Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Yes, because that's exactly what I said....oh wait a minute, when was it I did that again?

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

:rolleyes:

That's rich coming from just about the most biased person here. Someone who's able to infer all sorts of 'facts' from the scantest of evidence when it suits yet demands almost forensic standards of evidence from those who disagree.

You're really rather good at double standards and hypocricy aren't you.

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

I use the same standards as you do apparently. Why the need to be so insulting and disrespectful, it doesn't do your argument any good at all.

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

do this help
http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/11...t-met-baitvan/

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

lol - there you go again. Do you recall some of the insulting garbage you've issued in the past? You talk about being rude and disrespectful but I don't suppose you see any double standards there either...

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

They didn't appear very vulnerable. It seems as though senior police officers have too little faith in the courage of their men.

---------- Post added at 20:32 ---------- Previous post was at 20:31 ----------

Any chance of actually debating the subject at hand, or do you still wish to continue insulting other forum members?

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Any chance of you ever answering a simple question?

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

not really but thanks for trying ,this has already been discussed in detail here onwards

I think the conclusion i and others came too was that the van was simply parked ,it had to park somewhere,students started going past (peacefully) the police got out and 10mins later the van was surrounded and wrecked simply because it was there apparently ,it's a simple answer and no where nearly as complicated as certain members would like but there you go

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Which question would you like me to answer?

---------- Post added at 20:45 ---------- Previous post was at 20:43 ----------

So, had it broken down then?

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

no and no-one said it had ,for some reason you seem convinced it had

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

You cited, twice, that it might have broken down. I was simply asking whether you considered your theory was proven yet?

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

I've only asked one - work it out.

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Where?

Nonetheless, still not wanting to debate the subject of this thread then?

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

show me ,and be carefull or you will end up looking a bit silly,read them properly because i know what i wrote

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

From your holier than thou attitude that is where from, the rioters are **** and deserve to be treated as such and as I said above I would fully condone the use of Baton Rounds and Water Cannon on the streets if it stops **** like this from rioting and destroying property.

Lets hope that when the next demonstration takes place that firstly they are not allowed in Whitehall and secondly the Police are allowed to go in hard using as much force as required to subdue the troublemakers.

As for the van it is a none issue as all you are doing is trying to make people take their eye of the ball.