![]() |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
I go away for a day, and look what happens.............
(I was taken up into a spaceship and annually probed - well, it seems to happen once a year or so) |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
|
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
And if so, why are we posting to ourself? btw, the last two posts, no matter how peurile and inane, still make more sense (imho) than a "certain person's" posts ;) |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
You set up up a proposition, I either back it, or rubbish it, depending on what outcome we are looking to achieve - thus we are able to generally spread disinformation (which is better that datinformation), and bring down society, as requested by our lords and masters - which are not the 6ft lizards as previously mentioned, that's another lie that we have created to hide our masters true identities - I am of course talking about the bread people. Even now, they're in your house watching you, bravely sacrificing themselves to be eaten by you so that they can learn more about human biology. Wheat allergy? - it's phase one of their plan to kill one tenth of the human population. We'd just better hope they don't get their acts together and team up with the peanut people. Quote:
|
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
By the way, you may not have been aware, but I'm affiliated with the toast people, and I bring you and your bread brethren the gift of FIRE!!!!!!!! |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
You could redo 'The Sixth Sense' and make it into conspiracy film. 'I see Bread People!' |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
Where's that ban button... :) |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:57 ---------- Previous post was at 11:56 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
If someone is constructing a logical series of arguments that depend on the one before for the integrity of the whole, and I kick out one of the ones at the bottom, it does tend to damage the whole lot, quite apart from the credibility of people with blind faith in the argument I've just kicked out. In the case of the 9/11, the (rather a priori) argument goes 1) that planes weren't hijacked and flown into the things because 2) something other than a hijacked airliner hit the Pentagon because 3) the damage to the Pentagon is inconsistent with an airliner hitting it repeat for the other attacks. However, since I know roughly how aircraft are built (thin tube of aluminium containing air and fuel with a couple of engines slung underneath which consist of a big old fan with a really quite narrow, dense, enormously tough gas turbine behind them), it's not hard to see why the Pentagon damage is entirely consistent with an airliner hitting it - I'd expect the thing to disintegrate completely apart from the dense engine cores which have sufficient penetrative power to go through the building. Reference to images of intact tails sticking out of other accident scenes where the plane went in at half the speed into far less solid buildings are merely desperation, unless you want to argue that driving into a bollard at 30mph results in the same damage as driving into a reinforced concrete wall at 60. Having kicked out one plank of the argument, the others are no longer automatically true and one is obliged come up with a rational alternative explanation (say, a hijacked airliner being deliberately crashed) in order to keep the least complicated hypothesis (big up William of Ockham). Taking it further, if you have, in a short space and time, one hijacked airliner and three suspected hijacked airliners it is again thanks to Mr. Ockham that we can hypothesise that the same underlying cause is behind all four - once you accept that people planned something once, repeating it is just mass production. The alternative is that four events with identical apparent results (an airliner on an early morning east-west coast flight vanishing within minutes of each other at the same times and in the same locations as a large hole appears in something) have more than one cause, which is by definition multiplying hypotheses unnecessarily. |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
But the space-aliens/black helicopters/6ft lizards/bread people want you think that.........
(you will keep bringing verifiable facts into a thread, won't you? Tchhhhhh.......) |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
|
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In conclusion, it seems to me you have watched and read a few things on 9/11 and based no common sense or logic on the situation and just added 2+2 and came out with 896754. You have done no research what so ever. |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Quote:
Thank you for one of the best thoughtout and well put replys, said it better than I could. Don't think it is going to help at all for some reason. Wait a minute.... YOUR part of it as well aren't you! Why else would you make a rediculously clear argument full of common sense. JJ |
Re: Bush And Kerry Admitting Skull and Bones Membership + Acting suspicious.
Everybody shush - he's baaaa-aaaaacckkkkk ;)
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum