![]() |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
The fact that this thread got so easily sidetracked onto the Gatso debate shows precisely the problem; simple to understand single issue campaigns will dominate whilst the more complex concepts of, for example, policing by consent, will get left behind as politicians take the easy option and no doubt once again adopt, I'm harder than yow (thought I'd go all brummy on you for no apparent reason), position.
|
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
The reason why this thread got sidetracked onto speed cameras is because its a hot topic and an example of the police abusing their powers to make money and catch the easiest criminals rather than the ones that are causing the most detriment to the community.
And just because something is popular doesn't make it a bad thing. Also, it's very difficult to get multiple issues across in a forum where people pick single issues out to tackle. I have yet to see any reasoned argument against replacing the current un-accountable beurocratic PA's with an elected individual with the same powers. So far the arguments against seem to be simply fear of the unknown or dislike becuase it's a tory idea. At the moment you have the potential for 9 different voices going in 9 different directions as to what they believe the police should be doing. |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
For instance, the son of one of my mum's friends was murdered on his way home from the pub. Because it happened in an extremely rich area (even though it was 12 years ago now, the average house price was over £2milli on) , it was not reported in the local newspapers. The police caught the murderer, could not get a reliable conviction for Murder, so charged the criminal with ABH. In that case, it did not get reported in the local paper as the local populace didn't want the fuss of a crime on their doorstep. It is this sort of crime that I think a commissioner would not throw resources into. Our local police did, and the perpetrator is still (AFAIK) behind bars. |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
The "crimes that the public care about" are often the ones that get the most media coverage and make people go "something must be done!", but they are very often not necessarily the ones that really *need* to be dealt with. Consider the Soham Murders and the fallout from that whereby everyone who wants to get a job working with children or even working in areas *close* to children has to have a Criminal Record check which has resulted in the Criminal Records Bureau being swamped with a mass of applications that caused and is still causing backlogs. Now I appreciate that the murder of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman was a tragedy, but they were, in all honesty, an *isolated* incident, however due to the press coverage, any elected Comissioner who did *not* immediately respond to public concerns or said "this is not a sensible use of resources" would end up, as I pointed out in previous messages, being faced with claims that "they are failing to protect children". The end result would be that resources would end up being used up in an inefficient way because it would *look good* to the public. This is the problem with elected officials. |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
Quote:
I have read this thread from the start and it has thrown up some very interesting points. As for yours two comments above I will offer two things. Firstly we have mods to decide whether it has strayed far too much off topic. :angel: Secondly sorry teach :angel:but a big sigh says and adds nothing as you often tell us you know where the unsubscribe option is ;) Anyhows to drift back on to the topic i think the idea will work dependant on the area as down with us the Police are in the Councillors Pockets and vice versa. So an independantly elected one could be a bonus. :D |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
Quote:
The yorkshire ripper was a high profile case with a lot of resources thrown at it, and if you were a young woman in West Yorkshire at the time you'd bloody well be glad that there were. Likewise the Soham murdrers, if you were a parent around Ely and Cambridge during that time you'd want the police to throw evrything they had at finding the killer, they did and caught him quickly. I really don't see your point. Quote:
Which is why the two girls are no longer here! I'm afraid a backlog of applications for jobs is a small price to pay. Quote:
As said before children go missing and/or killed all too often, and the police will put the same effort into finding them whether it's headline news or not. By the time these things reach the papers the police investigation is usually well underway. Quote:
I couldn't disagree with you more. look around the country and what are the publics issues with crime. Anti-social behaviour Burglery Speed cameras These issues are what needs to be tackled 24/7 and on what the police will be judged. Not isolated terrible public crimes as you suggest. |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
Judging by the media in General (and this forum in particular), it would seem the only thing an Elected commissioner would care about is speed cameras.. All those less glamourous crimes (you know the petty little ones like oohhh, murder, mugging etc) would get forgotten, unless there was an angle to them (like the victim being an old person, a young kid etc). BTW, I believe that as thread starter, Incog does get some say as to what's on or off topic (even though she is not a Mod). She can certainly ask for the thread to be closed. __________________ Quote:
Actually I disagree. The issue is not Speed cameras as such, but the bad driving (speeding/causing accidents etc) they use as an excuse to use Speed cameras. No speeding (which, while it may not cause accidents as such, does increase the severity of injuries caused by accidents) and no bad driving = no excuse for Speed Cameras. I do agree that those crimes need to be sorted out. The problem is that come election time, the commissioner would be tempted to divert resources from those crimes to more glamourous ones that would get him or her more publicity. I am not saying they will do that, but I don't think we can take the chance they will. |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Like I said, unreasoned fears of the unknown.
Do you really believe a commisioner would come in and get the police to ignore all crime apart from one or two issues that concern the public??? Do you really think that is going to happen? |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
|
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
|
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
If, say, around election time there happened to be a child murderer on the loose and he was caught. The story was well reported in the papers and on the TV. I would be very happy, however If I also lived on a street where every house had been broken into I wouldn't be happy enough to vote for this commssioner. If before every election the PA, where forced to publish their stats, a leaflet through every door so everybody gets to see them. You will not be able to hide figures like 1 child murderer caught, but 15% rise in burglery. 1 serial killer caught, but 20% rise in violent crime. You have to give the public some credit, we're not all muppets that can easily be romanced by a bit of good publicity. |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Fear of crime is much bigger than the reality of crime; this is one of the problems with this proposal. It's an emotive issue which will be exploited by our feeble excuses for politicians. You only have to look at the banal dialogue currently being had through the media in the pre-election frenzy to see that. Crime statistics are already freely available to the public; it's just most people prefer to rely on the warped view they get through the media (hence the fear of crime) rather than seek out a more informed picture. I don't, however, dispute that police forces and authorities could do more to inform the public. But how quickly would the Press jump on them for the cost involved in doing that (say by leafleting all properties)?
|
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
I heard it said somewhere that while people individually are intelligent, witty etc., people as a group can be extremely stupid and prone to panic. |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
As the original poster I believe I have a right to steer this thread where I want it to go. :rolleyes: |
Re: I think this is a stupid Idea
Quote:
Well I thought about that in some detail and told myself an extremely pithy joke before going down the pub with some mates, talking about Jody Marsh for a while then we all spoiled our Calvin Klein keks when we missed last orders :) Is it time to close this thread?! |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum