Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36131118)

Search Warrant & Property Receipt.

https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploa...54.17.0_12.pdf

Items seized

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1660336862

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1660336862

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36131075)

Which Biden explicitly said donny wasn't getting because of his erratic behaviour

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36131128)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ate-department





https://www.politifact.com/article/2...-donald-trump/

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36131131)

Irrelevant.

The fact remains. She admitted to her wrong doing. She potentially violated several statutes on storage of classified material, she should have been prosecuted, the laws exists and she clearly broke them, only the FBI gave her a get out of jail free card, no different to this current case, only Trump is a former president, that still has, high level clearances and access, to top level classified material, access the level he had that she never had.

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36131134)

It's like a religous cult the way some people defend Trump whatever he says or does. Its as if if he's found out to be a lying fraud then that undermines themselves too.

Concrete evidence of wrongdoing ? Then it must be 'fake' or planted. Witnesses must be liar's. It's all Deep States doing, not the holy one... Change the subject to Clinton, Biden, Yogi Bear, anyone...

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36131137)

He didn't have permission to keep it in his house.

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36131134)

It's like a religous cult the way some people defend Trump whatever he says or does. Its as if if he's found out to be a lying fraud then that undermines themselves too.

Concrete evidence of wrongdoing ? Then it must be 'fake' or planted. Witnesses must be liar's. It's all Deep States doing, not the holy one... Change the subject to Clinton, Biden, Yogi Bear, anyone...

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36131137)

He didn't have permission to keep it in his house.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36131146)

That's the key issue here.

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36131148)

Neither did Hillary Clinton, so your point is moot.

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36131148)

No it’s not, Hillary Clinton did not have permission to have a private email server that she kept classified material on, it’s several violations on the law regarding it. Yet she did not get prosecuted.

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36131152)

No it isn't, that's what I am saying. There isn't a difference between what they've been accused of doing and the subsequent requirement for the FBI to investigate. Clinton was e-mails, Trump is physical files. Clinton's investigation is over and Trump is early days so we don't know what, if anything, he'll actually has.

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36131154)

What Hillary didn’t or didn’t do is irrelevant to Trump. If he’s broke the law he’s broke the law. Anything else is a distraction or politicising it.

If the rule of law has been poorly applied in the past that’s not a get out of jail free card for Trump or his supporters.

If “ah but Hilliary” is the new “ah but Starmer” this could be long, circuitous thread ignoring the facts.

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36131155)

There is no point keep saying she was cleared, she should never have been, the law exists on violations of classified material, and she should have been prosecuted for keeping a private server containing highly classified stuff on there. In her case, the law was selectively ignored.

You cannot have a law and then let someone get off Scot free when they violate it, yet she was and that was the wrong decision, you either believe in the rule of the law or you do not, just because of who it is.

Those emails were still classified and she did not have any permission to keep them on a private server, in her own property, same as Trump with these documents, only like you say, are in physical format, rather than a virtual one.

Classified material is either, they were not just random emails, they had classifications, and she violated laws on storage of and use of them.

---------- Post added at 11:01 ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 ----------



You as well, you need to wind your neck in too, I do not give a stuff about Trump, if he’s broke the law, fine, the book gets thrown at him, but we have a historical precedent of the law not being applied in such cases, & that matters, the law is the law, you cannot selectively let someone off for the same kind of violations on safe storage and use of classified material, Clinton was.

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36131155)

There is no point keep saying she was cleared, she should never have been, the law exists on violations of classified material, and she should have been prosecuted for keeping a private server containing highly classified stuff on there. In her case, the law was selectively ignored.

You cannot have a law and then let someone get off Scot free when they violate it, yet she was and that was the wrong decision, you either believe in the rule of the law or you do not, just because of who it is.

Those emails were still classified and she did not have any permission to keep them on a private server, in her own property, same as Trump with these documents, only like you say, are in physical format, rather than a virtual one.

Classified material is either, they were not just random emails, they had classifications, and she violated laws on storage of and use of them.

---------- Post added at 11:01 ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 ----------



You as well, you need to wind your neck in too, I do not give a stuff about Trump, if he’s broke the law, fine, the book gets thrown at him, but we have a historical precedent of the law not being applied in such cases, & that matters, the law is the law, you cannot selectively let someone off for the same kind of violations on safe storage and use of classified material, Clinton was.