Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran … War (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712196)

Hugh 24-10-2023 09:47

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36162662)
OK, just to clear this up, it seems that the phrase which has proved controversial to some has different meanings (just like ‘jihad’ apparently).

My meaning was ‘learn from it’ and that’s exactly what all those who think it’s a great idea to vote for a terrorist organisation should ponder.

I did not mean that phrase as insulting, although I get why some did.

But what about the 76% of the current population of the Gaza Strip who are under 35, therefore couldn’t have voted for Hamas in 2006, do?

btw, no one (except you, apparently) thinks "suck on that" means "learn from it" - the definition is

Quote:

that's too bad; deal with it; put up with it; tough luck

exclamation of triumph when you want to rub someone's nose in it
whilst "jihad", on the other hand

Quote:

1: a holy war waged on behalf of Islam as a religious duty

also : a personal struggle in devotion to Islam especially involving spiritual discipline

2: a crusade for a principle or belief

OLD BOY 24-10-2023 16:43

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36162674)
But what about the 76% of the current population of the Gaza Strip who are under 35, therefore couldn’t have voted for Hamas in 2006, do?

Those under 35 will also learn from the fact that people voted for a terrorist organisation and what that ultimately meant for their country.

I don’t think that was so difficult to understand.

---------- Post added at 16:43 ---------- Previous post was at 16:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36162674)

btw, no one (except you, apparently) thinks "suck on that" means "learn from it" - the definition is



whilst "jihad", on the other hand

I don’t much care what you think about this, Hugh. I’m telling you what I meant.

And by the way, different definitions do exist for that phrase but I’m not trawling the dictionaries to make the point. I have better things to do with my time.

1andrew1 24-10-2023 17:23

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36162674)
But what about the 76% of the current population of the Gaza Strip who are under 35, therefore couldn’t have voted for Hamas in 2006, do?

btw, no one (except you, apparently) thinks "suck on that" means "learn from it" - the definition is

whilst "jihad", on the other hand

Agreed.

Whilst I can't find a dictionary that supports Old Boy's understanding of the "suck on that" phrase; and he's not chosen to provide one either; I'm happy to give him the benefit of the doubt and accept that he used the phrase to mean "learn from that".

Sephiroth 24-10-2023 17:36

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36162674)
But what about the 76% of the current population of the Gaza Strip who are under 35, therefore couldn’t have voted for Hamas in 2006, do?

<SNIP>

Make bombs and feed powder into bullets, perhaps?

1andrew1 24-10-2023 21:26

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Interesting to read the comments in bold from the UN Chief.
Quote:

UN chief denounces ‘clear violations’ of international law in Gaza

António Guterres says Hamas assault ‘did not happen in a vacuum’ but grievances cannot justify violence

UN chief António Guterres condemned “clear violations of international law” in Gaza as the US added to mounting pressure on the Israeli government to pause its bombardment of the besieged strip and allow in more aid.

In his toughest remarks so far about the conduct of the war in Gaza, Guterres told the UN security council on Tuesday that the safety of civilians was paramount.

“Protecting civilians can never mean using them as human shields,” the secretary-general said, adding that it “does not mean ordering more than 1mn people to evacuate to the south, where there is no shelter, no food, no water, no medicine and no fuel, and then continuing to bomb the south itself.”

Guterres also said that Hamas’ deadly assault on southern Israel earlier this month “did not happen in a vacuum”.

“The Palestinian people have been subjected to 56 years of suffocating occupation,” he said, though he added that their grievances could not justify the “appalling attacks”. His remarks triggered a furious response from Israeli officials.

Israel’s ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan described the secretary-general’s statement as “shocking” and called on him to resign while foreign minister Eli Cohen cancelled a meeting with Guterres in protest.

Also addressing the security council, US secretary of state Antony Blinken blamed Hamas for using civilians as human shields but also called for “humanitarian pauses” in Israel’s air strikes against targets in Gaza to allow civilians to get out of harm’s way.

EU leaders are also expected to call later this week for a pause in hostilities to let more water, food and medicine into Gaza and to give more time for negotiations mediated by Qatar to secure the release of hostages.
https://www.ft.com/content/61c23c82-...9-ecdebb86c839

Hugh 24-10-2023 23:28

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36162692)
Those under 35 will also learn from the fact that people voted for a terrorist organisation and what that ultimately meant for their country.

I don’t think that was so difficult to understand.

---------- Post added at 16:43 ---------- Previous post was at 16:41 ----------



I don’t much care what you think about this, Hugh. I’m telling you what I meant.

And by the way, different definitions do exist for that phrase but I’m not trawling the dictionaries to make the point. I have better things to do with my time.

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=suck+on+that

hth…

Ms NTL 24-10-2023 23:42

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Since you all are in the sucking business, I posted a suck-ling offer for you in the website section. :D

Pierre 25-10-2023 00:11

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36162714)

It’s a bit boring now.

Ms NTL 26-10-2023 02:07

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
this is London

https://www.facebook.com/reel/294554...ibextid=kcDB8O

Hugh 26-10-2023 08:00

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36162781)

This is London

https://www.hackneygazette.co.uk/new...ain-suspended/

Ms NTL 26-10-2023 09:12

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36162788)

touché :)

Paul 28-10-2023 01:02

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quite rightly suspended, not something you should be doing while working, esp driving a train full of people.

Hugh 28-10-2023 08:38

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Agreed

Sephiroth 28-10-2023 13:34

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36162908)
Quite rightly suspended, not something you should be doing while working, esp driving a train full of people.


As I’ve said quite a few times, they’re here and uncontrolled numbers are growing.


Ms NTL 28-10-2023 15:31

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36162938)

As I’ve said quite a few times, they’re here and uncontrolled numbers are growing.


Who are "they"? the tube people looked quite white, and they were very spontaneous for their support to Palestine. Corbyn is an indigenous species & white too.. One lady looked Somali/Eritrean but she could have been in London for generations... She is one of us - Londoners.

Hugh 28-10-2023 15:46

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36162938)

As I’ve said quite a few times, they’re here and uncontrolled numbers are growing.


https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2023/10/3.gif

---------- Post added at 15:46 ---------- Previous post was at 15:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36162943)
Who are "they"? the tube people looked quite white, and they were very spontaneous for their support to Palestine. Corbyn is an indigenous species & white too.. One lady looked Somali/Eritrean but she could have been in London for generations... She is one of us - Londoners.

Seph is a big fan of the "Great Replacement Theory"...

Pierre 28-10-2023 16:15

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
The Gaza/Palestine issue has now entered the pantheon of luxury beliefs that white middle class halfwits can get behind. Demonising Israel now puts you on the right side of history.

Oct 7th is now History and conveniently forgotten and Israel are now the evil ones.

They call for a ceasefire by which they mean Israel to stop firing, but Hamas continue to fire rockets into Israel.

Israel still has a mandate to eliminate Hamas.

jfman 28-10-2023 19:33

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Opposing genocide - generally - puts you on the right side of history.

Pierre 28-10-2023 21:41

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36162959)
Opposing genocide - generally - puts you on the right side of history.

Yes, genocide….open prison….let’s play Gaza bingo.

Considering the population in Gaza has increased year on year. The Israelis really need to improve their genocide techniques as they obviously haven’t been working.

Anyway, it’s the supporting terrorists bit that tends to irk, but then when everybody around you supports terrorists, it makes it a lot easier for you to, too.

Ms NTL 28-10-2023 21:51

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36162944)

Seph is a big fan of the "Great Replacement Theory"...

In Seph's support, as he said, it did happen in Fiji, they lost their country to the Indians. Bula, Bula.

Pierre 28-10-2023 21:53

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36162967)
In Seph's support, as he said, it did happen in Fiji

And Lebanon.

Ms NTL 28-10-2023 22:19

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36162968)
And Lebanon.

Please explain. Phoenicians were the majority, no?, I have not been following. Hezbollah is not in control (?)

jfman 28-10-2023 22:32

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36162965)
Yes, genocide….open prison….let’s play Gaza bingo.

Considering the population in Gaza has increased year on year. The Israelis really need to improve their genocide techniques as they obviously haven’t been working.

Anyway, it’s the supporting terrorists bit that tends to irk, but then when everybody around you supports terrorists, it makes it a lot easier for you to, too.

The obvious way to avoid Gaza bingo is to not create situations that justify the comparisons.

I’d be interested to know if the population of Gaza is still increasing, using everyone’s favourite arbitrary starting point of 7 October. The population of northern Gaza looks to be lower.

Pierre 28-10-2023 22:57

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36162975)
Please explain. Phoenicians were the majority, no?, I have not been following. Hezbollah is not in control (?)

Lebanon was considered a Christian country, but the Muslims have now taken over and Hezbollah are a driving force of that.

Israel had to come to the defence of the Lebanese Christians.

Thing is minorities in the region do very poorly. Christians and Jews don’t do so well in inclusive and tolerant islamic countries.

Imagine how well Jews would flourish in a Palestinian controlled state?

I doubt very much their population would increase….that’s a fact.

---------- Post added at 22:57 ---------- Previous post was at 22:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36162976)
I’d be interested to know if the population of Gaza is still increasing, using everyone’s favourite arbitrary starting point of 7 October. The population of northern Gaza looks to be lower.

And whose fault would that be?


Hamas?

Then blame Hamas for the situation in Gaza and not Israel.

Blame Hamas for killing their own people.

I’d rather see anti-Hamas demonstrations than pro-Palestinian (I.e. anti-Israel)

But you don’t.

I haven’t seen any anti-Hamas rhetoric anywhere, at all. (Please post here if you see any)

That’s all you need to know.

jfman 28-10-2023 23:03

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36162978)
And whose fault would that be?


Hamas?

Then blame Hamas for the situation in Gaza and not Israel.

Blame Hamas for killing their own people.

I’d rather see anti-Hamas demonstrations than pro-Palestinian (I.e. anti-Israel)

But you don’t.

I haven’t seen any anti-Hamas rhetoric anywhere, at all. (Please post here if you see any)

That’s all you need to know.

It’s a perverse interpretation of events to solely blame Hamas. At some point Israel deserves criticism for its actions.

I don’t think it’s particularly helpful to tar pro-Palestinian demonstrators as “anti-Israel” because they oppose Israel’s actions.

Chris 28-10-2023 23:05

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36162980)
I don’t think it’s particularly helpful to tar pro-Palestinian demonstrators as “anti-Israel” because they oppose Israel’s actions.

Not as a category, no. But rather a lot of them were chanting or waving the ‘from the river to the sea’ slogan in London today, whose meaning is pretty clear.

Pierre 28-10-2023 23:15

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36162980)
It’s a perverse interpretation of events to solely blame Hamas.

And with this one sentence JF you lose all credibility. We can talk about history. But Israel has had no interest in Gaza for 18yrs. There have been isolated incidents over the years that I recognise, I can’t list them but acknowledge they’ve happened, but they have not been coordinated attacks to cause as much death and terror as possible.

So in regards to Oct 7th Hamas are 100% solely to blame.

Quote:

At some point Israel deserves criticism for its actions.
It does, and it’s getting it in spades.

Not from me, I think it’s ill advised and not the approach I would take. But I can understand why.

Quote:

I don’t think it’s particularly helpful to tar pro-Palestinian demonstrators as “anti-Israel” because they oppose Israel’s actions.
May not be helpful but it’s true.

Those thousands of people in London are 100% anti-Israel, 100%.

jfman 28-10-2023 23:25

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36162981)
Not as a category, no. But rather a lot of them were chanting or waving the ‘from the river to the sea’ slogan in London today, whose meaning is pretty clear.

I think it’s a contentious phrase, however it suits a particular narrative to pretend that it has a clear meaning. It’d be impossible without surveying everyone who actually chanted it to know what they meant by it.

---------- Post added at 23:25 ---------- Previous post was at 23:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36162983)
And with this one sentence JF you lose all credibility. We can talk about history. But Israel has had no interest in Gaza for 18yrs. There have been isolated incidents over the years that I recognise, I can’t list them but acknowledge they’ve happened, but they have not been coordinated attacks to cause as much death and terror as possible.

So in regards to Oct 7th Hamas are 100% solely to blame.

You’ve moved the goalposts here Pierre.

Paul 29-10-2023 00:22

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36162980)
It’s a perverse interpretation of events to solely blame Hamas.

Why ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36162980)
At some point Israel deserves criticism for its actions.

Well you seem to have stepped in to do that in spades.
Its pretty much the theme of every post of yours in here (and other topics, where btw, it does not belong).
You should offer your PR services to Hamas.

jfman 29-10-2023 08:02

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36162987)
Why ?

As I said at some point Israel becomes responsible for its own actions.

Quote:

Well you seem to have stepped in to do that in spades.
It’s pretty much the theme of every post of yours in here (and other topics, where btw, it does not belong).
You should offer your PR services to Hamas.
I’ve no great desire to do PR for a proscribed terrorist organisation. However I’m more than happy to call out the injustices being carried out by the Israeli state on the people of Gaza. I don’t think it’s fair to imply that is somehow PR for Hamas.

I’ve made references to Israel in one other topic where another poster made accusations of BBC bias for a story they ran that was also carried by large US outlets at that time and an event still disputed by some outlets. I don’t consider that particularly unreasonable.

Sephiroth 29-10-2023 19:34

Re: Hamas Israel War
 

What's missing from John's thinking is any parallel with WW2 and the fight against the Nazis.

Britain had to fight Germany in its self defence. Innocent people died on both sides, but that kind of war brings that kind of consequence.

It's no different with Israel vs Hamas. The Germans voted for Hitler in 1933 and there was never another vote. Palestinians in Gaza voted for Hamas in 2005 (or thereabouts) and there was never another vote.

Germany was bombed to bits; and there was no outcry in Britain. War is as much war now as then. Same in Ukraine, which is trying to defend itself.

Bleating about the civilian casualties in Gaza suggests a bias towards the the Gazans, whose plight is entirely down to the actions of Hamas.

Virtue signalling for a ceasefire is pointless; Israel has to defend itself and they will decide whether or not a ceasefire is to happen.

And remember, 100,00 Gaza sympathisers took to the streets, many of them calling for the obliteration of Israel and the Jews. Hitler tried that and many civilian casualties later, he was defeated.




Chris 29-10-2023 20:02

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36163028)

Germany was bombed to bits; and there was no outcry in Britain.

Wrong. The tactics of Bomber Command were controversial even at the time. Churchill himself was far from convinced that the area bombing of civilian targets was justified, morally or strategically. If you’re in any doubt as to how widespread public unease became once the fate of Dresden and other cities became known, note that after the war, no monument was erected to Bomber Command. There was no monument until 2012. Arthur Harris got a statue 8 years after he died, and only because a RAF veterans trust set up specifically to defend Harris’ reputation organised it. Is there any other senior British military leader who warranted an organisation specifically geared towards defending him?

When shown the results of the Dresden firestorm raids Churchill is said to have asked, “Are we beasts? Are we taking this too far?”

If there was room in Churchill’s reflections for questions like that even at a time of national existential struggle, then we are entitled to ask Israel’s leaders to behave similarly. National defence is justified. Offensive operations in pursuit of national defence are justified. But it is quite possible to go too far even in an existential struggle. Is anyone at the top of the Israeli government asking those questions? Because it doesn’t look like it right now.

jfman 29-10-2023 20:02

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36163028)

What's missing from John's thinking is any parallel with WW2 and the fight against the Nazis.

Britain had to fight Germany in its self defence. Innocent people died on both sides, but that kind of war brings that kind of consequence.

It's no different with Israel vs Hamas. The Germans voted for Hitler in 1933 and there was never another vote. Palestinians in Gaza voted for Hamas in 2005 (or thereabouts) and there was never another vote.

Germany was bombed to bits; and there was no outcry in Britain. War is as much war now as then. Same in Ukraine, which is trying to defend itself.

Bleating about the civilian casualties in Gaza suggests a bias towards the the Gazans, whose plight is entirely down to the actions of Hamas.

Virtue signalling for a ceasefire is pointless; Israel has to defend itself and they will decide whether or not a ceasefire is to happen.

And remember, 100,00 Gaza sympathisers took to the streets, many of them calling for the obliteration of Israel and the Jews. Hitler tried that and many civilian casualties later, he was defeated.


"Bleating about civilians" isn't a bias.

I'd say there's a major difference between a terror group numbering the small tens of thousands people in a controlled territory and Nazi Germany - which at it's peak covered about an area of Europe comprising 280 million people and all the industrial capabilities that come with.

Hamas are tiny opportunists by comparison.

The elections are a complete red herring and no justification for the killing of civilians - which it seems somewhat to be implied.

Pierre 29-10-2023 20:19

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36163030)
Offensive operations in pursuit of national defence are justified. But it is quite possible to go too far even in an existential struggle. Is anyone at the top of the Israeli government asking those questions? Because it doesn’t look like it right now.

Parallels between WWII are inevitable. The allies did not need to obliterate Dresden, or drop the Atomic bombs on Japan. The war was won already.

The damage caused by the atomic weapons wasn’t much worse from conventional bombing but it showed what 1no. Bomb could do v’s hundreds of conventional ones. Did they need to drop another?

The difference is, Israel’s objectives have not yet been met. Hamas has not been destroyed and their infrastructure has not been destroyed.

Until they’re satisfied, I think they’ll continue.

---------- Post added at 20:19 ---------- Previous post was at 20:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163031)
"Bleating about civilians" isn't a bias.

I'd say there's a major difference between a terror group numbering the small tens of thousands people in a controlled territory and Nazi Germany - which at it's peak covered about an area of Europe comprising 280 million people and all the industrial capabilities that come with.

Hamas are tiny opportunists by comparison.

The elections are a complete red herring and no justification for the killing of civilians - which it seems somewhat to be implied.

Comparisons between WWII and this are unhelpful, I’ve done it myself. Maybe some parallels can be drawn but they should scrutinised as to their relevance.

Hugh 29-10-2023 20:28

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36163028)

What's missing from John's thinking is any parallel with WW2 and the fight against the Nazis.

Britain had to fight Germany in its self defence. Innocent people died on both sides, but that kind of war brings that kind of consequence.

It's no different with Israel vs Hamas. The Germans voted for Hitler in 1933 and there was never another vote. Palestinians in Gaza voted for Hamas in 2005 (or thereabouts) and there was never another vote.

Germany was bombed to bits; and there was no outcry in Britain. War is as much war now as then. Same in Ukraine, which is trying to defend itself.

Bleating about the civilian casualties in Gaza suggests a bias towards the the Gazans, whose plight is entirely down to the actions of Hamas.

Virtue signalling for a ceasefire is pointless; Israel has to defend itself and they will decide whether or not a ceasefire is to happen.

And remember, 100,00 Gaza sympathisers took to the streets, many of them calling for the obliteration of Israel and the Jews. Hitler tried that and many civilian casualties later, he was defeated.




Actually, it’s not…

The adverse treatment of civilians in WW2 led to a new (the fourth) Geneva Convention, specifically to provide for the protection of civilians in wartime.

Quote:

Articles were also put in place to protect wounded, sick and pregnant civilians as well as mothers and children. It also stated civilians may not be collectively deported or made to work on behalf of an occupying force without pay. All civilians should receive adequate medical care and be allowed to go about their daily lives as much as possible.

… In 1977, Protocols I and II were added to the Conventions of 1949. Protocol I increased protections for civilians, military workers and journalists during international armed conflicts. It also banned the use of “weapons that cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering,” or cause “widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment.”

According to the Red Cross, Protocol II was established because most victims of armed conflicts since the 1949 Convention were victims of vicious civil wars. The Protocol stated all people not taking up arms be treated humanely and there should never be an order by anyone in command for “no survivors.”

Pierre 29-10-2023 20:58

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36163035)
Actually, it’s not…

The adverse treatment of civilians in WW2 led to a new (the fourth) Geneva Convention, specifically to provide for the protection of civilians in wartime.

I don’t think those additions have changed anything, in regards to this operation.

Its main objective seems to be to prevent slave Labour.

Such conventions exist only to be ignored by the superior power at the time. IF that power is defeated, then they may be brought to justice.

This one made me laugh

Quote:

It also banned the use of “weapons that cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering,” or cause “widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment.”
sounds like a decent description of thermo-nuclear weapons, they did well banning them, didn’t they?

1andrew1 30-10-2023 00:14

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163033)
Comparisons between WWII and this are unhelpful, I’ve done it myself. Maybe some parallels can be drawn but they should scrutinised as to their relevance.

World War was 80 years ago. Standards that were acceptable then are no longer accepted now.

Sephiroth 30-10-2023 07:39

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36163043)
World War was 80 years ago. Standards that were acceptable then are no longer accepted now.

@Andrew & @Pierre

You may consider comparisons with WW2 unhelpful, but I disagree. The psychology of war is eternal, imo. Hatred and/or territory.

Please remember, that I'm tilting at the position being taken by jfman, whose posts are very one sided.

As to Andrew's remark about "standards" - no, the Geneva Convention applied then as it does now.


Hugh 30-10-2023 08:05

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36163047)
@Andrew & @Pierre

You may consider comparisons with WW2 unhelpful, but I disagree. The psychology of war is eternal, imo. Hatred and/or territory.

Please remember, that I'm tilting at the position being taken by jfman, whose posts are very one sided.

As to Andrew's remark about "standards" - no, the Geneva Convention applied then as it does now.

As previously stated, the Geneva Conventions have been updated since WW2 to specifically increase sanctions against those who target civilians

nomadking 30-10-2023 09:03

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
If the whiners could provide the Israelis with the definite locations of Hamas military targets, then no problem. There isn't a clearly defined front line with targets in open view to aim at.

jfman 30-10-2023 09:29

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36163049)
If the whiners could provide the Israelis with the definite locations of Hamas military targets, then no problem. There isn't a clearly defined front line with targets in open view to aim at.

The onus isn’t on Hamas to present itself for annihilation. The absence of that doesn’t justify carpet bombing civilian areas, bombing churches, hospitals, refugee camps, etc.

1andrew1 30-10-2023 09:34

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36163047)
@Andrew & @Pierre

You may consider comparisons with WW2 unhelpful, but I disagree. The psychology of war is eternal, imo. Hatred and/or territory.

Please remember, that I'm tilting at the position being taken by jfman, whose posts are very one sided.

As to Andrew's remark about "standards" - no, the Geneva Convention applied then as it does now.


Technology has changed. People's access to a range of media that provides a more rounded view of events, and information more rapidly and graphically have changed. People's reaction to the Dresden bombings would likely have been different if they saw the results on their TV screens every morning.

And whilst the law always plays catch up to technology and social change, that has changed too, as Hugh has outlined.

---------- Post added at 09:34 ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36163049)
If the whiners could provide the Israelis with the definite locations of Hamas military targets, then no problem. There isn't a clearly defined front line with targets in open view to aim at.

It's not really a constructive way to engage with others by calling them whiners. You wouldn't call someone that in a debate down the pub so why do it online? :confused:

nomadking 30-10-2023 09:57

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
So where are these clearly defined targets? They are mixed in with other buildings. The whole area is one giant front line.

Pierre 30-10-2023 09:58

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163050)
The onus isn’t on Hamas to present itself for annihilation. The absence of that doesn’t justify carpet bombing civilian areas, bombing churches, hospitals, refugee camps, etc.

Hiding/shielding enemy combatants in civilian areas, churches, hospitals, refugee camps etc is also a war crime.

So what does Israel do if it has to go through human shields to achieve its objectives?

https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.ne...OHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

Quote:

Rubinstein and Roznai argue that an attack that would be disproportionate ought to be considered proportionate, if the presence of civilians is due to the wrongful actions of the enemy. They use the term "impeded party" to describe the burden placed on the attacking party under international humanitarian law norms. They point out that "attacking party" has traditionally been synonymous with the aggressor, but that it is often the attacker who is "defending democracy" and acting in self-defence when they use force in response to a prior attack.

Hugh 30-10-2023 10:01

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Interesting, even-handed (imho) article in today’s Times Comment section

Quote:

Is this a just war? Let’s apply some tests

To be morally legitimate, military action requires a righteous cause — but also a fair chance of achieving its objectives
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/9...6f9b9155c3c2d1

jfman 30-10-2023 10:46

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163056)
Hiding/shielding enemy combatants in civilian areas, churches, hospitals, refugee camps etc is also a war crime.

So what does Israel do if it has to go through human shields to achieve its objectives?

https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.ne...OHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

A lovely thought experiment is just that, regardless of how well educated the thinkers are.

A quick skim does however point to wider considerations around proportionality- including necessity. Considering the minimal threat Hamas actually pose to Israel - there is no “clear and present danger” from Hamas to Israel who have more than adequate defensive capabilities to defend themselves from rockets.

It’d be interesting to know if Israel are keeping tabs on what “legitimate” military target is being destroyed for each of the thousands of bombs being destroyed since there’s probably now more than 1 bomb per Hamas militant.

Pierre 30-10-2023 10:46

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36163057)
Interesting, even-handed (imho) article in today’s Times Comment section

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/9...6f9b9155c3c2d1

It's a fair article. I think everybody will in agreement that an invasion of Gaza will be bad for everyone - all round, with absolutely no certainty that the IDF will be able meet their two objectives. On that point he is correct, and uses that argument to say the war is not just because for a just war you need to be able see the outcomes.

But he offers no ideas on what Israel should do, instead.

His quote from Aquinas, that he then ignores is also prescient:

Quote:

a war can be just if it is the expression of a rightful intention to promote good and forestall evil
Hamas are the very embodiment of evil.

jfman 30-10-2023 10:54

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
And what’s displacing a million people and raining bombs down on them, cutting off electricity, fuel and food supplies if it’s not evil?

Pierre 30-10-2023 11:01

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163061)
And what’s displacing a million people and raining bombs down on them, cutting off electricity, fuel and food supplies if it’s not evil?

The IDF does not = Hamas, if you want to try to twist that false equivalence go ahead, as you have several times.

jfman 30-10-2023 11:03

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163064)
The IDF does not = Hamas, if you want to try to twist that false equivalence go ahead, as you have several times.

I’m not claiming the IDF are equal to Hamas. They’re only following orders, as the military saying goes.

I’m asking if the description I made, on its own merit, without being conflated with the actions of anyone else, could be considered evil?

I think if on a human level your answer is no, or starts ‘but…’ you have a problem.

Pierre 30-10-2023 11:32

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
I don't think it's evil. If it was the IDFs one and only objective to purely kill civilians, cause terror and fear to make a political point, take pleasure in the suffering and rejoice at all the deaths...

Then I would call them evil.

jfman 30-10-2023 11:37

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163068)
I don't think it's evil. If it was the IDFs one and only objective to purely kill civilians, cause terror and fear to make a political point, take pleasure in the suffering and rejoice at all the deaths...

Then I would call them evil.

Nobody said it was “purely” an objective to kill civilians - merely that it was a specific and controllable outcome from their actions.

If Israel’s point isn’t political, then what is it?

I’m certain somewhere in Israel there will be people taking pleasure and rejoicing. If we can have one person in this thread alone - then it’s certainly going to be a not insignificant minority of Israelis who have a vested interest.

I’d love the thoughts of those Stanford academics on specifically the blocking of food and water in aid convoys. When and where can that be justified? What military objective is achieved?

nomadking 30-10-2023 11:42

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
In the absence of clearly defined targets, what else is Israel expected to do? Nothing, but wait until the next attack?

jfman 30-10-2023 11:48

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36163073)
In the absence of clearly defined targets, what else is Israel expected to do? Nothing, but wait until the next attack?

Nobody has suggested Israel “do nothing”.

Israel will always be waiting for the next attack regardless.

tweetiepooh 30-10-2023 11:54

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
I think "evil" would be greatly impacted by motivation. Acts can be terrible but not evil.

jfman 30-10-2023 12:05

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36163077)
I think "evil" would be greatly impacted by motivation. Acts can be terrible but not evil.

What motivation can one have for restricting the supply of food and water to a million people you’ve displaced?

Sephiroth 30-10-2023 13:57

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36163051)
Technology has changed. People's access to a range of media that provides a more rounded view of events, and information more rapidly and graphically have changed. People's reaction to the Dresden bombings would likely have been different if they saw the results on their TV screens every morning.

And whilst the law always plays catch up to technology and social change, that has changed too, as Hugh has outlined.

---------- Post added at 09:34 ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 ----------


It's not really a constructive way to engage with others by calling them whiners. You wouldn't call someone that in a debate down the pub so why do it online? :confused:

Stalemate on the Dresden type discussion.

But about the "whiners", apart from you having a sanctimonious moment, in the Brexit debate that was a last resort that Leavers had to use. And there is at least one member still in that mode!

Pierre 30-10-2023 14:09

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163071)
Nobody said it was “purely” an objective to kill civilians - merely that it was a specific and controllable outcome from their actions.

I know nobody said it. My point is if that was their objective, then I would call them evil, but it's not their objective. It is a very sad outcome from operations they would deem essential. but they are not doing it purely for that reason.

That's why I differentiate between Hamas - evil, IDF - not evil.

nomadking 30-10-2023 14:20

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163076)
Nobody has suggested Israel “do nothing”.

Israel will always be waiting for the next attack regardless.

Really? If there are no clear separate targets, what do they do instead of attacking near other buildings? If the population of Gaza was so against the aims and ACTIONS of Hamas, why aren't they complaining about it?
The actions of Hamas have to have consequences, otherwise the actions will continue unabated and not criticised by many. How many of those clamouring for a ceasefire now, were clamouring for a ceasefire from Hamas before?

Sephiroth 30-10-2023 14:28

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36163089)
Really? If there are no clear separate targets, what do they do instead of attacking near other buildings? If the population of Gaza was so against the aims and ACTIONS of Hamas, why aren't they complaining about it?
The actions of Hamas have to have consequences, otherwise the actions will continue unabated and not criticised by many. How many of those clamouring for a ceasefire now, were clamouring for a ceasefire from Hamas before?

Brings me back to Dresden. Did the people there clamour for a ceasefire? Did they complain about their government inviting the destruction? The actions of the Nazis had to have consequences.

Hugh 30-10-2023 14:37

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36163089)
Really? If there are no clear separate targets, what do they do instead of attacking near other buildings? If the population of Gaza was so against the aims and ACTIONS of Hamas, why aren't they complaining about it?
The actions of Hamas have to have consequences, otherwise the actions will continue unabated and not criticised by many. How many of those clamouring for a ceasefire now, were clamouring for a ceasefire from Hamas before?

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/pr...hts-defenders/

Quote:

Hamas security forces’ violent crackdown against peaceful Palestinian protesters, activists, human rights workers – including an Amnesty International worker – and local journalists must be immediately halted and investigated, said Amnesty International.

Hundreds of protesters have been subjected to beatings, arbitrary arrest and detentions, and torture and other forms of ill-treatment since 14 March, when Palestinians took to the streets across the Gaza Strip to protest against the rising cost of living and deteriorating economic conditions under the Hamas de facto administration.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/protes...-they-persist/

Quote:

Given the near-complete absence of free media in the Strip, it is difficult for outside analysts to gauge how many people participated in the latest round of protests. According to videos circulating on social media, numbers seemed to be significantly larger in the first demonstration than in the second, when Hamas’s security apparatus adopted preventive measures.

Protests were scheduled to take place once again throughout the strip on Monday. However, Hamas came prepared to thwart them.

“In all the locations where we announced that gatherings would take place, there was a heavy presence of civilian and military security, and police cars everywhere,” a source inside Gaza told The Times of Israel on Tuesday.

“Whenever two people were walking together, they were forbidden to stop on the street, after not even a minute [security forces] would go up to them and tell them ‘get out of here or we will take you with us,'” he said.

jfman 30-10-2023 16:38

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163088)
I know nobody said it. My point is if that was their objective, then I would call them evil, but it's not their objective. It is a very sad outcome from operations they would deem essential. but they are not doing it purely for that reason.

That's why I differentiate between Hamas - evil, IDF - not evil.

Do you think, considering it’d be a gross violation of international law, any nation state would admit to those motives? Or do you think they’d disguise it under the cover or some other motive?

Hypothetically.

Pierre 30-10-2023 18:36

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
An excellent speech from Netanyahu this evening.

Ms NTL 30-10-2023 18:53

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
I no longer answer my phone....I get emails from both sides like this

I don't understand how you can sleep at night , get on with your day or feel okay to look yourself in the mirror knowing you will go down in history as those who didn't speak up with every power and platform you have .

You gave up before you started , you didn't even have the backbone to research and find out what is morally right . Rather like a coward you have believed the very propaganda that you taught us to dissect and analyse, critically review and strategically make educated and academic opinions on.

Pierre 30-10-2023 21:34

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Given Netanyahu’s speech at the press conference this evening, I’m sure it is now widely available to listen to.

Is there anything in that speech that the class disagree with?

https://www.youtube.com/live/LuAFVV-...KiK1_32UVubEUE

Paul 31-10-2023 02:47

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163118)
Is there anything in that speech that the class disagree with?

No idea, I dont have 30 minutes of my life to use up listening to it. :erm:

Pierre 31-10-2023 07:56

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36163124)
No idea, I dont have 30 minutes of my life to use up listening to it. :erm:

His speech is only about 6mins followed by press Q&A, but the Q&A is also interesting.

Chris 31-10-2023 12:35

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36163107)
I no longer answer my phone....I get emails from both sides like this

I don't understand how you can sleep at night , get on with your day or feel okay to look yourself in the mirror knowing you will go down in history as those who didn't speak up with every power and platform you have .

You gave up before you started , you didn't even have the backbone to research and find out what is morally right . Rather like a coward you have believed the very propaganda that you taught us to dissect and analyse, critically review and strategically make educated and academic opinions on.

Do you mind my asking … who is it you’re acquainted with that’s sending you this stuff? Are these genuine friends, business acquaintances, or mailing list emails you’re getting?

TheDaddy 31-10-2023 21:26

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Rafah crossing is opening temporarily tomorrow to allow 81 named seriously injured Palestinians to receive medical attention in Egypt, CF exclusive there ;)

The amount of aid getting through will dramatically increase over the next couple of days too

Unconfirmed reports of Cypriot air traffic control trying to establish the identity planes which may prove interesting in the coming days/ weeks

Hugh 31-10-2023 21:55

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Cyprus (well, the South) is offering to facilitate being a Humanitarian Corridor

https://cyprus-mail.com/2023/10/31/h...ays-president/

When I flew out from Larnaca on the 23rd, there were a lot more armed military in the airport.

1andrew1 31-10-2023 23:44

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
A good article by Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland, concluding

Quote:

...What’s more, such a framing brands all Israelis – not just West Bank settlers – as guilty of the sin of colonialism. Perhaps that explains why those letter writers could not full-throatedly condemn the 7 October killing of innocent Israeli civilians. Because they do not see any Israeli, even a child, as wholly innocent.

This is where you wind up when you view this conflict in monochrome, as a clash of right v wrong. Because the late Israeli novelist and peace activist Amos Oz was never wiser than when he described the Israel/Palestine conflict as something infinitely more tragic: a clash of right v right. Two peoples with deep wounds, howling with grief, fated to share the same small piece of land.

So, this is not a football game. It has no need for spectators who root for one team against the other, goading their chosen side to go to ever further extremes. This is not a game, for one grimly obvious reason. There are no winners – only never-ending loss.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...onflict-horror

Ms NTL 01-11-2023 05:43

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36163144)
Do you mind my asking … who is it you’re acquainted with that’s sending you this stuff? Are these genuine friends, business acquaintances, or mailing list emails you’re getting?

Most of it, is anonymous. I worked in Haifa and Tel Aviv (few weeks every year). Colleagues from USA, Canada, Arab countries, Israel, pressure me to make a statement under my work's name ("platform"), which I am not allowed to do ("inappropriate behaviour") or willing to do.

I do not answer the phone, because journalists try to trick you on saying something stupid and report it or ....I will tell them to f-off, as I have a short fuse and then report it.

The last purple sentence is from one of my students in London ...

Chris 01-11-2023 14:43

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36163182)
Most of it, is anonymous. I worked in Haifa and Tel Aviv (few weeks every year). Colleagues from USA, Canada, Arab countries, Israel, pressure me to make a statement under my work's name ("platform"), which I am not allowed to do ("inappropriate behaviour") or willing to do.

I do not answer the phone, because journalists try to trick you on saying something stupid and report it or ....I will tell them to f-off, as I have a short fuse and then report it.

The last purple sentence is from one of my students in London ...

This is awful, so sorry to hear this. :(

Ms NTL 03-11-2023 20:12

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
https://www.skysports.com/football/n...ial-media-post

I have been given prepared text to reply to emails. If I am in difficulty (the prepared text does not fit as reply), then somebody will prepare something new for me....

I guess ChatGPT prepared....

I feel so free....

Pierre 03-11-2023 21:16

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36163280)
I feel so free....

Well, you’re free to move to any Islamic country, if you consider this country not free enough.

Let me know how you get on.

Ms NTL 03-11-2023 21:31

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163286)
Well, you’re free to move to any Islamic country, if you consider this country not free enough.

Let me know how you get on.

Any suggestions? Red wine is a must. Why Islamic?

jfman 03-11-2023 21:55

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
The censorship of what is polling as the most popular stance in the UK at the minute, to support a ceasefire, is truly frightening.

No more can we ask how people stood by and let the Holocaust happen. For we are witnessing the playbook before our very eyes. Dehumanising Palestinian life, intimidating anyone who speaks up for them. In time, some of what has been said in the last few weeks will go down horrifically.

By our politicians and in this thread.

At least we can put to bed the claim Israel don’t bomb hospitals. But it’s alright though, “terrorists” use them. And ambulances. And churches. And refugee camps. And civilian areas.

So Israel can destroy Gaza, and push everyone who lives there into Egypt, carrying out ethnic cleansing but it’s fine though, we can trust them to be honest about the evidence.

---------- Post added at 21:55 ---------- Previous post was at 21:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36161485)
If I was Israel, I would completely destroy Gaza, just flatten it.

I know that’s what Hamas want, but i would give it to them in spades.

Give them 24hrs warning, then flatten it.

Aha, it all makes sense now. I’ve enjoyed much of the debate Pierre, but I’ve overlooked this on page 1 which explains your difficulty to move beyond Israel’s claims to, on any human level, sympathise with Palestinians.

Pierre 03-11-2023 21:57

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36163291)
Any suggestions? Red wine is a must.

Iran, enjoy the wine.

Quote:

Why Islamic?
I’m just surmising you’re getting grief for a pro-Palestinian stance that is impacting your right to free speech. Well I’m sure you’ll get a more sympathetic ear in an Islamic state. Just remember to wear your hijab.

jfman 03-11-2023 21:59

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163298)
Iran, enjoy the wine.

I’m just surmising you’re getting grief for a pro-Palestinian stance that is impacting your right to free speech. Well I’m sure you’ll get a more sympathetic ear in an Islamic state. Just remember to wear your hijab.

She will get a sympathetic ear among the vast majority of people in this country who support a ceasefire. Israel had little sympathy among the population at large to start with, it certainly has less now as it engages in war crimes.

Paul 03-11-2023 22:14

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163300)
Israel had little sympathy among the population at large to start with

On what do you base this exactly ?

and this ;
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163300)
it certainly has less now as it engages in war crimes.

Also, what War Crimes has it been convicted of ?

Pierre 03-11-2023 22:14

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163294)
So Israel can destroy Gaza, and push everyone who lives there into Egypt

Egypt don’t want them, no other Islamic state bordering want them.

Quote:

carrying out ethnic cleansing but it’s fine though, we can trust them to be honest about the evidence.

Ethnic cleansing…this is from 5 years ago but still very pertinent


https://youtu.be/35eEljsSQfc?si=1DvidO77lkc6sZLp



Quote:

Aha, it all makes sense now. I’ve enjoyed much of the debate Pierre, but I’ve overlooked this on page 1 which explains your difficulty to move beyond Israel’s claims to, on any human level, sympathise with Palestinians.
I posted that on the day of the atrocities by Hamas, it was an emotional response after watching the initial videos being circulated and the reports coming in, but I don’t shy away from those comments. Hamas is an evil death cult that should be wiped from the Earth, it manages to survive by wrapping itself with the population of Gaza.

It’s war, it’s survival, will innocents die? Yes, because it’s war, because it’s survival.

Do I want that? No. But it’s not about what us here nice and relatively safe in the U.K. want, is it?

jfman 03-11-2023 22:18

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36163301)
On what do you base this exactly ?

There’s polling to say that the majority of people support a ceasefire. A larger minority opposed flying Israeli flags above Government buildings in the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks than the minority who supported - with a sizeable “don’t know”.

Quote:

Also, what War Crimes has it been convicted of ?
Much like criminal law, a conviction doesn’t mean events didn’t happen.

Sephiroth 03-11-2023 22:23

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163303)
There’s polling to say that the majority of people support a ceasefire. A larger minority opposed flying Israeli flags above Government buildings in the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks than the minority who supported - with a sizeable “don’t know”.



Much like criminal law, a conviction doesn’t mean events didn’t happen.

The people supporting a ceasefire were not connected to the Israelis who were brutally murdered by Hamas.

And the question of flying Israeli flags above government buildings is totally confected.

Pierre 03-11-2023 22:23

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163300)
She will get a sympathetic ear among the vast majority of people in this country who support a ceasefire.

People in this country have no right to demand Israel to do anything, talk about imperialistic privilege, something I know you like to talk about now and then.


I’m pretty sure all the British marching on London, would think differently if it was their baby beheaded, their child kidnapped and held hostage, their wife executed, their husband tortured, their elderly parents slaughtered.

Those marching in the U.K. are able to display their “luxury beliefs”….it costs them nothing and they can appear to be “right on” with their annoying non-binary blue haired friends.

Paul 03-11-2023 22:25

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163303)
There’s polling to say that the majority of people support a ceasefire.

Nice bit of BS - but thats not what you said at all.
Quote:

Israel had little sympathy among the population at large to start with

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163303)
Much like criminal law, a conviction doesn’t mean events didn’t happen.

Another vague response that really answers nothing and does not support your statement (and also, read it again, I dont think it even makes sense).

Hugh 03-11-2023 22:26

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163298)
Iran, enjoy the wine.



I’m just surmising you’re getting grief for a pro-Palestinian stance that is impacting your right to free speech. Well I’m sure you’ll get a more sympathetic ear in an Islamic state. Just remember to wear your hijab.

That’s the problem with making assumptions without context or confirmation - I read Ms Ntl’s post to mean she was getting flak for not speaking up in support of the Palestinians…

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL View Post
I no longer answer my phone....I get emails from both sides like this

I don't understand how you can sleep at night , get on with your day or feel okay to look yourself in the mirror knowing you will go down in history as those who didn't speak up with every power and platform you have .

You gave up before you started , you didn't even have the backbone to research and find out what is morally right . Rather like a coward you have believed the very propaganda that you taught us to dissect and analyse, critically review and strategically make educated and academic opinions on.

Quote:

Most of it, is anonymous. I worked in Haifa and Tel Aviv (few weeks every year). Colleagues from USA, Canada, Arab countries, Israel, pressure me to make a statement under my work's name ("platform"), which I am not allowed to do ("inappropriate behaviour") or willing to do.
And I read the last part to mean they weren’t allowed to, but also didn’t want to, make supporting statements for any side.

Only Ms Ntl knows, neither of us do…

jfman 03-11-2023 22:30

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163302)
Egypt don’t want them, no other Islamic state bordering want them.

Ethnic cleansing…this is from 5 years ago but still very pertinent
https://youtu.be/35eEljsSQfc?si=1DvidO77lkc6sZLp

I posted that on the day of the atrocities by Hamas, it was an emotional response after watching the initial videos being circulated and the reports coming in, but I don’t shy away from those comments. Hamas is an evil death cult that should be wiped from the Earth, it manages to survive by wrapping itself with the population of Gaza

It’s war, it’s survival, will innocents die? Yes, because it’s war, because it’s survival.

Do I want that? No. But it’s not about what us here nice and relatively safe in the U.K. want, is it?

I appreciate this recognition and providing further context. I do take back my comment in that case.

It isn’t about what we want, of course, but in both sides of a war there’s emotionally involved people that need direction and support to do the right thing from outsiders. It does indeed appear that America are trying to take on this role but Israel are backing that Biden fears the pro-Israel lobby at home. Blinken’s impotence at the start of this is indicative.

However he is asking that Israel take civilians into account; an odd request if he confidently believes they are.

---------- Post added at 22:30 ---------- Previous post was at 22:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36163307)
Nice bit of BS - but thats not what you said at all.

Another vague response that really answers nothing and does not support your statement (and also, read it again, I dont think it even makes sense).

If more people oppose flying a flag in solidarity than flying it; I think it’s reasonable to say that there’s little sympathy. Or at least less than more - I was merely providing Ms NTL assurance in that regard.

Other people can take a different view but it’s exactly the type of virtue signalling cost nothing action that should easily have the support of a majority if they believe their cause to be just.

Pierre 03-11-2023 22:44

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36163308)
Only Ms Ntl knows, neither of us do…

Correct, but the post was made with a link in it to a story about a footballer that had lost his job for posting pro-Palestinian rhetoric…..

Ms NTL 04-11-2023 06:23

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163298)
Iran, enjoy the wine.


Checked, wine is not allowed.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163298)


Well I’m sure you’ll get a more sympathetic ear in an Islamic state. Just remember to wear your hijab.

Checked, cross-dressing is not allowed. :D

Itshim 05-11-2023 11:10

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL;




Checked, cross-dressing is not allowed. :D

I also thought you were female.

---------- Post added at 11:10 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------

An aside , if the IRA started up again, should the UK bomb the republic as Israel is in Gaza

Sephiroth 05-11-2023 12:38

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36163377)
I also thought you were female.

---------- Post added at 11:10 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------

An aside , if the IRA started up again, should the UK bomb the republic as Israel is in Gaza

What's the matter with you? The IRA usually gave warnings of a bomb; they didn't mutilate and murder children, etc. And, above all, they were of a culture that could negotiate.

In not so many years ahead, it is entirely possible that NI will become part of the Republic (and then there will be another problem to sort out).




Pierre 05-11-2023 17:10

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36163377)
if the IRA started up again, should the UK bomb the republic as Israel is in Gaza

You’re comparing apples and decapitated heads.

Ms NTL 06-11-2023 17:30

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36163377)
I also thought you were female.

Pierre was on a roll: He wanted to flatten Gaza, told me to convert to Islam, move to Iran and wear a hijab.

I am male, agnostic (I cannot convert to anything), I have no intention of moving to Persia, and the hijab will clash with my beard.:D

Sephiroth 06-11-2023 18:35

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36163513)
Pierre was on a roll: He wanted to flatten Gaza, told me to convert to Islam, move to Iran and wear a hijab.

I am male, agnostic (I cannot convert to anything), I have no intention of moving to Persia, and the hijab will clash with my beard.:D

Damn.

Pierre 06-11-2023 21:43

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36163513)
Pierre was on a roll: He wanted to flatten Gaza, told me to convert to Islam, move to Iran and wear a hijab.

I am male, agnostic (I cannot convert to anything), I have no intention of moving to Persia, and the hijab will clash with my beard.:D

Yeah, well maybe if you didn’t call yourself Ms NTL, you’d be oh so clever.

It’s like me calling myself Susan then sniggering when somebody thinks I’m female………oh the fools.

I still stand by all the items on my roll. I reckon you’d still suit a hijab.

Chris 06-11-2023 21:51

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Can we get back to discussing the topic instead of each other.

Chris 07-11-2023 07:24

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
A point worth noting this morning when considering any information released by Hamas:

Quote:

A senior Hamas leader has refused to acknowledge that his group killed civilians in Israel, claiming only conscripts were targeted.
Moussa Abu Marzouk told the BBC that "women, children and civilians were exempt" from Hamas's attacks.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67321241

Mouzak and his crew are profoundly unserious people if they think they can continue to claim “it didn’t happen, and it wasn’t us anyway it was those armed Hamas people” even while journalists are playing back videos of the massacres of children right in their faces.

Pierre 07-11-2023 08:30

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36163531)
A point worth noting this morning when considering any information released by Hamas:



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67321241

Mouzak and his crew are profoundly unserious people if they think they can continue to claim “it didn’t happen, and it wasn’t us anyway it was those armed Hamas people” even while journalists are playing back videos of the massacres of children right in their faces.

This is why I don't understand why the BBC and MSM, blindly report death figures from the Gaza Health Ministry aka Hamas.

I'm not belittling what's going on, or reducing it to a numbers game. but what was the last count 10,000 + 3,500 children dead. I mean of course it wouldn't play to their advantage to over inflate the figures to put more pressure on Israel would it?

jfman 07-11-2023 08:35

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36163531)
A point worth noting this morning when considering any information released by Hamas:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67321241

Mouzak and his crew are profoundly unserious people if they think they can continue to claim “it didn’t happen, and it wasn’t us anyway it was those armed Hamas people” even while journalists are playing back videos of the massacres of children right in their faces.

I’ll file it next to the IDF claiming they don’t target civilians with my photos of all the hospitals, refugee camps and churches that have been bombed. Alongside whole neighbourhoods razed to the ground.

I trust you aren’t using this to dispute the headline figure of civilian casualties, women and children killed? If anything even the Israeli’s think it’s an undercount.

---------- Post added at 08:35 ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36163539)
This is why I don't understand why the BBC and MSM, blindly report death figures from the Gaza Health Ministry aka Hamas.

I'm not belittling what's going on, or reducing it to a numbers game. but what was the last count 10,000 + 3,500 children dead. I mean of course it wouldn't play to their advantage to over inflate the figures to put more pressure on Israel would it?

Of course it could be that it’s the only health ministry they have. There’s been little indication they’ve fudged the figures over the years.

Even Israeli sources are quoting 20,000 killed, and US sources questioning whether the Israeli actions are even making a dent in Hamas capability.

It’s more likely the BBC and others are using “Hamas run” to give Israel that cover to dispute the figure, which it appears they don’t even bother to do.

By anyone’s count the Israeli’s have killed more civilians - and far more children - in a month than Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine has in around a year and three quarters. An armed conflict that has saw Russia secure 20% of Ukrainian territory, something around the size of the UK. Gaza is a mere city being obliterated with no regard for the civilians living there.

Chris 07-11-2023 09:09

Re: Hamas Israel War
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36163540)
I’ll file it next to the IDF claiming they don’t target civilians with my photos of all the hospitals, refugee camps and churches that have been bombed. Alongside whole neighbourhoods razed to the ground.

I trust you aren’t using this to dispute the headline figure of civilian casualties, women and children killed? If anything even the Israeli’s think it’s an undercount.

---------- Post added at 08:35 ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 ----------



Of course it could be that it’s the only health ministry they have. There’s been little indication they’ve fudged the figures over the years.

Even Israeli sources are quoting 20,000 killed, and US sources questioning whether the Israeli actions are even making a dent in Hamas capability.

It’s more likely the BBC and others are using “Hamas run” to give Israel that cover to dispute the figure, which it appears they don’t even bother to do.

By anyone’s count the Israeli’s have killed more civilians - and far more children - in a month than Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine has in around a year and three quarters. An armed conflict that has saw Russia secure 20% of Ukrainian territory, something around the size of the UK. Gaza is a mere city being obliterated with no regard for the civilians living there.

Actually I was using it mostly to nudge the thread back on to some relevant discussion, and because Marzouk happens to be on the front page this morning.

The apposite phrase right now would seem to be a plague on both their houses. Hamas is a murderous terrorist organisation with no interest in behaving according to international norms even while it presents itself as the legitimate government of Gaza. ‘Hamas run’ seems to me to be a well-calibrated phrase allowing the BBC to report what it says while allowing the possibility that it might not be reliable.

And there is no sense in which Israel’s response can be considered proportionate or strategic. It’s straight up vengeance with no regard for what comes next. I note this morning they’re now talking about taking on security responsibility for Gaza once this is over, which sounds like they’re preparing for occupation but are unable to call a spade a spade. If they go through with that, they’ll make Belfast 1972 look like a shining beacon of tolerance and respect by comparison.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum