Originally Posted by Orior (Post 34289184)

Why send Harry to Iraq, where his presence might endanger other soldiers (whose job is to go where danger is).

Instead bring Iraqis to Buck house and let them reduce the lot to smithereens.

Originally Posted by marky (Post 34290018)

Good luck to the lad and lets just hope the media stay away and let him do his job.

Originally Posted by Orior (Post 34290219)

Its great that young Hewitt is off to foreign lands, to meet interesting people and to kill them. He could be the last royal since XXX to have a confirmed kill. Who was the last royal to have a confirmed kill?

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 34290235)

I would guess at Richard III, plenty have lead men into the 'thick of it' since, notably Charles 1st nephew for one but I can't remember seeing any reports of them 'getting stuck in' themselves

Originally Posted by Orior (Post 34290240)

Which century? Was that the crusades?

Originally Posted by Orior (Post 34290219)

Who was the last royal to have a confirmed kill?

Originally Posted by BBKing (Post 34293414)

The Queen, pheasant, 2000

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1031343.stm

Actually, jokes about huntin and fishin notwithstanding, Prince Phillip did serve in the Royal Navy in WW2 including at the Battle of Matapan, which ended with a couple of thousand dead Italians (and jokes about glass bottomed ships). I shouldn't think anyone would have beaten that for a bag since, he says callously.