![]() |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Could almost anyone reasonably have the means to set up a rival streaming service? No. Barriers to entry are high. Pricing trends to oligopoly. Could almost anyone set up an independent retail outlet to sell goods similar to those in a supermarket? Yes. As demonstrated my hundreds of thousands of small independent grocery stores, bakeries, fishmongers, off licences and others up and down the country. Barriers to entry are relatively low by comparison. Pricing trends to perfect competition. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
---------- Post added at 10:24 ---------- Previous post was at 10:22 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
You can compare that to the media industry if you like, but as discussed on here, you can also compare it with supermarkets. In the first example, prices are higher than we would like and cause governments concern. In the second example, competition between the supermarkets is intense and ensures low prices. So yes, jfman, it's your choice which industry you compare with, but it's pretty pointless.really. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
You are the one that has described restrictions on distribution methods, vertical integration and all the classic characteristics of monopoly and oligopoly. You have even described it as a market that multi-billion dollar companies will be unable to compete in. That’s not the conditions of perfect competition driving down prices for end users. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
What I see happening is more streaming services set up with a vast amount of content. Some will be subscription services, others funded by advertising and it would not surprise me if some offered both alternatives. Some of them will be big, like Warner and Disney; others will be smaller, like StarzPlay. Whether the smaller ones will join together or not in time to compete with the giants, we shall see, but if they are cheaper, they could probably stand alone and not be absorbed by the larger providers in the short term. You keep going on about economic viability, and I believe that in your head, Netflix and Amazon should not even be here! You disregard in your calculations the fact that Amazon is prepared to see their Prime streaming service as a loss leader to promote their retail business and that Netflix will continue expanding for some time yet. Obviously, there will come a point where they won’t have to spend such huge sums on their content and at that point they might be prepared to allow other outlets the ability to watch their content. This is already happening, by the way - Designated Survivor is now showing on pay tv channels. So that is further income for the streaming companies. As far as the amount of new material being shown on the scheduled channels is concerned, we can already see how this is drying up. Unless they rely more on their own original material, they will be resorting to content already shown for a few years on the streamers and the films will be older too if the studios redirect their output. So Sky Cinema channels would suffer. So the scheduled channels will suffer from reducing advertising revenues caused by poorer and/or older quality programming and existing viewer trends towards VOD. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Do you ever research anything before posting ?
Designated Survivor was a show originally shown on ABC (linear TV) Seasons 1&2 , Netflix with Entertainment One took over from Season 3 and also has access to the first two seasons. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
It really is becoming tiresome. I can even see you resorted to throwing up a straw man in there by speculating on whether I think Netflix or Amazon should exist at all! You also make curious use of the word “obviously” and place an easily disputable point after it. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
You can add to that the other main strand of the arguments presented in this thread and other similar ones, basically “it’s what I like so obviously it’s what everyone else should like”. OB is always right. Experience is everything, remember. ;) |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
1. Even OB admits his wife cannot cope with getting onto streaming services (different boxes; changing inputs etc) and I am sure there are millions more who just want to turn on the TV, press a couple of buttons and watch. If all the linear channels go and the ability to simply record and play back on boxes like the V6, how will all those people cope?
2. I accept we must constantly have new programmes produced but the idea that most people only watch newly produced content is ridiculous. Surely a great many channels ONLY show previously viewed content and several are very popular. Dare I say that much of the content on Netflix has been previously shown on linear channels. Having enjoyed series 5 of Line of Duty on BBC, I then watched series 1 to 4 on Netflix, though why BBC programmes are on Netflix and not iPlayer is a mystery to me. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
Really? I for one never watch repeats. |
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Not everyone is able for various reasons to watch things first time round. Some things are certainly like to enjoy a second time. Why is there a market for DVD boxsets?
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
|
Re: Linear is old tech - on demand is the future
Quote:
---------- Post added at 18:15 ---------- Previous post was at 18:13 ---------- Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum