Apple and Disney feel like a natural fit but even then I don’t seem convinced they’d have the enthusiasm to blow 150 Billion on it and deal with legacy assets and theme parks. More inclined to think we may see the current 5 turn into 3 or 4 much like the record industry now stands. Let’s come back here in a few years and see right or wrong we were haha! |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Wormfood in the sense, that the Big Tech want to be the Hollywood players. Whether they buy the legacy companies or oubid them for rights, who can know for sure, but the tech cos have shown their hand with all this bidding for sports rights. They can't all win, can they?
On reduction of companies, yes. If Sky and WBD merge, that brings the number down of the legacy companies from the original Big Six hollywood companies to the Big Four, but then on top of that there is Apple, Amazon, Google and Mirosoft. I really don't think that eight global streamers can exist and all be profitable, but we'll see. On MGM, that's early days yet. We'll have to wait for the first "Amazon" James Bond film, to see how that all pans out. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
(I’m not saying they would allow it, but previously Sky have been far more dominant in the market on their own, with regulation of the wholesale price of Sky Sports 1 and 2). |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Yeah, as I see, it's just a change of the name badge.
Sky used to be top dog and in the near future it'll be Amazon, Apple etc exchanging blows (keeping it on the sports topic.;)) instead. Whether it was better before when Sky controlled everything, or whether we prefer a multiude of players now, is debateable. It certainly ain't cheaper now, that's for sure. Edit: just to step back from that for a second jfman, there are multiple players, but the point of the Big Tech cos is they are trillion/2 trillion dollar companies. They can compete with each other, but no one else on the planet has their deep pockets. So, we need to look at them four and then everyone else. In that context. Disney, Warner, Universal, Paramount etc are tier two, Big Tech is tier one. A massive gap between the two tiers of companies. ---------- Post added at 17:22 ---------- Previous post was at 17:00 ---------- Quote:
Wouldn't it be "great", if four or five companies owned premiership rights and if you wanted to watch all the matches, you would have to pay for several services....? |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
VirginMedia #534 has had Sky Sports F1 HDR for a few days now - and it now has the on-screen dog too.
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Apple and Amazon? Sure they’re spending money on tv, film and sports now but it’s not core to their business, it’s a way in to their ecosystem and services… if the day comes they realise all that cash is not worth the outlay to the larger business, they have no attachments and they will cut, run and it will be brutal. Right now? It’s a nice way to go to parties and meet stars but if it drags down the balance sheet? Different story! They won’t burn cash endlessly. Google? They already have the biggest streaming platform on the planet and their only move in sports so far is a product that everyone thinks is too expensive anyway and it’s most likely going to be used to as a marketing and retention tool for a linear tv package! Microsoft - they have a space in gaming the others don’t or have utterly failed at…. And right now I think they’re more likely to sink cash into OpenAI than Formula One rights. (And honestly I see Google burning cash in the AI space than the tv business going forward) Honestly if sports is going to be solved somehow I actually think it may be in the TVOS space… accessibility, bundling and discoverability is going to be the secret sauce I think and that’s where I think the real battle could end up being fought for streaming as a whole - and I actually think multiple streamers can exist…. Tv has never been an all or nothing business and no reason why that changes… I think the future ends up looking rather similar to the past! |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Agree.
The tv business may not be the core business for Big Tech, but they're outspending the traditional companies now, in several different areas. It's hardly set in stone and as you say, the companies have different priorities which they can change about. But at the moment, they are spending billions on sports content. I believe that will continue and will impact the existing media companies, like with DirecTV's loss of its sports rights. And on the last point yes, its all about the "home"" screen. What interface do consumers see when they switch on their devices and who controls that interface. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
The home screen is a good point to raise. It's something that may be more regulated in the UK in the future so the public service broadcasters don't lose out. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
For global sports rights, it may be different. The recent DAZN deal for NFL rights shows how it may go. (yes, I know DAZN is not Big Tech.:D) https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other...-deal-29157246 |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Here's what Big Tech has got in the States:
Amazon - NFL ($1B per year) Apple - MLB, MLS soccer ($2.5 deal) Google - NFL ($2bn per year), MLB NBA rights are up next and Big Tech is looking at them. And muliple articles are saying that Apple is going to bid this year for premiership rights here in the UK. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
When you consider the size of the market (330m+ people) those are quite small interventions. It’s also worth noting the primary rights (and more expensive!) for NFL games for each team in their home market are still with the likes of CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox paying a combined $11bn a year to 2033.
Apple’s MLS TV deal is a mere $250m a year for (non-exclusive in the US) worldwide rights for a decade. None of this precludes the possibility that the big tech companies could enter the UK or European market at massive scale for sports rights. Or simply by taking over or merging with incumbent rights holders. I think it’s far from clear it’s the best use of the billions available though. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
We'll see if they'll try and nab Sky's footie rights this year. If they do that, I think the direction will be clear.
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum