![]() |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I don't see it as cheating the system, I see it as the system cheating me.
What about people who have the means to receive live programs, but genuinely don't need a TV licence, do you see them as cheating licence dodgers? |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
BBC ready to contemplate alternative to the compulsory licence fee.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/201...-model-changes |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
The cost per subscriber would most likely be higher than the current licence fee because there would be no subsidy from those who decide not to subscribe, plus the additional cost introduced by encryption. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
Just because they go to subscription their costs will not rise as a program maker. The only rise in costs will be from encryption for their programs delivered by the local TV transmitter, and any costs incurred by sky or VM to encrypt the service. I still stand by my statement that the price of subscription will be: Cost to run the BBC/number of subscribers |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
You're forgetting that unlike now the BBC will have to make a profit and keep shareholders happy ,it would most likely spend years as a loss making company ,much the same as Sky did ,you may even see the BBC selling BB and phone services and going head to head with Sky and VM |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
I believe the BBC could never survive as a private company. I also think they could never compete or be in direct competition with the likes of sky or VM who are service carriers. (as well as program makers in the case of sky) The BBC could only offer what they currently offer, but they know that they currently have an unfair funding scheme where they are subsidised by those of us who don't have a choice. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
A subscription linked to a decoder and card would NOT mean the BBC is a private company. All it would do is make the BBC produce quality programs because if they don't they will not get the subscribers. If it mean that the BBC's output gets better then that's great if not then the senior managers might at last get a kick in the behind unlike now where they know they get the money no matter how bad they perform. |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
The question you have to ask is why would a public service broadcaster need a decoder ,the BBC is meant to be a public service with a shared cost ,any other model simply will not be a public service imo. If you are saying that we no longer need a public service broadcaster like the BBC,CH4 and i think CH5 then that is a totally different discussion to one of should we have TV licence |
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
I'd imagine the BBC would do ok being a private entity, given the number of people who watch their amazing *gag* shows like Eastenders and the like, I bet they wouldn't mind paying £1-3 a month for access to all the BBC TV shows.
|
Re: TV licence non payment could be made a civil offence
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum