![]() |
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
Vm charge for tv so therefore make revenue from tv. Where is your proof they make no money from it? |
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
VM/ntl can only offer me a analogue tv service, its possible the reason they not upgraded my area is that they cannot get permission to dig up the roads. But sorry I am not a charity case I simply go to a competitor that offers what I want. ---------- Post added at 11:19 ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Crumbs you lot, will somebody actually read the OP instead of indulging in wild speculation?
Quote:
Any and all discussion of the sale of Virgin Media itself is just naked speculation. I mean, speculate away by all means, but not on the back of this report in the Telegraph because that is not what is being reported. |
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
---------- Post added at 17:26 ---------- Previous post was at 17:10 ---------- Quote:
Do you have some inside knowledge that VM do not make any money on their tv service? Where is your proof? VM do not make much money on their analogue side of stuff granted but you didn't say that! You said VM make no money from their tv! VM infact does make money from their tv service and subscriptions are up every quarter. Just because they are concentrating on BB does not mean they don't make money on tv FFS! BB is their strong point, tv is Sky's strong point but that doesn't mean VM does not make money in their tv side of the business! Plus they didn't just state they are concentrating on BB they said they are concentrating on VOD aswell. Their tv service is going from strength to strength VOD is actively used by the millions more and more every quarter. You are talking absoloute rubbish and basing all your opinions on their analogue service which isn't a good comparison to VM's actual tv service at all. If VM made no money in their tv side why are they developing a new box which will allow VM extra reach to an extra 4m customers. Plus, VM's tv service has better up take than Sky in the areas they cable!:rolleyes: ---------- Post added at 17:28 ---------- Previous post was at 17:26 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
you dont think laughing at not keeping a network up to scratch isnt arrogant then? You defending VM very hard and trying to make them seem something that they are not.
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
Vm have several field teams to fix their infrastructure. Networks being one of them. In this thread you say they are not keeping their network up to scratch yet in another one you suggest that they are indeed cabling leeds! Which one is it exactly?:rolleyes: |
Re: Virgin to be sold?
When a network practically runs out of bandwidth to the extent that they have no room for a SD footie channel or any more HD channels then I would say that network was not up to scratch.
And that is not even mentioning the many areas that were left for up to 12 months with inferior BB after the 20meg downgrade and the areas apparently still not fixed.:rolleyes: |
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
Vm have never come out and said they are bandwith strapped. Even if they are they will be moving to docsis 3.0 soon to allow more bandwith, yet again means they are sorting out their network. They have no room for a SD footie channel? They added it didn't they? It took awhile, Arsenal may have commented it was due capacity but VM never. It could have be contractual issues there is no proof they could not add it. They added it without the removal of another channel which to me says there was no capacity issue. They will have room for more HD channels once they remove analogue tv. But what is the point in letting channels that call themselves HD when it is mostly infact upscaled content onto the network to take up capacity, when they could have much more SD channels as SD channels take up less capacity and you could have more of them? Channel 4 currently shows one hr a day of HD shows! Why would VM want that? They are better of for the time being leaving HD to VOD until this new IPTV services comes about and they can broadcast VOOM. All you are doing is basing what you think are facts on speculation. Oh you mean the FREE 20meg upgrade? What exactly do you want for FREE?:rolleyes: They rolled it out gradually to iron out any creases they may have had. 20meg is widely sorted now hence the move on to 50meg bb. VM is considered the most reliable and most loved ISP, it's also the biggest. No wonder their subscription numbers keep on growing hey? If people are unhappy as you are surely they would leave? So which areas do not have fixed 20meg upgrades then? Cable broadband has a far more happy customer base with their bb than Sky, Tiscali and co who have exchange issues. |
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
you asking for proof that southampton and leics networks are out of date right? cabling leeds is going to a new network it does not equate keeping a network up to scratch. I am trying so hard to not be rude to you. ---------- Post added at 15:36 ---------- Previous post was at 15:35 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:36 ---------- Previous post was at 15:35 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin to be sold?
I see the proof I asked for is still not here. And he completely ignored the question
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum