Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Brexit (Old) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33706539)

djfunkdup 21-01-2019 17:08

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richardcoulter (Post 35980202)
according to channel 5, a poll shows that 1.6 million people have ended their relationship with their partner because of differing views about brexit!


:LOL: :LOL:

Gavin78 21-01-2019 17:08

Re: Brexit
 
I'm sick to the back teeth with it all, I want to leave with no deal, We have a PM that is just dragging out something she wants and 48% of a losing side.

papa smurf 21-01-2019 17:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 35980194)
Nope, see here - https://www.finder.com/uk/brexit-pound

The last date on that chart was 2nd January so I have taken todays rates from Google

On 23rd June 2016, £1=$1.46. Now it's $1.29. 11.2% drop
On 23rd June 2016, £1=€1.28. Now it's €1.13. 11.7% drop

Thank you for supplying your source.

RichardCoulter 21-01-2019 17:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gavin78 (Post 35980206)
I'm sick to the back teeth with it all, I want to leave with no deal, We have a PM that is just dragging out something she wants and 48% of a losing side.

Well, she's currently speaking to Parliament and the main points announced at this moment in time are:

- The fee payable by EU citizens to stay in the UK is to be abolished.

- Workers rights will not be eroded.

- She will hold more talks with the DUP Re: The backstop.

- She will never reopen the Belfast agreement.

- She will be more flexible & inclusive.

mrmistoffelees 21-01-2019 17:28

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980208)
Well, she's currently speaking to Parliament and the main points announced at this moment in time are:

- The fee payable by EU citizens to stay in the UK is to be abolished.

- Workers rights will not be eroded.

- She will hold more talks with the DUP Re: The backstop.

- She will never reopen the Belfast agreement.

- She will be more flexible & inclusive.

She has said nothing new that's of significant importance whatsoever.

denphone 21-01-2019 17:31

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980208)
Well, she's currently speaking to Parliament and the main points announced at this moment in time are:

- The fee payable by EU citizens to stay in the UK is to be abolished.

- Workers rights will not be eroded.

- She will hold more talks with the DUP Re: The backstop.

- She will never reopen the Belfast agreement.

- She will be more flexible & inclusive.

Good as EU citizens that have contributed to the UK economy should have been exempted from any charge to start with.

Carth 21-01-2019 17:33

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980210)
She has said nothing new that's of significant importance whatsoever.

She doesn't need to, she just needs to keep talking for another 2 months :D

djfunkdup 21-01-2019 17:37

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980210)
She has said nothing new that's of significant importance whatsoever.



Nothing new to say that's why lol,We leave March 29th.

Just a matter of plodding along until then with all the bla bla bla bla and nice lunches and drinkies for the dudes doing the business side of things :)

---------- Post added at 16:37 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980212)
She doesn't need to, she just needs to keep talking for another 2 months :D


LOL :D:D

mrmistoffelees 21-01-2019 17:46

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980212)
She doesn't need to, she just needs to keep talking for another 2 months :D

Let's just try to have a brief moment of normality and clarity. No deal, quite simply, will not happen. She's playing poker against opponents who have shown themselves to be far more skilled and more determined than herself. She'll blink.

If she secures a deal, It will be a very soft brexit, in which case, whats the point ? Leavers won't be happy, remainers won't be happy

---------- Post added at 16:43 ---------- Previous post was at 16:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by djfunkdup (Post 35980213)
Nothing new to say that's why lol,We leave March 29th.

Just a matter of plodding along until then with all the bla bla bla bla and nice lunches and drinkies for the dudes doing the business side of things :)

---------- Post added at 16:37 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ----------




LOL :D:D


Ok, let's play your game... What do you think will happen to the conservative party if we left the EU on a no deal basis?

---------- Post added at 16:46 ---------- Previous post was at 16:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35980211)
Good as EU citizens that have contributed to the UK economy should have been exempted from any charge to start with.

Have they? I thought they just came over here took our jobs, caused increasing pressures onto the NHS. and were otherwise just generally up too nefarious activities.

djfunkdup 21-01-2019 17:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980216)
Let's just try to have a brief moment of normality and clarity. No deal, quite simply, will not happen. She's playing poker against opponents who have shown themselves to be far more skilled and more determined than herself. She'll blink.

If she secures a deal, It will be a very soft brexit, in which case, whats the point ? Leavers won't be happy, remainers won't be happy

---------- Post added at 16:43 ---------- Previous post was at 16:40 ----------




Ok, let's play your game... What do you think will happen to the conservative party if we left the EU on a no deal basis?



As long as the Jew hater is at the helm of Labour then the answer to your question is. 'Nothing' . He keeps Labour out the picture ,Simples.

RichardCoulter 21-01-2019 17:51

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980216)
Let's just try to have a brief moment of normality and clarity. No deal, quite simply, will not happen. She's playing poker against opponents who have shown themselves to be far more skilled and more determined than herself. She'll blink.

If she secures a deal, It will be a very soft brexit, in which case, whats the point ? Leavers won't be happy, remainers won't be happy

---------- Post added at 16:43 ---------- Previous post was at 16:40 ----------




Ok, let's play your game... What do you think will happen to the conservative party if we left the EU on a no deal basis?

---------- Post added at 16:46 ---------- Previous post was at 16:43 ----------



Have they? I thought they just came over here took our jobs, caused increasing pressures onto the NHS. and were otherwise just generally up too nefarious activities.

Some do (and also put pressure on housing, education etc), which is why the end of compulsory free movement is so important. There will be nothing to stop us accepting immigrants in the future if it can be demonstrated that this will be of some benefit to the UK.

djfunkdup 21-01-2019 17:54

Re: Brexit
 
If you believe in conspiracies it could be argued that JC is actually a Torie that's been planted there to make sure they never become a threat.He did go to a private school after all and never came from a working class background ;)

papa smurf 21-01-2019 17:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980216)
Let's just try to have a brief moment of normality and clarity. No deal, quite simply, will not happen. She's playing poker against opponents who have shown themselves to be far more skilled and more determined than herself. She'll blink.

If she secures a deal, It will be a very soft brexit, in which case, whats the point ? Leavers won't be happy, remainers won't be happy

---------- Post added at 16:43 ---------- Previous post was at 16:40 ----------




Ok, let's play your game... What do you think will happen to the conservative party if we left the EU on a no deal basis?

---------- Post added at 16:46 ---------- Previous post was at 16:43 ----------





Have they? I thought they just came over here took our jobs, caused increasing pressures onto the NHS. and were otherwise just generally up too nefarious activities.


A bit of sulking on Saturday and Sunday then back to feathering their own self interest on monday , sourbelly says she would resign we'll have to keep our fingers crossed on that.

mrmistoffelees 21-01-2019 18:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by djfunkdup (Post 35980219)
As long as the Jew hater is at the helm of Labour then the answer to your question is. 'Nothing' . He keeps Labour out the picture ,Simples.


Ok, let's play the scenario out further.

How long do you think Corbyn would remain as leader IF a no deal exit occurred?

Personally, I think he would be gone sharpish. Let's say Labour manage to bring David Milliband back in (or someone of his ilk)


The Tories would be out of power for the next > 20 years

All political parties primary concern is to be the governing party for as long as possible.

---------- Post added at 16:57 ---------- Previous post was at 16:55 ----------

Teresa May just confirms that even in the event of No Deal we would still have to legally pay monies to the EU.

Reese-Mogg probably now probably turned Crimson as his champagne is repeating on him

---------- Post added at 17:05 ---------- Previous post was at 16:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35980223)
A bit of sulking on Saturday and Sunday then back to feathering their own self interest on monday , sourbelly says she would resign we'll have to keep our fingers crossed on that.

Very short term viewpoint but probably not wrong ;)

---------- Post added at 17:35 ---------- Previous post was at 17:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980221)
Some do (and also put pressure on housing, education etc), which is why the end of compulsory free movement is so important. There will be nothing to stop us accepting immigrants in the future if it can be demonstrated that this will be of some benefit to the UK.


If you would like to provide the NET figures to show that overall that EEA EEA : OMS EEA : NMS migration is of negative fiscal value.


Also, if you can provide the NET figures for Native and Non-EEA

I'll wait...

RichardCoulter 21-01-2019 19:10

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980224)
Ok, let's play the scenario out further.

How long do you think Corbyn would remain as leader IF a no deal exit occurred?

Personally, I think he would be gone sharpish. Let's say Labour manage to bring David Milliband back in (or someone of his ilk)


The Tories would be out of power for the next > 20 years

All political parties primary concern is to be the governing party for as long as possible.

---------- Post added at 16:57 ---------- Previous post was at 16:55 ----------

Teresa May just confirms that even in the event of No Deal we would still have to legally pay monies to the EU.

Reese-Mogg probably now probably turned Crimson as his champagne is repeating on him

---------- Post added at 17:05 ---------- Previous post was at 16:57 ----------



Very short term viewpoint but probably not wrong ;)

---------- Post added at 17:35 ---------- Previous post was at 17:05 ----------




If you would like to provide the NET figures to show that overall that EEA EEA : OMS EEA : NMS migration is of negative fiscal value.


Also, if you can provide the NET figures for Native and Non-EEA

I'll wait...

This information has already been provided further back in the thread. The figures show that we generally make a profit out of having immigrants here, but if we limit ourselves to a better quality of them, this profit could be increased. I, however, don't accept these figures as they simply look at what they take out and what they put in.

The bigger picture is that even if they come here and work, pay taxes and don't claim any benefits, they could have taken a job that an existing person living here could have done. Eventually, if not immediately, this means that a person who would have found employment will remain on benefits. When this is taken into consideration, the so called profit is probably extinguished.

Other matters include the presence of immigrants lowering wages (they will often work for less because our minimum wage is a fortune to them). They also put pressure on doctors, schools etc. With regards to housing, their presence leads to market forces pushing up house prices and rent inflation and, consequently, homelessness and inadequate housing.

Limiting immigration to areas such as skill shortage areas, hard to fill posts etc with decent people who have demonstrated that they can conduct themselves in an acceptable manner will go a long way towards the resentment that more and more people are having towards immigrants to the UK. I am of the opinion that this is the reason most people voted to leave the EU (above sovereignty and everything else).Even the most did hard professional anti racists that I know broadly agree with this. One (a left wing old hippie) recently said to me that he didnt like the way that his community was being changed by the sheer number of newcomers.

An Asian taxi driver once said to me that "they' were sick of the poles coming in as they were stealing their fares and that there wouldn't be any jobs for Asian people before long". I just stayed silent and had a wry smile to myself.

mrmistoffelees 21-01-2019 19:12

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980243)
This information has already been provided further back in the thread. The figures show that we generally make a profit out of having immigrants here, but if we limit ourselves to a better quality of them, this profit could be increased. I, however, don't accept these figures as they simply look at what they take out and what they put in.

The bigger picture is that even if they come here and work, pay taxes and don't claim any benefits, they could have taken a job that an existing person living here could have done. Eventually, if not immediately, this means that a person who would have found employment will remain on benefits. When this is taken into consideration, the so called profit is probably extinguished.

Other matters include the presence of immigrants lowering wages (they will often work for less because our minimum wage is a fortune to them). They also put pressure on doctors, schools etc. With regards to housing, their presence leads to market forces pushing up house prices and rent inflation and, consequently, homelessness and inadequate housing.

Limiting immigration to areas such as skill shortage areas, hard to fill posts etc with decent people who have demonstrated that they can conduct themselves in an acceptable manner will go a long way towards the resentment that more and more people are having towards immigrants to the UK. I am of the opinion that this is the reason most people voted to leave the EU (above sovereignty and everything else).Even the most did hard professional anti racists that I know broadly agree with this. One (a left wing old hippie) recently said to me that he didnt like the way that his community was being changed by the sheer number of newcomers.

An Asian taxi driver once said to me that "they' were sick of the poles coming in as they were stealing their fares and that there wouldn't be any jobs for Asian people before long". I just stayed silent and had a wry smile to myself.


Absolute twaddle

RichardCoulter 21-01-2019 19:26

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980245)
Absolute twaddle

Nonsense.

mrmistoffelees 21-01-2019 19:27

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980251)
Nonsense.

So glad you've come around ;)

RichardCoulter 21-01-2019 19:32

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980252)
So glad you've come around ;)

You clearly aren't interested in having a serious adult debate about the subject as I initially believed, so let's leave it there as this is a non productive use of our time.

jfman 21-01-2019 19:32

Re: Brexit
 
Ah back to the old xenophobia.

RichardCoulter 21-01-2019 19:37

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980256)
Ah back to the old xenophobia.

And back to the old well worn cliches. IMO most people in the UK (of all types of races) are, to various extents, unhappy with the quality and quantity of immigrants for various reasons.

Thankfully, we've moved on since concerns about this were able to be silenced by accusations of racism, xenophobia et al.

jfman 21-01-2019 19:40

Re: Brexit
 
I actually quite like the xenophobic arguments for Brexit. At least they’re honest about not liking foreigners, despite the economic fact that EU migrants are net contributors to society. Indeed, if any party wanted to they could have operated greater controls on both EU and non-EU migration but didn’t.

The “great trade deals” arguments are generally dishonest, but at least the xenophobes generally front up about their ignorance. It’s quite refreshing in a way.

denphone 21-01-2019 20:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980216)

Have they? I thought they just came over here took our jobs, caused increasing pressures onto the NHS. and were otherwise just generally up too nefarious activities.

That is usually the thinking by those who can't see further then their nose.

---------- Post added at 19:11 ---------- Previous post was at 19:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980216)
Have they? I thought they just came over here took our jobs, caused increasing pressures onto the NHS. and were otherwise just generally up too nefarious activities.

Most of them are younger and fitter and as such don't really use the NHS as they are in good health

---------- Post added at 19:13 ---------- Previous post was at 19:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980216)

Have they? I thought they just came over here took our jobs, caused increasing pressures onto the NHS. and were otherwise just generally up too nefarious activities.

Nothing like blaming good old Johnny Foreigner for all our country's great ills.

papa smurf 21-01-2019 20:17

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980256)
Ah back to the old xenophobia.

Sounds like a foreign word;)

Hugh 21-01-2019 21:29

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35980266)
Sounds like a foreign word;)

Well, considering that English has it’s roots in ancient German, with later additions from Norman (a variant of French), Latin, Greek, that’s not really surprising... ;)

nomadking 21-01-2019 21:32

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35980266)
Sounds like a foreign word;)

The fact that we readily include foreign words and phrases into our culture is yet another example of the fact we are anything but xenophobic.

Pierre 21-01-2019 21:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980210)
She has said nothing new that's of significant importance whatsoever.

Well she’s ruled out a 2nd referendum!

Damien 21-01-2019 21:58

Re: Brexit
 
A whole bunch of amendments have been put today for next week's vote. I can't be bothered to post them other than to say it's gonna be a long afternoon next week. It seems the Remainers are basically pushing each option to see which stands the most chance of success before falling in behind it assuming May's own deal fails again.

RichardCoulter 21-01-2019 21:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980258)
I actually quite like the xenophobic arguments for Brexit. At least they’re honest about not liking foreigners, despite the economic fact that EU migrants are net contributors to society. Indeed, if any party wanted to they could have operated greater controls on both EU and non-EU migration but didn’t.

The “great trade deals” arguments are generally dishonest, but at least the xenophobes generally front up about their ignorance. It’s quite refreshing in a way.

Money isn't the only thing that people consider when forming their views on immigration. Not all are net contributors to the coffers anyway and, as I said before, the data on this doesn't paint the full picture.

I don't recall anybody saying that they "didn't like foreigners", that would be a very juvenile way of looking at it. I've employed one or two myself.

jfman 21-01-2019 22:04

Re: Brexit
 
It’s not about money for some, you’re right.

It’s essentially racism. The “full picture” as you put it simply the fact they are foreign.

Not everyone born in this country is a net contributor, so that’s a red herring. Impacts on poverty, housing or the NHS are sideshows to the reality that austerity is cutting public services as that’s Conservative ideology.

mrmistoffelees 21-01-2019 22:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980255)
You clearly aren't interested in having a serious adult debate about the subject as I initially believed, so let's leave it there as this is a non productive use of our time.


Agreed, let me know when you’re prepared to accept the facts as preeented to you

---------- Post added at 21:15 ---------- Previous post was at 21:13 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35980281)
Well she’s ruled out a 2nd referendum!

Did she ? Explicitly ? I thought the words used were ‘I believe’ ?

Hugh 21-01-2019 22:21

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980283)
Money isn't the only thing that people consider when forming their views on immigration. Not all are net contributors to the coffers anyway and, as I said before, the data on this doesn't paint the full picture.

I don't recall anybody saying that they "didn't like foreigners", that would be a very juvenile way of looking at it. I've employed one or two myself.

Well done, Richard.

---------- Post added at 21:21 ---------- Previous post was at 21:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35980278)
The fact that we readily include foreign words and phrases into our culture is yet another example of the fact we are anything but xenophobic.

The fact that we readily used the words ‘Blitz’ and ‘Gestapo’ during WW2 is yet another example of the fact we were anything but enemies to the Nazis...

Chris 21-01-2019 22:31

Re: Brexit
 
The IMF thinks the U.K’s economy will grow faster than Germany and Italy over the next two years (and be on a par with France). Joint 3rd in the G7 after the USA and Canada. #despitebrexit. ;)

https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/...com-TW-WEO0119

1andrew1 21-01-2019 22:40

Re: Brexit
 
Two reasons why I doubt a no-deal:
1.
Quote:

BREXIT LIVE: May hit by TRADE DISASTER - shock Border Force warning sparks freight concern
A NO-DEAL Brexit will plunge cross-Channel freight trade into a deep crisis, according to a Border Force document omitted from public no-deal documentation.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...irish-backstop
2.
Quote:

IMF reluctant to make UK economic forecasts amid Brexit uncertainty
The IMF said that a no-deal Brexit was a “potential trigger” for a global economic slowdown, adding that it was reluctant to make any economic forecasts for the UK.
In the latest update to its World Economic Outlook, the IMF left its UK economic growth forecast for 2019 unchanged at 1.5 per cent, but said there was “substantial uncertainty” around this prediction.
https://www.ft.com/content/f3f00f8e-...7-97e4dbd3580d

Mr K 21-01-2019 22:43

Re: Brexit
 
So Plan B is Plan A again ! :D.

Must be a policy of ' it'll sort itself out somehow.... '.

Damien 21-01-2019 22:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35980295)
The IMF thinks the U.K’s economy will grow faster than Germany and Italy over the next two years (and be on a par with France). Joint 3rd in the G7 after the USA and Canada. #despitebrexit. ;)

https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/...com-TW-WEO0119

Although they do make clear there is a lot of uncertainty but it assumes we reach a deal on Brexit and enter the transition period (i.e for the next two years we'll still be operating under the single market).

1andrew1 21-01-2019 22:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35980301)
Although they do make clear there is a lot of uncertainty but it assumes we reach a deal on Brexit and enter the transition period (i.e for the next two years we'll still be operating under the single market).

So that projection is based on our still following EU rules, making contributions and accepting freedom of movement. Sounds like BINO to me. ;)
Logical conclusion being that if we keep doing all the above we will enjoy good growth. ;)

RichardCoulter 21-01-2019 23:52

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980284)
It’s not about money for some, you’re right.

It’s essentially racism. The “full picture” as you put it simply the fact they are foreign.

Not everyone born in this country is a net contributor, so that’s a red herring. Impacts on poverty, housing or the NHS are sideshows to the reality that austerity is cutting public services as that’s Conservative ideology.

The fact that not everyone born here isn't a net contributor isn't relevant with regards to immigrants coming here and doing the same thing!

I think the main resentment is that people see some immigrants as coming here and taking away resources; by definition they will be foreign, but that isn't the problem, it's them moving over here that is.

I think that UKIP & Leave gained a lot of votes due to this. These voters aren't the types that would ever consider voting for the BNP etc as they don't consider themselves as racist, but have had enough of unfettered immigration.

Your last point has some merit as both have contributed to overstretching public services.

Sephiroth 22-01-2019 05:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35980278)
The fact that we readily include foreign words and phrases into our culture is yet another example of the fact we are anything but xenophobic.

That's a bit of a stretch. Our language isn't our culture.

One reason that the UK is attractive to foreign workers is that they tend to speak English as a second language rather than French or German.

As regards our culture vs Europe, as I've said before, we look alike but don't think alike.


jfman 22-01-2019 06:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980306)
The fact that not everyone born here isn't a net contributor isn't relevant with regards to immigrants coming here and doing the same thing!

It’s exactly the same. That’s the way taxation and public spending work.

Quote:

I think the main resentment is that people see some immigrants as coming here and taking away resources; by definition they will be foreign, but that isn't the problem, it's them moving over here that is.
Which isn’t evidence based.

Quote:

I think that UKIP & Leave gained a lot of votes due to this. These voters aren't the types that would ever consider voting for the BNP etc as they don't consider themselves as racist, but have had enough of unfettered immigration.

Your last point has some merit as both have contributed to overstretching public services.
I agree racism and xenophobia get out the vote for UKIP and Vote Leave. I also agree many racists lack the self awareness to realise they are racist.

“I’m not a racist, but...”, as they say.

Sephiroth 22-01-2019 08:13

Re: Brexit
 
The definition of "racist" varies between people.

What's more, some people associate valid concerns over specific ethnicities as racism.

Racism is a toxic topic and xenophobia is illogical and something quite different.


Damien 22-01-2019 09:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35980311)
As regards our culture vs Europe, as I've said before, we look alike but don't think alike.

We largely do though. The differences between British and most European cultures are quite superficial. Mostly similar values, shared history and a Judeo-Christian background. You don't have huge cultural disconnects if you're in Europe, talking to European people, eating European food or so on.

The differences people usually cite are small and involve stereotypes. I.E Germans are more logical or Southern Europeans more laid back.

If you're somebody coming from Asia the difference between Asian culture and European culture would be more pronounced than the different between British and European culture. They would lump us in with the continent quite easily.

Pierre 22-01-2019 09:37

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35980300)
So Plan B is Plan A again ! :D.

Must be a policy of ' it'll sort itself out somehow.... '.

She playing a page out of the EU’s playbook.

1andrew1 22-01-2019 10:05

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35980319)
She playing a page out of the EU’s playbook.

How so? Looks to me like Groundhog May, as some of the papers are terming it.

djfunkdup 22-01-2019 10:34

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35980321)
How so? Looks to me like Groundhog May, as some of the papers are terming it.


If you were half decent at Chess it would be apparent what she was doing ;)

ianch99 22-01-2019 11:53

Re: Brexit
 
JC takes another step, reluctantly kicking and screaming, towards a second referendum:

Labour calls for vote in Commons on holding second referendum

Quote:

Labour has said the Commons should be able to vote on whether to hold a second referendum in an amendment the party submitted on Monday night to Theresa May’s Brexit update.
He still has wiggle room but he is being slowly and grudgingly pushed toward this position.

heero_yuy 22-01-2019 12:00

Re: Brexit
 
1 Attachment(s)
Latest ICM opinion poll:

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1548154688

Attachment 27708

nomadking 22-01-2019 12:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35980311)
That's a bit of a stretch. Our language isn't our culture.

One reason that the UK is attractive to foreign workers is that they tend to speak English as a second language rather than French or German.

As regards our culture vs Europe, as I've said before, we look alike but don't think alike.


Are you saying that foreign words and phrase haven't been incorporated into British culture. As they are foreign, it can hardly be classed as included in the English language. The French constantly complain about English words being included in their culture/language.




Quote:

As the French language police crackdown on more
Anglicizations - this time it's 'fake news', here's a look at
20 of the most annoying English words that should be kicked out
of the French language according to a Gallic author.",
,
Quote:

The Académie, a council of 40 writers and artists, is entrusted with protecting French from “Anglo-Saxon” attacks and writing an official dictionary, of which the latest unfinished version began in 1992.

One of its tasks is to come up with French equivalents to unwanted English words that slip into French – for example turning “email” into “courriel”.




---------- Post added at 11:20 ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35980325)
JC takes another step, reluctantly kicking and screaming, towards a second referendum:

Labour calls for vote in Commons on holding second referendum



He still has wiggle room but he is being slowly and grudgingly pushed toward this position.

So would this 2nd vote be a "meaningful" one, or would that depend on the outcome?:mad:


As the recent Commons vote demonstrated, it's easy to have a nonsense question that both sides disagree with, thereby distorting the outcome of the vote. There were those on the remain side and those on the leave side that voted against the proposals.

Hugh 22-01-2019 12:29

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35980327)

Would that be the same poll where 26% thought that ‘no deal’ meant staying in the EU?

---------- Post added at 11:29 ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35980300)
So Plan B is Plan A again ! :D.

Must be a policy of ' it'll sort itself out somehow.... '.

Plan B is TM’s version of the British abroad - say Plan A again but slower and louder, with lots of hand gestures...

papa smurf 22-01-2019 12:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35980333)
Would that be the same poll where 26% thought that ‘no deal’ meant staying in the EU?

Sounds like 26% are a bit thick.

Hugh 22-01-2019 12:33

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35980336)
Sounds like 26% are a bit thick.

Agreed

mrmistoffelees 22-01-2019 12:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35980337)
Agreed

:LOL:

Mick 22-01-2019 12:56

Re: Brexit
 
Several posts have now been deleted - I see the pathetic jibes and digs is showing it's ugly head again - pack it in.

Picking someone up on how they have spelt something or used capitalisation is not acceptable and rather petty. It must not continue.

The next member to ignore team instructions will be placed on a winter break.

Sephiroth 22-01-2019 14:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35980311)
That's a bit of a stretch. Our language isn't our culture.

One reason that the UK is attractive to foreign workers is that they tend to speak English as a second language rather than French or German.

As regards our culture vs Europe, as I've said before, we look alike but don't think alike.



Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35980329)
Are you saying that foreign words and phrase haven't been incorporated into British culture. As they are foreign, it can hardly be classed as included in the English language. The French constantly complain about English words being included in their culture/language.


,[COLOR="Silver"]

<SNIP>

I'm drawing the distinction between language and culture. They are not the same.




---------- Post added at 13:47 ---------- Previous post was at 13:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35980316)
We largely do though. The differences between British and most European cultures are quite superficial. Mostly similar values, shared history and a Judeo-Christian background. You don't have huge cultural disconnects if you're in Europe, talking to European people, eating European food or so on.

The differences people usually cite are small and involve stereotypes. I.E Germans are more logical or Southern Europeans more laid back.

If you're somebody coming from Asia the difference between Asian culture and European culture would be more pronounced than the different between British and European culture. They would lump us in with the continent quite easily.

Instead of "largely" I'd use the term "superficially".

I agree with the point you make about Judeo-Christian background (which I'd have to call culture!). The uniting factor there is the Ten Commandments which then falls through into law.

Talking about law, the bulk of the European countries work off a Codex (based on the principles of Roman Law), which essentially tells you what you are allowed to do and anything else may be an offence; not quite as severe as I've put it but that's how Roman Law works. The EU behaves in strict accordance with Codex principles. British civil law is more around your obligations and what you are not allowed to do and is interpreted buy the Courts using the principle of precedent where possible and by reference to Parliament's intentions otherwise. These factors bear on people throughout their lives and thus result in cultural differences. We look alike but don't think alike.

The differences of culture are most easily seen in the degree of formality you see in, e.g. France & Germany, Eastern Europe. That stems in part from the rigid rules of grammar and word gender. Whereas English (and indeed Dutch) has significantly less of that, which feeds through into behaviour.

Our sense of humour is radically different from that in France and Germany (the Dutch and Scandinavians or more aligned our way as, incidentally, are the Polish).

A wonderful sub-topic.



RichardCoulter 22-01-2019 15:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980313)
It’s exactly the same. That’s the way taxation and public spending work.



Which isn’t evidence based.



I agree racism and xenophobia get out the vote for UKIP and Vote Leave. I also agree many racists lack the self awareness to realise they are racist.

“I’m not a racist, but...”, as they say.

Regardless of what the position is with regards to the net contribution or otherwise of people living here, we do not want to be taking in any immigrants that do not contribute to the UK financially or otherwise. We are not and cannot ever be an international social security system.

The evidence which you seek is plainly human nature. As human beings we are tribal and territorial animals. Even the less intelligent creatures in the animal kingdom tend to only accept newcomers to their group on the proviso that there are no shortages of things like space, food, water etc.

To unilaterally describe UKIP supporters and those who voted leave as xenophobic and racist is an over simplification to the point of being offensive.

mrmistoffelees 22-01-2019 15:21

Re: Brexit
 
and there in a flash, no deal is pretty much confirmed as dead. and the last weapon May had is gone.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-eu-confirms

papa smurf 22-01-2019 15:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980351)
and there in a flash, no deal is pretty much confirmed as dead. and the last weapon May had is gone.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-eu-confirms

The workforce won't live very long if they start installing fences etc.

Dave42 22-01-2019 15:31

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980351)
and there in a flash, no deal is pretty much confirmed as dead. and the last weapon May had is gone.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-eu-confirms

and it would break the good Friday agreement a legally biding treaty

RichardCoulter 22-01-2019 15:36

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35980314)
The definition of "racist" varies between people.

What's more, some people associate valid concerns over specific ethnicities as racism.

Racism is a toxic topic and xenophobia is illogical and something quite different.


Exactly this (it's purposely designed to stop people airing their views under threat of being labelled a 'racist' and was successful for a number of years) or it is various forms of virtue signalling (they often get into this habit during their days at uni and one or two never grow out of it after entering the real world).

Listening to two of them trying to out trump each other about who is the more racist/anti racist between them is very tedious. I remember hearing one say that he'd got himself into "a prickly situation" and was immediately condemned as racist! This condemnation, of course, has to be done as loudly as possible in from of the max number of people to achieve the desired effect of the perpetrator.

Another person of a similar ilk thought it appropriate to walk around his local railway station demanding to know why none of the black staff were driving the trains, only white men. He completely ignored the fact that none of the drivers were women, but anti sexism in those days paid out less in PC brownie points.

Meanwhile, black people just got on with it in the face of actual racism.

---------- Post added at 14:36 ---------- Previous post was at 14:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35980354)
and it would break the good Friday agreement a legally biding treaty

If this happens, I hope to God that this doesn't start up the troubles In Ireland again. Similarly, if we leave without a deal I suspect that Scotland may decide to try to become independent and rejoin the EU.

Dave42 22-01-2019 15:43

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980355)
Exactly this (it's purposely designed to stop people airing their views under threat of being labelled a 'racist' and was successful for a number of years) or it is various forms of virtue signalling (they often get into this habit during their days at uni and one or two never grow out of it after entering the real world).

Listening to two of them trying to out trump each other about who is the more racist/anti racist between them is very tedious. I remember hearing one say that he'd got himself into "a prickly situation" and was immediately condemned as racist! This condemnation, of course, has to be done as loudly as possible in from of the max number of people to achieve the desired effect of the perpetrator.

Another person of a similar ilk thought it appropriate to walk around his local railway station demanding to know why none of the black staff were driving the trains, only white men. He completely ignored the fact that none of the drivers were women, but anti sexism in those days paid out less in PC brownie points.

Meanwhile, black people just got on with it in the face of actual racism.

---------- Post added at 14:36 ---------- Previous post was at 14:33 ----------



If this happens, I hope to God that this doesn't start up the troubles In Ireland again. Similarly, if we leave without a deal I suspect that Scotland may decide to try to become independent and rejoin the EU.

there be a very high chance it would sadly and one of big reasons I have always argued we need to leave with a deal a no deal brexit is worse of all worlds

papa smurf 22-01-2019 15:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980355)
Exactly this (it's purposely designed to stop people airing their views under threat of being labelled a 'racist' and was successful for a number of years) or it is various forms of virtue signalling (they often get into this habit during their days at uni and one or two never grow out of it after entering the real world).

Listening to two of them trying to out trump each other about who is the more racist/anti racist between them is very tedious. I remember hearing one say that he'd got himself into "a prickly situation" and was immediately condemned as racist! This condemnation, of course, has to be done as loudly as possible in from of the max number of people to achieve the desired effect of the perpetrator.

Another person of a similar ilk thought it appropriate to walk around his local railway station demanding to know why none of the black staff were driving the trains, only white men. He completely ignored the fact that none of the drivers were women, but anti sexism in those days paid out less in PC brownie points.

Meanwhile, black people just got on with it in the face of actual racism.

---------- Post added at 14:36 ---------- Previous post was at 14:33 ----------



If this happens, I hope to God that this doesn't start up the troubles In Ireland again. Similarly, if we leave without a deal I suspect that Scotland may decide to try to become independent and rejoin the EU.



There would have to be a wall, a backstop in case the wall falls down and a multi billion £ leaving the UK fee.

mrmistoffelees 22-01-2019 15:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980355)
Exactly this (it's purposely designed to stop people airing their views under threat of being labelled a 'racist' and was successful for a number of years) or it is various forms of virtue signalling (they often get into this habit during their days at uni and one or two never grow out of it after entering the real world).

Listening to two of them trying to out trump each other about who is the more racist/anti racist between them is very tedious. I remember hearing one say that he'd got himself into "a prickly situation" and was immediately condemned as racist! This condemnation, of course, has to be done as loudly as possible in from of the max number of people to achieve the desired effect of the perpetrator.

Another person of a similar ilk thought it appropriate to walk around his local railway station demanding to know why none of the black staff were driving the trains, only white men. He completely ignored the fact that none of the drivers were women, but anti sexism in those days paid out less in PC brownie points.

Meanwhile, black people just got on with it in the face of actual racism.

---------- Post added at 14:36 ---------- Previous post was at 14:33 ----------



If this happens, I hope to God that this doesn't start up the troubles In Ireland again. Similarly, if we leave without a deal I suspect that Scotland may decide to try to become independent and rejoin the EU.

It won't happen, the EU have given May enough rope to hang herself and she has. She's now backed into a corner with only two ways too go. Still, those who wanted restrictions on freedom of movement have got their wish....

Carth 22-01-2019 16:08

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35980351)
and there in a flash, no deal is pretty much confirmed as dead. and the last weapon May had is gone.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-eu-confirms

You really think the EU would pay all that money to build and manage a hard border?

or are you suggesting the UK does it?

mrmistoffelees 22-01-2019 16:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980364)
You really think the EU would pay all that money to build and manage a hard border?

or are you suggesting the UK does it?

Not that it will happen, but IF then I'd suspect to see both sides paying a sum

jfman 22-01-2019 16:41

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980349)
Regardless of what the position is with regards to the net contribution or otherwise of people living here, we do not want to be taking in any immigrants that do not contribute to the UK financially or otherwise. We are not and cannot ever be an international social security system.

The evidence which you seek is plainly human nature. As human beings we are tribal and territorial animals. Even the less intelligent creatures in the animal kingdom tend to only accept newcomers to their group on the proviso that there are no shortages of things like space, food, water etc.

To unilaterally describe UKIP supporters and those who voted leave as xenophobic and racist is an over simplification to the point of being offensive.

There’s no evidence we are an international social security system. It’s simply a myth, and ignoring the reality that immigrants are less likely to be reliant on benefits than our own population. I dont for a minute believe people travel across the continent for a life of luxury on Universal Credit.

I like the comparison of racists and xenophobes to animals though, as they clearly don’t demonstrate the intelligence that humans are capable of.

ianch99 22-01-2019 17:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35980336)
Sounds like 26% are a bit thick.

or they didn't really know what they were voting for ...

RichardCoulter 22-01-2019 17:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980368)
There’s no evidence we are an international social security system. It’s simply a myth, and ignoring the reality that immigrants are less likely to be reliant on benefits than our own population. I dont for a minute believe people travel across the continent for a life of luxury on Universal Credit.

I like the comparison of racists and xenophobes to animals though, as they clearly don’t demonstrate the intelligence that humans are capable of.

Living on Universal Credit must be a hard existence, but to many immigrants this is a fortune compared to where they come from.

There is multiple evidence that people come here to take advantage of our welfare state.
As an example, this is why the Government are wanting to introduce enhanced ID checks for NHS users.

Hugh 22-01-2019 17:24

Re: Brexit
 
https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...q-to-singapore
Quote:

Sir James Dyson, the British billionaire inventor and outspoken Brexiter, is moving the headquarters of his vacuum cleaner and hair dryer technology company to Singapore.

The company’s chief executive, Jim Rowan, said the move from Wiltshire to Singapore had “nothing to do with Brexit” but was about “future-proofing” the business. The move of Dyson’s legal entity from the UK to Singapore “will happen over the coming months”, meaning it could happen before Brexit.
Luckily for Dyson, this is in place...

https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-s...ee-trade-deal/
Quote:

The European Union and Singapore today (16 December) announced that they have reached agreement on a free-trade deal, 33 months after they began formal negotiations.

This is the second free-trade agreement struck by the EU in Asia; the first – with South Korea – came into force in July 2011.


The EU began negotiations with Singapore in March 2010 after its hopes of lowering barriers with the ten-country Association of South-East Nations (Asean) were dashed in 2009, and Karel De Gucht, the European trade commissioner, said today he hoped the deal would “open the doors for FTAs [free-trade agreements] with other countries in the Asean region”.

Damien 22-01-2019 17:26

Re: Brexit
 
Well obviously he is going to move to a place with an EU trade deal....:rolleyes:

papa smurf 22-01-2019 17:33

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35980377)
or they didn't really know what they were voting for ...

I thought it was an opinion poll not a vote.

denphone 22-01-2019 17:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35980380)
Well obviously he is going to move to a place with an EU trade deal....:rolleyes:

Nothing like brazen Brexit hypocrisy especially as he was claiming to speak for the thousands of British businesses that are hoping to manufacture in the UK after Brexit.:rolleyes::td:

Dave42 22-01-2019 17:46

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35980380)
Well obviously he is going to move to a place with an EU trade deal....:rolleyes:

another brexiteer hypocrite im be fine sod rest of the people

Carth 22-01-2019 17:47

Re: Brexit
 
It's just business, nothing more. Move manufacturing to a country with low wages & long hours, build it cheap knowing the 'name' will sell it dear ;)



edit: in fact it's a little like Range Rover & Slovakia :D

Dave42 22-01-2019 17:50

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980386)
It's just business, nothing more. Move manufacturing to a country with low wages & long hours, build it cheap knowing the 'name' will sell it dear ;)

how many job loses you happy to accept

Carth 22-01-2019 17:51

Re: Brexit
 
Sorry Dave, I don't work for Dyson, and don't want to own one either . . . same as Range Rover :p:

Dave42 22-01-2019 17:52

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980388)
Sorry Dave, I don't work for Dyson, and don't want to own one either . . . same as Range Rover :p:

avoided question I see

Damien 22-01-2019 17:52

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980386)
It's just business, nothing more. Move manufacturing to a country with low wages & long hours, build it cheap knowing the 'name' will sell it dear ;)

Of course it's business. It's just that one of the biggest business supporters of Brexit and how it will help British business is moving his British business out of Britain. It may not be because of the EU, although at the present rate he'll have better access to that market than he would here, but it's hardly a big confidence vote in this new dawn for British manufacturing he advocated for.

Dave42 22-01-2019 17:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35980391)
Of course it's business. It's just that one of the biggest business supporters of Brexit and how it will help British business is moving his British business out of Britain. It may not be because of the EU, although at the present rate he'll have better access to that market than he would here, but it's hardly a big confidence vote in this new dawn for British manufacturing he advocated for.

:clap::clap::clap::clap:

jfman 22-01-2019 18:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980378)
Living on Universal Credit must be a hard existence, but to many immigrants this is a fortune compared to where they come from.

There is multiple evidence that people come here to take advantage of our welfare state.
As an example, this is why the Government are wanting to introduce enhanced ID checks for NHS users.

There is nowhere in the European Union where the cost of living is so low that Universal Credit can be considered a “fortune”; you’re also ignoring the fact they have to live on it HERE.

There’s little to no evidence of any of what you suggest and even where such little instances do happen removing EU migration and EU trade is somewhat using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

There’s no evidence the NHS will be better off when it has to take the time and effort to train staff rather than import them.

Carth 22-01-2019 18:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35980390)
avoided question I see

A question you should really be asking yourself, you're the one that wants to stay in the EU.


. . . anyway, the topics are getting silly again, more going around in circles

nomadking 22-01-2019 18:23

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980397)
There is nowhere in the European Union where the cost of living is so low that Universal Credit can be considered a “fortune”; you’re also ignoring the fact they have to live on it HERE.

There’s little to no evidence of any of what you suggest and even where such little instances do happen removing EU migration and EU trade is somewhat using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

There’s no evidence the NHS will be better off when it has to take the time and effort to train staff rather than import them.

There was a TV programme where a Czech Roma couple had arrived in Rotherham with twenty-two of their children and grandchildren. Only one of them had a job. So they, along with an estimated 6,000 other Czech Roma just in Rotherham, had to be housed, funded with benefits etc. The fallacy is that enough of the 3m EU residents actually contribute. Especially if you factor in an upfront cost of building the houses to house them in the first place.

So is the stock in all the Eastern European shops produced in the UK? Or is it shipped in from Eastern Europe.

denphone 22-01-2019 18:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980398)
A question you should really be asking yourself, you're the one that wants to stay in the EU.


. . . anyway, the topics are getting silly again, more going around in circles

Brexit touches on us all whether one likes it or not and as such its a subject that has a a very expansive scope don't you agree?.

Carth 22-01-2019 18:28

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35980401)
Brexit touches on us all whether one likes it or not and as such its a subject that has a a very expansive scope don't you agree?.

Yes it does, I agree . . . but when a 'certain' named businessman gets mentioned regularly, yet other businesses that 'move abroad' are never mentioned, it gets rather monotonous and silly ;)


edit:
Dyson launched a $360 million plant in Tuas, Singapore in 2013, which can produce 4 million digital motors a year

The EU began negotiations with Singapore in March 2010

remind me again, in which year was the Brexit referendum?

Dave42 22-01-2019 18:43

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980398)
A question you should really be asking yourself, you're the one that wants to stay in the EU.


. . . anyway, the topics are getting silly again, more going around in circles

leaving the EU is gonna cost us jobs not staying so it question leavers need to answer

Carth 22-01-2019 18:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35980404)
leaving the EU is gonna cost us jobs not staying so it question leavers need to answer

Many people believe being in the EU has cost us jobs, who's right, who's wrong?

And as posted above, Dyson moving production to Singapore (and other countries) was done years before Brexit was a true proposition, so was therefore simply a business costs move, nothing else

1andrew1 22-01-2019 18:55

Re: Brexit
 
Dyson's getting a bit of a hard time. He warned us many years ago that if we didn't join the Euro then he would expand overseas instead. We can't say we weren't told, though I would prefer to lose Dyson than gain the Euro. ;)
Quote:

Vacuum cleaner king James Dyson, the high-profile inventor and businessman, is set to reignite the debate surrounding the euro after threatening to expand his operations in Malaysia, rather than at his British factory, if the UK does not join the single currency.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...erverbusiness4

Carth 22-01-2019 19:00

Re: Brexit
 
Good post Andrew, the link is to an article from Sun 5 Nov 2000 showing that he thought the EURO would be beneficial to his (and other) businesses.

The man stood by his convictions and moved his business, fair play.

Dave42 22-01-2019 19:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35980406)
Dyson's getting a bit of a hard time. He warned us many years ago that if we didn't join the Euro then he would expand overseas instead. We can't say we weren't told, though I would prefer to lose Dyson than gain the Euro. ;)

https://www.theguardian.com/business...erverbusiness4

100% agree

Chris 22-01-2019 19:15

Re: Brexit
 
Reality is finally dawning in Dublin, it seems. In the event of No Deal, it’s not the British erecting a border they have to worry about, it’s that their EU obermeisters will instruct the Irish to do it.

The way is now obvious. The obstructionists in our Parliament need to lay off and allow the government to face the EU down. The Backstop was a serious strategic error on the EU’s part, borne out of their obsession with ideological purity, and if they come under sufficient pressure they will drop it.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-46961982

Carth 22-01-2019 19:16

Re: Brexit
 
While I'm still here, here's 2 links that some may find interesting ;)

from 2016 https://www.cer.eu/insights/eu-army-...ill-not-happen

from 2019 https://www.rte.ie/news/brexit/2019/...B0Ojl6_kSZm9gY

nomadking 22-01-2019 19:23

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980407)
Good post Andrew, the link is to an article from Sun 5 Nov 2000 showing that he thought the EURO would be beneficial to his (and other) businesses.

The man stood by his convictions and moved his business, fair play.

To somewhere OUTSIDE the Eurozone. So how does that work?

jfman 22-01-2019 19:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35980400)
There was a TV programme where a Czech Roma couple had arrived in Rotherham with twenty-two of their children and grandchildren. Only one of them had a job. So they, along with an estimated 6,000 other Czech Roma just in Rotherham, had to be housed, funded with benefits etc. The fallacy is that enough of the 3m EU residents actually contribute. Especially if you factor in an upfront cost of building the houses to house them in the first place.

So is the stock in all the Eastern European shops produced in the UK? Or is it shipped in from Eastern Europe.

If I check the Daily Mail there's plenty of examples of benefit scroungers from all backgrounds, so a single example isn't necessarily representative of society as a whole.

32.53 million people in work in this country contribute to millions of benefit claimants on Jobseekers, ESA, Universal Credit and PIP. That's the way the system works.

I don't shop in Eastern European shops - I can't comment on the content. It's quite irrelevant though. Some items will attract VAT, the shopkeeper will pay income tax, employ other people (again, paying tax and national insurance) -all of which are positives. Do you buy entirely British produce? Drive a British manufactured car? Or like everyone else do you buy whatever is cheapest?

Carth 22-01-2019 19:27

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35980412)
To somewhere OUTSIDE the Eurozone. So how does that work?

Because production costs were cheaper than staying here, obviously

Dave42 22-01-2019 19:36

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35980411)
While I'm still here, here's 2 links that some may find interesting ;)

from 2016 https://www.cer.eu/insights/eu-army-...ill-not-happen

from 2019 https://www.rte.ie/news/brexit/2019/...B0Ojl6_kSZm9gY

there was no way it happen with UK in the EU as would been vetoed now it got more chance since we leaving but other members could use veto but we will see

nomadking 22-01-2019 19:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980413)
If I check the Daily Mail there's plenty of examples of benefit scroungers from all backgrounds, so a single example isn't necessarily representative of society as a whole.

32.53 million people in work in this country contribute to millions of benefit claimants on Jobseekers, ESA, Universal Credit and PIP. That's the way the system works.

I don't shop in Eastern European shops - I can't comment on the content. It's quite irrelevant though. Some items will attract VAT, the shopkeeper will pay income tax, employ other people (again, paying tax and national insurance) -all of which are positives. Do you buy entirely British produce? Drive a British manufactured car? Or like everyone else do you buy whatever is cheapest?

6,000 from one group living in one town is not an isolated example. There are other groups, from other countries, in other towns and cities. There has been plenty of other examples in the media.




Where has the money that is spent in the shops come from? Public borrowing. Where do the profits end up, ie which country?


From 2011.
Quote:

Two years ago Adrian Oprea was living with his family in a ramshackle hut in a Romanian village with only a handful of farm animals to his name.
...
But Mr Oprea’s friends told him of a loophole. By selling the Big Issue magazine on the streets, he could register as “self-employed” and gain access to benefits and rights to work for his family.

Now the 24-year-old immigrant lives in a brand new house in Manchester, with eight of his relatives, with the help of the British taxpayer.**** Mr Oprea, who agreed to speak and pose for photographs because he is proud of the home he has provided for his family, said: “It’s very hard living in Romania.


...
In April last year Mr Oprea was joined in Britain by his sister, Catalina, 26, and her six-year-old son, Valentin. Then in January this year Mr Oprea’s sister, Renata, 30, brother-in-law, Ionut Codrianu, 31, and their two daughters, Alexandra, 11 and Ana-Maria, 5, moved in with them.
Since September the extended family have lived in a modern, privately-rented, three-bedroom house in a new development in the Gorton area of Manchester, which has a large Romanian community.
The house came kitted out with a new kitchen and carpets. The family have a new television and DVD player, and they own a Peugeot 406 which sits on the drive.

...
Of the five adults in the family, all have applied for benefits apart from Catalina, who does not work.


RichardCoulter 22-01-2019 19:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980397)
There is nowhere in the European Union where the cost of living is so low that Universal Credit can be considered a “fortune”; you’re also ignoring the fact they have to live on it HERE.

There’s little to no evidence of any of what you suggest and even where such little instances do happen removing EU migration and EU trade is somewhat using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

There’s no evidence the NHS will be better off when it has to take the time and effort to train staff rather than import them.

There are plenty of EU countries whose welfare state is either inferior or non existent compared to ours with plenty of evidence that this attracts both EU and non EU immigrants alike. To these people, UC is indeed a fortune as is the minimum wage. Because of our different standards of living, prices will also appear to be correspondingly higher too (especially for accommodation); this is mitigated by workers sleeping rough, living in tents, severely overcrowding houses etc.

I haven't suggested removing EU immigration, I haven't mentioned the separate issue of EU trade, nor the issue of immigrants working in the NHS- I was referring to the users of it.

jfman 22-01-2019 19:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35980423)
There are plenty of EU countries whose welfare state is either inferior or non existent compared to ours with plenty of evidence that this attracts both EU and non EU immigrants alike. To these people, UC is indeed a fortune as is the minimum wage. Because of our different standards of living, prices will also appear to be correspondingly higher too (especially for accommodation); this is mitigated by workers sleeping rough, living in tents, severely overcrowding houses etc.

I haven't suggested removing EU immigration, I haven't mentioned the separate issue of EU trade, nor the issue of immigrants working in the NHS- I was referring to the users of it.

https://www.glassdoor.co.uk/blog/soc...-isnt-britain/

RichardCoulter 22-01-2019 19:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35980400)
There was a TV programme where a Czech Roma couple had arrived in Rotherham with twenty-two of their children and grandchildren. Only one of them had a job. So they, along with an estimated 6,000 other Czech Roma just in Rotherham, had to be housed, funded with benefits etc. The fallacy is that enough of the 3m EU residents actually contribute. Especially if you factor in an upfront cost of building the houses to house them in the first place.

So is the stock in all the Eastern European shops produced in the UK? Or is it shipped in from Eastern Europe.

I remember seeing this programme and talking about it the day afterwards. One elderly customer remarked that she'd overheard an immigrant on his mobile phone saying "you come to England, they pay you to have children". I remember remarking that, however unpalatable his comments were, he was telling the truth.

Presumably this is why, in most cases, people can now only claim for a maximum of two children and why the NASS system for calculating money given to asylum seekers has been reformed.

Because we aren't allowed to treat EU citizens any differently to our own population, this legislation to counter this greedy abuse of our generosity also affects those who took no part in it too.

There's a similar issue with the EHIC cards. If someone from Spain comes here, they automatically enjoy all the benefits of our NHS. When I visit Spain, however, I have to register as a temporary visitor, which often means wasting my first day hanging around a Government office. They don't rush and, even then, the cover isn't equivalent to our NHS as there are often charges to pay.

nomadking 22-01-2019 20:01

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980424)

That mainly includes in-work benefits and doesn't include Eastern European countries, and is therefore not relevant.
Quote:

taking into account factors such as maternity and paternity leave, general parental leave, paid holiday allowance, paid sick leave and unemployment benefits.
The problems started when EU countries not included in that report, joined the EU or were allowed to come here.

RichardCoulter 22-01-2019 20:09

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35980424)

This data is three years old, but nevertheless is still interesting to look at. I'm surprised that the EU countries expecting us to bail them out after we ourselves have had to endure nearly a decade of austerity.

Overall, the UK is still a magnet, otherwise why would both EU and non EU immigrants take such desperate measures to get here? Asylum seekers in particular risk their lives and pass through safe places prior to getting to the UK.

The UK used to have a similar system as Denmark for cushioning the effects of unemployment, with claimants being paid an 'Earnings Related Supplement' during the initial period of their claim. The Thatcher Government abolished this in 1982.

---------- Post added at 19:09 ---------- Previous post was at 19:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35980426)
That mainly includes in-work benefits and doesn't include Eastern European countries, and is therefore not relevant.
The problems started when EU countries not included in that report, joined the EU or were allowed to come here.

Totally agree. The main problems appear to have started when the poorer Eastern European countries were allowed to join.

If a new law was introduced that allowed anyone in a particular street to live in any of the houses (and they could not lawfully be refused access) it's obviously going to be a case of the poorer residents moving into the more affluent homes!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum