Cable Forum
Page 7 of 12 « First 3456 7 891011 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Is this allowed? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=32391)

Neil 25-07-2005 10:41
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelus
But of course he knows he has done wrong. He said on the other forum that he changed his whois info for his site to a fake name.

The guy will not post his details and i hope NTL pulls the plug. Then he needs to be banned from here

He is a fanboy noob loser
If anyone needs to be banned it's you for making comments like that.

No more please.

Angelus 25-07-2005 11:01
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
If anyone needs to be banned it's you for making comments like that.

No more please.
SIR YES SIR

Pø†øƒGøLÐ 25-07-2005 11:21
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
If anyone needs to be banned it's you for making comments like that.

No more please.
Hmm... think I'm with Angelus on this one. He's breaking his TOS... he deserves to be discon.

Shaun 25-07-2005 11:25
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PÃÃ*â€™Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¸ÃƒÆ Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã*’Ã‚à ¸Ãƒâ€ Ã¢â‚ ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢GÃÃ*’ƸLÃÃ*’ 
Hmm... think I'm with Angelus on this one. He's breaking his TOS... he deserves to be discon.
That decision's down to NTL, and we're never going to find out what actions they take so there's really no point us worrying our little heads.

As for banning him from here, well that's down to the team but I can't see what forum rules he's broken? :erm:

Chris 25-07-2005 11:25
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PÃÃ*â€™Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¸ÃƒÆ Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã*’Ã‚à ¸Ãƒâ€ Ã¢â‚ ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢GÃÃ*’ƸLÃÃ*’ 
Hmm... think I'm with Angelus on this one. He's breaking his TOS... he deserves to be discon.
Neil was referring to personal insults. Can we stick to the topic please and not debate the modding. :)

Paul K 25-07-2005 11:26
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PÃÃ*â€™Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¸ÃƒÆ Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã*’Ã‚à ¸Ãƒâ€ Ã¢â‚ ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢GÃÃ*’ƸLÃÃ*’ 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
If anyone needs to be banned it's you for making comments like that.

No more please.
Hmm... think I'm with Angelus on this one. He's breaking his TOS... he deserves to be discon.
I think a major part of why Neil told Angelus off is the fact that Angelus has made more than one remark that can be seen as a personal attack on simpsonsFAN. SimpsonsFAN himself had a post edited to remove a personal attack on Angelus so both parties have now been reminded of the forum rule about not attacking other members of the forum. Also publicly calling for another member to be banned is not looked upon kindly as it is down to the team to decide that sort of thing.
Edit
Beaten by ChrisT lol

Neil 25-07-2005 11:29
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
Neil was referring to personal insults.
I was, yes. :)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris T
Can we stick to the topic please and not debate the modding. :)
^^ What he said.

Angelus 25-07-2005 11:39
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
I was, yes. :)



^^ What he said.
I will always debate Neil :P :D:D

ian@huth 25-07-2005 12:17
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignition
Quote:
Originally Posted by ian@huth
When a PC makes a request for information the request has to tell the target where to send the response. Packet inspection can determine the address of the originating request. Monitoring data to and from a specific account can therefore determine how many different devices are connected to that account during the period of monitoring.
Nope, don't mean to seem rude Ian but saying that demonstrates you've no idea how NAT works.

The device doing the NAT rewrites the headers containing source address, replacing them with its' own address, to do otherwise would be impossible (IE how is a device on the other side of the internet supposed to know how to get to your private network without a public IP address?) and remembers what to send where by holding a state table of what packets are sourced from where and their destination.

Also to check on source address doesn't require packet inspection just the normal headers inspection that is done by all layer 3 routing devices.
I tried to give a very simplistic explanation and in it used the word packet to include all data sent with the packet. You must admit that the target has to know how to get to the ultimate destination address in order to reply to it. The fact that the ultimate destination address within the stub domain is hidden by the address translation table in the router makes it difficult, but not impossible, to discover. Just how this is done has security implications that should not be discussed.

Pø†øƒGøLÐ 25-07-2005 12:35
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
I think a major part of why Neil told Angelus off is the fact that Angelus has made more than one remark that can be seen as a personal attack on simpsonsFAN. SimpsonsFAN himself had a post edited to remove a personal attack on Angelus so both parties have now been reminded of the forum rule about not attacking other members of the forum. Also publicly calling for another member to be banned is not looked upon kindly as it is down to the team to decide that sort of thing.
Edit
Beaten by ChrisT lol
Still having Monday morning brain-in-gear problems... even tho it's afternoon.

I misinterpreted the ban thing... I was reading it that he should be banned by his ISP, not being banned from the forum. Mebbe I should withdraw my comment and say nothing until I found second gear :confused:

spike7451 25-07-2005 16:51
Re: Is this allowed?
 
The are people on here,myself included ,who work for NTL in whatever capacity (i'm a feild tech) who are aware of this post,i also put it up on NTL Hell where a few employees have been very interested in the fraudulent abuse by simpsonfan.
All i can say is,it's been looked into!
Spike

nffc 25-07-2005 16:52
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelus
Yes

It was me that made that post on DS

I also have a screenshot of the idiots posts on the othe forum
http://www.batista.co.uk/images/nthellworld.JPG
/didn't think anyone used IE anymore... it's so easy to get your pc pwnd if you do...

Paul K 25-07-2005 17:03
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spike7451
The are people on here,myself included ,who work for NTL in whatever capacity (i'm a feild tech) who are aware of this post,i also put it up on NTL Hell where a few employees have been very interested in the fraudulent abuse by simpsonfan.
All i can say is,it's been looked into!
Spike
Shame that :angel: I know it got reported to AUP at least twice here. Maybe Mr FAN will learn a lesson from this.

Russ 25-07-2005 17:26
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by spike7451
The are people on here,myself included ,who work for NTL in whatever capacity (i'm a feild tech) who are aware of this post,i also put it up on NTL Hell where a few employees have been very interested in the fraudulent abuse by simpsonfan.
All i can say is,it's been looked into!
Spike
Be sure to keep us updated if you can :)

Angelus 25-07-2005 17:41
Re: Is this allowed?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nffc
/didn't think anyone used IE anymore... it's so easy to get your pc pwnd if you do...
Funny been using it for 6 years and still not got my pc pwned

firefox fanboy


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27.
Page 7 of 12 « First 3456 7 891011 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are Cable Forum