Cable Forum
Page 7 of 7 « First 3456 7
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   "Boycott Braehead" campaign over yet more anti-photographer stupidity (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33681802)

Derek 13-10-2011 13:48
Re: "Boycott Braehead" campaign over yet more anti-photographer stupidity
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strathclyde Police
People have been very quick to offer their opinions on this issue and were very keen to accept Mr White’s story as the only evidence that was available. Clearly this was not the case.
As I mentioned right back at the start of the thread. One person saying something doesn't make it the truth.

---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:40 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35314945)
If proven to be false that member of staff ought to be sued AND prosecuted.
Who says it's the member of staff that needs to be worried about getting prosecuted? Just saying...

techguyone 13-10-2011 14:01
Re: "Boycott Braehead" campaign over yet more anti-photographer stupidity
 
I dunno, so lets say his flies were undone.. You know, sometimes I've not noticed my flies were undone, does that make me a criminal?

Unless his dick was hanging out, I reckon you'd be hard pressed to prove that his 'flies were undone deliberately' and if they were, what's the charge? 'flies undone' doesn't really cut it, its hardly indecent exposure.

danielf 13-10-2011 14:03
Re: "Boycott Braehead" campaign over yet more anti-photographer stupidity
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35314993)
I dunno, so lets say his flies were undone.. You know, sometimes I've not noticed my flies were undone, does that make me a criminal?

Unless his dick was hanging out, I reckon you'd be hard pressed to prove that his 'flies were undone deliberately' and if they were, what's the charge? 'flies undone' doesn't really cut it, its hardly indecent exposure.
Public order offence? You can pretty much get done for a public order offence if you wear socks that don't match, so that's always a safe bet.

Maggy 13-10-2011 17:31
Re: "Boycott Braehead" campaign over yet more anti-photographer stupidity
 
Chinese whispers thread..;)

martyh 13-10-2011 17:45
Re: "Boycott Braehead" campaign over yet more anti-photographer stupidity
 
[QUOTE=Derek;35314982]As I mentioned right back at the start of the thread. One person saying something doesn't make it the truth.

----------QUOTE]

I'm amazed that some posters in this thread (who should know better )have jumped to so many conclusions .We have seen it hundreds of times in past threads where a news story has been quoted and pretty much the opposite has been shown to be true ,i' not saying that is the case here but it was blatently obvious from the original story that there was more to this than originally printed

Quote:
Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35314993)
I dunno, so lets say his flies were undone.. You know, sometimes I've not noticed my flies were undone, does that make me a criminal?

Unless his dick was hanging out, I reckon you'd be hard pressed to prove that his 'flies were undone deliberately' and if they were, what's the charge? 'flies undone' doesn't really cut it, its hardly indecent exposure.
you might make the olympics if you jump to conclusions a bit higher :rolleyes:

remember other members of the public have complained as well


Quote:
“The members of the public who asked for the security staff to become involved have told us that they did so for reasons which had absolutely nothing to do with him taking photographs of his daughter. They had a very specific concern
from Russ' link

Maggy 13-10-2011 18:04
Re: "Boycott Braehead" campaign over yet more anti-photographer stupidity
 
Question.Did anyone tell him his flies were undone at any point?

Because I would have said something.;)

Gary L 13-10-2011 18:17
Re: "Boycott Braehead" campaign over yet more anti-photographer stupidity
 
If it's suspect when a man taking pictures of his daughter has his fly open. does that mean the equivalent for a woman is having an extra button on her blouse undone, or will we go by her skirt being shorter than an agreed length?

and will the paranoid get confused and flappy if the child is the same sex as the defendant?


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01.
Page 7 of 7 « First 3456 7
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum