Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35961478)

These bags should not have the stores name on it.

I don't want to have to pay to advertise

Originally Posted by Chloé Palmas (Post 35961483)

According to what??

What prevents them for charging for it if they have their name on it exactly??

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35961486)

As l say l am not a expert on these matters Chloe but if their bags have their name on it that is classed as free advertising thus they should not be charging for it.

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35961516)

Its not an option, the law is they must charge.
Why shouldnt they have their names on them ?
They were just the same when they were given away free.

Originally Posted by Chloé Palmas (Post 35961494)

Yeah, if the customer is not happy with it anyway.

Den, I think I believe Hugh - you can't possibly be a woman.

Originally Posted by Chloé Palmas (Post 35961525)

Yeah most folks from Yorkshire usually do. They are not bad with potatoes and carrots, too. Not too much else, mind you. ;)

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35961521)

As l say l am only going by what someone who knows a lot more then l told me as personally it does not worry me as l am happy to fork out for a carrier or two.

---------- Post added at 05:09 ---------- Previous post was at 05:07 ----------



Hugh generally knows his onions l would say.:)

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35961533)

And his Haggis Tatties and neeps ;)