Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

Hugh 17-01-2022 18:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109988)
And i feel sure that once that decision is reached you'll finally be happy.

Once again, your feels are not congruent with actuality.

OLD BOY 17-01-2022 19:33

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36109990)
Who's Keith? :confused:

Typo, I think he means Kier. Sir Kier. You know, that shadowy Leader of the Labour Party…

papa smurf 17-01-2022 19:35

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109995)
Typo, I think he means Kier. Sir Kier. You know, that shadowy Leader of the Labour Party…

The one who travelled 265 miles for beer and pizza with his mates.

Mad Max 17-01-2022 19:35

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109995)
Typo, I think he means Kier. Sir Kier. You know, that shadowy Leader of the Labour Party…

You are absolutely right, OB, it wasn't a typo though, I think some in his own party know him as Keith, the boring chap.:)

Mr K 17-01-2022 19:42

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I smell lots of dead cats about, must be some thing to 'Operation Save Big Dog' ....
Let's hope it succeeds and Big Dog stays ;)

papa smurf 17-01-2022 19:49

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36110000)
I smell lots of dead cats about, must be some thing to 'Operation Save Big Dog' ....
Let's hope it succeeds and Big Dog stays ;)

We're on operation sir big hypocrite :beer:

Damien 17-01-2022 19:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Cummings has said Boris Johnson knew about the party before it took place. Sky News claim to have two Downing Street sources confirming that: https://twitter.com/MrMKimber/status...62670266265600

Would mean Johnson lied to Parliament (hard to believe, I know)

papa smurf 17-01-2022 19:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110002)
Cummings has said Boris Johnson knew about the party before it took place. Sky News claim to have two Downing Street sources confirming that: https://twitter.com/MrMKimber/status...62670266265600

Would mean Johnson lied to Parliament (hard to believe, I know)

Order order we don't use that term we say misled;)

Hugh 17-01-2022 20:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36110004)
Order order we don't use that term we say misled;)

Aha!

Only if you are an MP in the House of Commons - your cover is blown, Mark Francois… ;)

(and OB is probably JRM)

1andrew1 17-01-2022 20:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110002)
Cummings has said Boris Johnson knew about the party before it took place. Sky News claim to have two Downing Street sources confirming that: https://twitter.com/MrMKimber/status...62670266265600

Would mean Johnson lied to Parliament (hard to believe, I know)

From above Tweet "Sue Gray report may be delayed now".

Why am I not surprised?

Hugh 17-01-2022 20:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110007)
From above Tweet "Sue Gray report may be delayed now".

Why am I not surprised?

Again...

Mr K 17-01-2022 21:02

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Big Dog is innocent, leave him alone, he's doing fine. :)

Quote:

Largest lead we have had for any party since May 2020.

Westminster Voting Intention (17 Jan):

Labour 43% (+4)
Conservative 30% (-5)
Liberal Democrat 9% (-3)
Green 7% (+2)
Scottish National Party 4% (–)
Reform UK 4% (–)
Other 3% (+2)

Changes +/- 10 Jan

https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies....-january-2022/

Julian 17-01-2022 21:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
According to the above link people would rather have Rishi as PM than starmer………….

Sephiroth 17-01-2022 22:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36110010)
According to the above link people would rather have Rishi as PM than starmer………….

Oh no (to both).

Damien 17-01-2022 22:01

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36110010)
According to the above link people would rather have Rishi as PM than starmer………….

Not surprising as Sunak is the most popular politician in the country at the moment. Furlough and Eat Out to Help Out would have been the main reasons. Labour will be hoping the reality of Government if he were to become the leader and the coming tax hike and costing of living increases will hit him.

This is probably why the possible candidates are holding back despite the risk that Johnson could sink the Tories with him. This is not a good time to take over.

1andrew1 17-01-2022 22:13

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110012)
Not surprising as Sunak is the most popular politician in the country at the moment. Furlough and Eat Out to Help Out would have been the main reasons. Labour will be hoping the reality of Government if he were to become the leader and the coming tax hike and costing of living increases will hit him.

This is probably why the possible candidates are holding back despite the risk that Johnson could sink the Tories with him. This is not a good time to take over.

You would think that's a reason for Sunak to try and get a quick change of leadership in place before Awful April kicks in and Truss potentially becomes more popular in the Party.

Damien 17-01-2022 22:24

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Truss is already a favourite of the party, she led the last Conservative Home rankings.

Mick 17-01-2022 22:28

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110007)
From above Tweet "Sue Gray report may be delayed now".

Why am I not surprised?

We don’t need Sue’s report, to know No. 10 staff and Boris, broke lockdown rules.

nffc 17-01-2022 22:36

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110014)
Truss is already a favourite of the party, she led the last Conservative Home rankings.

She would be my choice...

1andrew1 17-01-2022 22:40

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110014)
Truss is already a favourite of the party, she led the last Conservative Home rankings.

That's probably why Johnson has set her the tough task of negotiating with the EU.

---------- Post added at 22:40 ---------- Previous post was at 22:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36110015)
We don’t need Sue’s report, to know No. 10 staff and Boris, broke lockdown rules.

Absolutely.

OLD BOY 17-01-2022 22:57

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110007)
From above Tweet "Sue Gray report may be delayed now".

Why am I not surprised?

Well, you shouldn’t be surprised. If these wreckers didn’t keep adding new allegations every day, it would be finished this week.

1andrew1 17-01-2022 23:09

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
[IMG][/IMG]
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110019)
Well, you shouldn’t be surprised. If these wreckers didn’t keep adding new allegations every day, it would be finished this week.

I'm not surprised as I only said a few days ago
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36109388)
Trouble is, by the time she's ready to publish the report, she'll have another collection of parties to review!

But we always had this early warning too.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1642463422

nffc 17-01-2022 23:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
No doubt Nadine "I'm so thick I even tried to not talk like a scouser" Dorries would find something to defend if they had a party every day.

1andrew1 17-01-2022 23:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36110021)
No doubt Nadine "I'm so thick I even tried to not talk like a scouser" Dorries would find something to defend if they had a party every day.

If she carries on at her present rate, she's in danger of putting Old Boy out of a job. :D

Mr K 18-01-2022 08:29

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36110016)
She would be my choice...

Absolutely, a remainer and former Libdem. Perfect.
Go Liz !

nffc 18-01-2022 09:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110022)
If she carries on at her present rate, she's in danger of putting Old Boy out of a job. :D

Well, it is starting to get to the point where raking up a new party every day, from 15 months ago, is starting to get a bit silly. It's clear they did it regularly, when most likely they shouldn't have (based on the acid test that we wouldn't be allowed to) and that they need to take the punishment for doing it, but constantly raking up new instances of basically the same thing aren't really helping anyone.



The situation where doing it doesn't apply at the moment so everything would be historic, and they have apologised (in a way), we're unlikely to be in the situation where they can do it again (and if we were, what would happen then), I just don't think it's helpful.


And all this stuff they're bringing out as a dead cat to distract people and make Boris look popular again is just silly too. I have no idea how this BBC licence freeze thing is beneficial to anyone, it will no doubt lead to cuts in services probably at the local or live broadcast level as that will be the easiest to cut back on. The focus needs to be on removing all Covid restrictions (legally) and reverting to guidance (e.g. working from home and wearing a mask should be your choice not a legal one) to get the country back to pre-pandemic state as after almost 2 years of it people are now getting sick of it. Then they need to be delivering their levelling up agenda in the north which they promised in 2019.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 09:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36110027)
And all this stuff they're bringing out as a dead cat to distract people and make Boris look popular again is just silly too. I have no idea how this BBC licence freeze thing is beneficial to anyone, it will no doubt lead to cuts in services probably at the local or live broadcast level as that will be the easiest to cut back on.

The ironical thing about the BBC situation is they're about the only organisation which hasn't been sent any leaked party emails or photos!

Damien 18-01-2022 09:58

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
The most damaging stuff has all gone to ITV.

peanut 18-01-2022 09:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Bozo has to go, he's lost all credibility. He's a liability and completely untrustworthy. Dragging it out is just making him and his party look worse day by day. Not a lot more to say really.

Mr K 18-01-2022 10:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36110027)
Well, it is starting to get to the point where raking up a new party every day, from 15 months ago, is starting to get a bit silly. It's clear they did it regularly, when most likely they shouldn't have (based on the acid test that we wouldn't be allowed to) and that they need to take the punishment for doing it, but constantly raking up new instances of basically the same thing aren't really helping anyone.



The situation where doing it doesn't apply at the moment so everything would be historic, and they have apologised (in a way), we're unlikely to be in the situation where they can do it again (and if we were, what would happen then), I just don't think it's helpful.


.

Apologies arent enough , it was breaking the law for which others were prosecuted and fined for.
Either they are saying the law doesn't apply to everyone, or they need to start again with new bunch of muppets running the country.

Hugh 18-01-2022 10:12

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110019)
Well, you shouldn’t be surprised. If these wreckers didn’t keep adding new allegations every day, it would be finished this week.

You appear to be blaming the people reporting the fires, rather than the arsonists - perhaps if the people who set the rules & laws hadn’t kept breaking the rules and laws, there would have been nothing to report?

papa smurf 18-01-2022 10:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110019)
Well, you shouldn’t be surprised. If these wreckers didn’t keep adding new allegations every day, it would be finished this week.

Beggars belief that dom is now the go to guy for the truth.

Hugh 18-01-2022 10:24

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b1994594.html

I don’t have a problem with Johnson commuting from Chequers to Downing Street during lockdown, as Mrs Johnson was in the "vulnerable" category (heavily pregnant), and was probably safer there, and Johnson was trying to deal with the COVID crisis - it’s just the bit at the end that raises doubts.

Quote:

The spokesman said there would have been staff at Chequers with the couple, and when asked if they had any non-work visitors he said: “Well, they were acting in accordance with the guidance and any subsequent legislation at all times. So beyond that, I don’t have any more to add.”
Why don’t they just say "No, we didn’t have any non-work visitors", rather than the phrase which dropped them in it before "The spokesman said there would have been staff at Chequers with the couple, and when asked if they had any non-work visitors he said: “Well, they were acting in accordance with the guidance and any subsequent legislation at all times."?.

papa smurf 18-01-2022 10:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Keir Starmer is accused of flouting Covid rules banning political campaigners from meeting indoors during local ballots last year

Now it has emerged that the event may also have breached special guidelines published for the local election campaign.


This guidance said campaigners should not meet indoors and there should be no social use of committee rooms.

It also stated that work organising campaigns should be done virtually and should not take place in person.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...mpaigning.html

Damien 18-01-2022 10:36

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110037)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b1994594.html

I don’t have a problem with Johnson commuting from Chequers to Downing Street during lockdown, as Mrs Johnson was in the "vulnerable" category (heavily pregnant), and was probably safer there, and Johnson was trying to deal with the COVID crisis - it’s just the bit at the end that raises doubts.



Why don’t they just say "No, we didn’t have any non-work visitors", rather than the phrase which dropped them in it before "The spokesman said there would have been staff at Chequers with the couple, and when asked if they had any non-work visitors he said: “Well, they were acting in accordance with the guidance and any subsequent legislation at all times."?.

I think you can also give some leeway to the Prime Minister to move between locations as well. The Chequers thing is a non-starter to me. Yeah if he had guests and another poxy party that's an issue obviously.

nffc 18-01-2022 10:40

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36110032)
Apologies arent enough , it was breaking the law for which others were prosecuted and fined for.
Either they are saying the law doesn't apply to everyone, or they need to start again with new bunch of muppets running the country.

Goes without saying they should take the punishment - at least what it would be if you or I had been doing it, as they are in a position of responsibility and need to set an example.


But I don't see what realistically they can do to put the matter right otherwise. They can't undo the parties.

Mr K 18-01-2022 10:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36110042)
Goes without saying they should take the punishment - at least what it would be if you or I had been doing it, as they are in a position of responsibility and need to set an example.


But I don't see what realistically they can do to put the matter right otherwise. They can't undo the parties.

There's lots they can do, resign, clear the convictions of those prosecuted , take some responsibility instead of lies and /retractions when found out ..

1andrew1 18-01-2022 10:50

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Don't want to alarm anyone, but I hear there's a shortage of popcorn in supermarkets, as the country stocks up in readiness for tomorrow's PMQs! :D

Sephiroth 18-01-2022 11:01

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36110042)
Goes without saying they should take the punishment - at least what it would be if you or I had been doing it, as they are in a position of responsibility and need to set an example.


But I don't see what realistically they can do to put the matter right otherwise. They can't undo the parties.


It would help to some extent if Boris, his PPS and all attendees reported themselves to the Police and let the law take its course. If the Police decide that the law was broken, these individuals would have to pay the prescribed penalty, maybe at a doubling rate for more than one attended party. That would put them on a par with public offenders. Sue Gray would be irrelevant to this if she found that only "guidance" was flouted.

It won't go away for the Guvmin if they flouted their own guidance; the public wouldn't see it favourably, never mind the flouting I reckon we've all done to some extent.

As to illegality, have a read of this: https://barristerblogger.com/2021/12...-street-party/

It's difficult to paste a useful quote due to the way the item is formatted. But really worth a read.



1andrew1 18-01-2022 11:27

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36110047)

It would help to some extent if Boris, his PPS and all attendees reported themselves to the Police and let the law take its course. If the Police decide that the law was broken, these individuals would have to pay the prescribed penalty, maybe at a doubling rate for more than one attended party. That would put them on a par with public offenders. Sue Gray would be irrelevant to this if she found that only "guidance" was flouted.

It won't go away for the Guvmin if they flouted their own guidance; the public wouldn't see it favourably, never mind the flouting I reckon we've all done to some extent.

As to illegality, have a read of this: https://barristerblogger.com/2021/12...-street-party/

It's difficult to paste a useful quote due to the way the item is formatted. But really worth a read.


That article is from December and pre-dates the recent party allegations, in particular the 100-invite May 20 one. Is it still relevant?

Sephiroth 18-01-2022 11:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110051)
That article is from December and pre-dates the recent party allegations, in particular the 100-invite May 20 one. Is it still relevant?

The December party is still part of the Sue Gray investigation.

jonbxx 18-01-2022 11:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Possibly for a different thread but, as there are more dead cats than a really bad vet coming from the Government, one issue hasn't reared its' head. Dmitry Grozoubinski a trade chap on Twitter pointed out;

Quote:

Interesting shift in British politics, or at least government's perception thereof.

An "Operation Red Meat" five months ago would have been full of performative provocations toward the EU, up to and including Article 16 invocation.

Now, not a thing.
That said, he followed up with;

Quote:

I appreciate I'm risking looking pretty silly when tomorrow they launch Trident at Brussels or invade Calais.
Not sure what has changed but I would have thought that keeping people like Steve Baker and Andrew Bridgen on side would be helpful right now...

1andrew1 18-01-2022 12:05

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36110055)
Possibly for a different thread but, as there are more dead cats than a really bad vet coming from the Government, one issue hasn't reared its' head. Dmitry Grozoubinski a trade chap on Twitter pointed out;

That said, he followed up with;

Not sure what has changed but I would have thought that keeping people like Steve Baker and Andrew Bridgen on side would be helpful right now...

Interesting point.

Damien 18-01-2022 12:09

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Not exactly a strong defence of the PM from Sunak: https://twitter.com/joepike/status/1483407346906841088

Quote:

NEW: @RishiSunak on allegations PM lied about No 10 parties:
"I won't get into hypotheticals. The ministerial code is clear on these matters."

Reporter: Do you believe the PM?
Sunak: Of course I do... I'd refer you to his words.'

via broadcast pool

Chris 18-01-2022 12:36

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110057)
Not exactly a strong defence of the PM from Sunak: https://twitter.com/joepike/status/1483407346906841088

I decided to look up the full context of ‘damn with faint praise’. It’s rather good.

Quote:

Damn with faint praise, assent with civil leer,
And without sneering, teach the rest to sneer;
Willing to wound, and yet afraid to strike,
Just hint a fault, and hesitate dislike.
- Alexander Pope

Damien 18-01-2022 12:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36110058)
I decided to look up the full context of ‘damn with faint praise’. It’s rather good.

Quote:

Willing to wound, and yet afraid to strike,
Just hint a fault, and hesitate dislike.
Pretty much nails it.

Halcyon 18-01-2022 12:49

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Take a look on youtube for "Cassette Boy - Rage Against the Party Machine" if you fancy a giggle this afternoon.

nffc 18-01-2022 13:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36110047)

It would help to some extent if Boris, his PPS and all attendees reported themselves to the Police and let the law take its course. If the Police decide that the law was broken, these individuals would have to pay the prescribed penalty, maybe at a doubling rate for more than one attended party. That would put them on a par with public offenders. Sue Gray would be irrelevant to this if she found that only "guidance" was flouted.

It won't go away for the Guvmin if they flouted their own guidance; the public wouldn't see it favourably, never mind the flouting I reckon we've all done to some extent.

As to illegality, have a read of this: https://barristerblogger.com/2021/12...-street-party/

It's difficult to paste a useful quote due to the way the item is formatted. But really worth a read.



Indeed, they should confess all to the police and let the system deal with it.


With all this coming out they're really going to struggle to get support if they try and extend Plan B especially face nappies. You only need to see what the comments are on a typical news article online to see how many people don't want it any more.

Hugh 18-01-2022 13:14

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
"face nappies"?

Isn’t that something that "COVID-lovers" say?

1andrew1 18-01-2022 13:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
A categorical denial. Should he sue Cummings for slander?
Quote:

Johnson: Nobody warned me drinks event was against rules

Boris Johnson has "categorically" denied he was warned a drinks party in the No 10 garden risked breaking lockdown rules.

"Nobody warned me that it was against the rules," the prime minister said, adding: "I would have remembered that."

Former aide Dominic Cummings says he warned Mr Johnson at the time, and has accused him of misleading MPs about it.

Asked if he would resign if he was found to have misled MPs, Mr Johnson said: "Let's see what the report says."

Senior civil servant Sue Gray is due to publish a report into alleged Covid rule breaking at lockdown get-togethers in Downing Street and government departments.

In his blog, Mr Cummings, who was still working in Downing Street at the time of the drinks party on 20 May 2020, said the prime minister had been told that it would break Covid guidelines.

He added that he had warned Mr Johnson about the gathering but the PM had "waved it aside".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60039868

Damien 18-01-2022 13:46

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Even though he is responding to a specific allegation the headline "No one warned me drinks event was against rules" is an awful one for him to have on the BBC News frontpage. People will think it's absurd.

Hugh 18-01-2022 13:47

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Tell us you haven’t seen "V for Vendetta" without telling us you haven’t seen "V for Vendetta"…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1642513442

Carth 18-01-2022 14:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Looks like a poor mans Bruce Willis

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1642525769

1andrew1 18-01-2022 14:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36110073)
Even though he is responding to a specific allegation the headline "No one warned me drinks event was against rules" is an awful one for him to have on the BBC News frontpage. People will think it's absurd.

An interesting aside is the rebranding from "alleged party" to "drinks event". Maybe Johnson was conscious of not making Raab's mistake when he called it a party and not an alleged party.

Dave42 18-01-2022 14:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110072)
A categorical denial. Should he sue Cummings for slander?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60039868

so he made rules and doesn't know his own made rules yeah right

Damien 18-01-2022 14:40

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110085)
so he made rules and doesn't know his own made rules yeah right

He didn't know the rules because he had work to do when the Prime Minister was announcing the rules on television.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 14:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110085)
so he made rules and doesn't know his own made rules yeah right

He is either totally incompetent or a liar! Which is it, Prime Minister?

bigsinky 18-01-2022 14:50

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110088)
He is either totally incompetent or a liar! Which is it, Prime Minister?

erm...... both i would have thought

OLD BOY 18-01-2022 14:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110020)
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

I'm not surprised as I only said a few days ago


But we always had this early warning too.



https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1642463422

Well, there you have it. A born leader in the making.

Sephiroth 18-01-2022 15:11

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...r-emerges.html

1andrew1 18-01-2022 15:32

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Halcyon (Post 36110062)
Take a look on youtube for "Cassette Boy - Rage Against the Party Machine" if you fancy a giggle this afternoon.

Very good :D

Link at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgq4fw6o8Gc

daveeb 18-01-2022 15:37

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36110095)


Boris appears to be perfecting his balancing skills for all those future tightropes he'll be navigating.
Also there looks to be a cherubic Rory Stewart in the background behind Bojo. Bet he wishes he'd kicked his fat backside while the opportunity was there. :D

Hugh 18-01-2022 16:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110020)
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

I'm not surprised as I only said a few days ago


But we always had this early warning too.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1642463422

Seems to be a theme…

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-party-britain

From his old boss

Quote:

We can’t predict what a Johnson government will do, because its prospective leader has not got around to thinking about this. But his premiership will almost certainly reveal a contempt for rules, precedent, order and stability.

A few admirers assert that, in office, Johnson will reveal an accession of wisdom and responsibility that have hitherto eluded him, not least as foreign secretary. This seems unlikely, as the weekend’s stories emphasised. Dignity still matters in public office, and Johnson will never have it. Yet his graver vice is cowardice, reflected in a willingness to tell any audience, whatever he thinks most likely to please, heedless of the inevitability of its contradiction an hour later.

Like many showy personalities, he is of weak character. I recently suggested to a radio audience that he supposes himself to be Winston Churchill, while in reality being closer to Alan Partridge.
Quote:

Johnson would not recognise truth, whether about his private or political life, if confronted by it in an identity parade.
Quote:

As it is, the Johnson premiership could survive for three or four years, shambling from one embarrassment and debacle to another

Damien 18-01-2022 16:15

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Some MPs think they have the number to challenge the PM:

https://twitter.com/Mollie_Malone1/s...58752854515712

Quote:

One Tory MP this afternoon tells me they think they are “nearly there” when it comes to letters, that numbers far exceed what whips think, that this weekend was a turning point, and that they give the PM “a week.” Says PM should go before SG report.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 16:18

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36110101)
Seems to be a theme…

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-party-britain

From his old boss

I take issue with this bit:
Quote:

As it is, the Johnson premiership could survive for three or four years, shambling from one embarrassment and debacle to another.
He'd be lucky to make two years!

I suspect that his objective now is to get over the two-year line but he won't hold the post longer than the "Strong and stable" Theresa May.

nffc 18-01-2022 16:23

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110093)
Well, there you have it. A born leader in the making.

To be fair, that doesn't sound too dissimilar from any academically intelligent secondary age kid who thinks he/she can just get through school and into university with minimal effort. I'm pretty sure you could have said similar about me at the same age. But you can't keep that kind of attitude in the level of public office which he has or any kind of professional environment.

Chris 18-01-2022 17:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110103)
I take issue with this bit:

He'd be lucky to make two years!

I suspect that his objective now is to get over the two-year line but he won't hold the post longer than the "Strong and stable" Theresa May.

As the article was written in June 2019 and he took office a month later, he’s already made it past 2 years and 5 months. But its prediction of 3-4 years could be right on the money. That would see him out on his ear any time between this coming summer and next.

Sephiroth 18-01-2022 17:22

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Don't you think it's more imminent? Like in the coming weeks?

His reputation is sinking faster and faster.

Chris 18-01-2022 17:29

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36110111)
Don't you think it's more imminent? Like in the coming weeks?

His reputation is sinking faster and faster.

I have long held the view that the drip-feeding of stories against him would lead to a leadership challenge, but not until the summer because right now covid is still very much a thing. Blue-on-blue internecine warfare on the Tory back benches is risky at a time of lingering national crisis. It looks self indulgent. However, this latest revelation is looking more like a game changer with each passing day. If sufficient MPs decide the damage resulting from him remaining in office exceeds the damage of a messy and inconvenient leadership election, they will strike. The odds on that happening do seem to be shortening.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 17:33

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36110110)
As the article was written in June 2019 and he took office a month later, he’s already made it past 2 years and 5 months. But its prediction of 3-4 years could be right on the money. That would see him out on his ear any time between this coming summer and next.

Doh, my bad, I meant he will be lucky to make it to three years.

Dave42 18-01-2022 17:35

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110115)
Doh, my bad, I meant he will be lucky to make it to three years.

he be lucky to make it past the next few weeks way it is going

1andrew1 18-01-2022 17:39

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36110111)
Don't you think it's more imminent? Like in the coming weeks?

His reputation is sinking faster and faster.

Piers Morgan's reading of Johnson's body language suggests he knows the game is up. How will he drag himself to PMQs tomorrow?
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1642527546

1andrew1 18-01-2022 17:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110116)
he be lucky to make it past the next few weeks way it is going

He'll be lucky to make it out of PMQs tomorrow alive. If he attends!

You know things are going really, really badly for Johnson now as even Papa Smurf and Old Boy seem to have stopped defending him. ;)

Carth 18-01-2022 17:49

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Crikey, seems many people have him gone anywhere from next week to the next 6 months.

I hope everyone is keeping their knives sharp for the next idiot that jumps into the hotseat . . if any do :D

Mr K 18-01-2022 17:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Dominic Cummings will be interviewed as part of an investigation into parties and gatherings at Downing Street during coronavirus restrictions.

Boris Johnson's former chief adviser confirmed to Sky News that he will be involved in the probe.

A Cabinet Office source told Sky News: "If we reach the end of the investigation and the inquiry hasn't spoken to Dominic Cummings, eyebrows would be raised."

The confirmation that Sue Gray will speak to Mr Cummings comes after he alleged that the prime minister knew in advance about a Downing Street drinks party in May 2020 and agreed that it could go ahead.
https://news.sky.com/story/downing-s...ation-12519275

I think 'Big Dog' will put himself down before the report comes out. Shame.

Dave42 18-01-2022 17:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Downing Street parties: Dominic Cummings will be interviewed as part of Cabinet Office investigation

https://news.sky.com/story/downing-s...ation-12519275

OLD BOY 18-01-2022 18:14

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110118)
He'll be lucky to make it out of PMQs tomorrow alive. If he attends!

You know things are going really, really badly for Johnson now as even Papa Smurf and Old Boy seem to have stopped defending him. ;)

I still say wait for the report. Then we should get a pretty good idea of the sequence of events and what actually happened. If it's as bad as it looks, he's toast.

heero_yuy 18-01-2022 18:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
If the misdemeanor don't get you the coverup will.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 18:39

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110124)
I still say wait for the report. Then we should get a pretty good idea of the sequence of events and what actually happened. If it's as bad as it looks, he's toast.

He may be toast before the report ever sees the light of day! He shouldn't need a senior civil servant to tell him that someone else should have explained his own rules to him! The British public is not as thick as Johnson likes to think.

Damien 18-01-2022 19:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Looks like it's the 2019 intake that is moving against Johnson.

TheDaddy 18-01-2022 19:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36110083)
Looks like a poor mans Bruce Willis

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1642525769

A poor man's gollum imo

Damien 18-01-2022 19:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
From one of the political editors at The Telegraph: https://twitter.com/christopherhope/...15583270461454

Quote:

Tomorrow is going to be [on fire] for Boris Johnson in Westminster. I am not sure the Government whips know what is coming. [Grimacing face]
Could just be getting overexcited but it looks like they're expecting the move tomorrow.

OLD BOY 18-01-2022 19:48

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110128)
He may be toast before the report ever sees the light of day! He shouldn't need a senior civil servant to tell him that someone else should have explained his own rules to him! The British public is not as thick as Johnson likes to think.

See how everything gets twisted? This was in answer to the allegation that he was told that event was a party. Boris said he was told no such thing.

Dave42 18-01-2022 19:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110138)
See how everything gets twisted? This was in answer to the allegation that he was told that event was a party. Boris said he was told no such thing.

and you know fine well he a very big proven liar OB have a look at his interview with Beth Rigby today

OLD BOY 18-01-2022 19:56

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110122)
Downing Street parties: Dominic Cummings will be interviewed as part of Cabinet Office investigation

https://news.sky.com/story/downing-s...ation-12519275

I wonder if DC will also be prepared to swear on oath that he was not testing his eyesight when he took his family to Durham, and was simply taking his family for a day out.

Are you really suggesting that having ridiculed DC for that obvious lie, we should believe him over the Prime Minister now that it suits your argument to do so? Sorry, but if DC is going to contradict the PM on this, he is going to have to provide back up evidence, because I certainly wouldn’t believe anything this arrogant poser has to say on its own merits.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 19:58

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110138)
See how everything gets twisted? This was in answer to the allegation that he was told that event was a party. Boris said he was told no such thing.

Firstly,20 May 2020 was self-evidently a party, Old Boy, even the keenest fans of Johnson would struggle to say otherwise. Don't let BoJo's boat sink with you on it!

Secondly, ignorance of the law is no defence especially if you're on TV weekly explaining the law to the general public.

Dave42 18-01-2022 19:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110140)
I wonder if DC will also be prepared to swear on oath that he was not testing his eyesight when he took his family to Durham, and was simply taking his family for a day out.

Are you really suggesting that having ridiculed DC for that obvious lie, we should believe him over the Prime Minister now that it suits your argument to do so? Sorry, but if DC is going to contradict the PM on this, he is going to have to provide back up evidence, because I certainly wouldn’t believe anything this arrogant poser has to say on its own merits.

Johnson and Cumming are the 2 biggest liars in the country but i know who the biggest one is and he not be in number 10 for much longer

OLD BOY 18-01-2022 20:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110139)
and you know fine well he a very big proven liar OB have a look at his interview with Beth Rigby today

I was referring to how people are twisting the truth to suit their own agendas.

The PM was contrite at that interview with Beth Rigby. Frankly, it doesn’t matter what Boris says about this, he knows his detractors will choose not to believe him. That is why he wants the report issued, so the facts are set out clearly and people will have those facts to consider.

Clearly, there are a lot of people out there, including on this forum, who are not interested in the facts because they just want any excuse to see the back of Boris. After all, this is the only way Labour and the other political parties can steal a march on the Conservatives. That’s because they have no worthwhile policies to fight with.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 20:05

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110140)
I wonder if DC will also be prepared to swear on oath that he was not testing his eyesight when he took his family to Durham, and was simply taking his family for a day out.

Are you really suggesting that having ridiculed DC for that obvious lie, we should believe him over the Prime Minister now that it suits your argument to do so? Sorry, but if DC is going to contradict the PM on this, he is going to have to provide back up evidence, because I certainly wouldn’t believe anything this arrogant poser has to say on its own merits.

No doubt that Cummings has been somewhat economical with the truth and that approach certainly served his last couple of campaigns well. But if others are prepared to back up his allegations as they are here, then calling out Cummings' honesty won't work as a defence.

OLD BOY 18-01-2022 20:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110142)
Johnson and Cumming are the 2 biggest liars in the country but i know who the biggest one is and he not be in number 10 for much longer

Why would you prefer to believe DC anyway? Seems like you haven’t thought this one through.

---------- Post added at 20:07 ---------- Previous post was at 20:06 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110144)
No doubt that Cummings has been somewhat economical with the truth and that approach certainly served his last couple of campaigns well. But if others are prepared to back up his allegations as they are here, then calling out Cummings' honesty won't work as a defence.

What will work as a defence is actual evidence. An oath taken by Cummings is worthless.

Dave42 18-01-2022 20:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110145)
Why would you prefer to believe DC anyway? Seems like you haven’t thought this one through.

---------- Post added at 20:07 ---------- Previous post was at 20:06 ----------



What will work as a defence is actual evidence. An oath taken by Cummings is worthless.

because Johnson is the biggest liar in country by far if i had to pick i choose to believe the one that not biggest liar in country

1andrew1 18-01-2022 20:11

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110143)
Clearly, there are a lot of people out there, including on this forum, who are not interested in the facts because they just want any excuse to see the back of Boris. After all, this is the only way Labour and the other political parties can steal a march on the Conservatives. That’s because they have no worthwhile policies to fight with.

There's a near-consensus on this Forum that the longer Johnson hangs on, the better Labour's election chances will be.

---------- Post added at 20:11 ---------- Previous post was at 20:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110145)
What will work as a defence is actual evidence. An oath taken by Cummings is worthless.

That email invite suffices for most of the public.

Would Johnson's oath be equally worthless?

OLD BOY 18-01-2022 20:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110147)
because Johnson is the biggest liar in country by far if i had to pick i chose to believe the one that not biggest liar in country

So you have two alleged liars and you choose, without waiting for evidence and preferring to take full account of uncorroborated allegations, to believe one over the other.

I wouldn’t apply for a position as a judge without a lot more education if I were you! Your conclusion, and the way you arrived at it, is completely illogical.

---------- Post added at 20:16 ---------- Previous post was at 20:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110148)
There's a near-consensus on this Forum that the longer Johnson hangs on, the better Labour's election chances will be.

I am afraid that the views of this Forum do not represent evidence.

---------- Post added at 20:20 ---------- Previous post was at 20:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36110148)
That email invite suffices for most of the public.


So what? That email does not prove that the event had his blessing. And for all you know, there might have been a subsequent email that withdrew or amended the first. We simply don’t know, do we?

I have no idea why you are so scared of the report. Don’t you want to know the full detail behind it?

Of course you don’t.

Dave42 18-01-2022 20:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110152)
So you have two alleged liars and you choose, without waiting for evidence and preferring to take full account of uncorroborated allegations, to believe one over the other.

I wouldn’t apply for a position as a judge without a lot more education if I were you! Your conclusion, and the way you arrived at it, is completely illogical.

---------- Post added at 20:16 ---------- Previous post was at 20:15 ----------



I am afraid that the views of this Forum do not represent evidence.

Johnson is one that made the rules now saying he didnt know the rules the ones that he made come on OB

Damien 18-01-2022 20:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
https://twitter.com/patrickkmaguire/...34414818725888

Quote:

Even government whips acknowledging that a confidence vote in Boris Johnson is a question of if not when this evening…

One admits: “We’re not at 54 letters yet. But there are definitely 54 letters out there.”
(He means a question of when not if obviously)

OLD BOY 18-01-2022 20:22

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36110156)
Johnson is one that made the rules now saying he didnt know the rules the ones that he made come on OB

He hasn’t said that. What he said about not being told it was against the rules was in answer to the allegation that he was told just that.

You have changed his denial into a separate assertion.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 20:51

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110158)
He hasn’t said that. What he said about not being told it was against the rules was in answer to the allegation that he was told just that.

You have changed his denial into a separate assertion.

Dave42 is right. Check out the Sky News video below. Johnson says "nobody told me" the Number 10 garden party during lockdown was "against the rules".

Whilst ignorance of the law is no defence, they're his rules that he announced the rules to the public!
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1483431855001063429

---------- Post added at 20:51 ---------- Previous post was at 20:33 ----------

The Government's alleged attempt at a deadcat in the form of briefing that Ghana and Rwanda would be sent asylum applicants has ended spectacularly poorly. Ghana has cleverly termed it "Operation Dead Meat" and denied it strongly.
https://twitter.com/GhanaMFA/status/...903937/photo/1

Damien 18-01-2022 20:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
https://twitter.com/christopherhope/...44039555321864

Quote:

EXC As many as 20 Tory MPs from the 2019 intake are planning to submit letters of no confidence in Boris Johnson tomorrow.
The number could breach the 54 letters required for a confidence vote. One 2019 Tory MP told me it could be the PM’s “D-Day”, adding: “His time has gone.”

daveeb 18-01-2022 21:03

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36110143)
I was referring to how people are twisting the truth to suit their own agendas.

The PM was contrite at that interview with Beth Rigby. Frankly, it doesn’t matter what Boris says about this, he knows his detractors will choose not to believe him. That is why he wants the report issued, so the facts are set out clearly and people will have those facts to consider.

Clearly, there are a lot of people out there, including on this forum, who are not interested in the facts because they just want any excuse to see the back of Boris. After all, this is the only way Labour and the other political parties can steal a march on the Conservatives. That’s because they have no worthwhile policies to fight with.

He looked like a five year old who had been caught with his hands in the sweetie jar. My dog makes a better job of looking contrite. He should be a lot better at it by now, he's had enough practice apologising to all and sundry. Perhaps he needs some lessons from Matt Hancock.

1andrew1 18-01-2022 21:12

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveeb (Post 36110164)
He looked like a five year old who had been caught with his hands in the sweetie jar. My dog makes a better job of looking contrite. He should be a lot better at it by now, he's had enough practice apologising to all and sundry. Perhaps he needs some lessons from Matt Hancock.

Your dog would also make a better job of running the country too. :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum