Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Online Safety Bill Etc (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711643)

RichardCoulter 02-04-2025 19:52

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36193745)
You seem to think that they did it in order to teach a lesson. That is, without doubt, disproportionate and a misuse of the power of detention. Make up your mind.

No, I suggested that this may be the case. I don't know for sure either way.

---------- Post added at 19:52 ---------- Previous post was at 19:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36193748)
Do you even realise how incrediby daft that definition is ?
By that standard anyone can simply say anything anyone else says is "malicious or offensive".

Not to mention in this case the comments were in a PRIVATE conversation between unrelated people.

I've already addressed these points further up thread.

Chris 02-04-2025 20:52

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36193756)
No, I suggested that this may be the case. I don't know for sure either way..

Which brings us, full circle, to the somewhat troubling way you clapped like a performing seal when you posted the news item yesterday. Uncritical approval of police action whose motivations you do not know, and aspects of which you admit may not look great, is not a good look on you.

Pierre 02-04-2025 21:45

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36193742)

No, if it was clearly nothing offensive like 'Do you like apple pie', you would be given short thrift if you complained.

No, sorry I consider “do you like apple pie” as a pseudo racial slur, like “cotton picker” and I’m going to complain about you and have you arrested and detained for 8hrs.

Quote:

If someone inadvertently offended someone, for example by using a dated term for a black person, and they genuinely didn't mean to be offensive, they would be only too pleased to negate the offense caused by withdrawing and apologising for the remark. If they refuse to do so, this would call into question whether if was accidental and if it was deliberately said in order to cause upset. The incident would then be viewed in an entirely different light.
By your standard, accidental or not, they would be arrested and detained for 8hrs whilst investigated before any option was given to apologise, indeed they would not even be advised about what it was they said was supposedly offensive.

You are clueless about what you are advocating…..clueless.

Perhaps it is down to whatever cognitive disability you claim to have, in that case I would reevaluate your statements on the matter as your often cited cognitive disability is potentially affecting your reasoning on the subject matter.

papa smurf 03-04-2025 08:36

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36193763)
No, sorry I consider “do you like apple pie” as a pseudo racial slur, like “cotton picker” and I’m going to complain about you and have you arrested and detained for 8hrs.



By your standard, accidental or not, they would be arrested and detained for 8hrs whilst investigated before any option was given to apologise, indeed they would not even be advised about what it was they said was supposedly offensive.

You are clueless about what you are advocating…..clueless.

Perhaps it is down to whatever cognitive disability you claim to have, in that case I would reevaluate your statements on the matter as your often cited cognitive disability is potentially affecting your reasoning on the subject matter.



do you get a certificate for that?

RichardCoulter 03-04-2025 22:25

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36193761)
Which brings us, full circle, to the somewhat troubling way you clapped like a performing seal when you posted the news item yesterday. Uncritical approval of police action whose motivations you do not know, and aspects of which you admit may not look great, is not a good look on you.

We are more like going round & round in circles, with you making rude comments. I'm surprised at this as you have previously said that people should be more polite on here.

Again, I said that the police seemed to be going overboard.

Neither you nor I know the reasons why the police behaved as they did, they may or may not have been justified. Any investigation should hopefully find this out.

---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36193763)
No, sorry I consider “do you like apple pie” as a pseudo racial slur, like “cotton picker” and I’m going to complain about you and have you arrested and detained for 8hrs.



By your standard, accidental or not, they would be arrested and detained for 8hrs whilst investigated before any option was given to apologise, indeed they would not even be advised about what it was they said was supposedly offensive.

You are clueless about what you are advocating…..clueless.

Perhaps it is down to whatever cognitive disability you claim to have, in that case I would reevaluate your statements on the matter as your often cited cognitive disability is potentially affecting your reasoning on the subject matter.

Feel free to go through the official channels and make a complaint & let me know how you get on. Of course, you won't, because, as opposed to playing devil's advocate, you just like to troll various threads with silly comments/arguments.

---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36193789)
do you get a certificate for that?

I don't understand what you mean. What kind of certificate are you referring to? For disabilities??

papa smurf 04-04-2025 07:27

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36193865)
We are more like going round & round in circles, with you making rude comments. I'm surprised at this as you have previously said that people should be more polite on here.

Again, I said that the police seemed to be going overboard.

Neither you nor I know the reasons why the police behaved as they did, they may or may not have been justified. Any investigation should hopefully find this out.

---------- Post added at 22:24 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------



Feel free to go through the official channels and make a complaint & let me know how you get on. Of course, you won't, because, as opposed to playing devil's advocate, you just like to troll various threads with silly comments/arguments.

---------- Post added at 22:25 ---------- Previous post was at 22:24 ----------



I don't understand what you mean. What kind of certificate are you referring to? For disabilities??

i was simply asking if a person claims to have cognitive disabilities do they get a certificate of proof of the alleged condition.

peanut 04-04-2025 08:46

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36193881)
i was simply asking if a person claims to have cognitive disabilities do they get a certificate of proof of the alleged condition.

Strange question. But I would have thought his posts, obsessional tendencies along with complete lack of understandings of other opinions other than his own would be proof enough. :shrug:

papa smurf 04-04-2025 08:50

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36193883)
Strange question. But I would have thought his posts, obsessional tendencies along with complete lack of understandings of other opinions other than his own would be proof enough. :shrug:

i don't know who you are referring too i assume it's a theoretical person

Pierre 04-04-2025 09:52

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36193865)
you just like to troll various threads with silly comments/arguments.

I can only assume you were looking in the mirror as you typed that out.

RichardCoulter 04-04-2025 11:00

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36193888)
I can only assume you were looking in the mirror as you typed that out.

Examples?

---------- Post added at 11:00 ---------- Previous post was at 10:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36193881)
i was simply asking if a person claims to have cognitive disabilities do they get a certificate of proof of the alleged condition.

I see. The only certificate that i'm aware of is one to claim Council Tax exemption.

Russ 04-04-2025 11:12

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36193881)
i was simply asking if a person claims to have cognitive disabilities do they get a certificate of proof of the alleged condition.

There’s no certificate, as with pretty much any diagnosis just a letter from the GP confirming whatever condition but you need to request it and in some cases GPs charge for it, usually about £10 but this isn’t common.

RichardCoulter 04-04-2025 11:16

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Just seen a post on facebook where a group of paedophile hunters are complaining that Welsh police have again been to see one of their team regarding posts he made on the platform.

These people seem to think that laws don't apply when talking about (alleged) paedophiles. Just because someone dislikes the possibility of someone belonging to a certain group (maybe with good reason) doesn't exempt them from the law of the land.

---------- Post added at 11:16 ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36193899)
There’s no certificate, as with pretty much any diagnosis just a letter from the GP confirming whatever condition but you need to request it and in some cases GPs charge for it, usually about £10 but this isn’t common.

Yes, that's been my experience too, (though they've never charged me).

Russ 04-04-2025 11:19

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36193900)
Just seen a post on facebook where a group of paedophile hunters are complaining that Welsh police have again been to see one of their team regarding posts he made on the platform.

These people seem to think that laws don't apply when talking about (alleged) paedophiles. Just because someone dislikes the possibility of someone belonging to a certain group (maybe with good reason) doesn't exempt them from the law of the land.

---------- Post added at 11:16 ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 ----------



Yes, that's been my experience too, (though they've never charged me).

Without knowing what/who you’re talking about it’s hard to comment on whatever the hell you’re talking about but the only times the police have ever been in touch with us (and any groups we associate with) has been when comments have been posted that could either incite retaliation crimes or jeopardise the case.

Either way any decent hunter team ought to have an admin who monitors the chat in live stings etc and removes such posts asap.

papa smurf 04-04-2025 17:34

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36193904)
Without knowing what/who you’re talking about it’s hard to comment on whatever the hell you’re talking about but the only times the police have ever been in touch with us (and any groups we associate with) has been when comments have been posted that could either incite retaliation crimes or jeopardise the case.

Either way any decent hunter team ought to have an admin who monitors the chat in live stings etc and removes such posts asap.

a bit like Alfred in the Bat cave monitoring the bat computer assisting you boy wonders to clean up Gotham city, jiminy jillikers, do you get a cape mask and utility belt.

Russ 04-04-2025 17:52

Re: Online Safety Bill
 
No but we do get a free keyring and a pen.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum