Cable Forum
Page 68 of 121 « First 185864656667 68 6970717278118 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=48795)

budwieser 13-06-2006 18:20
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Any idea when we might get `Done` in Cambridge? :erm: :D

popper 13-06-2006 18:22
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdjkeelan
Wythenshawe - Manchester - Using Samsung STB

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:34:20 GMT
1st 128K took 266 ms = 492752 Bytes/sec = approx 4100 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 265 ms = 494611 Bytes/sec = approx 4115 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 266 ms = 492752 Bytes/sec = approx 4100 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 266 ms = 492752 Bytes/sec = approx 4100 kbits/sec
ntl250 modem in wythenshawe not done yet, strange that, as i thought all wythenshawe went through the same place, arr well perhaps thursday.......

---
not that it would make any difference baz, but
http://www.ipchicken.com/
Name Address: bagu-cache-5.server.ntli.net

cookie_365 13-06-2006 18:33
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Brighton's got it. Oh, and we've got the speed upgrade too, after a reboot ;)

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:32:03 GMT

1st 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1093 ms = 468.4 KB/sec, approx 3860 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
4th 512K took 1079 ms = 474.5 KB/sec, approx 3910 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 3871 Kbps, 3.78 Mbps

Gregsy 13-06-2006 18:38
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
and Winchester

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:38:09 UTC
1st 128K took 250 ms = 524288 Bytes/sec = approx 4362 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 265 ms = 494611 Bytes/sec = approx 4115 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 281 ms = 466448 Bytes/sec = approx 3881 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 297 ms = 441320 Bytes/sec = approx 3672 kbits/sec

stu8975 13-06-2006 18:42
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
im upgraded to in sunderland..oooo its nice

trigg67 13-06-2006 18:51
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
where abouts in sunderland stu??? im in washington and still on 2 here through stb..

bliss 13-06-2006 19:00
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baz.
Which proxy do you use this will tell you

http://www.ipchicken.com/

I'am under
Name Address: bagu-cache-5.server.ntli.net

But i'am still on 2mb
I'm on bagu-cache-5.server.ntli.net too. Still 2mbit :(

Adcuz 13-06-2006 19:22
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Im on a cosham cache, anyone in this area should be upgraded as i am.

astra_lestat 13-06-2006 19:40
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Bedford, ntl home 120

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:39:25 UTC

1st 512K took 2172 ms = 235.7 KB/sec, approx 1942 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
2nd 512K took 2157 ms = 237.4 KB/sec, approx 1956 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
3rd 512K took 2171 ms = 235.8 KB/sec, approx 1943 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
4th 512K took 2157 ms = 237.4 KB/sec, approx 1956 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 1949 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps

mills04 13-06-2006 20:32
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Grrr, I still haven't got it and I'm about 15miles west of Brighton so I thought that when Brighton got it, I would as well. :(

Swipe 13-06-2006 20:33
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Just rebooted my Samsung STB here in Stoke on Trent:

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:30:34 GMT
1st 128K took 209 ms = 627139 Bytes/sec = approx 5218 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 230 ms = 569878 Bytes/sec = approx 4741 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 256 ms = 512000 Bytes/sec = approx 4260 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 305 ms = 429744 Bytes/sec = approx 3575 kbits/sec

grubbymitts 13-06-2006 20:44
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
turned my modem on and off to reboot the thing here in Newcastle under lyme (just up the road from Stoke) and still no 4mb. Oh well, hopefully soon.

Paradox26 13-06-2006 20:45
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adcuz
Im on a cosham cache, anyone in this area should be upgraded as i am.
You sure? I'm in PO5 on a home 200

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:43:59 GMT

1st 512K took 2187 ms = 234.1 KB/sec, approx 1929 Kbps, 1.88 Mbps
2nd 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
3rd 512K took 2172 ms = 235.7 KB/sec, approx 1942 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
4th 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps


Overall Average Speed = approx 1946 Kbps, 1.9 MbpsAnd that what I get, could you post yours please?

Adcuz 13-06-2006 20:53
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sahil
You sure? I'm in PO5 on a home 200

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:43:59 GMT

1st 512K took 2187 ms = 234.1 KB/sec, approx 1929 Kbps, 1.88 Mbps
2nd 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
3rd 512K took 2172 ms = 235.7 KB/sec, approx 1942 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
4th 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps


Overall Average Speed = approx 1946 Kbps, 1.9 MbpsAnd that what I get, could you post yours please?
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:54:29 GMT

1st 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1078 ms = 475 KB/sec, approx 3914 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps
4th 512K took 1078 ms = 475 KB/sec, approx 3914 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 3885 Kbps, 3.8 Mbps

harveyvan 13-06-2006 21:17
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozsat
I have an ntl250 - have powered off for one minute and still runs averaging 2m on speedtest.

So I take it nothing in Oxford yet.
Guess not, then. I turned mine off for just a few seconds before rebooting -- mine's a different box than yours, in case that matters. (Mine's old kit -- SB4100, which I've had for 5 1/2 years.)

I hope someone else in Oxford can confirm/not-confirm the upgrade for you.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04.
Page 68 of 121 « First 185864656667 68 6970717278118 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum