Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33644220)

Turkey Machine 16-01-2009 17:39

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
If I was a major shareholder, I would be telling Virgin to stop upgrading the downstream, and start looking at the upstream. As it is, they don't seem to listen to customers.

Ignitionnet 16-01-2009 19:45

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Turkey Machine (Post 34717064)
If I was a major shareholder, I would be telling Virgin to stop upgrading the downstream, and start looking at the upstream. As it is, they don't seem to listen to customers.

Sadly there isn't necessarily an immediate financial return in that, which is all the short termist gimboids who appear to be the majority of shareholders infesting the holdings of telecomms companies care about - just note the BT shareholders who wrote to their boss complaining about a mere £1.5 billion investment in infrastructure saying they should retain the cash...

cook1984 17-01-2009 22:43

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
VM should compete on upload speeds and advertise it for what it is going to be used for - sharing.

Faster uploads of photos to Flickr or Picasa, faster sending large emails, quicker YouTube uploads, faster P2P. They already advertise fast downloads of things like music and video, so now it's time to move to the next level - sharing.

It's the direction things are moving in.

zerolight 19-01-2009 15:30

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Broadbandings (Post 34712856)
Gaming - your advertising is nonsense. There is no game that uses enough upstream to stress 768kbps upstream and 1.5Mbit will not give better latency, its' only use is for hosting of games, and it will not improve the experience of the hoster in any event.
BB

I beg to differ. Many of us use Xbox Live. This is essentially peer to peer gaming. If you play FPS, you tend to be limited to somewhere between 8 and 10 players on games which don't have dedicated servers (most games). With racing games, lag tends to spoil the fun when you host a game with more than say 5 racers (MotoGP being the exception, but it does less in terms of physics than say Forza). This is with a 768k upload. If you double that to 1.5 upload you could comfortably host 10 to 12 player races and maybe 20 player FPS gaming. If it were to be up'd to 5mb then you'd have a terrific time host full 25 to 30 car races, and massive FPS games, just like you find on dedicated servers that have better uploads than we have at home.

Your argument that current games don't stress uploads is utterly wrong. Fine, if all you do is game on a PC. The rest of us use consoles.

Ignitionnet 19-01-2009 16:35

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zerolight (Post 34718473)
I beg to differ. Many of us use Xbox Live. This is essentially peer to peer gaming. If you play FPS, you tend to be limited to somewhere between 8 and 10 players on games which don't have dedicated servers (most games). With racing games, lag tends to spoil the fun when you host a game with more than say 5 racers (MotoGP being the exception, but it does less in terms of physics than say Forza). This is with a 768k upload. If you double that to 1.5 upload you could comfortably host 10 to 12 player races and maybe 20 player FPS gaming. If it were to be up'd to 5mb then you'd have a terrific time host full 25 to 30 car races, and massive FPS games, just like you find on dedicated servers that have better uploads than we have at home.

Your argument that current games don't stress uploads is utterly wrong. Fine, if all you do is game on a PC. The rest of us use consoles.

Reread your own quote of me zero - I said that it was only of use for hosting. As a client extra upload makes no difference, I fully acknowledge that it'd be of value for hosting, and even then the hoster's latency stays the same, obviously as they are the host.

'Experience' was perhaps a bad word to use, but certainly no point besides hosting in the higher upstream.

General Maximus 19-01-2009 17:32

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zerolight (Post 34718473)
If you play FPS, you tend to be limited to somewhere between 8 and 10 players on games which don't have dedicated servers

You can't be playing any decent shooters then because all the ones I play are dedicated servers galore

Ignitionnet 20-01-2009 07:43

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 34718536)
You can't be playing any decent shooters then because all the ones I play are dedicated servers galore

On Xbox Live?

General Maximus 21-01-2009 11:05

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
my bad, i thought we was talking about PCs. Shooters should be banned on consoles because there is no way you can play them properly, they have to dumbed down for consoles so it is pointless playing them anyway

Horace 21-01-2009 12:13

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
OT: There's 250,000(on average) players of COD:WaW who'd disagree, me included and I'd played FPS' for over a decade on a PC before I got a 360.

Stabhappy 21-01-2009 12:22

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
Although I personally believe that the experience of a shooter on the PC is better, this thread isn't the place and is primarily a discussion of the limiting factors of the terrible upstream limits and throughput on the 50mb service from VM...

General Maximus 21-01-2009 12:44

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
sorry dude but as good as games are becoming on consoles (because they are copying pcs for the game play experience) there is no way you can match the playability of a keyboard and mouse with a joypad. I could kick anyones ass playing on a console any day. You just cant beat flicking a laser mouse across the screen in a split second and getting a head shot.

Kymmy 21-01-2009 12:51

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
I still play the original Unreal Tournament (UT99) online, that shows just how good the PC was ahead of consoles with online FPS...

Stabhappy 21-01-2009 13:40

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
Half the problem was that the Xbox 360/PS3 are the first gen of consoles that are openly able to get online. There weren't many online games on PS2 and even then it was a bitch to set up because of the lack of decent networking equipment in the home (most people had USB modems etc.)

UnReaL 21-01-2009 13:41

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
Unreal Tournament 2004 is highly addictive, I cannot stress that enough ^

You can host alot of players on the 20mb upload, I wonder what 50mb would be like, with twice the upload.

General Maximus 21-01-2009 15:09

Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
 
yup, that is why i want 20/2 or 50/5, it isnt just for torrents, it is for games as well


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:29.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum