![]() |
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
The truth is that if there was absolutely no way that a pedestrian could get hurt or killed on any road in Britain. there would still be speed cameras plotted all over the place to raise revenue.
I read somewhere about all this mass hysteria about paedophiles. someone said it's not happening, there is not a war going on outside your front door. it's only there because you are told it's there and you want to believe it's there. The government wants you to believe that we need to be nannied, and we have got to the point where we want this. and get up in the morning to find out what they are going to do for us today to make our lives more governed than it was yesterday. |
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
Quote:
Anyway.... to get back on topic, would it not be better to use paedophiles as sleeping policeman on all dangerous roads since they appear to serve no other useful purpose in our society. Second thoughts, bad idea, Lots of people might speed up instead of slowing down. ;) |
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
Quote:
---------- Post added at 16:41 ---------- Previous post was at 16:32 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
Quote:
2 yes other road users most though because of head ons for amount of deaths these would be unlikely to be affected by a 10mph drop derek say more accidents are from those just leaving the road but i expect that most of those are ones doing over the limit anyway so far the government has brought forth no studies that show that this would in any way be effective and the data that they have available shows that pedestrian education should save more lives |
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
No, still doesn't make any sense. Who TF is "derek?"
|
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
try post 82 to find Derek
|
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
Quote:
And my most lengthy post on this subject is here. |
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
Quote:
|
Re: Road speed limit cut to 50mph ?
Quote:
they say that the problems are inattention lack of observation by both car drivers and pedestrians any speed over 30 is likely to be fatal to a pedestrian and in real terms any speed over 40 in head ons is likely to be fatal the run of roads that Derek says are higher in numbers than the head ons are from the crashes i can find data on unlikely to be affected by any speed limit as the majority seem to be going well over any posted limit in any case the evidence that a speed limit reduction will do any thing is not there if they want to get more to stick to the limits we have ( though motorways should be increased in any case ) is to actually plan the limits we already have properly and increase responsibility for pedestrians most side roads should be reduced to 10 /20 mph ( yep some places i want slower limits ) other non main route roads should be 30 with lower variable limits for school and even busy crossing places at certain times of day ( we have them working very well fow some of our schools controlled by the lolly pop man on other a and b roads 30 40 50 limits should be put in appropriate to the road and not as a lot are now reduced on straight sections so its easy to put a sped trap in on a road that was perfectly safe at a high speed till camera turned up motorways should have higher but variable limits where its safe to do and if they realy want a big reduction every child should have to pass a driving test of some sort before leaving school and start retesting every one at least once evry 10 years preferably every 5 ( both could help get extra people in work to at the moment ;) ) |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum