![]() |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
__________________ Quote:
My ex's pub however made hardly any money through food in comparison to what they raked in from booze (and they had seating for 80 diners) Now if they were to ban smoking and loose their regulars because of it (all of whom smoked, one of which did so to death) they would go bust. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Of course quite a few pubs use food for marketing purpposes, to attract custom, from which drink is then their main revenue earner. And draught soft drinks offer the highest margins so attracting more families mightn't be a bad idea.
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Or, as I posted earlier pubs will be smoke free, alcohol free with a crÃÃ*’¨che, soft drinks and approved non-threatening music playing in the background ;) |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Just putting the record straight. __________________ Quote:
Crazy innit ! |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Further to the discussion of private planes ...
It has been the tactic of the pro-smokers in this thread to reduce the arguments in favour of a ban and to attempt to deconstruct them, the resulting deconstruction sounding authoritative but actually bearing little resemblance to the matter in hand. The parallel between aircraft and pubs is clear and obvious. The law bans smoking on the 0730 BA flight from Glasgow to Heathrow and it bans smoking on the Airtours/Monarch/Air2000 charter flight to Marbella/Faro/Gran Caranria/wherever. All of these examples are *public* flights, whether scheduled or chartered, because the *public* are invited to take seats on them. The matter of private planes chartered by private groups is utterly irrelevant to this discussion, as the Government is not proposing banning smoking in private homes. Xaccers also mentioned earlier that the smoking ban on planes was introduced for fire safety rather than respiratory health reasons. Again, this is totally irrelevant and misses (I hope not wilfully) the point I was actually making. Here it is again anyway: We do not hear continuous complaints that our civil liberties and freedom of choice are being infringed by the ban on smoking on aircraft. Why not? |
Re: smoking and the pub
Because noone has chosen to be cantankerous in that area yet??
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
It is interesting to note that as yet nobody has commented on the cultural impact of the ban that I posted earlier http://www.sundayherald.com/46058 I was trying to move away from discussing the ban from specifically within a discourse of risk: risk to health, risk to landlords business, risk to increased taxes, risk to mental health, risk of losing choice, etc. etc. And to look at other examples and how the ban has affected them. But it appears that as other threads show (I'm thinking of the Express headlines one specifically), that the culture of fear and risk that we seem to live is what people want to discuss. Which only serves to construct and perpetuate much of that fear. Maybe. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Or are you just proving my point ;) |
Re: smoking and the pub
Well I am not sure what you want me to say. I was being genuine when I said it was interesting. But it doesn't change what I think about the ban. There are still a minority of smokers in this country. We still don't know what will happen if there is a UK ban. And no matter what happens, there are still non-smokers who would like to be protected from the smoke. As I have said all along, I would support a call for a sealed smoking room in pubs. As for this guy:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Although it does appear from the Irish example that smokers are having all the fun :D |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are Cable Forum