Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Brexit (Old) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33706539)

Dave42 12-01-2019 00:58

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35978876)
This seems to be the 'clarification' that was speculated on a while back. An exchange of letters highlighting the better parts of the deal for May as well as some political language that expresses a joint desire for the backstop to be limited. I think the government hopes that the letters can be pointed at as both the better parts of the deal but also as material for any future legal challenge should the EU not agree to end the backstop in future.

It's not changing the deal itself though.

exactly it not legal text so cant see it making much difference at all

Pierre 12-01-2019 08:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35978855)
Hopefully- whichever side we voted, nobody should want an outcome which hurts the UK.

An outcome that hurts the U.K. least in the short to medium term.

ianch99 12-01-2019 09:25

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35978895)
An outcome that hurts the U.K. least in the short to medium term.

I don't understand this comment.

You regularly say that the 17.4 million knew what they voted for but none of them were told "vote Leave and we will hurt the U.K. at least in the short term and also probably the medium term as well"?

So this scenario is definitely off the agenda then. We can only leave with No Deal if it fulfils the pledges of the Leave campaign. That is, after all, what you voted for, right?

papa smurf 12-01-2019 09:33

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35978899)
I don't understand this comment.

You regularly say that the 17.4 million knew what they voted for but none of them were told "vote Leave and we will hurt the U.K. at least in the short term and also probably the medium term as well"?

So this scenario is definitely off the agenda then. We can only leave with No Deal if it fulfils the pledges of the Leave campaign. That is, after all, what you voted for, right?

Were you sleeping at the height of project fear mk1 :shrug:

1andrew1 12-01-2019 09:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35978876)
This seems to be the 'clarification' that was speculated on a while back. An exchange of letters highlighting the better parts of the deal for May as well as some political language that expresses a joint desire for the backstop to be limited. I think the government hopes that the letters can be pointed at as both the better parts of the deal but also as material for any future legal challenge should the EU not agree to end the backstop in future.

It's not changing the deal itself though.

At the end of the day, May has a little more than she did last year. Whether it's enough to sway the vote, time will tell, but she can say she's tried. Junker can also face up to his stakeholders in the event of a no-deal Brexit and say he went the extra kilometre to try and prevent it happening.

---------- Post added at 09:49 ---------- Previous post was at 09:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35978902)
Were you sleeping at the height of project fear mk1 :shrug:

I think ianch99 meant none of them were told by the Leave Campaigns.

ianch99 12-01-2019 11:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35978904)
I think ianch99 meant none of them were told by the Leave Campaigns.

Thank you Andrew ..

Maggy 12-01-2019 11:26

Re: Brexit
 
In view of the warnings about a hard brexit who is stockpiling and what are you stockpiling?

I'm not sure whether to do so as lack of space will be my issue. I just hope that the medication I'm prescribed will still be available.I'm already having trouble with one product..

papa smurf 12-01-2019 11:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35978913)
In view of the warnings about a hard brexit who is stockpiling and what are you stockpiling?

I'm not sure whether to do so as lack of space will be my issue. I just hope that the medication I'm prescribed will still be available.I'm already having trouble with one product..

I always stockpile tinned/preserved and dried food at this time of year ready to stock up the food cupboards on my boat so if we have shortages i'll be semi prepared,and there's
always rabbits /pigeons etc to shoot.

i think i have most of the country's supply of lamb chops in the freezer;)

Mick 12-01-2019 11:51

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35978899)
I don't understand this comment.

You regularly say that the 17.4 million knew what they voted for but none of them were told "vote Leave and we will hurt the U.K. at least in the short term and also probably the medium term as well"?

So this scenario is definitely off the agenda then. We can only leave with No Deal if it fulfils the pledges of the Leave campaign. That is, after all, what you voted for, right?

Erm yes it was said there could be issues, it was still worth the risk because I wanted to leave the totally corrupted EU. 90% of the World Future Trade growth, sounds a lot better than a declining 10% economic bubble, that will be the EU.

However, Pierre has repeatedly stated he voted Remain. But unlike you, respects the Democratic result.

jfman 12-01-2019 11:52

Re: Brexit
 
Article 50 will need extended even if Theresa May wins the vote.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8723281.html

Quote:

The government must pass a series of bills including those relating to trade, immigration and agriculture to ensure the country has the legislative framework in place come Brexit day.

Angua 12-01-2019 11:52

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35978913)
In view of the warnings about a hard brexit who is stockpiling and what are you stockpiling?

I'm not sure whether to do so as lack of space will be my issue. I just hope that the medication I'm prescribed will still be available.I'm already having trouble with one product..

Biggest issue with medication is the limits GPs put on renewals. I really had to fight to get one prescription renewed as I was told to take a double dose for a month, so ran out a month early.

denphone 12-01-2019 12:01

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35978917)
Biggest issue with medication is the limits GPs put on renewals. I really had to fight to get one prescription renewed as I was told to take a double dose for a month, so ran out a month early.

l can concur with you on that as l have had several issues about some of my medications with my surgery.

ianch99 12-01-2019 12:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35978915)
Erm yes it was said there could be issues, it was still worth the risk because I wanted to leave the totally corrupted EU. 90% of the World Future Trade growth, sounds a lot better than a declining 10% economic bubble, that will be the EU.

However, Pierre has repeatedly stated he voted Remain. But unlike you, respects the Democratic result.

My recollection of the Leave campaign is that they did not make it clear that a Leave vote would risk short to medium term harm to the country. As for Pierre, he does support the "mandate" that the Leave result delivered. This "mandate" does not validate the option of short to medium term harm as it was not on the table during the campaign.

So, consequently, the only deal that comes close (ish) to being validated by the Leave "mandate" is Mrs May's. Having said that, I do not recognise the result as a democratic decision for the variety of reasons I have mentioned numerous times previously in this thread.

1andrew1 12-01-2019 12:32

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35978913)
In view of the warnings about a hard brexit who is stockpiling and what are you stockpiling?

I'm not sure whether to do so as lack of space will be my issue. I just hope that the medication I'm prescribed will still be available.I'm already having trouble with one product..

I don't think that there will be a hard Brexit and I'm not hoarding anything, but this Breakfast food infographic is interesting.
https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg...nfographic.pdf

Mick 12-01-2019 12:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35978920)
My recollection of the Leave campaign is that they did not make it clear that a Leave vote would risk short to medium term harm to the country. As for Pierre, he does support the "mandate" that the Leave result delivered. This "mandate" does not validate the option of short to medium term harm as it was not on the table during the campaign.

So, consequently, the only deal that comes close (ish) to being validated by the Leave "mandate" is Mrs May's. Having said that, I do not recognise the result as a democratic decision for the variety of reasons I have mentioned numerous times previously in this thread.

But despite all the lies from “Both” Leave and Remain camps. Had Remain won, you would had no problem recognising the result and we would miraculously not be having this discussion.

The fact you want yet another referendum, that would be just as bad in the first with scare stories etc and Leave won again on similar %s, should we keep going until we get the result you want, bearing in mind that there will still be people not old enough to vote etc etc.... ?

RichardCoulter 12-01-2019 13:17

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35978913)
In view of the warnings about a hard brexit who is stockpiling and what are you stockpiling?

I'm not sure whether to do so as lack of space will be my issue. I just hope that the medication I'm prescribed will still be available.I'm already having trouble with one product..

I've been stockpiling medication where I can and have increased my stock of tinned goods (i'm lucky in that space isn't an issue).

They say that people shouldn't stockpile as this in itself will cause shortages, but I cannot risk running out of essential medication and need food to take some of it with. I simply daren't risk not doing anything else as I don't trust this incompetent Government and their approach to Brexit.

They are now only just doing very limited tests with lorries being held up and seconding civil servants to deal with the matter, they have made promises which turned out to be lies and changed their minds at the last minute etc.

heero_yuy 12-01-2019 13:29

Re: Brexit
 
We're not stockpiling as there's quite enough food in the cupboards and freezers to last several months. I make the bread anyway and we don't use milk except dried for cooking.

It's only some imported fresh veg, tomatoes and brocolli have been mentioned, that might be affected. The millennials will just have to do without avocados for a while. :D

denphone 12-01-2019 14:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35978932)
We're not stockpiling as there's quite enough food in the cupboards and freezers to last several months. I make the bread anyway and we don't use milk except dried for cooking.

It's only some imported fresh veg, tomatoes and brocolli have been mentioned, that might be affected. The millennials will just have to do without avocados for a while. :D

l read this the other day on our reliance on food and feed sourced from abroad.

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ad-study-finds

Mr K 12-01-2019 14:51

Re: Brexit
 
Planning for extra crops in the allotment this year; still self sufficient in pumpkins/leeks/parsnips and will be for some time...
Have tried stockpiling wine but it never quite works out ;)

RichardCoulter 12-01-2019 14:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35978932)
We're not stockpiling as there's quite enough food in the cupboards and freezers to last several months. I make the bread anyway and we don't use milk except dried for cooking.

It's only some imported fresh veg, tomatoes and brocolli have been mentioned, that might be affected. The millennials will just have to do without avocados for a while. :D

... and it's fresh things that we can't stockpile.

Mr K 12-01-2019 14:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35978942)
... and it's fresh things that we can't stockpile.

Get a goat Richard , milk, cheese, little space needed and will keep the weeds, and everything else down. I'm tempted to get one !

RichardCoulter 12-01-2019 14:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35978941)
Planning for extra crops in the allotment this year; still self sufficient in pumpkins/leeks/parsnips and will be for some time...
Have tried stockpiling wine but it never quite works out ;)

������

On films about dystopian societies, they often have people pinching things from allotments or petrol for generators etc I hope we don't end up like that:(

---------- Post added at 14:57 ---------- Previous post was at 14:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35978943)
Get a goat Richard , milk, cheese, little space needed and will keep the weeds, and everything else down. I'm tempted to get one !

Haha now that's an idea. I'll swap you some milk for some of your leeks :D

denphone 12-01-2019 14:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35978942)
... and it's fresh things that we can't stockpile.

And its the perishables which could be in short supply and if that happens then the price is highly likely to shoot up.

RichardCoulter 12-01-2019 14:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35978946)
And its the perishables which could be in short supply and if that happens then the price is highly likely to shoot up.

Well, the weather last year has apparently affected crops, so vegetables are due to go up in price anyway. Another reason i've been stockpiling tinned stuff.

papa smurf 12-01-2019 15:28

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35978943)
Get a goat Richard , milk, cheese, little space needed and will keep the weeds, and everything else down. I'm tempted to get one !

Had one they stink and upset the neighbours.

---------- Post added at 15:27 ---------- Previous post was at 15:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35978947)
Well, the weather last year has apparently affected crops, so vegetables are due to go up in price anyway. Another reason i've been stockpiling tinned stuff.

Potatoes are quite small this year.

---------- Post added at 15:28 ---------- Previous post was at 15:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35978944)
������

On films about dystopian societies, they often have people pinching things from allotments or petrol for generators etc I hope we don't end up like that:(

---------- Post added at 14:57 ---------- Previous post was at 14:56 ----------



Haha now that's an idea. I'll swap you some milk for some of your leeks :D

I gave up my allotment because we are already there.

jfman 12-01-2019 16:27

Re: Brexit
 
Stockpiling cash in dollars and euro preparing for the collapse of the pound on the currency markets.

papa smurf 12-01-2019 16:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35978957)
Stockpiling cash in dollars and euro preparing for the collapse of the pound on the currency markets.

Not all your pocket money surely ;):D:D:D:)

RichardCoulter 12-01-2019 16:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35978948)
Had one they stink and upset the neighbours.

---------- Post added at 15:27 ---------- Previous post was at 15:25 ----------



Potatoes are quite small this year.

---------- Post added at 15:28 ---------- Previous post was at 15:27 ----------



I gave up my allotment because we are already there.

People were already digging your vegetables up :shocked:

papa smurf 12-01-2019 16:55

Re: Brexit
 
Yellow Vests face Yellow Vests: Fights erupt between anti-Brexit and pro-Brexit supporters

Eyewitness Ed Crawford, a photojournalist, has told The Express: "Both sides met at Trafalgar Square and there were several fights that broke out between UK antifa.

"Multiple people arrested and both sides screaming Nazi at each other.

"Owen Jones was questioned by A pro Brexit campaigner Danny Tommo and things got heated with him being escorted away.

"He claimed the pro Brexit protester was being rude and other pro Brexit protesters were spitting at him.

"A huge entourage of left wing activists escorted him away and loads of people were chasing after him.


https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/10...xit-pro-brexit

jfman 12-01-2019 17:29

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35978961)
Not all your pocket money surely ;):D:D:D:)

30% of a tenner is nearly £3 ;)

Chris 12-01-2019 17:41

Re: Brexit
 
You’re a Nazi!

No, you’re a Nazi!

Yeah well my dad says you’re a Nazi and my dad could beat up your dad so there!

:rolleyes:

It really has gone the full Python ...

jfman 12-01-2019 18:03

Re: Brexit
 
It’s all rather depressing.

Referenda aren’t really helpful where they aren’t clearly won or lost by decisive majorities. The division in the country is huge and is unlikely to be healed regardless of the outcome.

Switzerland does hold many, but this results in shorter campaigns, less entrenched views and a more mature response to losing. Looking at the results for the last ten years in that country most are settled 60-40 or greater. A number of issues, tax, family income, have been raised in different forms many times, so ongoing results inform policy development going forward. None of the issues are as wholesale or wide-ranging as a black/white question of leaving the EU.

1andrew1 12-01-2019 18:04

Re: Brexit
 
Belated move by the Met.
Quote:

Protester James Goddard held over Parliament incidents
Pro-Brexit activist James Goddard has been arrested in connection with incidents outside Parliament on Monday.
Police said a man in his 30s was arrested outside St James's Park Tube station in London just before midday.
He is being held on suspicion of a public order offence.
Mr Goddard was involved in a protest in Westminster earlier this week during which Remain-supporting Conservative MP Anna Soubry was called a Nazi.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46849939

jfman 12-01-2019 18:09

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35978973)

He can count his blessing he didn’t speak with an Irish accent while carrying a table leg.

Pierre 12-01-2019 18:09

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35978899)
I don't understand this comment.

You regularly say that the 17.4 million knew what they voted for but none of them were told "vote Leave and we will hurt the U.K. at least in the short term and also probably the medium term as well"?

So this scenario is definitely off the agenda then. We can only leave with No Deal if it fulfils the pledges of the Leave campaign. That is, after all, what you voted for, right?

No deal will obviously cause issues in the short and possible medium term. But many think a price worth paying

jfman 12-01-2019 18:11

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35978976)
No deal will obviously cause issues in the short and possible medium term. But many think a price worth paying

Without any ideas “many” would be well advised to avoid speculation, or sheer guesswork, on what future may look like.

Pierre 12-01-2019 18:12

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35978913)
In view of the warnings about a hard brexit who is stockpiling and what are you stockpiling?

I'm not sure whether to do so as lack of space will be my issue. I just hope that the medication I'm prescribed will still be available.I'm already having trouble with one product..

Nothing as it is all scaremongering bollocks, and any one that does is very impressionable.

Chris 12-01-2019 18:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35978972)
It’s all rather depressing.

Referenda aren’t really helpful where they aren’t clearly won or lost by decisive majorities. The division in the country is huge and is unlikely to be healed regardless of the outcome.

Switzerland does hold many, but this results in shorter campaigns, less entrenched views and a more mature response to losing. Looking at the results for the last ten years in that country most are settled 60-40 or greater. A number of issues, tax, family income, have been raised in different forms many times, so ongoing results inform policy development going forward. None of the issues are as wholesale or wide-ranging as a black/white question of leaving the EU.

Switzerland has an utterly different political culture to the UK. Referendums (not referenda, the Latin word is a verb, not a noun ;) ) are a fundamental part of their process and the top of their government doesn’t even have a president - there’s a committee with a rotating chair.

Referendums are alien to the U.K., and we never held one before the original EU referendum. It is unfortunate that they now have clear precedent when, despite all appearances, the maturity of our own political system is in Parliament.

The one thing nobody’s talking about right now, but which I predict will define the next generation of our politics, is the opportunity Parliament has had here to exert influence. Admittedly it’s doing so when the executive is at a historic low point in its own power and competence, but I believe that once the dust has long settled on Brexit, Parliament will not easily lose its voice.

Pierre 12-01-2019 18:17

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35978977)
Without any ideas “many” would be well advised to avoid speculation, or sheer guesswork, on what future may look like.

It’s called faith in the country. You should try it sometime.

jfman 12-01-2019 18:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35978980)
It’s called faith in the country. You should try it sometime.

Faith is for belief in deities, the supernatural, mythology or similar. I suppose appropriate to a fiction like a glorious Brexit.

papa smurf 12-01-2019 18:37

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35978983)
Faith is for belief in deities, the supernatural, mythology or similar. I suppose appropriate to a fiction like a glorious Brexit.

I'm sure your faith in the EU will see you through your crisis.

Damien 12-01-2019 19:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35978926)
But despite all the lies from “Both” Leave and Remain camps. Had Remain won, you would had no problem recognising the result and we would miraculously not be having this discussion.

I think we would be having this discussion ;)

Early on in the campaign before it became clear how well Leave were doing it was hardly a secret than some Eurosceptics were looking to keep the 'loss' over 40% to order to maintain momentum for a future referendum. Remainers were discussing how big the win would need to be in order to 'kill the issue for a generation' and the question of a 2nd Scottish referendum was being discussed too. I think even some members on here were talking about what would be required in order to have another vote.

The vote always had the prospect of a second referendum in the background it was just people thought it was be if Remain won a narrow victory. If it was Remain 52% I am almost certain we would be discussing it.

Doesn't mean it's right. I would be arguing against it. I don't feel as strongly against a second referendum now obviously :D although I still don't really support it.

Hugh 12-01-2019 19:11

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35978980)
It’s called faith in the country. You should try it sometime.

Faith doesn’t solve problems, planning does.

Hugh 12-01-2019 19:30

Re: Brexit
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35978966)
Yellow Vests face Yellow Vests: Fights erupt between anti-Brexit and pro-Brexit supporters

Eyewitness Ed Crawford, a photojournalist, has told The Express: "Both sides met at Trafalgar Square and there were several fights that broke out between UK antifa.

"Multiple people arrested and both sides screaming Nazi at each other.

"Owen Jones was questioned by A pro Brexit campaigner Danny Tommo and things got heated with him being escorted away.

"He claimed the pro Brexit protester was being rude and other pro Brexit protesters were spitting at him.

"A huge entourage of left wing activists escorted him away and loads of people were chasing after him.


https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/10...xit-pro-brexit

The Pro-Brexit "yellow vests" were handing out these fliers in London today showing a list of the things they, the U.K. Yellow Vests, stand for - I think they meant "against" rather "for" most of the items.

Pierre 12-01-2019 19:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35978983)
Faith is for belief in deities, the supernatural, mythology or similar. I suppose appropriate to a fiction like a glorious Brexit.

Well I have faith in myself, my family, my co-workers, our citizens and our nation.

I don’t believe anyone has pre-fixed Brexit with “Glorious”, except you, just then.

It will not be glorious, it will be messy and painful. But that does not mean that ultimately it cannot be successful.

I’ve always been a glass half full kind of person.

---------- Post added at 19:38 ---------- Previous post was at 19:35 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35978995)
The Pro-Brexit "yellow vests" were handing out these fliers in London today showing a list of the things they, the U.K. Yellow Vests, stand for - I think they meant "against" rather "for" most of the items.

Why call them Pro-Brexit demonstrators? Brexit was only one thing on there, why not call them anti-greedy bankers demonstrators?

mrmistoffelees 12-01-2019 19:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35978976)
No deal will obviously cause issues in the short and possible medium term. But many think a price worth paying

It’s very easy to say if you’re either a) not one of the ones who will be affected or B) one of the ones who don’t understand how you will be affected

Nb not aimed specifically at you, rather a generalisation

ianch99 12-01-2019 19:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35978979)
Referendums (not referenda, the Latin word is a verb, not a noun ;) )

Yes, Referenda :)

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/referenda

Seems either are fine ..

Carth 12-01-2019 19:51

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35978998)
It’s very easy to say if you’re either a) not one of the ones who will be affected or B) one of the ones who don’t understand how you will be affected

I'm not sure if I'm an 'A' or a 'B' :erm:

Could you please post some examples of 'A' for me to browse through, just in case I am a 'B' :D

Mr K 12-01-2019 19:55

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35978999)
Yes, Referenda :)

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/referenda

Seems either are fine ..

What about 'referendi'? (Sorry, I'll get my coat.....) :)

mrmistoffelees 12-01-2019 19:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35979001)
I'm not sure if I'm an 'A' or a 'B' :erm:

Could you please post some examples of 'A' for me to browse through, just in case I am a 'B' :D

A)
Financially secure
Working in an indemand industry or industry that’s furthest away from the ripples
Etc

B)
financially insecure
Manufacturing industry employee or within supply chain
Lacking in political nouse


The affluent are ultimately not going to be ones who suffer the hardest of shocks

Damien 12-01-2019 20:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35978996)

Why call them Pro-Brexit demonstrators? Brexit was only one thing on there, why not call them anti-greedy bankers demonstrators?

Because their protests so far have largely been about Brexit and their incoherent list of things they stand for doesn't really add much.

papa smurf 12-01-2019 20:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35978999)
Yes, Referenda :)

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/referenda

Seems either are fine ..

Whip up a poll we can referenderate the situation:)

jfman 12-01-2019 20:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35978996)
Well I have faith in myself, my family, my co-workers, our citizens and our nation.

I don’t believe anyone has pre-fixed Brexit with “Glorious”, except you, just then.

It will not be glorious, it will be messy and painful. But that does not mean that ultimately it cannot be successful.

I’ve always been a glass half full kind of person.

---------- Post added at 19:38 ---------- Previous post was at 19:35 ----------



Why call them Pro-Brexit demonstrators? Brexit was only one thing on there, why not call them anti-greedy bankers demonstrators?

Surely, if Brexit is to be successful in the longer term and not short/medium term then taking the time to get it right is more important than doing it as quickly as possible?

If the plan is to leave on WTO terms surely making sure we are as ready as we can be is more important than adhering to a date decided two years ago when all the discussion was around “how good the deal will be”.

---------- Post added at 20:18 ---------- Previous post was at 20:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35979009)
Whip up a poll we can referenderate the situation:)

Can we use the single transferable vote to ensure a decisive outcome ;)

RichardCoulter 12-01-2019 20:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35978978)
Nothing as it is all scaremongering bollocks, and any one that does is very impressionable.

Well, I don't trust this Government and their muddled approach to Brexit and can't afford to take any chances as, without my medication, I would probably die.

I usually stockpile canned foodstuff in case there are any problems with supply or delivery, but I must admit i've got more than usual.

If Brexit doesn't go ahead, a deal is reached or there doesn't turn out to be any problems I won't have lost anything as it will all still get used eventually.

---------- Post added at 20:30 ---------- Previous post was at 20:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35979005)
A)
Financially secure
Working in an indemand industry or industry that’s furthest away from the ripples
Etc

B)
financially insecure
Manufacturing industry employee or within supply chain
Lacking in political nouse


The affluent are ultimately not going to be ones who suffer the hardest of shocks

As is usually the case. If things start to go wrong I genuinely fear there could be riots. Whilst I do have sympathy with people who are poor or are in insecure jobs, I wouldn't want any problems at any domestic or commercial premises of mine or anyone else's.

jfman 12-01-2019 20:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35979012)
Well, I don't trust this Government and their muddled approach to Brexit and can't afford to take any chances as, without my medication, I would probably die.

I usually stockpile canned foodstuff in case there are any problems with supply or delivery, but I must admit i've got more than usual.

If Brexit doesn't go ahead, a deal is reached or there doesn't turn out to be any problems I won't have lost anything as it will all still get used eventually.

---------- Post added at 20:30 ---------- Previous post was at 20:25 ----------



As is usually the case. If things start to go wrong I genuinely fear there could be riots. Whilst I do have sympathy with people who are poor or are in insecure jobs, I wouldn't want any problems at any domestic or commercial premises of mine or anyone else's.

Whatever happened to we’re all in this together.

Brexit appealed to the lowest common denominator in society so it can’t be considered a surprise that when it doesn’t deliver to expectations they will kick out.

It’d be preferable for any riots or looting to be larger, sending the country further into crisis. It’d focus the minds of our politicians and we’d maybe see some honesty for a change.

Mr K 12-01-2019 20:51

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979014)
Whatever happened to we’re all in this together.

Brexit appealed to the lowest common denominator in society so it can’t be considered a surprise that when it doesn’t deliver to expectations they will kick out.

It’d be preferable for any riots or looting to be larger, sending the country further into crisis. It’d focus the minds of our politicians and we’d maybe see some honesty for a change.

Riots? Looting? I think we underestimate the apathy of the masses..... As long as Strictly is on, and they can still order pizza, they'll keep their heads down and descend into a diabetic coma.

papa smurf 12-01-2019 20:51

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35978995)
The Pro-Brexit "yellow vests" were handing out these fliers in London today showing a list of the things they, the U.K. Yellow Vests, stand for - I think they meant "against" rather "for" most of the items.

Some one's probably at home right now banging their head against the wall saying oops :banghead:

denphone 12-01-2019 20:55

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35979016)
Riots? Looting? I think we underestimate the apathy of the masses..... As long as Strictly is on, and they can still order pizza, they'll keep their heads down and descend into a diabetic coma.

l hope l am not included in your description of the masses as l don't watch Strictly and l don't order pizza.;)

Mr K 12-01-2019 21:00

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35979019)
l hope l am not included in your description of the masses as l don't watch Strictly and l don't order pizza.;)

Then you'll be the one rioting Den ;)

Chris 12-01-2019 21:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35978999)
Yes, Referenda :)

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/referenda

Seems either are fine ..

An American English online dictionary without any discussion or etymology? No thanks ...

The Oxford English Dictionary says no, but seeing as it’s behind a paywall the closest we can get to its wisdom is sadly via a discussion of it at Wikipedia ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referendum

In short, because it is coined in English as an English noun, and not according to its Latin usage, it should be pluralised according to English grammatical rules, not Latin ones. Hence referendums, not referenda.

Dictionary.com is simply recording the fact that the word is used in that way, not necessarily that it is correct to do so.

But we digress. :)

denphone 12-01-2019 21:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35979021)
Then you'll be the one rioting Den ;)

Not for me Mr K as l don't fancy spending a night in the cell and having a criminal record at the end of it all.:)

jfman 12-01-2019 21:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35979016)
Riots? Looting? I think we underestimate the apathy of the masses..... As long as Strictly is on, and they can still order pizza, they'll keep their heads down and descend into a diabetic coma.

I said it’d be preferable in the event of leaving.

However yes, I agree with your point about general apathy.

richard s 12-01-2019 21:33

Re: Brexit
 
I have just found out that the Tory MP leavers want to build a wall straight up the middle of the English channel.:D

pip08456 12-01-2019 22:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35979023)
An American English online dictionary without any discussion or etymology? No thanks ...

The Oxford English Dictionary says no, but seeing as it’s behind a paywall the closest we can get to its wisdom is sadly via a discussion of it at Wikipedia ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referendum

In short, because it is coined in English as an English noun, and not according to its Latin usage, it should be pluralised according to English grammatical rules, not Latin ones. Hence referendums, not referenda.

Dictionary.com is simply recording the fact that the word is used in that way, not necessarily that it is correct to do so.

But we digress. :)

There's always the Cambridge English Dictionary as a falllback.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...ish/referendum

Or even Oxford Living Distionaries.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/referendum

From example sentences.
Quote:

‘He could also claim a legitimacy built on a succession of victories in irreproachably clean popular votes in referendums and multi-party elections.’

1andrew1 13-01-2019 00:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35979023)
An American English online dictionary without any discussion or etymology? No thanks ...

The Oxford English Dictionary says no, but seeing as it’s behind a paywall the closest we can get to its wisdom is sadly via a discussion of it at Wikipedia ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referendum

In short, because it is coined in English as an English noun, and not according to its Latin usage, it should be pluralised according to English grammatical rules, not Latin ones. Hence referendums, not referenda.

Dictionary.com is simply recording the fact that the word is used in that way, not necessarily that it is correct to do so.

But we digress. :)

Interesting side debate. :) Annoying we can't see the OED.
Side point: ianch99's link referenced Collins (a UK publisher not US) and it has referenda available as a plural. My preference is referendums for as you say, referendum has been brought into the English language.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/di...ish/referendum

jfman 13-01-2019 00:23

Re: Brexit
 
If a word is used incorrectly enough it gets defined that way.

It literally kills me when it happens.

1andrew1 13-01-2019 00:32

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979038)
If a word is used incorrectly enough it gets defined that way.

It literally kills me when it happens.

Lol, thank you for your contribution from the next world. :)

Meanwhile, Theresa May could be facing a coup if she loses the vote on Tuesday. The Sunday Times reports that a cross-party group of backbenchers are planning to take control of exit talks if her plan falls through.
https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/01/8.jpg

jfman 13-01-2019 01:02

Re: Brexit
 
I did spot a link to that on Twitter, wasn’t 100% sure how to link to the image. A genuinely interesting article that frames the difficulty of our ‘unwritten’ constitution.

It’s based on norms and common practice. It doesn’t specify an arbiter or ultimate decision maker.

The supremacy of the Commons over the Lords is in statute in the Parliament Act.

The belief is that the will of Government and Parliament can’t be too far apart. In normal times that would be true, a Government would be free to drop a policy it viewed as too contentious, or to make a deal in common ground. Generally a Government wouldn’t be able to be held to ransom by the DUP, or even a jilted ex-Minister and a few friends.

We’ve got a Chancellor who is in the role because May can’t remove him

These are truly uncharted waters.

The Government is presently in contempt of Parliament, a situation that can only embolden the Speaker. If the Government seeks to remove Bercow that only increases the crisis.

Our political system wasn’t designed for a situation where a Government pushes a policy that the majority of MPs oppose, yet it could very well win a vote of confidence.

Angua 13-01-2019 09:26

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35979016)
Riots? Looting? I think we underestimate the apathy of the masses..... As long as Strictly is on, and they can still order pizza, they'll keep their heads down and descend into a diabetic coma.

I watch Strictly but don't order pizza. A better analogy would be BB or Love Island (neither of which I watch). Strictly is frightfully middle class don't you know?

Would rather see A50 extended and an acceptable deal worked out, than dropping of a cliff edge into no deal.

Before the referendum was called, I suspect no thought whatsoever was given to the NI border issues relating to the GFA. May getting into bed with the DUP has hampered negotiations ever since, but the election results meant to govern she needed other support.

Adversarial politics mean we are where we are.

ianch99 13-01-2019 09:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35979023)
An American English online dictionary without any discussion or etymology? No thanks ...

The Oxford English Dictionary says no, but seeing as it’s behind a paywall the closest we can get to its wisdom is sadly via a discussion of it at Wikipedia ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referendum

In short, because it is coined in English as an English noun, and not according to its Latin usage, it should be pluralised according to English grammatical rules, not Latin ones. Hence referendums, not referenda.

Dictionary.com is simply recording the fact that the word is used in that way, not necessarily that it is correct to do so.

But we digress. :)

Final word is to be had by the formidable Betty Boothroyd :)

UK Politics: News Referendums or referenda?

Quote:

Latin or English? Singular or plural? The gerundive ... or not?

Speaker Betty Boothroyd was plunged on Wednesday morning into this thorny grammatical debate: is the plural of referendum "referendums" or "referenda"?

Tory MP and author Alan Clark pressed her to give a ruling, or at least a preference, on which MPs should use.

With murmurs of "it's the gerundive" from the Tory benches, Mr Clark (Kensington and Chelsea), encouraged the Speaker to "strike a blow for classical revivalism."

But Betty Boothroyd was not going to be drawn. It was, she said, "All a matter of taste".

The Speaker took the point of order with some humour

Mr Clark asked for the ruling during a debate on referendums. He said he was prompted to do so after remembering that in the past he had been called to order for "using the language of the common market."

His point was that he had "heard on many occasions colleagues refer to referendums - which is an exceedingly ugly term."

He wanted to know whether Madame Speaker would "prefer us to continue to use the Latin word, or whether you have no objection to the continued anglicisation of this term."

The Speaker's answer came swiftly. Although it was hardly a point of order, and more a matter of taste, she said:

"I do notice on the Public Bill List that the word referendums for Scotland and Wales is used there. The word referendum was first used in English 150 years ago, according to the Oxford English dictionary which I've just been able to refer to.

"So I imagine after 150 years the House will be quite used to it now. I think the plural is a matter of taste but I've always preferred the use of the English language to any Latin form if that is of some guidance."

And there - for the time being - the House let the matter rest.

1andrew1 13-01-2019 09:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35978995)
The Pro-Brexit "yellow vests" were handing out these fliers in London today showing a list of the things they, the U.K. Yellow Vests, stand for - I think they meant "against" rather "for" most of the items.

Hilarious in a twisted kind of way.
They don't seem to have learnt from the populists with their more memorable (albeit undeliverable) slogans of "lock her up", "take back control", "build the wall".

---------- Post added at 09:54 ---------- Previous post was at 09:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35979044)
I watch Strictly but don't order pizza. A better analogy would be BB or Love Island (neither of which I watch). Strictly is frightfully middle class don't you know?

Would rather see A50 extended and an acceptable deal worked out, than dropping of a cliff edge into no deal.

Before the referendum was called, I suspect no thought whatsoever was given to the NI border issues relating to the GFA. May getting into bed with the DUP has hampered negotiations ever since, but the election results meant to govern she needed other support.

Adversarial politics mean we are where we are.

Don't think the EU is keen on an extension just for more negotiations but it knows that a no-deal is not good for anyone. Due to the delay in negotiations, there are now two things to sort out and not one.
1) Withdrawal Agreement. This is meant to be a fairly quick agreement around costs due etc. Theresa May laid down her red lines so the options open should be relatively straightforward.
2) Free trade agreement. This is where the negotiations really begin eg fishing rights, degree of commons standards, access to each other's markets, etc. The EU is saving its energies for this as it will be a long-term situation.

The NI border was flagged up but derided as Project Fear. I think some on here even mentioned it as a non-issue invented by Remainers.

Mr K 13-01-2019 11:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35979039)
Lol, thank you for your contribution from the next world. :)

Meanwhile, Theresa May could be facing a coup if she loses the vote on Tuesday. The Sunday Times reports that a cross-party group of backbenchers are planning to take control of exit talks if her plan falls through.
https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/01/9.jpg

They love their 'plots' these unimaginative headline writers. Also.'traitors' and 'saboteurs' are favourite ones.
The Fail has.maged to get 2 of them into one headline, well done !

denphone 13-01-2019 11:09

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35979055)
They love their 'plots' these unimaginative headline writers. Also.'traitors' and 'saboteurs' are favourite ones.
The Fail has.maged to get 2 of them into one headline, well done !

No one is a traitor and no one is a saboteur as some in this country need to get a grip as that language helps no one at the end of the day..

papa smurf 13-01-2019 11:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35979057)
No one is a traitor and no one is a saboteur as some in this country need to get a grip as that language helps no one at the end of the day..

Well that's certainly an opinion den but clearly one that is not shared by many members of the public or voters as they like to be called.

Angua 13-01-2019 11:26

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35979057)
No one is a traitor and no one is a saboteur as some in this country need to get a grip as that language helps no one at the end of the day..

True

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35979058)
Well that's certainly an opinion den but clearly one that is not shared by many members of the public or voters as they like to be called.

No. MPs were selected by the majority of voters in their respective constituencies. Claiming they are traitors for looking out for what they see as the best interests of their constituents is typical DM/Express tension stirring.

Mr K 13-01-2019 11:34

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35979057)
No one is a traitor and no one is a saboteur as some in this country need to get a grip as that language helps no one at the end of the day..

Guy Fawkes was the only decent 'plotter'. Country might rue the day he failed....

papa smurf 13-01-2019 11:34

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35979059)
True



No. MPs were selected by the majority of voters in their respective constituencies. Claiming they are traitors for looking out for what they see as the best interests of their constituents is typical DM/Express tension stirring.

Once again that's an interesting opinion that you have, but i think it's the way many people feel and that's why the papers print it .

denphone 13-01-2019 11:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35979062)
Once again that's an interesting opinion that you have, but i think it's the way many people feel and that's why the papers print it .

Wrong papa as the papers print it to stir it up hate and dissent with their irresponsible front page banner headlines.

papa smurf 13-01-2019 11:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35979063)
Wrong papa as the papers print it to stir it up hate and dissent with their irresponsible front page banner headlines.

People buy papers that reflect their politics/views .

You can't just dismiss my comments as wrong just because it makes you feel uncomfortable because you buy a paper with a different political bias.

Angua 13-01-2019 11:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35979062)
Once again that's an interesting opinion that you have, but i think it's the way many people feel and that's why the papers print it .

Which came first, the papers printing the claims, or the agreement with those particular papers?

denphone 13-01-2019 11:58

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35979064)
People buy papers that reflect their politics/views .

You can't just dismiss my comments as wrong just because it makes you feel uncomfortable because you buy a paper with a different political bias.

l am not dismissing anybody's comments as l am just stating that many of the headlines we have seen in these past two years have been irresponsible front page grabbing headlines.

l don't buy newspapers as they have basically gone too far away from what a newspaper should be printing and have basically become nothing more then their owners own political vehicle.

Mr K 13-01-2019 12:08

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35979064)
People buy papers that reflect their politics/views .

Think it's more a case of some people buy papers to tell them what to think ( to save themselves the bother). Their circulation continues to fall though.

papa smurf 13-01-2019 12:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35979069)
Think it's more a case of some people buy papers to tell them what to think ( to save themselves the bother). Their circulation continues to fall though.

Yes the Guardian and the independent have a lot to answer for.

denphone 13-01-2019 12:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35979074)
Yes the Guardian and the independent have a lot to answer for.

Along with many of the others...

Hugh 13-01-2019 12:56

Re: Brexit
 
Going round in circles now - please move on

RichardCoulter 13-01-2019 13:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979014)
Whatever happened to we’re all in this together.

Brexit appealed to the lowest common denominator in society so it can’t be considered a surprise that when it doesn’t deliver to expectations they will kick out.

It’d be preferable for any riots or looting to be larger, sending the country further into crisis. It’d focus the minds of our politicians and we’d maybe see some honesty for a change.

We weren't all in it together when austerity started and we won't be in it together with any fallout from Brexit.

jfman 13-01-2019 18:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35978916)
Article 50 will need extended even if Theresa May wins the vote.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8723281.html

Technical extension until July likely.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-at-least-july

Mick 13-01-2019 19:07

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979095)
Technical extension until July likely.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-at-least-july

The EU cannot delay anything, it is not up to them - the UK has passed a law, we leave on 29th March 2019 and as previously said, Statute can only be changed with another Statute.

From Dominic Grieve himself:

"Govt should immediately remove Brexit date from domestic law if it loses on Tuesday - without doing that there is no point in going to the EU and asking for an extension."

jfman 13-01-2019 19:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35979102)
The EU cannot delay anything, it is not up to them - the UK has passed a law, we leave on 29th March 2019 and as previously said, Statute can only be changed with another Statute.

From Dominic Grieve himself:

"Govt should immediately remove Brexit date from domestic law if it loses on Tuesday - without doing that there is no point in going to the EU and asking for an extension."

The mechanics are irrelevant. We aren’t in a position to leave on 29th March, so it’s a matter of when we ask, not if. There’s no way Parliament wouldn’t vote to extend (given they want to remain anyway).

It’s good to know the EU have their finger on the pulse though.

Mick 13-01-2019 19:29

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979104)
The mechanics are irrelevant. We aren’t in a position to leave on 29th March, so it’s a matter of when we ask, not if. There’s no way Parliament wouldn’t vote to extend (given they want to remain anyway).

It’s good to know the EU have their finger on the pulse though.

Are you being deliberately obtuse?

The Mechanics are not irrelevant!!!

I trust the word of the former Attorney General, who knows a thing or two about law than you will ever know.

We leave on 29th March 2019, nothing you say alters that!!! :rolleyes:

jfman 13-01-2019 19:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35979107)
Are you being deliberately obtuse?

The Mechanics are not irrelevant!!!

I trust the word of the former Attorney General, who knows a thing or two about law than you will ever know.

We leave on 29th March 2019, nothing you say alters that!!! :rolleyes:

I’m not being deliberately obtuse.

There’s no need to be disrespectful either because you don’t agree.

When May’s deal goes down there’s no chance that she will actually go through with no deal on 29th March. We need six Bills passed and a few hundred statutory instruments to facilitate Brexit and don’t have the time to do it.

At that point the Government and Parliament agree on one narrow point (to amend the existing or replace legislation). I’m not actually disagreeing with Dominic Grieve.

Mick 13-01-2019 19:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979108)
I’m not being deliberately obtuse.

There’s no need to be disrespectful either because you don’t agree.

When May’s deal goes down there’s no chance that she will actually go through with no deal on 29th March. We need six Bills passed and a few hundred statutory instruments to facilitate Brexit and don’t have the time to do it.

At that point the Government and Parliament agree on one narrow point (to amend the existing or replace legislation). I’m not actually disagreeing with Dominic Grieve.

Yes you are!

I am not being disrespectful, it's just you keep saying the same factually inaccurate things.

Saying the mechanics are irrelevant when they are actually not.

I repeat - The date is set - we leave on 29th March, 2019, unless a new Statute is passed and it's the government of the day, who actually puts forward this change.

Pierre 13-01-2019 19:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979104)
The mechanics are irrelevant. We aren’t in a position to leave on 29th March.

Yes we are.

jfman 13-01-2019 19:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35979109)
Yes you are!

I am not being disrespectful, it's just you keep saying the same factually inaccurate things.

Saying the mechanics are irrelevant when they are actually not.

I repeat - The date is set - we leave on 29th March, 2019, unless a new Statute is passed and it's the government of the day, who actually puts forward this change.

The mechanics don’t matter when Government and Parliament agree.

The Government has to ask the EU for an extension, if it does, and the EU agree as suggested in the linked article then Parliament won’t stand in the way.

Angua 13-01-2019 19:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35979111)
Yes we are.

We shall see? Particularly now the government has to come up with an alternative within 3 days, as May's current deal on the table seems likely to be rejected.

Delay in having a vote has given us less time to sort things out.

jfman 13-01-2019 20:00

Re: Brexit
 
Between now and leaving Parliament needs to pass:

Trade Bill
Agriculture Bill
Fisheries Bill
Healthcare Bill
Immigration Bill
Financial services Bill
Withdrawal Agreement

Mick 13-01-2019 21:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979114)
The mechanics don’t matter when Government and Parliament agree.

The Government has to ask the EU for an extension, if it does, and the EU agree as suggested in the linked article then Parliament won’t stand in the way.

The Government has no plans and has repeatedly ruled out extending A50. So as I said... The mechanics do matter. The sooner you accept that, the better.

jfman 13-01-2019 21:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35979127)
The Government has no plans and has repeatedly ruled out extending A50. So as I said... The mechanics do matter. The sooner you accept that, the better.

If you are right, which I don’t believe you are, my acceptance or otherwise is an irrelevance.

We will see what happens after Tuesday. The can is getting kicked. They all deep down want to, they just want to blame someone else for it.

You are pinning your hopes on people you can’t trust to deliver what you want. The sooner you accept that, the better.

Mick 13-01-2019 21:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35979131)
If you are right, which I don’t believe you are, my acceptance or otherwise is an irrelevance.

We will see what happens after Tuesday. The can is getting kicked. They all deep down want to, they just want to blame someone else for it.

You are pinning your hopes on people you can’t trust to deliver what you want. The sooner you accept that, the better.

Can we keep this thread to facts please. Not your own personal presumptions.

You have clearly no clue what you’re talking about and try not to profess to know what I am hoping on, for a start, I don’t do “hope”.

jfman 13-01-2019 22:17

Re: Brexit
 
We’ll see.

The facts are Parliament is majority Remainers and Theresa May is good at saying one thing and doing another when it’s advantageous (the 2017 election she ruled out so often being just one example).

I get that you really don’t want it to happen but that really has no bearing on the likelihood once she loses the vote on Tuesday.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum