![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
well what does one expect from them the clam up wont saying anything when asked or avoid the questions with a question or misdirection.
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
the Information Commissioner Richard Thomas has told the Ministry of Defence and the HM Revenue and Customs that if they don't get their act together
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7472814.stm Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I know that this is a big discussion about webwise, but when exactly are VM implementing it....?
Ben :) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
followed by the quote I think they could have got away with it, but by saying In fact, academic Richard Clayton supports our privacy claims stating that: " ...." (Italics mine) Could Dr Clayton challenge that comment and their interpretation as incorrect? @Privacy Matters Sorry made a cuppa in the middle of typing my post and you beat me to it. :-) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:41 ---------- Previous post was at 22:40 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
If it all goes wrong, they will take the moral high ground and say it's not suitable for their customers. If it works (ho ho), they will want to pimp your data too. Unfortunately, if phorm goes belly up, or BT withdraws first, it's going to be really difficult for them to claim that high ground. They will just look stupid. And if BT and Phorm end up in court, you can bet VM will also be looked at up close, but that assumes HMG withdraws sponsorship of the project. So to answer your question, i'm afraid you will have to wait and see, but don't forget to let VM know if you don't like the idea. :) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I've posted a comment to Richard's blog pointing out to him that Phorm are still posting this one paragraph as his support for their system. Hopefuly he'll see that and maybe ask them himself to stop doing it. Maybe one of you chaps might want to post a comment to Richard's blog mentioning it, too. OB |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
The use of Phorm spyware in 2006/7 was secret, illegal, deliberate, and intentional. From that article; Quote:
Quote:
The man must go. Richard Thomas, the door over there, with [EXIT] over it. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2008/07/25.gif |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
So here's to Phorm's PR lackeys; you've done a great job guys :beer: |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Well I guess I should have expected this sooner or later. Someone has added https://nodpi.org to Spam Cops spam lists because Entanet mentioned the protest with a link to the site in one of their partner newsletters.
I have been in communications with the party who filed the report and advised them to remove it. Apparently they don't want to receive Entanet newsletters any more so they feel the appropriate course of action is to pick one domain out of the entire newsletter and add it to a spam list as opposed to just unsubscribing from the newsletter. If NoDPI.Org goes offline in the next 24 hours it is because we have not managed to resolve this issue. Our hosting provider take spam very seriously and have threatened to suspend our service should the issue not be dealt with within 24 hours. Personally I think this wreaks of malicious intent, there is no way I can see a logical argument for reporting a single URL from a newsletter to a spam list as a valid or natural reaction to not wanting to receive the newsletter. One would expect the party to simply unsubscribe from said newsletter as opposed to taking offensive action against a single entity mentioned within the newsletter. Needless to say the matter is being taken very seriously and Entanet have been contacted as well to help resolve the issue. I apologise if there is any downtime. Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I wonder who is most scared of you phorm or BT with the AGM coming up. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Deleted
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:33. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum