Cable Forum - President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)

- - President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33705924)

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35944143)

Potential doesn’t necessarily equate to a future aspect

Quote:

potential

adjective

Having or showing the capacity to develop into something in the future.

Works for me ..

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35944156)

Works for me ..

So a potential crime committed can potentially result in a future conviction.

Works for me.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35944176)

So a potential crime committed can potentially result in a future conviction.

Works for me.

and for me if *actually* convicted in a court of law in the present :)

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35944146)

What would be the point of re-investigating if it was already proved there was nothing crooked or criminal going on? Or any evidence that the investigation was flawed?

Have you been sleeping? ;)

There is a massive big investigation in to "Inconsiderations", that took place during that investigation of Secretary Clinton and the investigator, investigating the investigators is the U.S Office of Inspector General, who started his investigation in January 2017.

BREAKING: 11 members of Congress have MADE criminal referrals to AG Jeff Sessions, FBI Director Chris Wray, and US Attorney John Huber to conduct a criminal investigation of the following individuals:

-James Comey (Former Director of the FBI)

-Hillary Clinton (Former Secretary of State)

-Loretta Lynch (Former U.S Attorney General)

-Andrew McCabe (Former Deputy Director FBI)

-Peter Strzok (FBI CounterIntelligence Agent)

-Lisa Page (FBI Counsel)

Criminal Referral Page 1

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1524082924

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Criminal Referral Page 6 and Last page.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1524083488

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

What ever happened to the criminal referral for Christopher Steel?

It's a bizarre system that let's politicians refer people for investigation especially when they may be politically motivated. The whole point should be that these systems are separate. At the moment there seems to be a move from a minority of Republican congressmen to fire and shut down investigations into Trump, including the New York one, and start an investigation into Clinton and other Trump critics.

It's bordering on tin-pot dictator stuff when politicians dictate who gets investigated and whose doesn't. If there is evidence then hand it over to the proper authorities and let them do it. It's vital these things are separate.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

11 Republican members of Congress - quelle surprise?

I wonder if they will have 33 hearings, like they did with Benghazi at a cost of $7.8 million over two and a half years with no criminal charges at the end?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

I really think the best thing would be to let all the multitude of investigations complete without politicians weighing in all the time. It's mental.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35944210)

No it is not a bizarre system, Congressman are lawmakers, not law enforcers and they have the evidence. They have every right to make referrals when clear violations have been committed and it is not tin pot stuff at all, this stuff in the referral is real, those people have potentially committed violations of those Federal Statutes, you cannot just target Donald Trump with dodgy investigations that have so far led to nothing and no evidence, because you and Hugh don't like the guy.

You claim these Congressman are being political, well you and Hugh are doing the exact same thing, Trump must be investigated but never Hillary, she is not above the law and needs to be held to account and properly investigated, not investigated in a shoddy way like prior investigations clearly have been.

Alas, the only justification that I take with great pleasure is Hillary's monumental loss, especially where there is strong indicators of cheating and yet she cannot win an election, even after all the cheating....

---------- Post added at 23:15 ---------- Previous post was at 23:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35944211)

Might have something to do with them not being done properly, you keep spinning that same useless line Hugh, it's utter rubbish. Remove the Hillary tinted specs, people have clearly been biased in her favour in the justice department, turning blind eyes at very obvious criminal violations, what appears for a long time. Not any more. :rolleyes:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Talking about Bengazi.

Defense, State Department Documents Reveal Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...ys-in-advance/

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35944041)

I don't hate Trump, I hate what he's doing to a country that I admire very much, and how he is abusing his power and the office of the President - he acts like a spoilt 10 year old when he is the leader of the free world and the most powerful nation on earth. I dislike him because he hasn't criticised Putin, the leader of the country which has been trying to undermine democracy in the USA (and other places), as unanimously confirmed by all his Intelligence Community agencies, but criticises everyone else.

I think Corbyn is great - he's the main reason the Tories stayed in power; if Labour had a decent leader, they may have won the last election (so I am hoping he stays Leader); also, Corbyn is completely in the wrong not condeming Putin.

As for the statement "I see no criticisms of Corbyn by you", here you go...

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35942417

Here I am defending the BBC against the Corbynistas.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35941333

Here's one where I mock Corbyn.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35940823

Here's one where I criticise Momentum, Corbyn's most rabid supporters.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35938564

Here's one where I praise him with faint damns...
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35937988

Here's one where I jokingly suggest he might be a sleeper agent.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35937651

Here's one where I state I am not a Corbyn fan.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35937179

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35915483

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...n#post35902614

Other than those though, when have you ever criticised him... :D