Originally Posted by zinglebarb (Post 34512608)

errrrr dude that would require every time it failed to be at the exact right time for fertilisation to result in a pregnancy please stop throwing bull crap figures at me in a lame attempt to dismiss me

Originally Posted by zinglebarb (Post 34512608)

If its got to the point they are needing an 8th abortion they seriously need to do something . Are you telling me its ok to have 8 abortions in a life? let alone the possibility that any of these might have a 9th or 10th? no normal person would get into this position

Originally Posted by Xaccers (Post 34512594)

If a contraceptive is 99% successful, and you have sex 600 times a year, that's 6 times it failed.
Do that over 30 years and that's 180 failures.

Originally Posted by Xaccers (Post 34512612)

Please read what I write, I said failures, not pregnancies.
8 out of 180 is a pretty small number.




One might say no normal person would find it preferable for women to have to perform their own abortions and risk their lives and those of future children they may want.

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34512614)

Not meaning to get into the argument, but who the f. has sex 600 times a year? That's twice a day discounting certain erm... periods.

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34512614)

Not meaning to get into the argument, but who the f. has sex 600 times a year? That's twice a day (all year) discounting certain erm... periods.