![]() |
Re: The energy crisis
There seems to be two choices, spend billions giving us handouts, or spend billions on buying the suppliers, and then more billions reducing the price we pay.
This assumes the actual gas/electricity will still cost the same for the suppliers to buy, regardless of who owns them. The second option sounds more expensive. |
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
|
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
|
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
As I've said before we shouldn't have squandered our national resources but maybe it's not too late to set up a sovereign wealth fund. Selling every asset the country has is a very short sighted approach and if nothing else we should learn that making a profit out of a public service shouldn't be the be all and end all. Make a profit yes, but let the country as a whole benefit from the profit. Other countries have state owner oil and gas sectors and not all of them have turned out like Venezuela. |
Re: The energy crisis
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/2...fa906ca19dc7c0
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
There is no "magic" answer. |
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
We need to do the things the private sector won’t do - actually satisfy demand removing the price premiums. Wind farms, nuclear reactors, you name it. The problem for the Tories is if the public see this as the way forward for energy what next? Water? Exorbitant costs to have hundreds of thousands of tons of human waste released into rivers and the sea? Telecommunications? Railways? None of these sectors are genuinely competitive marketplaces as understood in economic theory. Nobody can enter these markets easily without significant investment. Meaning incumbents can continue to price gouge end users. |
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
Nationalise the sector. Employ the best management, paid at fair free market rates and invest for the long term. It is not rocket science. |
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
|
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
|
Re: The energy crisis
Not quite sure how any of all that lowers the price of gas and other energy that comes from outside of the UK.
The biggest problem with infrastructure products is the ridiculous amount of time the planning permission process takes. Eg Thames Water have been trying to get permission for creating a new reservoir for over 10 years. The UK has become too much of an undesirable place to do business(nothing to do with Brexit). Just look at all the nasty attention, individuals and businesses get from the media and the public. If I had a great business or technological idea, I wouldn't want to set up in the UK. Too much anti-success sentiment. It's been like that for decades. It you're not trashed by the media and the public, you get trashed by taxes and over regulation, which adds to business costs. |
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
Anti success sentiment :rofl: these aren’t entrepreneurs coming up with exciting new ideas. They’ve bought the family silver and charging you just to have a look at it through the window. |
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
Private energy companies tend not to invest in long-term infrastructure and energy is a long-term business. If you're overly-concerned about what people think of you, you're unlikely to be a successful entrepreneur. I don't think the UK is anti-success. The grass next door is not always greener. ---------- Post added at 10:56 ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 ---------- Quote:
Water is a lot less complex and is a monopoly at regional level. To not get the basics right here is appalling. In my area, for example, there's a Thames Water leak that's been ongoing for at least three weeks impacting households' water supplies as well as blocking the road and being wasteful. |
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
Add all the excessive ongoing leaks and is it any wonder we have a escalating water shortage. |
Re: The energy crisis
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum