![]() |
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
It is a strange one though, why would Virgin seemingly go out of their way to disable 4 channels? It wouldn't be anything daft like having to re-jig the web interface to show all 8, would it? I'm not disagreeing here, I'm just saying that it's odd for them to do that. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
For those people, the superhub is about as future proof as you can get right now. That's not saying the SH2 wasn't a necessary or welcome replacement, but there'll be superhubs around for years yet which to me says it must be future proof to a degree. Quote:
Of course, you have to factor in "Virgin Logic". Quote:
---------- Post added at 10:47 ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 ---------- Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
My experience of the hh3 is that it looks nice, but its a bit of a pile of poo. One gigabit port and very slow wireless. Never used the hh4, however on paper its not the best as still only has 1 gigabit port. But there is a upcoming hh5 which will finally be all gigabit so on paper will have equal specs to the SH2. However even if the hardware is ok the features will likely be poor due to the locked down firmware. One thing good about homehub's is they at least get around the poor pppoe mtu limitation if jumbo frames is enabled. Although thats not relevant to this discussion. |
Re: superhub 2
Isn't the HH5 meant to be wireless-ac?
|
Re: superhub 2
Sorry off topic just wondered best settings for wireless in performance section of the asus rt n66u saw seph talking about it a bit bak so fort id ask thanks david
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Also BT's HH3 did have actually working congestion and interference avoiding algorithms, which even have the rudimentary ability to avoid non-802.11 interference. ---------- Post added at 15:43 ---------- Previous post was at 15:43 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:45 ---------- Previous post was at 15:43 ---------- Quote:
Frankly I find the HH3 looked a hell of a lot better than the Superhub 1: https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/36.jpg |
Re: superhub 2
Does anyone know when these are going to launch? or even if they have by now can't wait to get rid of my crappy non wireless SH1
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
|
Re: superhub 2
Might have to call up and see if I can get one, thought the tech that came around and upgraded my services a couple of weeks ago might of said something as we was talking about how crap the hubs are at wireless.
|
Re: superhub 2
I called retentions just now, but as I have an engineer coming out on Saturday to resolve an intermittent fault they won't be posting me one, but as a tech was advised replace SH if need be, they updated the ticket to advise to replace with a SH 2 as well to save them posting it. So hope I get one :)
|
Re: superhub 2
ok ill rephrase the hh5 will at least match the shub2 on paper, possibly surpassing if ac is in the final product.
on paper doesnt mean everything tho, as the shub2 has modem mode, its wireless apparently works pretty well, and its not as locked down as bt's firmware, eg. on the hh3 I couldnt even make myself pingable. |
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
|
Re: superhub 2
read Qasi's signature!
|
Re: superhub 2
I got a SH2 installed today to replace the SH1 i had due to ongoing issues. Seems to be fine but the hub has rebooted itself 3 times since being installed at 8am this morning. Is this a common fault with the SH2? My signal levels are fine and for all the nonsense that the SH1 was, it never rebooted itself.
|
Re: superhub 2
Quote:
Get yourself a proper router and stick the hub in modem mode. |
Re: superhub 2
Kushan: And that picture is of the small antennae!
Qas did a home trial? of various router/modems. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:17. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum