Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36193894)

Examples?

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36193904)

Without knowing what/who you’re talking about it’s hard to comment on whatever the hell you’re talking about but the only times the police have ever been in touch with us (and any groups we associate with) has been when comments have been posted that could either incite retaliation crimes or jeopardise the case.

Either way any decent hunter team ought to have an admin who monitors the chat in live stings etc and removes such posts asap.

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36193943)

This entire thread.

And dozens more, going back years, usually related to some implied disability we’re supposed to dance around, that only seems to surface when you’re questioned or backed into a corner.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36193977)

Indeed yes, they should. I can't remember their name, but the group that I saw were also 'outing' what they refer to as 'Nonce protector' judges and police who had been found to have been charged with child abuse over the years in retaliation for one of their hunters receiving a police visit whilst he was out.

Their issue seems to be that one of their hunters gets a police visit for remarks made online, whilst judges hand out lenient sentences and some police have been found guilty of the crimes that they seek to prevent. I can't see what they hope to gain by rubbing the judiciary & local police force up the wrong way though.

---------- Post added at 12:06 ---------- Previous post was at 11:56 ----------



So many that you are unable to provide specific examples.

You appear to be questioning my disability itself and the effects thereof. Do you do the same to any other member of this site? If someone says that they are a cancer survivor, that they have been bereaved or have some form of mental or physical disability, do you seize upon this to make snide & discriminatory remarks to try and hurt or upset them? Do you get a kick out of this?

A withdrawal and apology for these gratuitous remarks would be greatly appreciated. My carer reports that I actually look physically shaken, not helped by various things keeping me awake for most of the night.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36193977)

Indeed yes, they should. I can't remember their name, but the group that I saw were also 'outing' what they refer to as 'Nonce protector' judges and police who had been found to have been charged with child abuse over the years in retaliation for one of their hunters receiving a police visit whilst he was out.

Their issue seems to be that one of their hunters gets a police visit for remarks made online, whilst judges hand out lenient sentences and some police have been found guilty of the crimes that they seek to prevent. I can't see what they hope to gain by rubbing the judiciary & local police force up the wrong way though.

---------- Post added at 12:06 ---------- Previous post was at 11:56 ----------



So many that you are unable to provide specific examples.

You appear to be questioning my disability itself and the effects thereof. Do you do the same to any other member of this site? If someone says that they are a cancer survivor, that they have been bereaved or have some form of mental or physical disability, do you seize upon this to make snide & discriminatory remarks to try and hurt or upset them? Do you get a kick out of this?

A withdrawal and apology for these gratuitous remarks would be greatly appreciated. My carer reports that I actually look physically shaken, not helped by various things keeping me awake for most of the night.

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 36193980)

No one else goes on about their disabilities and/or illnesses and uses them to get off with getting berated for daft comments or posts. Claiming discrimination etc etc.

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36193981)

And this is exactly why there’s more chance that I’d get an apology (not wanted, needed or appropriate) from Pierre than RC would.

If you (plural) have a disability, there’s no need to bring it up 8 out of 10 times when you (again, plural) perceive a personal attack.

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36193987)

Well, that’s a new one.

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 36193980)

No one else goes on about their disabilities and/or illnesses and uses them to get off with getting berated for daft comments or posts. Claiming discrimination etc etc.

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36193984)

It does help though if you want to use it as a get out of jail free card for the things you've said or threats you've made. Personally I'd never bring a disability into a thread to excuse myself when I've got over excited but I easily could and you're one of the few people on here that even know what's wrong with me, the thing imo with disability or illness is if you let it define you, it will, my partner is an inspiration to me, she has form of blood cancer but never moans or complains about it and because of that it's always me that has to remind other members of the family that she even has it and she wouldn't have it any other way.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36194931)

The overwhelming majority of my posts aren't related to my disability. It's only mentioned when necessary, just like you with your anxiety state. People need to be informed about any disabilities where it's relevant so that they can take it into account and avoid any discrimination.

There was once someone on here who kept getting berated for his spelling mistakes. He couldn't help it because he was dyslexic and had to keep on telling people this time and time again.

Would you say that he was using his condition to 'get off' with making spelling mistakes? Would you say that the repeated remarks about spelling mistakes, despite people being made aware of his dyslexia, was discrimination?

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36194931)

The overwhelming majority of my posts aren't related to my disability. It's only mentioned when necessary, just like you with your anxiety state. People need to be informed about any disabilities where it's relevant so that they can take it into account and avoid any discrimination.

There was once someone on here who kept getting berated for his spelling mistakes. He couldn't help it because he was dyslexic and had to keep on telling people this time and time again.

Would you say that he was using his condition to 'get off' with making spelling mistakes? Would you say that the repeated remarks about spelling mistakes, despite people being made aware of his dyslexia, was discrimination?

---------- Post added at 18:04 ---------- Previous post was at 17:57 ----------



I'm sorry to hear about your partner, i imagine that this form of cancer is particularly awful. I've mentioned her in my prayers.