Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Superhub : Superhub 2 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33693243)

Kushan 07-08-2013 11:47

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606627)
Umm you've clearly not been paying attention to this thread, the last two or three pages have been confirming the Ambit 300 does 8 downstreams. VM are just too cheap to enable it.

I have been paying attention and as far as I can see, a few people have weighed in with different opinions but nobody's actually got anything concrete either way.

It is a strange one though, why would Virgin seemingly go out of their way to disable 4 channels? It wouldn't be anything daft like having to re-jig the web interface to show all 8, would it? I'm not disagreeing here, I'm just saying that it's odd for them to do that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606627)
The primary purpose of the Superhub at time of release, and what it was designed for, was not as a modem, it was as a combined wireless router. For the record I've managed to get over 230Mbps over wireless on my test Superhubs, but under standard 2.4Ghz operation I'd expect it to top out about 100.

I can't disagree with this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606627)
It's no more able than the VMNG300 either.

See the main issue I have with this argument is that really you need to say it's no more able than the VMNG300 potentially is because right now it can only do 4 DS channels, no matter what it actually is capable of. I could also say that the Superhub is potentially able to be a decent piece of equipment if you replace the wireless chip inside it but that would just be silly. As it stands today, side by side, the Superhub is more capable than the Ambit 300 - not as a router, but as a modem. Actually technically it's more capable as a router as well, albeit a poor one. It's not completely broken, just really terrible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606627)
But again, the majority of people don't have the SH1 in modem mode, and nor was it intended to be used that way by most people. And again, in just modem mode, it's no better a modem than the VMNG300 (on paper). Admittedly practice is different, there are certain performance characteristics which are improved, of the sort you don't see on the spec sheet.

Yeah, I agree with this as well. It's funny, because I remember when the SHUB first appeared and I had people on the phone literally screaming at me to get one because they were stick of having to deal with 2 separate boxes. I was more than happy to send them one, it was what they deserved.


Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606627)
No it doesn't. Because 8 DS verses 8 DS is exactly the same.

I think we can probably put a lid on this one for now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606627)
See above, when it gets installed by VM it's not "just a modem". It's set up as a wireless router; only certain more knowledgeable customers use it in modem mode. The average joe does not. But even as a modem it's capabilities on paper are identical to the VMNG300 before it and the SH2 after it. If the SH1 is "future proof" as a modem, so is the VMNG300 (which defeats the point of its existence as a "future proof" replacement for the VMNG300...)

As much as we all hate the superhub and lament it's wireless (in)capabilities, the awkward truth is that there are quite a lot of people out there who are happy enough with it. Anecdotally, out of all my friends using it, it's probably about a 50/50 split of people who have issues and people who are happy enough. That includes technical people as well who aren't even bothered to put it into modem mode. I've had quite a few conversations whereby I've spotted the superhub in a corner somewhere and gone "Oh...you have a superhub..." and they go "Yeah, I've never had any problems with it". I don't believe them, but they're happy one way or another.
For those people, the superhub is about as future proof as you can get right now. That's not saying the SH2 wasn't a necessary or welcome replacement, but there'll be superhubs around for years yet which to me says it must be future proof to a degree.


Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606627)
It wasn't - the triallists have specifically addressed this question before - special dedicated modems were used, modems that haven't been seen or heard from on VM's network since.

See, this brings em back to my original point - why would they use a completely different modem if their existing one was capable of it? Why not put a stock firmware on an ambit 300 if it's capable of the 8 channels? Surely it's more expensive to use a separate modem entirely?

Of course, you have to factor in "Virgin Logic".

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606627)
Well, yes, but then it used to be that 100Mbit over 3 channels was viable, until congestion got out of hand, but now it's improving again it's not entirely impractical. Ignition was of the impression 400Mbit service over 8 channels could actually be practical with correct network management.

Well I guess that rules Virgin out :D

---------- Post added at 10:47 ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35606691)
How good is the SH2? Most useful router functions are slugged out (just as well) and it's nothing but a get you going device as a router. VM could be bold and promote it on versatility providing a modem mode for those requiring advanced features (!) offered by third party routers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 35606696)
I believe it's very good in regards to performance. Obviously if you want some of the additional router features it doesn't offer at present, then that would sway your decision.

How good is BT's hub? As far as I'm aware, it's even more locked down and featureless than the SH2 is.

Chrysalis 07-08-2013 13:10

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by raging bull (Post 35606677)
Just getting fed up with the adverts proclaiming the BT hub is the best.
Can't Virgin retaliate with some decent advert on the SH2?

Not seen such ad's but yes BT are been silly as well.

My experience of the hh3 is that it looks nice, but its a bit of a pile of poo. One gigabit port and very slow wireless.

Never used the hh4, however on paper its not the best as still only has 1 gigabit port.

But there is a upcoming hh5 which will finally be all gigabit so on paper will have equal specs to the SH2. However even if the hardware is ok the features will likely be poor due to the locked down firmware.

One thing good about homehub's is they at least get around the poor pppoe mtu limitation if jumbo frames is enabled. Although thats not relevant to this discussion.

Kushan 07-08-2013 13:21

Re: superhub 2
 
Isn't the HH5 meant to be wireless-ac?

heardd05 07-08-2013 16:29

Re: superhub 2
 
Sorry off topic just wondered best settings for wireless in performance section of the asus rt n66u saw seph talking about it a bit bak so fort id ask thanks david

qasdfdsaq 07-08-2013 16:45

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35606735)
Not seen such ad's but yes BT are been silly as well.

At least BT's Home Hub 3 was WiFi certification complaint from the outset, VM's Superhub took about a year and half dozen firmware updates before it stopped violating WiFi alliance requirements.

Also BT's HH3 did have actually working congestion and interference avoiding algorithms, which even have the rudimentary ability to avoid non-802.11 interference.

---------- Post added at 15:43 ---------- Previous post was at 15:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35606747)
Isn't the HH5 meant to be wireless-ac?

Indeed.

---------- Post added at 15:45 ---------- Previous post was at 15:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35606735)
But there is a upcoming hh5 which will finally be all gigabit so on paper will have equal specs to the SH2.

I take exception to the implication 802.11ac is equal to 802.11n

Frankly I find the HH3 looked a hell of a lot better than the Superhub 1:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/36.jpg

saabmania2 07-08-2013 17:36

Re: superhub 2
 
Does anyone know when these are going to launch? or even if they have by now can't wait to get rid of my crappy non wireless SH1

BenMcr 07-08-2013 17:55

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by saabmania2 (Post 35606894)
Does anyone know when these are going to launch? or even if they have by now can't wait to get rid of my crappy non wireless SH1

SuperHub 2 has been out for a couple of months now

saabmania2 07-08-2013 17:59

Re: superhub 2
 
Might have to call up and see if I can get one, thought the tech that came around and upgraded my services a couple of weeks ago might of said something as we was talking about how crap the hubs are at wireless.

StevenNT 07-08-2013 18:12

Re: superhub 2
 
I called retentions just now, but as I have an engineer coming out on Saturday to resolve an intermittent fault they won't be posting me one, but as a tech was advised replace SH if need be, they updated the ticket to advise to replace with a SH 2 as well to save them posting it. So hope I get one :)

Chrysalis 07-08-2013 18:22

Re: superhub 2
 
ok ill rephrase the hh5 will at least match the shub2 on paper, possibly surpassing if ac is in the final product.

on paper doesnt mean everything tho, as the shub2 has modem mode, its wireless apparently works pretty well, and its not as locked down as bt's firmware, eg. on the hh3 I couldnt even make myself pingable.

Kushan 07-08-2013 18:55

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35606863)
Frankly I find the HH3 looked a hell of a lot better than the Superhub 1:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/08/36.jpg

WTF is with those antennae!

Sephiroth 07-08-2013 18:56

Re: superhub 2
 
read Qasi's signature!

djstevie 07-08-2013 19:01

Re: superhub 2
 
I got a SH2 installed today to replace the SH1 i had due to ongoing issues. Seems to be fine but the hub has rebooted itself 3 times since being installed at 8am this morning. Is this a common fault with the SH2? My signal levels are fine and for all the nonsense that the SH1 was, it never rebooted itself.

Mick Fisher 07-08-2013 19:44

Re: superhub 2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by djstevie (Post 35606935)
I got a SH2 installed today to replace the SH1 i had due to ongoing issues. Seems to be fine but the hub has rebooted itself 3 times since being installed at 8am this morning. Is this a common fault with the SH2? My signal levels are fine and for all the nonsense that the SH1 was, it never rebooted itself.

That doesn't sound very promising :(

Get yourself a proper router and stick the hub in modem mode.

raging bull 07-08-2013 20:01

Re: superhub 2
 
Kushan: And that picture is of the small antennae!
Qas did a home trial? of various router/modems.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:17.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum