![]() |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
- Premier League considering reducing price of PPV matches to under £10
- One match got fewer than 1,000 views. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/s...ches-56ghptkwq (subscription) |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
They need to come up with a way to make all the matches available. The average viewer isn’t likely to buy even one per week at £10. Probably closer to one per month, if even that.
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
https://www.digitaltveurope.com/2020...-cause-u-turn/ |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
What we have actually learned is that they want/need approx 175,000 subscribers. £2.6m a week for the 28 or so for matchdays not already not fully covered by BT/Amazon. So if Sky/BT can come up with an amicable split and £73m they are back in the game. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
However, whilst there are other solutions that we can both think of, it is quite possible that an alternative may not be provided. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
For the loose change it is to Sky/BT I can’t see the league upsetting their customers.
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
I think they already have!
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
They can reconcile the situation :)
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
What is the point in posting a link to an article that wants me to subscribe to read it?
As bad as PPV itself! Having read an alternative article, it appears Sky/BT are happy to see the fee reduced or scrapped altogether. A meeting of EPL clubs (presumably by zoom) today is likely to discuss options. Ashley (Newcastle) suggests £4.95 per game others £9.95 per game. Apparently, when the £14.95 was set it was that or games not on TV. ---------- Post added at 16:58 ---------- Previous post was at 16:53 ---------- Quote:
Why would Sky/BT pay more? Judging by what happened at end of 19/20 season they will be looking for refunds as the customer experience is not what they contracted for. I would have thought the only way to avoid refunds would be to split the games between BT/Sky and have them free to the customer. Of course, what clubs really want is fans back in stadia (even 30% capacity would be a start), many have already done planning how this can be achieved safely. Perhaps EPL should say they won't entertain bailing out the other league clubs until they see progress in getting fans back. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
I’m not sure Sky/BT can reasonably argue it’s not the customer experience they are paying for.
My thought process is that the £80m is tiny compared to the billions they are paying for the 220 ordinarily televised games. I definitely think it creates a better value offering all round to have all games televised. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
---------- Post added at 21:02 ---------- Previous post was at 21:00 ---------- Quote:
They contracted to show games with crowds not empty cavernous stadia which is what they argued. I agree it is not EPL fault but they gave refunds nonetheless. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
The update includes "A meeting of the 20 clubs today decided to stick with £14.95 for the next two rounds of matches but agreed to review the PPV price for games after the international break, with a decision to be taken on November 5." |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum