![]() |
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
So what are you going to do about this nannying/snooping?
Here are some ideas for you: Complaints, Virgin Media, PO Box 333, Matrix Court, Swansea. SA7 9ZJ http://www.ofcom.org.uk/ Let us know how you get on or if you don't want to post your results can you mail me at yea-right@careface.me |
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
/pointless thread.
|
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
My mail hasn't changed, I'm not a VM customer, however my ISP has the same policy on their mail. So I use Googlemail and hushmail.
You got people opinions and argued against them, dragging out a thread of which you have no opinion of one way or another and aim to do nothing about having this restrictions made against you by VM. Quote:
|
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
Well, if nannying means, as has been pointed out before, that limiting attachment types can mean the reduction in Malware, then I am all for it.
Sadly there has been no tangible evidence presented here that VM have any interest what so ever in the content of your email - spying. All we have had is opinion, and some opinion has a personal agenda as its platform, or fuelled by the usual Internet snooping paranoia. Moving on. |
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
If your AV software scans(as most, if not all do) inside archive(zip, rar etc), then while your email is stored on Virgin's(or google's) server's then you really should expect them to be want to be able to scan every file that is stored.
For this, and other reasons, I am not allowed to store password protected archives on the work network, neither am I allowed to use Microsoft Office's password protection mechanisms. At the end of the day, email's not much good for file transfer anyway, 20Mb is only enough for two decent quality/size photographs. Sorry Gary but I think this is a pointless thread, it was biased from the start as you gave the options of spying or nannying both negative to Virgin Media, how about a third, consumer safety? What next, do you want them to remove the block on SMB ports(tcp 137-139) as it may be seen as nannying? |
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
Quote:
those are the 2 I chose. they might happen to be both negative unintentionally. people have said that it could be for consumer safety. why not all 3. it is possible to have a positive and a negative at the same time. if I posted about a child abuser, asking monster or evil. would we have to have a positive such as nice man? Quote:
|
Re: Virgin email - spying or nanny?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum