![]() |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
You've once again speculated, however not evidenced, that the often hypothesised streaming future brings lower costs to the end user for Premiership football. The fact you've got DAZN, a company with more liabilities than assets, outbidding Sky for the rights under no basis whatsoever means we can safely file most of your posts from today in the fiction section and return from time to time for entertainment value only. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Have you seen the Netflix figures? That company will never fly, will it? DAZN? I'm sure it is dead in the water. Any more economic predictions you can entertain us wth before we gst back to reality? ;) |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
I'll continue to await the calculation on how a streamer raises and turns a profit on £5bn for Premiership football rights. I'm sure you'll tell me these people are geniuses, of course, but it was Sky who correctly predicted that none of them would enter the market for the first round of bids in 2019-22 and that the rights would go down in value. What changes in 2022-25, other than the recession? If BT are right that the value of rights falls what makes Sky with it's customer base in place from day 1 less well placed than a streamer? |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Now TV do a football season pass for about £200 give or take. I find it hard to imagine anyone else can raise £5bn at that price point. You can reverse engineer the figure as you please. A further thought on the Premier League themselves selling direct to customers they might decide against in the event that we end up with more dead rubber closed door games in future seasons. A huge risk to take on retailing that directly. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Many years ago, the thought was that you would be able to buy a season ticket to watch your favourite clubs matches (home and away). This never got off the ground - I suspect because they didn't have the tech to do it. Now the streamers have shown you can stream games live all you need is a method of getting payment. advertising the new service would be cheap as they can do it mid game throughout the season - preparing people for the next season. This would blow the streamers out of the water as the content wouldn't be available. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Season tickets for clubs would be interesting - and a genuinely new offering so has the potential to attract more customers - although the 3pm blackout (which I profoundly disagree with) remains the problem, but with so few Premiership games actually taking place then would it really be an issue to move the 'main' kick off time to 1pm or a Sunday? The way to league could test demand would be to offer the rest of the games over and above the main contract TV games on their own service for a 3 year period before seeking to take full control themselves. The issue for the League is that while such an offering has potential - the contracts with existing TV companies are no risk money in their hands. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
SVOD and streaming IS the future, no matter what you believe and no matter what you say. Most people, I am pretty sure, agree with that. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
It’s you that says linear will cease to exist - I’ve never claimed that streaming won’t be (or isn’t) popular in its own right. No calculations that don’t involve a billionaire philanthropist then? |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
We read enough of this in other threads! |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
You are at the front of the queue to say how much easier it is to have everything on one box. Why would someone exclude a Sky Q box? If they were going to make the service available from 2022 why would they not make it available in Ultra HD to everyone? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum