Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Black Lives Matter (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709106)

1andrew1 20-06-2020 11:42

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36040494)
If you have an opinion that the woke folk don't like you get hounded out by the wokerazzi,that's why people have to quickly issue a statement saying they support a load of stuff that they don't really give a damn about.

Whether correct or incorrect, your point doesn't support Nomad King's statement that
Quote:

"It's the ones that are not "woke" that are being fired or forced to resign, and therefore ending up broke.

nomadking 20-06-2020 12:18

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040505)
Whether correct or incorrect, your point doesn't support Nomad King's statement that

So nobody has ever been fired or forced to resign over such things.:shocked: Countless examples out there in the REAL WORLD. I'm not going to go around forever bookmarking every little story, just in case it's needed at some point in the future. No real easy way of retrospectively coming up with a list. Over the years, case after case has been reported. To deny it's not happening can only be if you are not reading or viewing news reports, international, national, or local.



Whether or not you approve of the source, the cases listed are GENUINE and are reported elsewhere.
Link.
Quote:

There will be no opting out of the Black Lives Matter movement. You’re either for BLM or against it—and if you’re against it, you’re a racist. You will either support BLM publicly and enthusiastically, or you will be harassed, shunned, and shamed out of mainstream America. If you dare to speak a word against BLM, you will be targeted, mobbed, and probably fired.
That’s the message coming through loud and clear, not just from protesters but from corporations and institutions desperate to seem woke enough to escape the wrath of the BLM movement.
It doesn’t matter what your job or profession might be. It doesn’t matter if you’re in a position of power or prestige—in fact being in a position of power might make you more of a target. The only thing that can protect you from the BLM movement’s punitive rage is fealty. Bend the knee, and you might be spared. Then again, you might not.
The list of people who have lost their jobs or been suspended for criticizing or even questioning the BLM movement is long—and growing daily. Most prominent on the list is erstwhile New York Times opinion page editor James Bennet, who “resigned” under pressure from woke NYT staffers after he ran an op-ed by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton that made the uncontroversial case that the U.S. military should be deployed if police can’t get riots under control.

1andrew1 20-06-2020 12:52

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040507)
So nobody has ever been fired or forced to resign over such things.:shocked: Countless examples out there in the REAL WORLD. I'm not going to go around forever bookmarking every little story, just in case it's needed at some point in the future. No real easy way of retrospectively coming up with a list. Over the years, case after case has been reported. To deny it's not happening can only be if you are not reading or viewing news reports, international, national, or local.

Whether or not you approve of the source, the cases listed are GENUINE and are reported elsewhere.
Link.

The newspaper said he resigned because he failed to meet editorial standards, not because he wasn't woke.
Do you actually have any proper examples and in this country?

peanut 20-06-2020 12:52

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quite worrying if true... 'Revealed: The British arm of Black Lives Matter's full agenda - abolish the police, smash capitalism... and close all prisons'.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...es-Matter.html

Hugh 20-06-2020 15:31

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36040512)
Quite worrying if true... 'Revealed: The British arm of Black Lives Matter's full agenda - abolish the police, smash capitalism... and close all prisons'.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...es-Matter.html

Good to see the DM is only 12 days behind CF - I posted this on the 12th June, post #91 in this thread

Also, it won't let you read it unless you disable your ad-blocker, then it immediately (and I tried repeatedly) takes you to a spam competition pretending to be Virgin Media.

Quote:

Who we are.

Black Lives Matter UK (BLMUK) is a coalition of black activists and organisers across the UK. We’ve been organising since 2016 for justice in our communities.

We’re guided by a commitment to dismantle imperialism, capitalism, white-supremacy, patriarchy and the state structures that disproportionately harm black people in Britain and around the world. We build deep relationships across the diaspora and strategise to challenge the rise of the authoritarian right-wing across the world, from Brazil to Britain.

We’re developing new and exciting ways of organising that centre transparency, accountability, safety and healing for our organisers and our communities. BLMUK organises in the black radical tradition, using political education, direct action and political leadership toward black liberation.

Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people.

pip08456 20-06-2020 15:40

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
I read it OK,I wasn't asked to disable my ad blocker nor was I taken to a spam comp.

nomadking 20-06-2020 16:17

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040511)
The newspaper said he resigned because he failed to meet editorial standards, not because he wasn't woke.
Do you actually have any proper examples and in this country?

Didn't realise it was a list of ONE.:rolleyes:

Quote:

A New York Times editor resigned under pressure from coworkers and Democrats who criticized an op-ed by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton calling for deploying the military to deter rioters and looters.

Didn't realise I was expected to keep a detailed record of each instance that has been reported over the years.

---------- Post added at 15:17 ---------- Previous post was at 15:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040517)
Good to see the DM is only 12 days behind CF - I posted this on the 12th June, post #91 in this thread

Also, it won't let you read it unless you disable your ad-blocker, then it immediately (and I tried repeatedly) takes you to a spam competition pretending to be Virgin Media.

"disproportionately harm black people.:confused: Isn't it Black people themselves doing that? Operation Trident was started because Black people were being killed.
Quote:

Operation Trident was set up in 1998 in response to a string of what are often called "black-on-black" shootings and murders in the Lambeth and Brent areas of London.
The killings, mainly of young men, came amid fears of a wave of 'yardie'-style violence, linked to a growing crack cocaine problem and a spiralling guns culture.
Trevor Philips

Quote:

The Labour Party member and former chairman of Commission for Equality and Human Rights, said: "It is young black men who are dying and by the way young black men doing the killing." And added three young people are dying every week in London "from knife crimes".
...
"This is not an accidental thing, what is happening is young people are being hunted down by packs of other people," he said.
"They are being stabbed. And aside from the ones who are dying, there are hundreds of people in this city who are being stabbed."
Going on to paint a very disturbing picture, he said offenders are now stabbing youths "in the anus so they have to wear colostomy bags", adding: "This is vicious and out of control."


Maggy 20-06-2020 17:23

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36040512)
Quite worrying if true... 'Revealed: The British arm of Black Lives Matter's full agenda - abolish the police, smash capitalism... and close all prisons'.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...es-Matter.html

Seriously? You still read this rag?:rolleyes:

peanut 20-06-2020 18:08

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36040521)
Seriously? You still read this rag?:rolleyes:

So instead of commenting on the content you have to have a dig. I know you've got a grudge with me and that's fine but it is tiresome. Try contributing for a change.

downquark1 20-06-2020 19:44

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
George Washington in Portland and Uylsses S Grant statues toppled in San Francisco.

RichardCoulter 20-06-2020 19:44

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040475)
All depends on how much their employers support their right to say things. They and their employers constantly face a barrage of abuse because of it.

Try saying "All Lives Matter", and see where it gets you.

Just look at all the flak recently aimed at JK Rowling. If she wasn't already successful, how do you think it would go? Would and will the BBC still be interested in anything she creates?

Man loses his job for confronting a man chalkimg BLM outside his home:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/finance/ot...bep_csid=18986

papa smurf 20-06-2020 20:24

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36040527)
George Washington in Portland and Uylsses S Grant statues toppled in San Francisco.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...grant-national

Maggy 20-06-2020 21:05

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36040522)
So instead of commenting on the content you have to have a dig. I know you've got a grudge with me and that's fine but it is tiresome. Try contributing for a change.

I am contributing.I have been trying to get people to actually come up with any kind of strategy to actually address the issue..and the Daily Mail won't offer any practical help in that regard.It's a publication that frequently fans the flames of hatred.

OLD BOY 20-06-2020 21:20

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36040532)
I am contributing.I have been trying to get people to actually come up with any kind of strategy to actually address the issue..and the Daily Mail won't offer any practical help in that regard.It's a publication that frequently fans the flames of hatred.

Well, they can start with introducing a general equality law rather than specify the particular minority groups who can benefit from it. That would at least end the resentment of able-bodied, heterosexual white men that currently exists. Maybe then people will start to see equality in a different light.

With all members of the public on board (due to self interest) the pressure will finally exist to weigh against employers who do not have proper processes in place to select staff, against police to demonstrate suitable cause to arrest and detain, etc. The population will be speaking with one voice.

I do believe education is already happening. All the young people I contact are very aware of the stupidity and injustice of discrimination in all its forms. The older generation who hold racist views are, frankly, beyond help, but they are becoming less relevant with time.

However, minority groups need to be careful as well. If they press too hard, resentment will surface on both sides. This whole issue needs to be carefully managed, and pulling down statues will have the opposite effect from that intended by right thinking people.

jfman 20-06-2020 21:41

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36040533)
Well, they can start with introducing a general equality law rather than specify the particular minority groups who can benefit from it. That would at least end the resentment of able-bodied, heterosexual white men that currently exists. Maybe then people will start to see equality in a different light.

The thing is there isn't a law that specifically targets minority groups. It's people, and their interpretation of said laws. White, able bodied, heterosexual men don't experience the downside of such unconscious, or even conscious, bias.

Quote:

With all members of the public on board (due to self interest) the pressure will finally exist to weigh against employers who do not have proper processes in place to select staff, against police to demonstrate suitable cause to arrest and detain, etc. The population will be speaking with one voice.
Admirable in it's ignorance of the divisions within society, cross cutting race, class, political standing, gender, age.

Quote:

I do believe education is already happening. All the young people I contact are very aware of the stupidity and injustice of discrimination in all its forms. The older generation who hold racist views are, frankly, beyond help, but they are becoming less relevant with time.
I'd say the opposite. While the older, more ignorant, generations are dying out the flag of nationalism is stoking up divisions around the world at the minute. Given the failure of capitalism, and globalisation, to generate wealth that everyone has a stake in such divisions will only continue.

Quote:

However, minority groups need to be careful as well. If they press too hard, resentment will surface on both sides. This whole issue needs to be carefully managed, and pulling down statues will have the opposite effect from that intended by right thinking people.
Who can possibly resent someone who simply wants equality? As said white, heterosexual, able-bodied man. It'd be extremely ignorant of me to claim that everyone has exactly the same opportunities as me in education or employment. And the reasons are entirely structural. Who wouldn't be pissed off if the game was fundamentally rigged against them?

Carth 20-06-2020 22:04

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36040532)
I am contributing.I have been trying to get people to actually come up with any kind of strategy to actually address the issue..

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36040533)
Well, they can start with introducing a general equality law rather than . . <snip>

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36040536)
The thing is there isn't a law that specifically targets minority groups. It's people, and their interpretation of said laws . . <snip>

I think your not going to get anything that works Maggy. As the two posts show, when one person suggests something there's another person to pull it apart.

I'm not having pops at OB & jfman, they're just an example of why nothing usually gets sorted to any satisfaction.

jfman 20-06-2020 22:25

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Thanks :D

Paul 21-06-2020 02:36

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36040536)
White, able bodied, heterosexual men don't experience the downside of such unconscious, or even conscious, bias.

I dont know how you managed to say that with a straight face. :erm:

Did you miss the post about the Football League 'rule'.
Quote:

The English Football League has made it policy that clubs must interview at least one black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) candidate when searching for a new first-team manager.
Is there a rule that says they must interview a none BAME candidate ?
(Answer: No, there isnt).

I have seen countless adverts from my local council stating they "particularly welcome" applicants from non white communities, more bias.

You dont fix racism by applying it in the opposite direction.

Maggy 21-06-2020 10:50

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36040549)
I dont know how you managed to say that with a straight face. :erm:

Did you miss the post about the Football League 'rule'.

Is there a rule that says they must interview a none BAME candidate ?
(Answer: No, there isnt).

I have seen countless adverts from my local council stating they "particularly welcome" applicants from non white communities, more bias.

You dont fix racism by applying it in the opposite direction.

:clap:

---------- Post added at 09:50 ---------- Previous post was at 09:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36040533)
Well, they can start with introducing a general equality law rather than specify the particular minority groups who can benefit from it. That would at least end the resentment of able-bodied, heterosexual white men that currently exists. Maybe then people will start to see equality in a different light.

With all members of the public on board (due to self interest) the pressure will finally exist to weigh against employers who do not have proper processes in place to select staff, against police to demonstrate suitable cause to arrest and detain, etc. The population will be speaking with one voice.

I do believe education is already happening. All the young people I contact are very aware of the stupidity and injustice of discrimination in all its forms. The older generation who hold racist views are, frankly, beyond help, but they are becoming less relevant with time.

However, minority groups need to be careful as well. If they press too hard, resentment will surface on both sides. This whole issue needs to be carefully managed, and pulling down statues will have the opposite effect from that intended by right thinking people.

:tu:

Pierre 21-06-2020 11:46

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36040549)
I dont know how you managed to say that with a straight face. :erm:

Did you miss the post about the Football League 'rule'.

Is there a rule that says they must interview a none BAME candidate ?
(Answer: No, there isnt).

I have seen countless adverts from my local council stating they "particularly welcome" applicants from non white communities, more bias.

You dont fix racism by applying it in the opposite direction.

All anyone should want is equality of opportunity. As long as there is equal and fair access for all. Outcome should depend on the individuals talent and ability.

Carth 21-06-2020 12:10

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040560)
All anyone should want is equality of opportunity. As long as there is equal and fair access for all. Outcome should depend on the individuals talent and ability.

Yep, that works for ageism too.

Sheesh, the number of roles/positions I 'enquired' about and had the firm falling all over me . . . until they discovered my age* :D



*when I was in late 50's

papa smurf 21-06-2020 12:15

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040560)
All anyone should want is equality of opportunity. As long as there is equal and fair access for all. Outcome should depend on the individuals talent and ability.

Don't we already have that https://www.eoc.org.uk/

The Equality Act has specified 9 areas that are termed in the legislation as protected characteristics. These include (in no particular order):

Age
Sex
Race
Disability
Pregnancy
Marital status
Sexual orientation.
Gender reassignment
Religious background

Pierre 21-06-2020 12:32

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36040563)
Don't we already have that https://www.eoc.org.uk/

The Equality Act has specified 9 areas that are termed in the legislation as protected characteristics. These include (in no particular order):

Age
Sex
Race
Disability
Pregnancy
Marital status
Sexual orientation.
Gender reassignment
Religious background

Indeed but my point was more aimed at those that push for equality of outcome. i.e. a specific quota of whatever minority you might think of.

Meaning you put a less able and qualified person ahead of a more able and qualified person just to fulfil an outcome.

papa smurf 21-06-2020 12:37

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040564)
Indeed but my point was more aimed at those that push for equality of outcome. i.e. a specific quota of whatever minority you might think of.

Meaning you put a less able and qualified person ahead of a more able and qualified person just to fulfil an outcome.

Positive discrimination ? https://coodes.co.uk/blog/positive-d...n%20the%20past.

An employer is guilty of positive discrimination if they hire or seek an individual purely based on their protected characteristic, rather than experience or qualifications. Protected characteristics include race, gender, age, disability, religion and sexual orientation.

Positive discrimination also includes setting quotas or benchmarks in the recruitment process, or promoting a specific number of people within a minority group.

Hugh 21-06-2020 13:10

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36040563)
Don't we already have that https://www.eoc.org.uk/

The Equality Act has specified 9 areas that are termed in the legislation as protected characteristics. These include (in no particular order):

Age
Sex
Race
Disability
Pregnancy
Marital status
Sexual orientation.
Gender reassignment
Religious background

It's a law - doesn't mean it's always followed (otherwise, we wouldn't have drunk drivers, speeders, burglars, murderers, etc. as there are also laws against those).

---------- Post added at 12:10 ---------- Previous post was at 12:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040564)
Indeed but my point was more aimed at those that push for equality of outcome. i.e. a specific quota of whatever minority you might think of.

Meaning you put a less able and qualified person ahead of a more able and qualified person just to fulfil an outcome.

Never seen that happen - just because someone has a "protected characteristic" doesn't mean they'll get a job because of that; they also have to have the competencies, capabilities, and required experience.

(unless you're talking about political Ministerial posts - experience and competency don't seem to be a requisite (for whichever party is in power)).

Carth 21-06-2020 13:25

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Pretty sure that, for years, I've been reading about the need for a push to employ more >*insert race, confused gender, disability here*< because they're lower than the statistics say they should be.

Isn't that akin to employing people based on statistics rather than ability?

Jimmy-J 21-06-2020 14:10

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040564)
Indeed but my point was more aimed at those that push for equality of outcome. i.e. a specific quota of whatever minority you might think of.

Meaning you put a less able and qualified person ahead of a more able and qualified person just to fulfil an outcome.

Like they seem to do at the BBC? :D

nomadking 21-06-2020 14:15

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
This "equality of opportunity" is just a load of nonsense. There are so many factors involved for EVERYBODY. If anything, it's White, British, Heterosexual, Males, that are last in line.

Maggy 21-06-2020 14:20

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040570)
This "equality of opportunity" is just a load of nonsense. There are so many factors involved for EVERYBODY. If anything, it's White, British, Heterosexual, Males, that are last in line.

:rofl:

nomadking 21-06-2020 14:44

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36040571)
:rofl:

So how many schemes and how much money go to things that include them?
Eg
Quote:

Lewis Hamilton has announced plans to set up a commission in his name to increase diversity in motorsport.
The world champion said he wants the Hamilton Commission to make "real, tangible and measurable change".

"Despite my success in the sport, the institutional barriers that have kept F1 highly exclusive persist," he said in a column for the Sunday Times
So many other factors involved, and race ISN'T one of them. Eg Better to live in the right area, where there are race tracks, and the engineering companies that go with it. The White people in F1 DIDN'T ONLY get there simply because they are White.:rolleyes: They also didn't get there overnight.

Maggy 21-06-2020 14:47

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040572)
So how many schemes and how much money go to things that include them?
Eg
So many other factors involved, and race ISN'T one of them. Eg Better to live in the right area, where there are race tracks, and the engineering companies that go with it. The White people in F1 DIDN'T ONLY get there simply because they are White.:rolleyes: They also didn't get there overnight.

So how many black or female F1 drivers are there?

Paul 21-06-2020 15:07

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Lewis Hamilton springs to mind.

Quote:

A six-time Formula One World Champion, he is widely regarded as one of the greatest drivers in the history of the sport

1andrew1 21-06-2020 15:12

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040564)
Indeed but my point was more aimed at those that push for equality of outcome. i.e. a specific quota of whatever minority you might think of.

Meaning you put a less able and qualified person ahead of a more able and qualified person just to fulfil an outcome.

I don't know anyone who pushes for that, but when you have all-male boards and half the population is female you start to wonder what criteria makes someone more able? Is it because they look and sounds like similar people on the board? Is unconscious bias playing a role?

---------- Post added at 14:12 ---------- Previous post was at 14:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36040549)
I have seen countless adverts from my local council stating they "particularly welcome" applicants from non white communities, more bias.

You dont fix racism by applying it in the opposite direction.

This instance is not applying it in the opposite direction. If an employer is under-represented in some communities be it race, gender, age etc then it needs to ensure it is welcoming to people from such communities to encourage them to apply.
Having a diverse workforce brings different perspectives and ideas to the table and should ultimately make it more successful.

nomadking 21-06-2020 15:35

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36040573)
So how many black or female F1 drivers are there?

How many are remotely interested? How many have the dedication required? How many have anything like the required qualifications and more importantly ABILITY?

The main factor helping out Lewis Hamilton was the support from his father. Without it, he wouldn't have got anywhere.

Difficult to be sure from the pictures and/or listed nationality.
F1 Drivers At least 3.
F2 Drivers At least 5.
F3 Drivers At least 3.
Those with surnames such as Scumacher, Piquet, Alesi, Fittipaldi have advantages, but still nothing whatsoever to do with race.:rolleyes:

Eg So much racing engine technology takes place within a 20 mile radius of Northampton. We also have Silverstone race track.

---------- Post added at 14:35 ---------- Previous post was at 14:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040575)
I don't know anyone who pushes for that, but when you have all-male boards and half the population is female you start to wonder what criteria makes someone more able? Is it because they look and sounds like similar people on the board? Is unconscious bias playing a role?

---------- Post added at 14:12 ---------- Previous post was at 14:08 ----------


This instance is not applying it in the opposite direction. If an employer is under-represented in some communities be it race, gender, age etc then it needs to ensure it is welcoming to people from such communities to encourage them to apply.
Having a diverse workforce brings different perspectives and ideas to the table and should ultimately make it more successful.

They tend to get to those positions because of ABILITY. Bet none of the companies that have mainly non-white or females as employees or board members gets any adverse attention.


People are expecting to simply piggy-back on the previous success of White males in building the companies in the first place.

Pierre 21-06-2020 15:58

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040566)
Never seen that happen - just because someone has a "protected characteristic" doesn't mean they'll get a job because of that; they also have to have the competencies, capabilities, and required experience.

(unless you're talking about political Ministerial posts - experience and competency don't seem to be a requisite (for whichever party is in power)).

Last line of the Virgin Media policy. 50/50 gender balance within the company by 2025.

https://www.virginmedia.com/corporat...more-inclusive

Or Vodafone’s policy for women to hold 40% of top positions by 2025

https://www.vodafone.com/our-purpose...ender-equality

Once you set a target, followed by date to reach that target then how can you possibly Be objective when assessing candidates for a position?

https://www.stemwomen.co.uk/blog/201...tem-statistics

If you have only 25% of women, for example, in STEM.and you have a policy to have 50/50 male /female Engineers then that is to the disadvantage of male graduates, plus you are potentially not picking the best graduates based on their grades.

---------- Post added at 14:57 ---------- Previous post was at 14:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040572)
So how many schemes and how much money go to things that include them?
Eg
So many other factors involved, and race ISN'T one of them. Eg Better to live in the right area, where there are race tracks, and the engineering companies that go with it. The White people in F1 DIDN'T ONLY get there simply because they are White.:rolleyes: They also didn't get there overnight.

F1 is a bad example, you generally get there if you’re rich.

---------- Post added at 14:58 ---------- Previous post was at 14:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040575)
I don't know anyone who pushes for that, but when you have all-male boards and half the population is female you start to wonder what criteria makes someone more able? Is it because they look and sounds like similar people on the board? Is unconscious bias playing a role?

See reply to Hugh and research any top companies diversity policy.

Carth 21-06-2020 16:34

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040575)
. . but when you have all-male boards and half the population is female you start to wonder what criteria makes someone more able? </snip>

Men don't get pregnant
Men can talk about football
Men can take their sexy young secretary to out of town 'business meetings'
Men don't get stressed if other men have the same suit/shoes/tie on

:D

OLD BOY 21-06-2020 17:43

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36040536)
The thing is there isn't a law that specifically targets minority groups. It's people, and their interpretation of said laws. White, able bodied, heterosexual men don't experience the downside of such unconscious, or even conscious, bias.

Admirable in it's ignorance of the divisions within society, cross cutting race, class, political standing, gender, age.

I'd say the opposite. While the older, more ignorant, generations are dying out the flag of nationalism is stoking up divisions around the world at the minute. Given the failure of capitalism, and globalisation, to generate wealth that everyone has a stake in such divisions will only continue.

Who can possibly resent someone who simply wants equality? As said white, heterosexual, able-bodied man. It'd be extremely ignorant of me to claim that everyone has exactly the same opportunities as me in education or employment. And the reasons are entirely structural. Who wouldn't be pissed off if the game was fundamentally rigged against them?

There are laws that deal with race discrimination, sex discrimination, disability discrimination, religious discrimination, etc. This creates resentment from a part of the population who do not feel that they have any protection. We need just one law that guarantees fairness for everyone, and that will do wonders for attitudes. Just as we've seen arguments that 'all lives matter' to the current BLM campaign. Exclude a section of society from a perceived benefit and you enhance divisions instead of eliminating them.

You confuse 'nationalism' with 'racism'. There is nothing wrong with being proud of one's country, which does not mean that those with such beliefs are racists. You are dragging capitalism and globalism into this argument - are you attempting to dilute the message? Of course you are. I agree that capitalism and globalism could be better managed, but that has nothing to do with racism, which is what this is all about.

As for saying 'who can possibly resent someone who simply wants equality?, now that is a pretty naive thing to say. Whether or not you think that is perverse, nevertheless many people do hold that view, and I have seen it first hand. Clearly, minority groups are at a disadvantage, but creating laws just for them is the wrong way to go about it.

Notice I didn't call you 'ignorant' for disagreeing with a perfectly sensible post.

nomadking 21-06-2020 17:43

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Basically, perceived(ie imagined) Racism and Sexism aren't really factors in "equality of opportunity". So many other factors in play.


There were so many factors holding me back in the past, but if it was the same situation today, the thing that would be holding me back, by not having people falling over themselves to get around those things, is the fact that I'm a White male.

jfman 21-06-2020 17:49

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36040549)
I dont know how you managed to say that with a straight face. :erm:

Did you miss the post about the Football League 'rule'.

Is there a rule that says they must interview a none BAME candidate ?
(Answer: No, there isnt).

I have seen countless adverts from my local council stating they "particularly welcome" applicants from non white communities, more bias.

You dont fix racism by applying it in the opposite direction.

I can see that they are trying to ensure their processes are inclusive. However when I look around workplaces I've been in I see predominantly white people. Understandably, as that's the biggest proportion of the wider population. I haven't seen any evidence of the best candidate being overlooked if white.

downquark1 21-06-2020 17:54

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

If you have only 25% of women, for example, in STEM.and you have a policy to have 50/50 male /female Engineers then that is to the disadvantage of male graduates, plus you are potentially not picking the best graduates based on their grades.
OK so this is a true story. A few years ago Theresa May ordered companies to publish their wages gaps. So the HR departments in universities went to work to calculate their wage gaps. To their horror they found a large wage gap.
So it seems that the highest paid positions (Professors) skew male and the lowest paid positions (cleaners) skew female. How could this be? Could they be relentless bigots? Could the labour markets be skewed, it matters not, the wage gap does not care when the results are published. How to fix this? You can't sack the professors, that would be illegal and leave you with no university. You can't pull a load of female professors from no where. So what to do?

Well what some Universities did was remove the cleaners from the payroll and hire an external company to do the cleaning.

So by one form of analysis they shrank the wage gap which they can now brag about at cocktail parties and feminist award ceremonies.

By another form of analysis all they did was sack some working class women and call it a victory for equality.

OLD BOY 21-06-2020 17:59

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36040596)
OK so this is a true story. A few years ago Theresa May ordered companies to public their wages gaps. So the HR departments in universities went to work to calculate their wage gaps. To their horror they found a large wage gap.
So it seems that the highest paid positions (Professors) skew male and the lowest paid positions (cleaners) skew female. How could this be? Could they be relentless bigots? Could the labour markets be skewed, it matters not, the wage gap does not care when the results are published. How to fix this? You can't sack the professors, that would be illegal and leave you with no university. You can't pull a load of female professors from no where. So what to do?

Well what some Universities did was remove the cleaners from the payroll and hire an external company to do the cleaning.

So by one form of analysis they shrank the wage gap which they can now brag about at cocktail parties and feminist award ceremonies.

By another form of analysis all they did was sack some working class women and call it a victory for equality.

Clearly demonstrating how ill-judged our current equality laws are.

Hugh 21-06-2020 18:21

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36040596)
OK so this is a true story. A few years ago Theresa May ordered companies to publish their wages gaps. So the HR departments in universities went to work to calculate their wage gaps. To their horror they found a large wage gap.
So it seems that the highest paid positions (Professors) skew male and the lowest paid positions (cleaners) skew female. How could this be? Could they be relentless bigots? Could the labour markets be skewed, it matters not, the wage gap does not care when the results are published. How to fix this? You can't sack the professors, that would be illegal and leave you with no university. You can't pull a load of female professors from no where. So what to do?

Well what some Universities did was remove the cleaners from the payroll and hire an external company to do the cleaning.

So by one form of analysis they shrank the wage gap which they can now brag about at cocktail parties
and feminist award ceremonies.

By another form of analysis all they did was sack some working class women and call it a victory for equality.

I call "shenanigans"...

The Universities that have outsourced cleaning also usually outsource the maintenance, porters, and security work (all low paid, but most maintenance, porters, and security staff are mostly male, so balances out the cleaning staff) - also, most Universities' Gender Pay Gap & Equal Pay Report is also by pay grade and staff category, not just the overall gap; for instance, see Strathclyde's report
Quote:

Our overall pay analysis by gender indicates that the University has a marginal gender pay gap within grades. Only Grades 4 and 5 have a difference in pay between the average male salary and the average female salary which is above 1% (in these cases, the pay gap is 1.5% and 2.3% in favour of females). Since our last Equal Pay Audit, the equal pay gap at Professor/Director level has reduced from 4.8% in favour of males to 0.5% in favour of males. This reduction is primarily a consequence of the introduction of a zoning system for our professorial staff during 2016/17.

Despite there being equal pay within grades, there is still an overall gender pay gap as a result of occupational segregation; within the University there are significantly higher proportions of females than males at junior levels, in particular in Grades 1, 4 and 5, and, conversely, higher proportions of males than females at the more senior Grades 9, 10 and at Professor and Director level. Between 2017 and 2019 there has been a reduction of more than three percentage points in the overall gender pay gap (the percentage difference between men’s average hourly pay (excluding overtime) and women’s average hourly pay (excluding overtime), irrespective of Grade) and the University remains commited to taking appropriate action to further reduce this gap.
btw, I worked at 3 different Universities over a 10 year period (at a senior level) and never saw, or attended, a cocktail party - bit of inverse grading snobbery occurring in that jibe, methinks... ;)

nomadking 21-06-2020 18:27

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
There was a University that in the name of equality:rolleyes:, paid men a LOWER hourly rate than the women. The men were expected to work for more hours and more days for the same annual salary as the women. The jobs the men were doing were ones that the women couldn't and wouldn't do.


How many women are clearing out fat bergs in the sewer system? How many women on the refuse collection rounds? The list goes on and on.

papa smurf 21-06-2020 18:38

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040603)
I call "shenanigans"...

The Universities that have outsourced cleaning also usually outsource the maintenance, porters, and security work (all low paid, but most maintenance, porters, and security staff are mostly male, so balances out the cleaning staff) - also, most Universities' Gender Pay Gap & Equal Pay Report is also by pay grade and staff category, not just the overall gap; for instance, see Strathclyde's report

btw, I worked at 3 different Universities over a 10 year period (at a senior level) and never saw, or attended, a cocktail party - bit of inverse grading snobbery occurring in that jibe, methinks... ;)

Head porter? or security guard.

nomadking 21-06-2020 18:40

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36040608)
Head porter? or security guard.

That's about senior as White men are going to be allowed to get.

Pierre 21-06-2020 18:46

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040606)
There was a University that in the name of equality:rolleyes:, paid men a LOWER hourly rate than the women. The men were expected to work for more hours and more days for the same annual salary as the women. The jobs the men were doing were ones that the women couldn't and wouldn't do.


How many women are clearing out fat bergs in the sewer system? How many women on the refuse collection rounds? The list goes on and on.

Oh it does, let’s get gender equality in Brick laying.

The whole idea of some evil patriarchy subjugating women is one of the biggest hoax’s of the 21st century.

downquark1 21-06-2020 18:54

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040603)
I call "shenanigans"...

The Universities that have outsourced cleaning also usually outsource the maintenance, porters, and security work (all low paid, but most maintenance, porters, and security staff are mostly male, so balances out the cleaning staff) - also, most Universities' Gender Pay Gap & Equal Pay Report is also by pay grade and staff category, not just the overall gap; for instance, see Strathclyde's report

btw, I worked at 3 different Universities over a 10 year period (at a senior level) and never saw, or attended, a cocktail party - bit of inverse grading snobbery occurring in that jibe, methinks... ;)

OK admittedly I don't know if they get sent to as nice conference parties as I do. But the Professor/Cleaner skew was specifically mentioned at internal meetings.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Clearly demonstrating how ill-judged our current equality laws are.

The point I would take from it is not to reduce complex problems to political slogans and near meaningless metrics.

---------- Post added at 17:54 ---------- Previous post was at 17:47 ----------

Quote:

Between 2017 and 2019 there has been a reduction of more than three percentage points in the overall gender pay gap (the percentage difference between men’s average hourly pay (excluding overtime) and women’s average hourly pay (excluding overtime), irrespective of Grade) and the University remains commited to taking appropriate action to further reduce this gap.
Translation, maybe we can get cancel our security contracts and hire men directly. Or outsource catering.

Carth 21-06-2020 19:21

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36040608)
Head porter? or security guard.

Now now . . I rather think Hugh was something to do with Computers . . maybe technical support.


I'm actually (honestly) re-watching DVD's of The IT Crowd currently.


For future reference, I will be thinking Hugh is the Irish one ;)

downquark1 21-06-2020 19:48

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
1 Attachment(s)
Do you have the previous report from something like 2015? I want to compare headcounts

nomadking 21-06-2020 19:55

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
I wonder what the figures are for Newnham College, Cambridge? It's Women only.

OLD BOY 21-06-2020 20:47

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040606)
There was a University that in the name of equality:rolleyes:, paid men a LOWER hourly rate than the women. The men were expected to work for more hours and more days for the same annual salary as the women. The jobs the men were doing were ones that the women couldn't and wouldn't do.


How many women are clearing out fat bergs in the sewer system? How many women on the refuse collection rounds? The list goes on and on.

How is that equality? Another example of the muddled thinking some universities are afflicted with.

RichardCoulter 22-06-2020 00:26

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36040596)
OK so this is a true story. A few years ago Theresa May ordered companies to publish their wages gaps. So the HR departments in universities went to work to calculate their wage gaps. To their horror they found a large wage gap.
So it seems that the highest paid positions (Professors) skew male and the lowest paid positions (cleaners) skew female. How could this be? Could they be relentless bigots? Could the labour markets be skewed, it matters not, the wage gap does not care when the results are published. How to fix this? You can't sack the professors, that would be illegal and leave you with no university. You can't pull a load of female professors from no where. So what to do?

Well what some Universities did was remove the cleaners from the payroll and hire an external company to do the cleaning.

So by one form of analysis they shrank the wage gap which they can now brag about at cocktail parties and feminist award ceremonies.

By another form of analysis all they did was sack some working class women and call it a victory for equality.

When I worked in the benefits department, the top bods decided that all telephone calls should be answered within rings to "improve the service". Management then routed all calls to one telephone in our office. Each call answered was indeed answered within 5 rings and the new policy was achieved (despite the fact that most people got the engaged tone and less people than ever before actually got through).

pip08456 22-06-2020 00:40

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36040645)
When I worked in the benefits department, the top bods decided that all telephone calls should be answered within rings to "improve the service". Management then routed all calls to one telephone in our office. Each call answered was indeed answered within 5 rings and the new policy was achieved (despite the fact that most people got the engaged tone and less people than ever before actually got through).

So there was only one person tsking calls then.

1andrew1 22-06-2020 00:58

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040606)
There was a University that in the name of equality:rolleyes:, paid men a LOWER hourly rate than the women. The men were expected to work for more hours and more days for the same annual salary as the women. The jobs the men were doing were ones that the women couldn't and wouldn't do.

Which university was this? I'm guessing not the UK which has salary bands at universities.

nomadking 22-06-2020 01:12

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040649)
Which university was this? I'm guessing not the UK which has salary bands at universities.

Aberystwyth is the UK, isn't it? It was salary bands that caused the issue. The men were paid the same annual salary as the women, but were expected to work more hours, on more days. As a consequence their hourly rate was less.

Hugh 22-06-2020 09:20

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36040608)
Head porter? or security guard.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040609)
That's about senior as White men are going to be allowed to get.

IT Director at one, Head of IT Development & Support at two others. :)

Maggy 22-06-2020 09:22

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Strange how a BLM thread has become a thread about equality between men and women. Now is that going off topic or not?

Hugh 22-06-2020 09:32

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040653)
Aberystwyth is the UK, isn't it? It was salary bands that caused the issue. The men were paid the same annual salary as the women, but were expected to work more hours, on more days. As a consequence their hourly rate was less.

Again, shenanigans.

Under the HERA pay scales (brought in 2005-06), Grades 1-5 all have overtime (after 37 hours) at x1.5 (Mon-Sat) and x2 (Sundays & Bank Holidays) - Grade 6s and above is ‘hours required to fulfil duties’.

---------- Post added at 08:32 ---------- Previous post was at 08:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040624)
I wonder what the figures are for Newnham College, Cambridge? It's Women only.

That’ll be a shock for Ian Wilson, John Fawcett, Matthew Ireland, Nigel Knight, Rupert Brown, and the other men who teach there... ;)

1andrew1 22-06-2020 10:02

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36040661)
Strange how a BLM thread has become a thread about equality between men and women. Now is that going off topic or not?

See intersectionality.

nomadking 22-06-2020 10:05

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040662)
Again, shenanigans.

Under the HERA pay scales (brought in 2005-06), Grades 1-5 all have overtime (after 37 hours) at x1.5 (Mon-Sat) and x2 (Sundays & Bank Holidays) - Grade 6s and above is ‘hours required to fulfil duties’.

---------- Post added at 08:32 ---------- Previous post was at 08:25 ----------

That’ll be a shock for Ian Wilson, John Fawcett, Matthew Ireland, Nigel Knight, Rupert Brown, and the other men who teach there... ;)

There was a legal case about it.


There was news report about arguments over whether men should finally allowed to be Fellows.
Quote:

2. Fellows in Category A
College Lecturers and Tutors are appointed by the Council. Any woman appointed to College Lecturer or Tutor will be elected into a Fellowship in Category A which will be retained for the period of appointment. A man appointed College Lecturer is employed on the same terms and conditions as a woman and is entitled to attend meetings of the Governing Body, but cannot be elected into a Fellowship.
Quote:

One of Cambridge University’s last women’s only colleges is to accept men from 2021, as its president says there are now “other under-represented groups”.
...

It is the latest women’s College to update its admission policy in recent years. In 2017, Murray Edwards College changed its policy to allow any students who "identify" as female to apply.
The college previously required all applicants to be “legally defined as female”, but its council approved an update to its entry criteria, stating that it will accept any student “who at the point of application identifies as a woman”.
Meanwhile Newnham College, which was co-founded in 1871 by one of the leaders of the suffragist movement, Millicent Garrett Fawcett, made a “Transgender Policy Statement” in 2015.
It said they accept “any individual who had transitioned to female, and any individual who is legally recognized as female under the Gender Recognition Act”.
Earlier this year, it emerged that Oxford University ended its women-only fellowship after the university’s administrators said it breached equality law.


Hugh 22-06-2020 10:31

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Again with the goal-post moving- you said
Quote:

It's Women only.
You forgot to add ‘except for the men who work there’ (who I think should be allowed to be "Fellows").

RichardCoulter 22-06-2020 13:19

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36040648)
So there was only one person tsking calls then.

Yep (in esch section). Goes to show that statistics can be manipulated as 100% of calls were recorded as being answered within 5 rings. The fact that hardly anyone could get through was neither here nor there!

nomadking 22-06-2020 17:39

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

The Angiolini Review of deaths in police custody found that, while the death rate of black individuals arrested was not disproportionate to white people in England, the proportion of deaths involving use of force was.
It also found that mental health and intoxication was a major factor in deaths in police custody, meaning black people with mental health issues often suffered "double discrimination".
Quote:

In 2016, David Lammy was asked to lead a government-backed review into the treatment of black and minority ethnic (BAME) individuals in the criminal justice system in England and Wales.
The final report made 35 recommendations, including:
  • introducing assessments of young offenders' maturity
  • exploring how criminal records could be "sealed" or kept from employers, in particular for young people
  • allowing some prosecutions to be deferred

Basically, try to let them get away with committing crime.

Hugh 22-06-2020 17:44

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Please provide a link to any quotes you post, as this allows usage under the "Fair Use" principle.

Here is a link to the review mentioned - could you please add a link to the source you have quoted.

https://assets.publishing.service.go...Accessible.pdf

https://www.inquest.org.uk/angiolini...ublished-today

1andrew1 22-06-2020 18:47

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
In terms of solutions, this may be of interest. It's on Channel 4, Thursdays, 9pm.
Quote:

For three weeks, 24 Year 7 students, aged 11 and 12 and from diverse ethnic backgrounds were given a new timetable of classes, activities and games to explore their racial heritage and issues around ethnicity.
Inspired by similar experiments in the US, production company Proper Content joined forces with Channel 4 to prove the point that talking about race, however uncomfortable it might feel, is better than pretending it doesn’t exist – and the earlier those conversations happen, the better.
Glenthorne offered the ideal combination of diversity, an engaged student population and an enthusiastic head teacher to make the project work.[/quote]
https://inews.co.uk/culture/televisi...endship-449997
https://www.channel4.com/programmes/...-to-end-racism

ianch99 22-06-2020 18:58

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040715)
Basically, try to let them get away with committing crime.

Are you actually saying the reviews' recommendations are designed to facilitate black people to commit crime?

nomadking 22-06-2020 21:05

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36040728)
Are you actually saying the reviews' recommendations are designed to facilitate black people to commit crime?

So which one doesn't?
"Introducing assessments of young offenders' maturity"
So that they can be mysteriously be treated as being younger and so sentences(if that's going to be allowed) will be more lenient. It certainly wouldn't have been suggested to treat them as more mature.



"Exploring how criminal records could be "sealed" or kept from employers, in particular for young people"
To avoid a more negative impact. Why the special treatment for them?



"Allowing some prosecutions to be deferred"
Why? The general assumption made seems to be that the first prosecution is the first time they've offended. How often is that? For major crimes maybe, but minor ones, a lot less likely. How many more crimes will they commit during the deferral of JUSTICE? The Legal maxin is "Justice delayed is justice denied".


The whole purpose of the report is to go easy on them.

Pierre 22-06-2020 21:14

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36040746)
Once you start a thread old chap, you have to accept others may have different opinions. I believe it's called a 'Forum'.

Can't just close it down because you're bored or it hasn't gone the way you wanted.

Au contraire, Monsieur K, I was quite happy for the thread to evolve. It was taking an interesting turn. Nothing has been mentioned about BLM for many days, because as expected, Everybody has got off their knees and could no longer give a shiatsu.

Now lockdown is over no doubt London’s black youth will be shanking each other left right and centre - without a protest in sight.

Paul 22-06-2020 21:51

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Nonsense Posts Removed.

A reminder to those who seem to have forgotten how things work.
The CF staff decide when a thread is going off topic, and when/if it will be closed.


So, back to the topic at hand. Thank you.

RichardCoulter 22-06-2020 22:15

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
BBC to commit £100m to increase diversity on TV:

'In October last year, TV presenter and campaigner June Sarpong was appointed as the BBC's director of creative diversity, as it pledged to ensure 50% of on-air roles will go to women by 2020, with targets of 15% for black, Asian and minority ethnic groups [BAME], 8% for disabled people and 8% for LGBT staff.

Off air, the BBC promised at the time to increase the proportion of leadership roles filled by women from 44% to 50% by next year, and raise the share of such senior roles held by BAME staff from 11.5% to 15%'.

It was said on the news that this represents about 3% of BBC spending.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-53135022

Sephiroth 22-06-2020 22:33

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36040773)
BBC to commit £100m to increase diversity on TV:

'In October last year, TV presenter and campaigner June Sarpong was appointed as the BBC's director of creative diversity, as it pledged to ensure 50% of on-air roles will go to women by 2020, with targets of 15% for black, Asian and minority ethnic groups [BAME], 8% for disabled people and 8% for LGBT staff.

Off air, the BBC promised at the time to increase the proportion of leadership roles filled by women from 44% to 50% by next year, and raise the share of such senior roles held by BAME staff from 11.5% to 15%'.

It was said on the news that this represents about 3% of BBC spending.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-53135022

... at the expense of pensioners' licence fee whatever the % of BBC spending.


RichardCoulter 22-06-2020 22:41

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36040779)
... at the expense of pensioners' licence fee whatever the % of BBC spending.


The free TVL for pensioners has now been extended until October and may be being kept permanently (the new DG is consideting this).

Pierre 23-06-2020 00:01

Re: Coronavirus
 
Just when things we’re getting a bit stale, well this is priceless.

https://news.sky.com/story/burnley-c...match-12012848

A few quotes

Quote:

Burnley have said they "strongly" condemn those responsible for flying a "White Lives Matter" banner over their Premier League match with Manchester City.
Quote:

"This, in no way, represents what Burnley Football Club stands for and we will work fully with the authorities to identify those responsible and issue lifetime bans."
?

RichardCoulter 23-06-2020 01:26

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Well, they clearly were trying to deride and show contempt for the message that the BLM movement are trying to get across. However, the BLM protesters should have had the foresight to include the word 'too' at the end of their title to emphasise that they weren't suggesting that non black lives were any less important than those of black people.

Paul 23-06-2020 02:37

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36040773)
'In October last year, TV presenter and campaigner June Sarpong was appointed as the BBC's director of creative diversity, as it pledged to ensure 50% of on-air roles will go to women by 2020, with targets of 15% for black, Asian and minority ethnic groups [BAME], 8% for disabled people and 8% for LGBT staff.

Unbelievable, what a complete bunch of idiots.
Targets are a form of discrimination in themselves.

---------- Post added at 01:37 ---------- Previous post was at 01:28 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040792)
Just when things we’re getting a bit stale, well this is priceless.

Not at all surprised, Burnley seem to have lost the plot completely.

At least Man City showed some sense ;
Quote:

Manchester City’s Pep Guardiola added:
Quote:

“Of course white lives matter but black lives matter too. Human beings matter. Everyone, we are the same.

OLD BOY 23-06-2020 08:26

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36040801)
Unbelievable, what a complete bunch of idiots.
Targets are a form of discrimination in themselves.

If the BBC take this too far, their dramas will get so PC that they will lose their core audience in droves. That will mean more pressure - not to abolish the licence fee, but to abolish the BBC.

Hugh 23-06-2020 09:05

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36040801)
Unbelievable, what a complete bunch of idiots.
Targets are a form of discrimination in themselves.

---------- Post added at 01:37 ---------- Previous post was at 01:28 ----------


Not at all surprised, Burnley seem to have lost the plot completely.

At least Man City showed some sense ;

Targets are one of the methods of balancing decades of (sometimes subconscious) discriminatory hiring, and motivate companies to review policies that can support equality of opportunities, introducing practices such as "blind CVs", balanced interview panels, & outreach programmes.

Unfortunately, old ways of doing things don’t fix themselves, and a target is an ambition, not a measure companies will go under from not meeting.

pip08456 23-06-2020 09:21

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040815)
Targets are one of the methods of balancing decades of (sometimes subconscious) discriminatory hiring, and motivate companies to review policies that can support equality of opportunities, introducing practices such as "blind CVs", balanced interview panels, & outreach programmes.

Unfortunately, old ways of doing things don’t fix themselves, and a target is an ambition, not a measure companies will go under from not meeting.

What a load of boolcks! This is the PC BBC we are talking about. It is not a target, it is a certainty!

Mr K 23-06-2020 09:41

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
BLM and the BBC in one thread ! I predict the angry right wing old white men will appear soon...

Oh, I see they already have ! ;)

Maggy 23-06-2020 09:46

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36040821)
BLM and the BBC in one thread ! I predict the angry right wing old white men will appear soon...

Oh, I see they already have ! ;)

Stop twisting tails and try contributing?;)

papa smurf 23-06-2020 09:50

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
So if you go for a job interview at the beeb on pick a token [colour/ alphabet person]day your pretty much buggered if your a white hetro male.:shrug:

Sephiroth 23-06-2020 09:57

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
That's the problem with this thread. US police do bad things with black lives. Suddenly, the UK becomes tarred with the same brush but on a wider scale. Then the left wing biased BBC is brought into play (Papa's sentiment is right).

OLD BOY 23-06-2020 10:21

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36040824)
That's the problem with this thread. US police do bad things with black lives. Suddenly, the UK becomes tarred with the same brush but on a wider scale. Then the left wing biased BBC is brought into play (Papa's sentiment is right).

The BBC was brought into play legitimately, Seph, due to their response to the BLM issue.

However, we should not allow racists to water down the fact that this movement gained popular support due to US police violence against black people.

This is not about statues, attacks on the white population or the sensibilities of the flakes, and it’s certainly not about violent protest and damage to property. It’s about the continuing violent repression towards blacks in the US, which operates in plain sight. I have no time for the U.K. version, which has the overthrow of capitalism as one of its objectives - nothing to do with addressing discrimination against black people at all.

Sephiroth 23-06-2020 10:34

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36040829)
The BBC was brought into play legitimately, Seph, due to their response to the BLM issue.

However, we should not allow racists to water down the fact that this movement gained popular support due to US police violence against black people.

This is not about statues, attacks on the white population or the sensibilities of the flakes, and it’s certainly not about violent protest and damage to property. It’s about the continuing violent repression towards blacks in the US, which operates in plain sight. I have no time for the U.K. version, which has the overthrow of capitalism as one of its objectives - nothing to do with addressing discrimination against black people at all.

I agree with everything you say, OB. Just to clarify on the BBC, sure they come into this thread legitimately - as the epitome of taking things to the nth leftie agenda degree.

A debate on the BBC might be amusing.

Damien 23-06-2020 10:37

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040792)
Just when things we’re getting a bit stale, well this is priceless.

https://news.sky.com/story/burnley-c...match-12012848

A few quotes


?

Because it's mocking the BLM movement essentially.

Again implicit in the slogan of Black Lives Matter is the addition of 'too'. Black Lives Matter too. It's isn't that they matter more, it's that the life of someone whose black matters as much as that of someone who is white.

If you were to complain you've been treated unfairly in relation to your co-workers, say you get 5 days fewer holidays than everyone else, and said 'I deserve as much as holiday as anyone else' and all your boss kept saying is 'EVERYONE deserves the same' then you'll get pretty pissed off.

Hugh 23-06-2020 10:54

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36040823)
So if you go for a job interview at the beeb on pick a token [colour/ alphabet person]day your pretty much buggered if your a white hetro male.:shrug:

You sound as if you feel you’re being discriminated against - not much fun, is it? ;)

btw, the latest stats show people from BAME backgrounds make up 15.3% of BBC staff - since nearly 85% of are white, your statement is probably not based on actuality...

Pierre 23-06-2020 10:56

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36040801)
Unbelievable, what a complete bunch of idiots.
Targets are a form of discrimination in themselves;

The same kind of targets i was assured didn’t exist in the corporate world by persons on here, until I showed that they did.......suddenly that line of discussion went quiet.

1andrew1 23-06-2020 11:00

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36040831)

A debate on the BBC might be amusing.

There's many a circular thread to be found on the BBC in this forum. ;)

papa smurf 23-06-2020 11:01

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040838)
You sound as if you feel you’re being discriminated against - not much fun, is it? ;)

btw, the latest stats show people from BAME backgrounds make up 15.3% of BBC staff - since nearly 85% of are white, your statement is probably not based on actuality...

Trust me if i wen't for a job at the beeb they'd throw me out no matter what my colour /alphabet status was on the day,i'm just not pc friendly :)

Pierre 23-06-2020 11:01

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040815)
Targets are one of the methods of balancing decades of (sometimes subconscious) discriminatory hiring, and motivate companies to review policies that can support equality of opportunities, introducing practices such as "blind CVs", balanced interview panels, & outreach programmes.

Unfortunately, old ways of doing things don’t fix themselves, and a target is an ambition, not a measure companies will go under from not meeting.

So you’ve moved from “never seen that happen”

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...&postcount=625

To:

Oh yah, it’s a method of balancing decades of discrimination, oh yah

1andrew1 23-06-2020 11:04

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36040824)
That's the problem with this thread. US police do bad things with black lives. Suddenly, the UK becomes tarred with the same brush but on a wider scale. Then the left wing biased BBC is brought into play (Papa's sentiment is right).

No way is the Farage-loving Brexit Broadcasting Corporation left wing biased. But that's another debate. ;)

downquark1 23-06-2020 11:06

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040838)
You sound as if you feel you’re being discriminated against - not much fun, is it? ;)

btw, the latest stats show people from BAME backgrounds make up 15.3% of BBC staff - since nearly 85% of are white, your statement is probably not based on actuality...

Quote:

according to the 2011 Census, the total population of England and Wales was 56.1 million, and 86.0% of the population was White
admittedly that number must have shifted a bit by now.

stop presenting equality AS bias.

Damien 23-06-2020 11:09

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040843)
So you’ve moved from “never seen that happen”

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...&postcount=625

To:

Oh yah, it’s a method of balancing decades of discrimination, oh yah

Those aren't contradictory though.

There is a difference between hiring someone because they're BAME and setting up a recruitment system that's designed to increase the number of BAME candidates that go to interview and therefore get employed.

That's where blind CVs have been shown to work, at least for opening positions early on in someone's career, because more women and BAME candidates get through to the interview stage in that system. (There is a question of if this is effective for more senior roles later on).

Hugh was responding to your claim that someone is directly hired because they're from a minority demographic. I.E That someone less capable is hired because of it. However in the system Hugh describes that isn't what happens, instead, a more diverse group of candidates get considered and the power of numbers means over enough interviews the percentage of BAME/female candidates that get employed goes up.

---------- Post added at 10:09 ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36040845)
admittedly that number must have shifted a bit by now.

stop presenting equality AS bias.

Bear in mind that the BBC's biggest staffing areas have traditionally been in London (40% BAME) and Manchester (16-17%) BAME as well. In fact with all the talk of representation in media there is the London-effect in play as well. Growing up in London gives a nice step-up for anyone looking to go into the arts or journalism.

downquark1 23-06-2020 11:11

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36040846)
Bear in mind that the BBC's biggest staffing areas have traditionally been in London (40% BAME) and Manchester (16-17%) BAME as well.

Well make up your mind, should be the BBC represent, the UK, the world, or London? Exactly what do you call fair?

Most of these problems don't get solved because the problem isn't even properly defined.

Hugh 23-06-2020 11:15

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36040845)
admittedly that number must have shifted a bit by now.

stop presenting equality AS bias.

So the stats show that the BBC has the same percentage of of BAME as the U.K. population?

Kinda refutes papa’s point, doesn’t it?

---------- Post added at 10:13 ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36040842)
Trust me if i wen't for a job at the beeb they'd throw me out no matter what my colour /alphabet status was on the day,i'm just not pc friendly :)

"pc friendly" - treating everyone equally.

OK, then...

---------- Post added at 10:15 ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040839)
The same kind of targets i was assured didn’t exist in the corporate world by persons on here, until I showed that they did.......suddenly that line of discussion went quiet.

No one said targets didn’t exist - they said people weren’t hired because of them; they are there to provide opportunities to balance things out, but if anyone can’t meet the requirements for the job, they shouldn’t get hired.

Nice attempt at twisting words - not like you... ;)

Damien 23-06-2020 11:16

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1 (Post 36040851)
Well make up your mind, should be the BBC represent, the UK, the world, or London? Exactly what do you call fair?

Most of these problems don't get solved because the problem isn't even properly defined.

Make up my mind on what?

My point is the BBC's current staffing seems somewhat in line with the national average of BAME and if anything you would think it might be a bit higher because the local pool they're recruiting from is disproportionately BAME relative to the national population.

I am not declaring anything there. Just find it an interesting thing to consider.

downquark1 23-06-2020 11:18

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36040857)
Make up my mind on what?

My point is the BBC's current staffing seems somewhat in line with the national average of BAME and if anything you would think it might be a bit higher because the local pool they're recruiting from is disproportionately BAME relative to the national population.

I am not declaring anything there. Just find it an interesting thing to consider.

Well I understand the efforts are made to be representative of the UK, so the fact that they are would suggest they are at least superficially successful. That is if you agree with the whole argument to begin with.

Pierre 23-06-2020 11:59

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36040832)

If you were to complain you've been treated unfairly in relation to your co-workers, say you get 5 days fewer holidays than everyone else, and said 'I deserve as much as holiday as anyone else' and all your boss kept saying is 'EVERYONE deserves the same' then you'll get pretty pissed off.

You’ll have to run that by me again. That’s a poor analogy.

Where are black people being told to accept less than everyone else?

---------- Post added at 10:51 ---------- Previous post was at 10:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36040846)
Those aren't contradictory though.

There is a difference between hiring someone because they're BAME and setting up a recruitment system that's designed to increase the number of BAME candidates that go to interview and therefore get employed.

That's where blind CVs have been shown to work, at least for opening positions early on in someone's career, because more women and BAME candidates get through to the interview stage in that system. (There is a question of if this is effective for more senior roles later on).

Hugh was responding to your claim that someone is directly hired because they're from a minority demographic. I.E That someone less capable is hired because of it. However in the system Hugh describes that isn't what happens, instead, a more diverse group of candidates get considered and the power of numbers means over enough interviews the percentage of BAME/female candidates that get employed goes up.

---------- Post added at 10:09 ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 ----------



Bear in mind that the BBC's biggest staffing areas have traditionally been in London (40% BAME) and Manchester (16-17%) BAME as well. In fact with all the talk of representation in media there is the London-effect in play as well. Growing up in London gives a nice step-up for anyone looking to go into the arts or journalism.

As I’ve mentioned earlier I am totally in favour of equality of opportunity.

Equality of outcome however, where you set a figure of the number of people from any background that you must employ I.e. setting the outcome, is the road to hell.

---------- Post added at 10:59 ---------- Previous post was at 10:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040852)
No one said targets didn’t exist - they said people weren’t hired because of them; they are there to provide opportunities to balance things out, but if anyone can’t meet the requirements for the job, they shouldn’t get hired.

Nice attempt at twisting words - not like you... ;)

Piffle, I can see the next diversity report from a major ethical corporation.

“Yes , well we interviewed lots of candidates That are under represented in our organisation but we missed our diversity targets because they just weren’t good enough, and we had a much larger pool of white men to choose from, so we just went with that.”

OLD BOY 23-06-2020 12:05

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36040815)
Targets are one of the methods of balancing decades of (sometimes subconscious) discriminatory hiring, and motivate companies to review policies that can support equality of opportunities, introducing practices such as "blind CVs", balanced interview panels, & outreach programmes.

Unfortunately, old ways of doing things don’t fix themselves, and a target is an ambition, not a measure companies will go under from not meeting.

It's a blunt instrument, Hugh, that simply substitutes one form of discrimination for another. Two wrongs do not make a right. Instead of alienating a minority, this simply alienates the majority.

The solution is equal treatment. That is the way to go.

---------- Post added at 11:05 ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040844)
No way is the Farage-loving Brexit Broadcasting Corporation left wing biased. But that's another debate. ;)

Since when did the BBC adore Farage? They treat him with contempt!

downquark1 23-06-2020 12:40

Re: Black Lives Matter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36040871)
Since when did the BBC adore Farage? They treat him with contempt!

They think that the BBC's constitutional obligation to host him is an endorsement.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:16.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum