![]() |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Hate to disagree with OB, but the telegraph reported (in the last 2-3 days) that Amazon have no interest in bidding fir the main EPL contracts held by Sky & BT
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...mp-tv-revenue/ “Experts say valuations peaked in 2016, and, while Sky and BT still consider the league their most valuable offering, Covid-19 has accelerated a gradual fall. Amazon, which bought up matches for the first time last season, is not expected to compete with the big two bidders. ...there is no suggestion that the likes of Netflix or Facebook are interested in tabling a bid due to the limits over syndication worldwide.” Probably far too early to tell but some of the Telegraph’s media speculation is usually bang on the money (they were the first to report on the Sky/Disney Plus deal) so I’m not inclined to completely disbelieve it. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
However,I accept that the impact of COVID-19 has changed everything and so anything can happen now. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
However, the uncertainty that has been created by this pandemic might force Amazon to take a more cautious approach. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
I suppose if they can get more at the bargain basement they’d happily take them. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Your whole assumption seems to be based on what Amazon bid last time. Do you actually think that proves anything? ---------- Post added at 23:36 ---------- Previous post was at 23:29 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 23:37 ---------- Previous post was at 23:36 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
More superfast broadband? I’m sorry I don’t accept that Amazon would be shelling out £5bn on the difference between 95% and 100% coverage. They could also offer a satellite or cable broadcast - as DAZN do in Germany for pubs and other venues. These aren’t cost prohibitive steps for a £5bn investment - they are firmly in the ‘loose change’ category - if you have a business model. It’s all a presumption by reporters regardless of terminology used. None of these companies, on recognised stock exchanges, would engage in tittle tattle though the Telegraph. Old Boy the only person on this thread that sees the world in black and white is you with your streaming vs linear future rather than recognise they are complementary, not competing, technologies. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
You want an evidence based argument? Well let’s hear yours then, jfman. I am not seeing anything in black or white, jfman,that’s how you seem to view everything. I fully accept I could be wrong. Nobody, but nobody can be 100% certain about the future. But you and some others seem determined to try to paint everything I say as being ‘predictions’ that I would die in a ditch to defend. I don’t. I’m just giving my opinion on how I see things developing. This is a discussion forum, after all. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
If that was the case they’d have won on the first round of bidding, possibly guaranteeing one game per week or at least one per month. Instead Scudamore went out in round 2 with the begging bowl for rights of no value to Sky or BT. Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
And that is also what my views on this are - an opinion. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum