Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Superhub : Superhub Firmware Beta Test (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33675881)

Helix 15-07-2011 21:13

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KenK (Post 35273926)
It's fairly standard. Whoever's got the contract to develop the software provides occasional 'code drops' for the customer to try out and report back on. Maybe this hasn't happened often enough in this case; but why should VM spend staff time on a process that they're paying someone else to provide.

Maybe because the process clearly isn't working. Surely after this number of shoddy firmware updates and delays someone should realise something is up and be on Netgears back - send in some of their team to work alongside them and get the issues fixed once and for all.

ccarmock 15-07-2011 22:05

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Why on earth didn't they ship the thing with the Netgear standard firmware?! I guess they could have turned the colours red and put a VM logo in place of the Netgear one, but that should have been fairly trivial compared with the mess this has been.

thelongmile 16-07-2011 01:47

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
I may be making a rather naive point here but given Netgear make some fairly decent routers, and since all this does really is stick a modem on the end of one, AND Netgear have made cable modems .... then VM must have really done something quite special to balls this up, right?

kenoliver 16-07-2011 09:12

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thelongmile (Post 35274001)
I may be making a rather naive point here but given Netgear make some fairly decent routers, and since all this does really is stick a modem on the end of one, AND Netgear have made cable modems .... then VM must have really done something quite special to balls this up, right?

Most long time VM Customers will already have their own wireless equipment as in the early days VM did not supply it, so we went out a bought it ourselves

A modem only option (rather than the HUB) or a switchable "Modem" option on the HUB should have been built into the original spec to allow the 1000's of existing customers who already have their own equipment to carry on using it

I suppose now with the proposed release of R28 the modem option is planned
but VM could have avoided many problems and negative comments if they had included the "Modem" option from the start

From a commercial point of view I can understand how VM would want all their customer base on one piece of equipment, as supporting multiple configurations must be a nightmare

But this could have been done over time, and if the quality of the HUB had been better then most customers would have migrated over, as powering just one piece of equipment is better than multiple units

I gave the HUB a fair go, as I liked the idea of just one unit to power up, and the fact it was supported and would be replaced if required by VM,

But the wireless performance was poor and far worse than my original configuration,

But if the HUB improves I will give it another try, but in the meantime I continue to run two separate units

Mick Fisher 16-07-2011 10:37

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Drinking sessions and breweries come to mind.

kenoliver 16-07-2011 11:07

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick Fisher (Post 35274094)
Drinking sessions and breweries come to mind.

:LOL:

you are the master of understatement :cool:

thelongmile 16-07-2011 15:16

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Actually, does anyone have a list of what the R28 firmware is proposed to change?

Skie 16-07-2011 18:42

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
I was going to come up with a list of comedy additions, but I dont think I could make anything more hilarious than what virgin will do with the amount of ineptitude they have in reserve.

Helix 16-07-2011 18:52

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thelongmile (Post 35274196)
Actually, does anyone have a list of what the R28 firmware is proposed to change?

I don't think VM know themselves.

thelongmile 16-07-2011 18:57

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skie (Post 35274269)
I was going to come up with a list of comedy additions, but I dont think I could make anything more hilarious than what virgin will do with the amount of ineptitude they have in reserve.

Hah... I don't know, the 'Folding paper aeroplane' button might just come in on R28!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35274278)
I don't think VM know themselves.

Ok, that's quite annoying. I was hoping I'd see something about the WiFi rather than just taking this long to put a modem only button in there! Then again, it doesn't surprise me!

Helix 16-07-2011 19:04

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
They did say that it would fix some of the bugs that users have been reporting, I recon that WiFi is going to be a Hardware rather than Firmware issue though.

There is/was a picture quality issue affecting some Tivo users and they came out and said it was a firmware rather than hardware issue that will be fixed in the next update.

They haven't said the same about some of the issues people have been having with WiFi and the Superhub they have just kept quiet about it all.

thelongmile 16-07-2011 19:09

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35274291)
They did say that it would fix some of the bugs that users have been reporting, I recon that WiFi is going to be a Hardware rather than Firmware issue though.

There is/was a picture quality issue affecting some Tivo users and they came out and said it was a firmware rather than hardware issue that will be fixed in the next update.

They haven't said the same about some of the issues people have been having with WiFi and the Superhub they have just kept quiet about it all.

Indeed. I understand making it a closed beta in case 'everyone' downloads it and bricks their modems, but to stop us seeing the discussions, bugs, and faults baffles me. It's not like it's a new product now!

Helix 16-07-2011 19:14

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thelongmile (Post 35274296)
Indeed. I understand making it a closed beta in case 'everyone' downloads it and bricks their modems, but to stop us seeing the discussions, bugs, and faults baffles me. It's not like it's a new product now!

I have access to the Beta forums and you are not missing anything. The issues that get posted are ignored so I think people have given up reporting them now. Its mainly made up of posts complaining about the delays to the beta test.

thelongmile 16-07-2011 19:26

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35274300)
I have access to the Beta forums and you are not missing anything. The issues that get posted are ignored so I think people have given up reporting them now. Its mainly made up of posts complaining about the delays to the beta test.

Oh, wonderful. I can't say I'm surprised, although I was rather hoping they had something like Bugtraq, or a list of what they've compiled for the release...

At least they are doing SOMETHING

Helix 16-07-2011 19:32

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thelongmile (Post 35274303)
Oh, wonderful. I can't say I'm surprised, although I was rather hoping they had something like Bugtraq, or a list of what they've compiled for the release...

At least they are doing SOMETHING

I would hope they have something like that internally, but access isn't provided to Beta testers. We just have a bog standard forum like the rest of the community site. There isn't even anyone from the firmware team that posts on there, everything goes through the forum manager.

thelongmile 16-07-2011 19:41

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35274304)
I would hope they have something like that internally, but access isn't provided to Beta testers. We just have a bog standard forum like the rest of the community site. There isn't even anyone from the firmware team that posts on there, everything goes through the forum manager.

Jesus.... Ok well... uh

KenK 16-07-2011 21:24

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35273929)
Maybe because the process clearly isn't working. Surely after this number of shoddy firmware updates and delays someone should realise something is up and be on Netgears back - send in some of their team to work alongside them and get the issues fixed once and for all.

The first of these may have happened, it might explain the delay - maybe Netgear are not releasing anything else until they think they've finally got it right.

But for the second - do VM have employees with enough detailed expertise (i.e. in writing firmware for modem-routers) to assist the suppliers' people? And is it a large-enough team to be able to spare a few for several weeks?

kwikbreaks 17-07-2011 09:39

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35274291)
I recon that WiFi is going to be a Hardware rather than Firmware issue though.

Certainly I think the poor range will be down to the hardware but the hangs and frequent refusals to accept new connections or work at all in 300Mbps mode when driven hard are all going to be firmware.

As the radio is a plug in PCI-e card (just like a laptop) upgrading the wireless should be reasonably straight forward but I strongly suspect it won't happen - if existing customers got wind of improved hardware they'd all be trying to wangle a replacement one way or another and the costs would be high. I think we're (ok - you're - I wangled a VMNG300) stuck with the hardware until the next CPE arrives. I'm amazed they have the cheek to supply the superhub for 100Mbps.

qasdfdsaq 17-07-2011 11:26

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
It'll be a while before the next CPE arrives, the Superhub is rated for up to 320mbps so they may be using it for the 200/300mbps services too. Won't be till 400mbps arrives that we'll definately be rid of the Superhub.

kwikbreaks 17-07-2011 11:38

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Check the various forums - it's already a disincentive for many to upgrade from 20Mbps to 30Mbps at a lower monthly charge for some. VM need to put in a lot of effort to recover their reputation after the Superhub saga.

dave.m 17-07-2011 19:21

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35274466)
Check the various forums - it's already a disincentive for many to upgrade from 20Mbps to 30Mbps at a lower monthly charge for some. VM need to put in a lot of effort to recover their reputation after the Superhub saga.

I am one of those statistics, have 20mb and would definately upgrade to 30mb if I knew I'd get a hassle free standalone cable modem or equivelant low power usage modem mode hub (I won't use anything other than my router with tomato as I'd miss too many features). I'd also save £1.50 a month moving to standard payment!

KenK 17-07-2011 20:44

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dave.m (Post 35274744)
I am one of those statistics, have 20mb and would definately upgrade to 30mb if I knew I'd get a hassle free standalone cable modem or equivelant low power usage modem mode hub (I won't use anything other than my router with tomato as I'd miss too many features). I'd also save £1.50 a month moving to standard payment!

I have 20mb as well, but I'd happily downgrade if I thought it'd reduce the bills. I'm certainly not interested in upgrading if it means having to find somewhere to put an oversized, over-lit hunk of plastic that provides no real benefit to me.

kenoliver 17-07-2011 21:14

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KenK (Post 35274777)
I have 20mb as well, but I'd happily downgrade if I thought it'd reduce the bills. I'm certainly not interested in upgrading if it means having to find somewhere to put an oversized, over-lit hunk of plastic that provides no real benefit to me.

Well I did upgrade :( and have spent the last month getting my network back to what it was

I have eventually turned the Hub into a "Modem" and have gone back to using my old Wireless device (Time Capsule)

But instead of a small neat VM modem that only use 2 watts to run, I have finished up with a replacement Hub that uses 12.7 to do the same job

And as you say in you post above it is an "oversized, over-lit hunk of plastic", that I have to hide away,

VM have always had my support and still do, I just hope they replace the HUB with a more accomplished device that will enhance the companies reputation

jb66 17-07-2011 21:29

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
What about the superhub alternative vendor? Not heard any news on that? Surely the new vendor will see the issues and sort it out

KenK 17-07-2011 22:10

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jb66 (Post 35274794)
What about the superhub alternative vendor? Not heard any news on that? Surely the new vendor will see the issues and sort it out

From what has been posted, the "super"hub from the new supplier will be the same spec and the same physical appearance. So it'll still be oversized and over-lit, and provide no real benefit to me, even if it doesn't suffer from the problems that VM and the first supplier are still struggling to sort out. And I wouldn't be able to request one anyway.

Stephen 18-07-2011 16:21

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
I'm sure I saw it mentioned on here in a post who the alternative vendor is.

I do know but am not going to say anything just yet.

Phil-ntl 18-07-2011 17:33

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35275044)
I'm sure I saw it mentioned on here in a post who the alternative vendor is.

I do know but am not going to say anything just yet.

Not noticed it mentioned on here but I may have missed it. I too have been told the new supplier by an internal vm source and tbh, if the info I have does turn out to be correct (the source is very in the know and normally very reliable), I'm not convinced that its going to be any more of a quality product than the existing one.

Not going to post it on here due to NDA.

Phil

Helix 18-07-2011 18:01

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Surely not Belkin? They are the only ones I can think of that would be worse than Netgear.

Mick Fisher 18-07-2011 18:53

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35275110)
Surely not Belkin? They are the only ones I can think of that would be worse than Netgear.

LMAO!! I suggested Belkin as the alternative supplier in one of the Superhub threads purely as a joke.

But seeing as how the superhub is also a joke maybe all the pieces of the puzzle are finally fitting together. :D

General Maximus 18-07-2011 19:57

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
i they wanted to make up for past mistakes and get consumer confidence back they would setup a contract with Linksys/Cisco

Helix 18-07-2011 20:01

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
You would think that Cisco would do some sort of deal for them, especially as they produce the Tivo boxes.

KenK 18-07-2011 20:25

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35275203)
You would think that Cisco would do some sort of deal for them, especially as they produce the Tivo boxes.

Why? Cisco are a commercial company, with their own reputation to protect. They may not want to be associated with a low-end piece of kit like the "super"hub, unless the price is right for them.

Helix 18-07-2011 20:34

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KenK (Post 35275212)
Why? Cisco are a commercial company, with their own reputation to protect. They may not want to be associated with a low-end piece of kit like the "super"hub, unless the price is right for them.

No I don't mean with the Superhub. With a hub which actually works.

KenK 18-07-2011 21:01

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35275223)
No I don't mean with the Superhub. With a hub which actually works.

If the posts about alternative supplier are to be believed: the alternative version will be exactly the same (low) spec, same interface, same (over-everything) appearance and "form-factor", same (poor) capability, the only difference will be the details on the label.

There is no new hub coming, just another version of what they have already. And the customers will not be able to decide on one or the other - they'll get what they are given, and be expected to like it.

If R28 finally makes the Netgear kit work, good -at least it might do what it claims to do. Not bad, it must now be six months since the alpha test version was shipped to thousands of unsuspecting customers (who paid for it!).

General Maximus 18-07-2011 21:27

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Virgin Media Super Hub
Discover unbeatable wireless with the Virgin Media Super Hub combined modem and router. Features include:

The best wireless broadband performance available
The latest wireless N technology
Future proofed for speeds of over 100Mb (thanks to DOCSIS3, if you’re interested!)
Improved coverage, with fewer 'black spots' in your network
Fantastic range, so you can work further away from your router
Great performance for home & small business networking
Super-fast file transfer between computers - ideal for sharing large files
The latest wireless encryption technology for extra security

Efficient power consumption



That is from the Virgin Media website. I hope you all appreciate how much Virgin have put themselves out to provide you with such fantastic hardware with the best wireless performance available (I am sure we could sue them for false advertising or something), they do afterall have your best interests at heart! I am sure they forgot to put "not" in front of all those bullet points :)

Skie 18-07-2011 21:39

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Lol, that entire list except the wireless security is like a reverse list of all the issues people are having.

Ignitionnet 18-07-2011 22:42

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil-ntl (Post 35275087)
Not noticed it mentioned on here but I may have missed it. I too have been told the new supplier by an internal vm source and tbh, if the info I have does turn out to be correct (the source is very in the know and normally very reliable), I'm not convinced that its going to be any more of a quality product than the existing one.

Not going to post it on here due to NDA.

Phil

I however am not under such an NDA - Huawei.

ccarmock 18-07-2011 22:54

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Ah so it could be a direct clone of the Netgear then :-)

AngryNugget 19-07-2011 01:05

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
I have been informed by VirginMedia that the new firmware will be available on the 29th.

Quote:

I confirm that there will be a firmware improvement to the Superhub on 29 July 2011 which will incorporate a bridge so that you may connect to a third party router.

Sirius 19-07-2011 05:36

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AngryNugget (Post 35275308)
I have been informed by VirginMedia that the new firmware will be available on the 29th.

We shall see :rolleyes:

kwikbreaks 19-07-2011 07:27

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Considering every release to testers so far has been on a Friday (presumably following a regular Friday morning meeting with Netgear) and the last we heard (on a Friday of course) was that there were still too many bugs for it to go out for testing I'm guessing that the 29th is just an estimate of when it will be made available to the testers - so not this Friday either.

Of course they could just not bother with the supposed beta testers as they rarely respond to any of the issues posted in the testing forum and just ignored the faults reported with R25 and shipped it anyway. In fact the shipped version wasn't even the one tested as a trivial bug with WiFi channel setting in the Janet & John section had been fixed.

The only thing professional about the process so far is that customers (victims?) are still being charged.

General Maximus 19-07-2011 07:36

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skie (Post 35275256)
Lol, that entire list except the wireless security is like a reverse list of all the issues people are having.

I know, I think we should let Anne Robinson rip them to bits on Watchdog

kenoliver 19-07-2011 08:25

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AngryNugget (Post 35275308)
I have been informed by VirginMedia that the new firmware will be available on the 29th.


Apart from "Bridge Mode" does anyone know whats in the update?

Many off us have found a workaround to put the Hub into "Bridge" anyway

I would imagine after the update all these user setting will disappear and hopefully the new "Bridge Mode" will be just a case of ticking a box

Or is my naivety showing again :erm:

imranm 19-07-2011 08:33

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
I still don't see why there is a lingering delay with the new fw release, surely if Netgear are resolving these issues alone why is the device not tested as per whatever methodology they're utilising before it's sent to VM. One thing is for sure no one is spending all day fixing the never ending list of bugs, over a six month period it'll be shocking to see the number of hours of "development" gone into the SH, a cost effective CPE!

Phil-ntl 19-07-2011 09:58

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AngryNugget (Post 35275308)
I have been informed by VirginMedia that the new firmware will be available on the 29th.

Care to place a wager on it? :p:

Quote:

The latest update from the firmware team is that during testing we've found three significant bugs in the modem mode functionality in the new firmware. We're currently working on fixing these bugs and producing an updated firmware version. We're continuing to test the firmware to make sure it's as robust as possible before we release it for testing.



So at the moment it's looking unlikely that we'll be able to start the beta test next week. As soon as I have more news on this I'll post an update.



Thanks
So its not even out to beta testers yet, the chances of a rollout by the 29th are slim to none imho

---------- Post added at 10:58 ---------- Previous post was at 10:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenoliver (Post 35275339)

I would imagine after the update all these user setting will disappear and hopefully the new "Bridge Mode" will be just a case of ticking a box

Or is my naivety showing again :erm:

"Modem Mode" is a simple case of ticking a box on a page in the gui.


Phil

dave.m 19-07-2011 10:47

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kenoliver (Post 35274789)
But instead of a small neat VM modem that only use 2 watts to run, I have finished up with a replacement Hub that uses 12.7 to do the same job

I would like to hope that modem only mode would reduce the power usage but unless they can switch off hardware i.e. the unused router, I don't see it happening. So we'll have an "always on" device that slowly eats more watts than necessary.

What does 12.7w on 24/7 for a year add up to ?

kwikbreaks 19-07-2011 11:24

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
A good rule of thumb is that 1w on 24x7 costs ~ £1 per year

kenoliver 19-07-2011 16:16

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dave.m (Post 35275398)
I would like to hope that modem only mode would reduce the power usage but unless they can switch off hardware i.e. the unused router, I don't see it happening. So we'll have an "always on" device that slowly eats more watts than necessary.

What does 12.7w on 24/7 for a year add up to ?

Well my old VM modem used 2.7 watts so I am using an extra 10 watts per hour to do the same job,

I work it out in my case as an extra £1.05 per month

an extra 10 watts per hour = 100 hours to use a unit at 14.5p

720 hours in a 30 day month divided by 100 = 7.2 units x 14.5 = 104.4p

so an extra £12.53 per year,

KenK 19-07-2011 20:22

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kenoliver (Post 35275541)
so an extra £12.53 per year,

Of course, you could switch it off when you're not using it. No, I don't either :D

But in these energy-conscious days, a 5-times (ish) increase in consumption to do the same job does seem a bit strange.

kenoliver 19-07-2011 20:38

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KenK (Post 35275714)
Of course, you could switch it off when you're not using it. No, I don't either :D

.

I know but would it start again? no way would I take that risk ;)

Think those flashing lights are the culprit as far as the extra power consumption goes,

Still they will look nice come christmas time, wont need the tree lights on so that should save me a bit :erm:

kwikbreaks 19-07-2011 21:16

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kenoliver (Post 35275541)
a unit at 14.5p

You need to seriously consider swapping your electricity supplier.

bigsinky 19-07-2011 22:21

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35275738)
You need to seriously consider swapping your electricity supplier.

it would be nice if some of us had a choice :(

kenoliver 20-07-2011 06:04

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35275738)
You need to seriously consider swapping your electricity supplier.

I Know (don't want to stray off topic) BUT :erm:

Just done the deal fixed till July 2013, its supposed to be 8% on top of current tariffs, My hope is that I get it back during the 2 years

Just come off a another fixed deal so had a 20% increase just for that and another 8% on top :shocked:

So my point regarding this, is that power consumption of the HUB is high as a modem replacement only

I had hopped I could reduce my power consumption by taking out my Time Capsule and old modem and just use the HUB instead

Maybe after the R28 firmware upgrade the next one could dim the HUBS lights, as this is were I believe the power go's

Don't get me going again on energy prices, :mad:

dave.m 20-07-2011 07:56

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kenoliver (Post 35275798)
Maybe after the R28 firmware upgrade the next one could dim the HUBS lights, as this is were I believe the power go's

The lights are most likely plain led's which take a miniscule amount of power. The real drain will come from the router/main cpu chip and wireless radio. Even if there were seperate chips for the router and modem, the user interface would most likely be controlled from the main cpu so switching that off would not likely be an option.

I'm sure we'll find out soon enough once R28 is released.

kwikbreaks 20-07-2011 08:30

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
I've not seen anybody post up the consumption in bridge mode but there is known to be a discrete WiFi board which could be powered down and although the main processor can't be turned off the switch circuitry presumably could be or at least run at reduced power (some switches have a "green" mode). I imagine the power required by the CPU should also drop with the reduced load.

I guess it all depends on how skilled the firmware coders are and how bothered they are about your leccy bill...

So - probably unchanged then :(

Compared to having to fork out for a router to do the job the supplied hub should be doing the extra power cost is pretty small beer.

kenoliver 20-07-2011 08:55

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35275840)

Compared to having to fork out for a router to do the job the supplied hub should be doing the extra power cost is pretty small beer.

I agree with you entirely, and had hopped I could just use the HUB and take out my own router

This would have reduced power consumption for me, (and helped the planet for everyone else) :erm:

But sadly it's not worked out like that :cool:

kwikbreaks 20-07-2011 08:58

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
> and helped the planet for everyone else

venturing there would certainly be way too far [img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

kenoliver 20-07-2011 09:04

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35275855)
> and helped the planet for everyone else

venturing there would certainly be way too far http://www.kwikbreaks.webspace.virgi...s/offtopic.gif

Only trying to be humorous didn't mean to offend

kwikbreaks 20-07-2011 09:21

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
You didn't offend.....

cook1984 20-07-2011 17:30

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Come on VM, some of us are waiting. I want to upgrade to 30 meg because the current 10 meg is pathetic. The STM limits are so low I can't even watch a single 1 hour HD TV show at peek times without being clobbered. I just need the Superhub to support bridge mode so I can use my own router.

Either that for just give me a proper modem...

kenoliver 20-07-2011 17:46

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cook1984 (Post 35276045)
Come on VM, some of us are waiting. I want to upgrade to 30 meg because the current 10 meg is pathetic. The STM limits are so low I can't even watch a single 1 hour HD TV show at peek times without being clobbered. I just need the Superhub to support bridge mode so I can use my own router.

Either that for just give me a proper modem...

You can configure the Hub to pass the broadband through to your own device

This Guide is for a Time Capsule but will work with most configurations

It took me 10 minutes to set up my Time Capsule, and now the Hub just acts as a "modem" with the TC doing all the rest

cook1984 21-07-2011 18:24

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Unfortunately using the DMZ is not quite the same as proper bridge mode, but thanks anyway.

kenoliver 21-07-2011 18:33

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cook1984 (Post 35276497)
Unfortunately using the DMZ is not quite the same as proper bridge mode, but thanks anyway.

Ok, no problem,

I was trying to give you an alternative until "proper bridge mode" is available

It works well for me thought it may have helped you :cool:

Phil-ntl 22-07-2011 16:36

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
And so it continues........

Quote:

The latest update from our firmware team is that the new firmware needs more testing before we can give it to our beta testers. In the last few days we've found another serious bug with Modem Mode which prevents us releasing the current version we're testing until this problem has been understood and fixed.

We understand your frustration and impatience about this but we can't compromise on the quality of the firmware. We are still close to a release but we can't do that until we're sure that it's ready.

I'll update you on our progress with testing next week and as soon as I have any news I'll post it here.

Thanks

Phil

Helix 22-07-2011 16:44

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Its strange because no one seemed to report any issues with the modified R26 with bridge mode. So they have some how managed to muck up implementing a UI, surely a fairly basic change.

BenMcr 22-07-2011 16:59

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35276871)
Its strange because no one seemed to report any issues with the modified R26 with bridge mode.

Just because it wasn't picked up in testing, doesn't mean it isn't there - what has happened for some customers with the SuperHub since launch proves that.

It looks like Virgin have learnt from that, and whatever they are doing with the firmware this time around is picking up issues before a wider rollout would have done.

KenK 22-07-2011 20:07

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35276883)
Just because it wasn't picked up in testing, doesn't mean it isn't there - what has happened for some customers with the SuperHub since launch proves that.

It looks like Virgin have learnt from that, and whatever they are doing with the firmware this time around is picking up issues before a wider rollout would have done.

If only they'd applied the same principle before the initial escape of the device, none of this negative feedback would have happened.

Helix 22-07-2011 20:15

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
I wonder what they would do if it turned out to be something that couldn't be fixed with a Firmware update and it was hardware related.

KenK 22-07-2011 20:57

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35277000)
I wonder what they would do if it turned out to be something that couldn't be fixed with a Firmware update and it was hardware related.

Some of it is hardware - the size, the lights, the power consumption...

qasdfdsaq 22-07-2011 23:47

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35275198)
i they wanted to make up for past mistakes and get consumer confidence back they would setup a contract with Linksys/Cisco

Pfft. I've seen numerous problems with Linksys and Cisco products spanning the range from cheapo consumer routers to enterprise routers costing 10K+ a pop. They're no more immune to their fair share of problems than any other company.

---------- Post added at 00:43 ---------- Previous post was at 00:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35275286)
I however am not under such an NDA - Huawei.

Hmm. I've got a distant relative who's pretty high up there. This could get... interesting.

---------- Post added at 00:44 ---------- Previous post was at 00:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by dave.m (Post 35275818)
The lights are most likely plain led's which take a miniscule amount of power. The real drain will come from the router/main cpu chip and wireless radio. Even if there were seperate chips for the router and modem, the user interface would most likely be controlled from the main cpu so switching that off would not likely be an option.

I'm sure we'll find out soon enough once R28 is released.

As I mentioned earlier, it's an integrated SoC so the modem and CPU are integrated in one chip. "Routers" are just a piece of software running on the CPU.

---------- Post added at 00:46 ---------- Previous post was at 00:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35275840)
I've not seen anybody post up the consumption in bridge mode but there is known to be a discrete WiFi board which could be powered down and although the main processor can't be turned off the switch circuitry presumably could be or at least run at reduced power (some switches have a "green" mode). I imagine the power required by the CPU should also drop with the reduced load.

I guess it all depends on how skilled the firmware coders are and how bothered they are about your leccy bill...

So - probably unchanged then :(

Compared to having to fork out for a router to do the job the supplied hub should be doing the extra power cost is pretty small beer.

Heh. I wouldn't hold my breath. Yeah there's a seperate switch chip, though even gigabit switches shouldn't take more than a couple watts when idle. Wireless chips like the one in the SH only take ~0.5-2w as well, so there's not a huge amount of scope for saving.

---------- Post added at 00:47 ---------- Previous post was at 00:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35276883)
Just because it wasn't picked up in testing, doesn't mean it isn't there - what has happened for some customers with the SuperHub since launch proves that.

It looks like Virgin have learnt from that, and whatever they are doing with the firmware this time around is picking up issues before a wider rollout would have done.

Interesting. Issues that testers have been complaining about for months get ignored, but when there's an issue testers aren't even aware of it's suddenly classed as a show-stopper. Lol.

dave.m 23-07-2011 08:24

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35277105)
Heh. I wouldn't hold my breath. Yeah there's a seperate switch chip, though even gigabit switches shouldn't take more than a couple watts when idle. Wireless chips like the one in the SH only take ~0.5-2w as well, so there's not a huge amount of scope for saving.

So potentially a 4w saving which would drop the device to 8.7w.

That could be a 31% drop in power usuage which is actuall very good imo. It should also produce less heat too with those chips off.

qasdfdsaq 24-07-2011 01:39

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Yeah but down to 8.7w is still higher than what my dual-radio gigabit router uses at full load with everything on, and still several times higher than a standalone modem, which is what it'd be doing in that state.

Phil-ntl 27-07-2011 12:54

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
2 Attachment(s)
Looks like R28 has been binned...........

Attachment 22490 Attachment 22491


Phil

Helix 27-07-2011 13:02

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Does this mean we are in for even more of a delay? or does it look like R29 is in a good enough state that they may release it to beta testers soon.

kenoliver 27-07-2011 13:02

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil-ntl (Post 35279100)
Looks like R28 has been binned...........

Attachment 22490 Attachment 22491


Phil

Hi Phil are those screen shots from your live modem or from beta testing

Phil-ntl 27-07-2011 13:09

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kenoliver (Post 35279104)
Hi Phil are those screen shots from your live modem or from beta testing

Beta but waiting on confirmation now as to wether its going to remain beta or being pushed out to all users.

Phil

---------- Post added at 14:09 ---------- Previous post was at 14:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35279103)
Does this mean we are in for even more of a delay? or does it look like R29 is in a good enough state that they may release it to beta testers soon.

Waiting on confirmation but it seems stable enough up to now. just put it through some heavy duty transfers etc and no probs here.


UPDATE: CONFIRMED AS BETA TRIAL


Phil

kenoliver 27-07-2011 13:12

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil-ntl (Post 35279105)
Beta but waiting on confirmation now as to wether its going to remain beta or being pushed out to all users.
Phil

Thanks Phil
Lets hope its stable enough for general release, appreciate the info

Helix 27-07-2011 13:13

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil-ntl (Post 35279105)
Beta but waiting on confirmation now as to wether its going to remain beta or being pushed out to all users.

Phil

---------- Post added at 14:09 ---------- Previous post was at 14:05 ----------



Waiting on confirmation but it seems stable enough up to now. just put it through some heavy duty transfers etc and no probs here.


Phil

When you say all users, do you mean the beta testing group on the forums or are they going to skip them and go live to everyone at the same time. I hope its not the latter.

Phil-ntl 27-07-2011 13:15

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35279112)
When you say all users, do you mean the beta testing group on the forums or are they going to skip them and go live to everyone at the same time. I hope its not the latter.

Just updated my post above.

Its a beta trial and not going live yet. Limited testers only for now.

Quote:

a small initial group of testers, so we can do a final check before we open the full beta
Quote:

We'll be evaluating your feedback early next week alongside our ongoing lab tests before we make a decision on whether to start the full beta test.

Phil

Helix 27-07-2011 15:05

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Message been posted on the forums now, not quite sure why they are closing the existing beta forums.

Quote:

I'm pleased to announce that we've just pushed the R29 beta firmware out to a limited group of testers for a final check before we start moving towards a full beta. We'll be evaluating their feedback early next week alongside our ongoing lab tests before we make a decision on the beta test. Once we've made that decision I'll announce it here on the forum early next week.

Meanwhile I'm locking this forum while we prepare for the R29 beta test, if we're given the all clear next week all our beta testers will be invited to the new forum as they're upgraded. This forum will remain open but locked until everyone is moved across to the new forum.

Thanks for your patience

Phil-ntl 27-07-2011 15:18

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35279153)
Message been posted on the forums now, not quite sure why they are closing the existing beta forums.

I would guess its a case of fresh firmware-fresh page as hopefully a lot of things relating to previous releases shouldn't be relevent now.

unlikely to be anything more sinister.



Phil

kwikbreaks 27-07-2011 15:44

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Possibly some of the original group of testers have died of old age waiting for the new release? Certainly at least one has deserted to BT Infinity and another (me) gave up on the hub and wangled a modem instead. It looks like the new beta forum will exclude the dropouts.

Phil-ntl 27-07-2011 16:30

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35279173)
Possibly some of the original group of testers have died of old age waiting for the new release? Certainly at least one has deserted to BT Infinity and another (me) gave up on the hub and wangled a modem instead. It looks like the new beta forum will exclude the dropouts.

I guess that would make sense as any new firmware is no longer relevent to them.

Must admit though, up to now R29 seems stable and has cured the showstopper of large file transfers across my network locking it up for me and also cured the minor niggles I had with R27T2.

Just the rest of the wishlist now.......... lol


Phil

kwikbreaks 27-07-2011 17:29

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
> cured the showstopper of large file transfers across my network locking it up

Was that ethernet or via wifi and if wifi what mode?

I only had problems with large file transfers using 300Mbps WiFi. If yours was something else it seems that incompatibilities could be to blame and that could well prove to be a real problem to fix.

Once it's all done and dusted I may try my old superhub to see if it was de-registered or not. I'm not that fussed using my own router but I do want something that works.

Phil-ntl 27-07-2011 17:38

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35279242)
> Was that ethernet or via wifi and if wifi what mode?

300mbs killed it dead and transferring anything in 145mb mode made my connection un usable while the transfer was in progress.

I can hoof things round @ 300 now with no lockups or freezes and still access the internet quite happily on other machines.



Phil

kwikbreaks 27-07-2011 18:13

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
OK pretty similar to mine. I didn't try anything else while my 145Mbps mode backup test was running - I'd started it off late and as it was slow just left it running and went to bed.

Phil-ntl 27-07-2011 19:39

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Just to add a little more:

Seeing wireless signal levels increased by almost 12db. thats an increase of nearly 20% over R27T2. Yes i know it could just be a coincidence but hub is still in same place it always was and I'm sat where I always do.

Tested using inssider. hub on 300n 2.4ghz using channels 4+8.



Phil.

Rexz 27-07-2011 20:09

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Any improvement on the modem itself? Ping reduced? Jitter reduced?

Rexz

Phil-ntl 27-07-2011 20:13

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Ping still the same, steady 10ms to namesco london and never had any problem with jitter so cant comment there.


Phil

Psychotext 03-08-2011 13:30

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
I'd be quite happy if the new firmware improved the wireless connection. Mine is APPALLING, it might as well be off for how close I need to get to the damn thing before it'll work.

Neo-Tech 03-08-2011 15:43

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Just got R29 pushed to my Hub. Wireless performance is still the same, and the only change I see is a Modem mode page.

Sirius 03-08-2011 15:50

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neo-Tech (Post 35282662)
Just got R29 pushed to my Hub. Wireless performance is still the same, and the only change I see is a Modem mode page.

Was that as part of the beta

Helix 03-08-2011 15:54

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
At last, typical VM though didn't think to tell us in advance - just waited until we discovered it.

Sirius 03-08-2011 15:55

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Helix (Post 35282668)
At last, typical VM though didn't think to tell us in advance - just waited until we discovered it.

Is it part of the beta ?

jinxed 03-08-2011 15:55

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Had it pushed to my hub to, but i did apply to be part of the beta test.

HD Boy 03-08-2011 15:56

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
i also just got R29 pushed to my Hub. yes that as part of the beta

Helix 03-08-2011 16:04

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 35282669)
Is it part of the beta ?

I am a Beta tester, not sure if they have rolled it out wider. They haven't updated the message in the now closed Beta forum. We were meant to be moved to a new forum as R29 was rolled out.

AndyCalling 03-08-2011 16:22

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Can I ask, when you enable modem mode does it resync the modem connection? I ask because mine is very stable for most things but can take an hour or more to resync and the Superhub always reboots when I try to control my Dad's computer through Remote Assistance. I shall be wanting to drop to modem mode to do RA and then back to router mode when finished. There is no reason why the modem should reboot if we're just switching the router on and off but I thought I'd just check.

Can you confirm for me?

theoldbill 03-08-2011 16:25

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Yes it forces a restart and you get a fresh public IP.

kwikbreaks 03-08-2011 17:19

Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyCalling (Post 35282679)
There is no reason why the modem should reboot if we're just switching the router on and off

It has to at least get a new DHCP lease because the MAC the modem section sees has changed from the internal router to that of the PC in port 1. It may or may not resync.


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:00.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum