![]() |
Re: TV price rises
Thanks Ben, that sounds like an excuse to raise the price! I best give them a ring.
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
They increased Sky Sports package by £3.25 in August. I didn't expect more price rises to be on the way so soon :rolleyes: It's still just about okay at the moment but if it carries with this kind of frequency I may have to kiss the premium package goodbybe - or maybe only have it 6 months out of 12.
My TV package is M+ I don't get all the 24 HD channels do I? |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:52 ---------- Previous post was at 19:49 ---------- Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:53 ---------- Previous post was at 19:52 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Steady on Carl you've only been on for the last ten minutes and you've rolled your eyes 6 times :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::D
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
I feared price rises happening and things may get worse.
I have already made these points elsewhere, but feel that they are relevant to this thread too. The Communication Workers Union (CWU) are trying to sue VM to obtain a significant amount of extra money for some former VM staff who were made redundant. All staff have received their redundancy payments and, following help from VM, all staff who wanted alternative employment secured new positions relatively quickly. My point to them was that, if the CWU win the case, there simply isn't a pot of spare money for these extra payments. Virgin Media is heavily in debt and services would be affected and/or prices would increase with subscribers seeing nothing for it. This would see disgruntled customers leave VM and the downward spiral would continue, leading to even more staff losing their jobs. When somebody from the CWU was asked how he felt about the effect that this could have on customers and former colleagues, he openly stated that he did not care. Maybe VM are using these price increases to build up a slush fund in case they lose the case? Maybe that's why no new decent channels have been forthcoming? One thing that is for sure, is that any victory by the CWU will not be paid for by VM, but it's customers and/or remaining staff. ---------- Post added at 20:34 ---------- Previous post was at 20:32 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
That is nothing but pure speculation. VM have to declare business risks in their quarterly reports and I don't remember seeing anything about that at all in the last one.
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
VM's price rise was earlier this year. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum