Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

Been upgraded to 4Mb.

Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:12:46 GMT
1st 128K took 359 ms = 365103 Bytes/sec = approx 3038 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 375 ms = 349525 Bytes/sec = approx 2908 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 359 ms = 365103 Bytes/sec = approx 3038 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 375 ms = 349525 Bytes/sec = approx 2908 kbits/sec

I was expecting it to be faster. I've run the test numerous times at different times of the day - doesn't seem to make any difference.

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

Probability Mr Burns, is that everyone on your UBR has just realised they have 4MBit and are downloading the Internet, give it a while im sure itll settle down :)

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

i doubt that 85% of people know they are going even be upgraded

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

Did you know that 22.5% of statistics are completely made up? :)

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

maybe

probability n to the 10 thousand shades of infinity, - and counting .... that Gary is probably right :p: :D

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

i doubt that, but the point was that point made in the previous post was pointless:erm:

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

in the pointless forest, maybe, but oblio & arrow proved that you didn't have to have a point, and once that point had been made, we could all move on :)

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

I think you'll find that only 18.7% of statistics are made up.

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

I could have sworn it was 92.5%

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

1% of new members join just to post a random thing in 1 thread? :welcome:

---------- Post added at 01:11 ---------- Previous post was at 00:45 ----------

Well here in Parkstone (BH14) my Internet just died and came back to life and I was hoping it was 4meg coming along but, alas, still running at 2meg! Oh well

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

Upgrade to report here in Belfast. 10 minutes downtime and

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:31:29 UTC
1st 128K took 265 ms = 494611 Bytes/sec = approx 4115 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 266 ms = 492752 Bytes/sec = approx 4100 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 265 ms = 494611 Bytes/sec = approx 4115 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 297 ms = 441320 Bytes/sec = approx 3672 kbits/sec

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

Winnersh has been upgraded.:)
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 04:10:07 UTC
1st 512K took 1094 ms = 468 KB/sec, approx 3856 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1078 ms = 475 KB/sec, approx 3914 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1078 ms = 475 KB/sec, approx 3914 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps
4th 512K took 1078 ms = 475 KB/sec, approx 3914 Kbps, 3.82 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 3900 Kbps, 3.81 Mbps.

Ken

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

Upgraded in RG10 9 area

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:27:06 GMT

1st 512K took 1100 ms = 465.5 KB/sec, approx 3836 Kbps, 3.75 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1095 ms = 467.6 KB/sec, approx 3853 Kbps, 3.76 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1083 ms = 472.8 KB/sec, approx 3896 Kbps, 3.8 Mbps
4th 512K took 1093 ms = 468.4 KB/sec, approx 3860 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps


Overall Average Speed = approx 3861 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps

NTL:100 SACM

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

Change the misleading thread title to New Speeds July 1st and people might stop asking when they're going to get upgraded.
I don't know why NTL bother announcing these things and putting a deadline in. If they just rolled it out then announced it after the event nobody would be complaining and lots people would think it was a bonus as opposed to an entitlement.

Re: New Speeds - June 1st
 

:zzz::zzz::zzz::zzz::zzz: