Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Trump’s Troubles (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711548)

ianch99 06-03-2024 17:51

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
"Puting" aside his colour, his lies and his sexual crimes, the real problem is that he is Putin's useful idiot. NATO is at real risk if he gets a second term plus Putin will be emboldened making attacks on the Baltic countries & Moldova far more likely.

The world will be a far more dangerous place with him as President.

Itshim 06-03-2024 18:53

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36171521)
"Puting" aside his colour, his lies and his sexual crimes, the real problem is that he is Putin's useful idiot. NATO is at real risk if he gets a second term plus Putin will be emboldened making attacks on the Baltic countries & Moldova far more likely.

The world will be a far more dangerous place with him as President.

Perhaps it's time for "Europe " looked after its self instead of wanting the USA to hold its hand. Just can't vote for Biden given his vp , so looks like a no hoper or Trump will get my vote . Always say if you don't vote don't complain :rolleyes:

Hugh 06-03-2024 19:14

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36171524)
Perhaps it's time for "Europe " looked after its self instead of wanting the USA to hold its hand. Just can't vote for Biden given his vp , so looks like a no hoper or Trump will get my vote . Always say if you don't vote don't complain :rolleyes:

The USA was very keen on NATO being a buffer between the USA and the Soviet Union during the 40 odd years of the Cold War, and NATO rallied to the US’s invocation of Article 5 after 9/11.

jfman 06-03-2024 19:15

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36171521)
"Puting" aside his colour, his lies and his sexual crimes, the real problem is that he is Putin's useful idiot. NATO is at real risk if he gets a second term plus Putin will be emboldened making attacks on the Baltic countries & Moldova far more likely.

The world will be a far more dangerous place with him as President.

It’d be a safer place for the Ukrainian conscripts being sacrificed on the front line.

However, I’m inclined to think Trump will be Navalnied before he ever takes office second time. The court system is too contentious and tens of millions will reject it anyway.

Hugh 06-03-2024 19:21

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36171526)
It’d be a safer place for the Ukrainian conscripts being sacrificed on the front line.

However, I’m inclined to think Trump will be Navalnied before he ever takes office second time. The court system is too contentious and tens of millions will reject it anyway.

Your thoughtfulness for the well-being of the Ukrainian conscripts is fantastic…

Re your second point, I think it would be pretty audacious of Putin to murder another politician so soon, especially one who admires him so much…

1andrew1 06-03-2024 20:15

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36171526)
However, I’m inclined to think Trump will be Navalnied before he ever takes office second time.

You.don't put down an obedient pet dog unless it bites you. ;)

Chris 06-03-2024 21:22

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36171528)
You.don't put down an obedient pet dog unless it bites you. ;)

I think he means by an agency closer to home. Many of them have been well and truly bitten by the Donald already.

1andrew1 06-03-2024 21:44

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36171531)
I think he means by an agency closer to home. Many of them have been well and truly bitten by the Donald already.

My bad. Trump has indeed bitten them.

Could be wrong but don't think discrete assassinations are the US's style.

jfman 06-03-2024 21:48

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36171532)
My bad. Trump has indeed bitten them.

Could be wrong but don't think discrete assassinations are the US's style.

They literally invented the “mysterious fall from a window”.

Although a grotesquely obese elderly man has to run the risk of a “heart attack”.

Chris 06-03-2024 22:20

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36171532)
My bad. Trump has indeed bitten them.

Could be wrong but don't think discrete assassinations are the US's style.

Are you sure :scratch:

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2024/03/4.jpg

:D

Dude111 06-03-2024 23:10

I read on hipforums Trump is running again Chris!!

Do you think he will make it in again?

Hugh 07-03-2024 11:43

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
https://wapo.st/49GThTp

Quote:

The Supreme Court has scheduled argument for April 25 to review Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune from criminal prosecution on charges of trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

The case will be heard on the final day of the court’s argument calendar and will determine whether and how quickly Trump faces trial in D.C. for allegedly trying to block Joe Biden’s election victory.

Hugh 07-03-2024 23:58

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-...se-2024-03-07/

Quote:

A federal judge on Thursday denied Donald Trump's request to delay enforcement of the writer E. Jean Carroll's $83.3 million verdict in her recent defamation case.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan adds to pressure on the former U.S. president to line up an acceptable bond by Monday so he can appeal.

In the Jan. 26 verdict, jurors agreed with Carroll, a former Elle magazine advice columnist, that Trump had defamed her in June 2019 by denying he had raped her in the mid-1990s in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan.

Kaplan made the verdict official on Feb. 8, and gave Trump 30 days to post a bond or cash during his appeal, which is expected to challenge the jury's finding of liability and the amount of damages.

Trump had sought to delay enforcement of the verdict until Kaplan ruled on his motions to throw it out, which he filed on Tuesday.

But the judge said Trump should not have waited 25 days after the verdict before seeking a delay.

He also said Trump failed to show how he might suffer "irreparable injury" if required to post a bond.

"Mr. Trump's current situation is a result of his own dilatory actions," the judge wrote.

Kaplan has yet to rule on Trump's request for a reduced bond.
Quote:

Asked on March 5 if he could pay what was owed or post bond in both cases, Trump told Fox News: "I have a lot of money. I can do what I want to do. ... I don't worry about the money."

Chris 08-03-2024 15:00

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
A fair assessment of who the Republican Party has picked as its presidential candidate.

https://x.com/bmay/status/1765805296...56-Kgau3lzowJw

pip08456 08-03-2024 16:39

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Biden scored points in his State of the Union address yesterday.

https://twitter.com/RpsAgainstTrump/...76091628331412

Itshim 08-03-2024 17:48

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36171525)
The USA was very keen on NATO being a buffer between the USA and the Soviet Union during the 40 odd years of the Cold War, and NATO rallied to the US’s invocation of Article 5 after 9/11.

More fool them if they really think that the USA is doing anything other than looking after its own interest. Putin invading alaska is the only way that I can see USA getting involved .

TheDaddy 08-03-2024 18:06

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36171696)
Biden scored points in his State of the Union address yesterday.

https://twitter.com/RpsAgainstTrump/...76091628331412

Only heard the first bit of it but I thought he did really well, from what I heard anyway

heero_yuy 08-03-2024 18:11

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36171701)
Only heard the first bit of it but I thought he did really well, from what I heard anyway

I assumed he had had an injection of Monkey Glands or something similar.:D

Pierre 08-03-2024 19:33

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36171690)
A fair assessment of who the Republican Party has picked as its presidential candidate.

https://x.com/bmay/status/1765805296...56-Kgau3lzowJw

Hope you’re never in a jury presiding over me, if that’s your definition of fair.

Yes, There’s much in there that’s true, and much that isn’t or at the very least questionable.

As soon as you throw in a racist, almost immediately….whatever, another hack.

1andrew1 12-03-2024 17:54

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
I wonder how Trump will react to these allegations.
Quote:

Donald Trump said Adolf Hitler "did some good things" and praised Vladimir Putin on more than one occasion during his time in the White House, his former chief of staff has claimed.

Mr Trump, who is currently on the campaign trail and hoping to land a second stint as president, also repeatedly admired North Korea's Kim Jong Un, according to a new book.

General John Kelly, a retired marine who became the Trump administration's longest-serving chief of staff, makes allegations about Mr Trump's views in a forthcoming book by a CNN journalist.

Mr Kelly tells Jim Sciutto that the then-president "thought Putin was an OK guy and Kim was an OK guy" - before recalling a specific conversation they allegedly had about Hitler.

He says: "[Trump] said, 'well, but Hitler did some good things'. I said, 'well, what?' And he said, 'well, [Hitler] rebuilt the economy'.
https://news.sky.com/story/donald-tr...laims-13092843

jfman 12-03-2024 17:57

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
No point. From his perspective the legal system is rigged against him, and it’s just handing it an opportunity to condemn him. At best it rules in his favour - undermining his claims the system is rigged.

Russ 12-03-2024 18:08

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36171929)
I wonder how Trump will react to these allegations.

https://news.sky.com/story/donald-tr...laims-13092843

Ok Hitler did some *positive* things. He got Germany working again. He got their autobahns running. So on that basis yes he did do some good.

However the small matter of his plan for total extermination of Jewish people kind of overshadows that. Such a mass genocide has a habit of trumping (no pun intended) benefits to the economy.

I’m not suggesting I think the deranged orange tosspot would order the deaths of millions. But I’m convinced he has it in him to turn a blind eye to it happening in other countries if he believed allowing it to happen would help ‘make America great again’ (although many of us struggle to recall when his country was originally regarded as ‘great’).

Pierre 12-03-2024 19:32

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36171929)
I wonder how Trump will react to these allegations.

https://news.sky.com/story/donald-tr...laims-13092843

I’m sure he won’t give a duck.

He wouldn’t be wrong either.

Also Mussolini made the trains run on time*







* he didn’t but ….whatever.

TheDaddy 12-03-2024 20:47

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36171934)
Ok Hitler did some *positive* things. He got Germany working again. He got their autobahns running. So on that basis yes he did do some good.

However the small matter of his plan for total extermination of Jewish people kind of overshadows that. Such a mass genocide has a habit of trumping (no pun intended) benefits to the economy.

I’m not suggesting I think the deranged orange tosspot would order the deaths of millions. But I’m convinced he has it in him to turn a blind eye to it happening in other countries if he believed allowing it to happen would help ‘make America great again’ (although many of us struggle to recall when his country was originally regarded as ‘great’).

The orange nightmares already told Putin to Do what you want, as for hitler Gustav Stresemann got them out of hyper inflation and the nazis carried on the policies of Kurt von Schleicher's government that led to full employment, interestingly hitler did use the slogan make Germany great again more than once though

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36171947)
I’m sure he won’t give a duck.

He wouldn’t be wrong either.

Also Mussolini made the trains run on time*







* he didn’t but ….whatever.

He got one train running on time once...

Chris 12-03-2024 20:51

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36171934)
Ok Hitler did some *positive* things. He got Germany working again. He got their autobahns running. So on that basis yes he did do some good.

This is a claim often made, however it’s a fallacy. If you’re assessing someone’s legacy you can’t pick an arbitrary end date, at which point you declare something a success. Otherwise, I could throw myself off a cliff and claim to have learned the secret of flight. And I will seem to have done so, until I hit the rocks - which is exactly what Hitler’s policies did to Germany. His economic and infrastructure reforms were directly linked to militarisation, misappropriation of wealth (mostly of Jews), then annexation of foreign territories and mobilisation of national sentiment by creating scapegoats (again, mostly against Jews). The ‘good’ Hitler did can’t be decoupled from the inevitable consequences of the way he went about it.

Hugh 16-03-2024 00:55

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
https://wapo.st/49cQgt3

Quote:

Former vice president Mike Pence said Friday that he will not endorse Donald Trump, the president with whom he served, just days after Trump won enough delegates to secure the Republican Party’s 2024 nomination.

Pence served under Trump but has been critical of the former president after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol in which Pence was targeted by a mob of pro-Trump supporters who wanted to stop certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory. Withholding his endorsement in a remarkable break with tradition, Pence rebuked his former boss in strong terms Friday, saying Trump’s agenda doesn’t align with his view of conservatism.

“Donald Trump is pursuing and articulating an agenda that is at odds with the conservative agenda that we governed on during our four years, and that is why I cannot in good conscience endorse Donald Trump in this campaign,” Pence told Fox News host Martha MacCallum.

Mr K 16-03-2024 08:41

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
If Trump does win ( because the Democrats insist on a geriatric), it will implode very quickly for him and the Republicans. Mainly because he isn't a Republican, he's a Trumpist. In it for himself, his own legal protection, and general madness.

Let's hope it doesn't result in the world imploding too, which is a real risk. Let him **** up his own country by all means.

jfman 16-03-2024 10:04

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
I’d be weary of conflating what you’d like to see happen and what you think will happen.

If Trump is elected there will be many Republicans down the ticket riding his coat tails all the way to Capitol Hill. They’re not an entirely altruistic species.

Pierre 16-03-2024 15:58

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172108)

I’m sure he’s devastated!

TheDaddy 16-03-2024 17:07

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172128)
I’m sure he’s devastated!

Devastated the mob didn't hang Pence as planned?

Chris 16-03-2024 17:24

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172128)
I’m sure he’s devastated!

Actually as a narcissistic sociopath this will irritate Trump a fair bit. And Pence is a genuinely conservative politician, there are those who will take seriously what he says.

1andrew1 16-03-2024 17:44

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172128)
I’m sure he’s devastated!

Toys will be thrown out of the pram!

Hugh 16-03-2024 18:00

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36172132)
Toys will be thrown out of the pram!

More likely to be ketchup on the walls…

Pierre 16-03-2024 22:46

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36172131)
Actually as a narcissistic sociopath this will irritate Trump a fair bit. And Pence is a genuinely conservative politician, there are those who will take seriously what he says.

He did away with Pence as an ally, friend or supporter after the last election. After Pence refused to void the election result.

What makes you think he wanted, or expected, Pence to be team Trump?

Trump doesn’t need a Pence endorsement, nor expected one. Also a Pence endorsement carries about as much weight as a termites shopping bag.

Someone said it this week and I forget where I heard it. I’m paraphrasing:

Biden is a weak proxy put forward by the party to communicate their plans, whereas Trump is the party.

jfman 16-03-2024 23:46

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172138)
Biden is a weak proxy put forward by the party to communicate their plans, whereas Trump is the party.

This is, for the “genuinely conservative politicians”, the biggest concern.

Trump has successfully captured the party to the extent it’s not even a debate. He’s not the outlier. “Anyone but Trump” is.

Chris 16-03-2024 23:48

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172138)
He did away with Pence as an ally, friend or supporter after the last election. After Pence refused to void the election result.

What makes you think he wanted, or expected, Pence to be team Trump?

Trump doesn’t need a Pence endorsement, nor expected one. Also a Pence endorsement carries about as much weight as a termites shopping bag.

Someone said it this week and I forget where I heard it. I’m paraphrasing:

Biden is a weak proxy put forward by the party to communicate their plans, whereas Trump is the party.

You’re missing the point.

Your comment earlier (I’m sure he’s devastated) is not a million miles from the truth.

Trump is a narcissistic sociopath. Whether he needs Pence’s endorsement is by the by. The fact is he feels entitled to it and will be aggrieved not to receive it.

Hugh 17-03-2024 00:38

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172138)
He did away with Pence as an ally, friend or supporter after the last election. After Pence refused to void the election result.

What makes you think he wanted, or expected, Pence to be team Trump?

Trump doesn’t need a Pence endorsement, nor expected one. Also a Pence endorsement carries about as much weight as a termites shopping bag.

Someone said it this week and I forget where I heard it. I’m paraphrasing:

Biden is a weak proxy put forward by the party to communicate their plans, whereas Trump is the party.

And what happens to the party after the 77 year old morbidly obese junk food eating heart attack waiting to happen is not with us any more?

jfman 17-03-2024 00:54

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172142)
And what happens to the party after the 77 year old morbidly obese junk food eating heart attack waiting to happen is not with us any more?

A battle between Republicans to position themselves as the heir to Trump. Ivanka? Don Jr? DeSantis?

Traditional conservatism is deader on that side of the pond than it is on ours. And that’s saying something.

Hugh 17-03-2024 01:05

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
When a political party becomes the personification of an individual, it’s no longer a political party, it’s a cult…

jfman 17-03-2024 01:08

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
If we take a step back how many vying to lead the Conservative Party have tried to portray themselves as following in the footsteps of Thatcher?

Mr K 17-03-2024 08:46

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36172146)
If we take a step back how many vying to lead the Conservative Party have tried to portray themselves as following in the footsteps of Thatcher?

Didn't do this guy any good....
Attachment 30930

Pierre 17-03-2024 10:56

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172142)
And what happens to the party after the 77 year old morbidly obese junk food eating heart attack waiting to happen is not with us any more?

I think that will depend very much on who Trump tries to anoint as his successor.

Mr K 17-03-2024 11:16

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172153)
I think that will depend very much on who Trump tries to anoint as his successor.

Let me guess, Trump Jr....

---------- Post added at 11:16 ---------- Previous post was at 11:02 ----------

And the orange one is now promising a 'bloodbath' if he's not elected by one means or another....
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2513829.html

No wonder he admires Putin, not much difference in their election tactics.

Pierre 17-03-2024 16:18

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36172154)
Let me guess, Trump Jr....

---------- Post added at 11:16 ---------- Previous post was at 11:02 ----------

And the orange one is now promising a 'bloodbath' if he's not elected by one means or another....
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2513829.html

No wonder he admires Putin, not much difference in their election tactics.

He said it will be a bloodbath for the US auto industry and economy, if he isn’t elected.

Meaning the democrats will destroy both.

But he’s used to having his words twisted.

Hugh 17-03-2024 17:45

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172162)
He said it will be a bloodbath for the US auto industry and economy, if he isn’t elected.

Meaning the democrats will destroy both.

But he’s used to having his words twisted.

What he actually said

Quote:

“Now we’re going to put a 100 percent tariff on every single car that comes across [the] line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those guys — if I get elected,” he said. “Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole. That’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country.”

Pierre 17-03-2024 17:50

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172164)
What he actually said

I’m well aware of the whole quote, I read it, and the context of which it was given.

And I again repeat he was referring to the economic impact to the auto industry and the economy as a whole.

Unless you think he was talking about something else, happy to hear what you think he was talking about?

Hugh 17-03-2024 17:59

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
I think he is deliberately vague, with the intent of being misinterpreted by his supporters to incite their anger (stochastic terrorism) and to then lash out at the mainstream media for taking a different interpretation. He frequently changes subject mid-sentence, causing confusion about what he’s talking about - deliberately or not, not sure…

Who uses "bloodbath" in reference to the auto industry?

Pierre 17-03-2024 18:21

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172167)
I think he is deliberately vague, with the intent of being misinterpreted by his supporters to incite their anger (stochastic terrorism) and to then lash out at the mainstream media for taking a different interpretation.

The poor innocent media….fine people on both sides……Jan 6th…..they do have a habit of misinterpreting.

Quote:

He frequently changes subject mid-sentence, causing confusion about what he’s talking about - deliberately or not, not sure…
I think deliberate would be giving him way too much credit.

His fuller quote was this, in referring to factories China is building in Mexico to sell EV cars into the USA

Quote:

, "If you’re listening, President Xi — and you and I are friends — but he understands the way I deal. Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you’re building in Mexico right now… you’re going to not hire Americans and you’re going to sell the cars to us, no. We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected."

"Now if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole auto industry – that’s gonna be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That will be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars. if I’m elected They’re building massive factories."
Words in bold added by me

Quote:

Who uses "bloodbath" in reference to the auto industry?
Well he wasn’t talking about anything else, at the time.

Chris 17-03-2024 18:38

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
It makes no difference what ‘bloodbath’ was in reference to. Responsible politicians don’t use such turns of phrase because they know they rile up extremists. Extremist politicians do use such terms for the same reason.

jfman 17-03-2024 18:49

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
On the same basis, responsible media outlets shouldn’t report the statements out of context.

Hom3r 17-03-2024 21:39

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Because of their age and health I'd be surprised if either see the end of their term.


TBPH no one should be allowed to run if they hit 74 during their term.


As Billy Connolly said "My dad's younger and we don't give him the remote for the TV"

Pierre 17-03-2024 23:19

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36172175)
TBPH no one should be allowed to run if they hit 74 during their term.

It’s strange as there is a lower limit.


I disagree though, age should not be a limiting factor.

Capability should though, and Biden is clearly incapable.

jfman 18-03-2024 10:10

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
If you are going to upper age limit the President (not an unreasonable step IMHO) the same should apply to Congress.

1andrew1 18-03-2024 11:05

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36172189)
If you are going to upper age limit the President (not an unreasonable step IMHO) the same should apply to Congress.

Agreed.

Hugh 18-03-2024 15:51

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/18/trum...wyers-say.html

Quote:

Donald Trump cannot obtain a bond to secure the $454 million civil business fraud judgment against him as he pursues an appeal of the case, his attorneys said in a New York court filing Monday.

Attorneys for Trump and his co-defendants in the fraud case argued that it was “impossible” for them to secure a complete appeal bond, which would “effectively” require “cash reserves approaching $1 billion.”

″Defendants’ ongoing diligent efforts have proven that a bond in the judgment’s full amount is ‘a practical impossibility,’” the lawyers wrote, quoting an affidavit in the filing with the Appellate Division of Manhattan Supreme Court.

They said they have approached roughly 30 surety companies through four separate brokers, and that they have spent “countless hours negotiating with one of the largest insurance companies in the world.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...d-is-struggle/

Quote:

In an April 2023 deposition, Trump volunteered that he had “substantially in excess of 400 million in cash.”

“Developers usually don’t have cash. They have assets, not cash,” Trump said. “We have, I believe, 400 plus and going up very substantially every month.”

Trump added later that, despite the legal fees he was facing, “I have over 400 — fairly substantially over $400 million in cash. That’s just cash. That’s just cash.”

pip08456 18-03-2024 15:53

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172179)
It’s strange as there is a lower limit.


I disagree though, age should not be a limiting factor.

Capability should though, and Biden is clearly incapable.

Sorry Pierre, I disagree. I can see the need for a lower limit (experience) but cannot see why no upper limit.

Pierre 18-03-2024 16:09

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
His ego and his mouth getting him into trouble again.

but it's a rediculous figure, that he was probably never expected to achieve and a rediculous malicious case that's been brought against him.

---------- Post added at 16:09 ---------- Previous post was at 16:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36172208)
Sorry Pierre, I disagree. I can see the need for a lower limit (experience) but cannot see why no upper limit.

OK, we disagree then.

1andrew1 18-03-2024 17:24

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
If he can't raise the money, then will he have to spend some time behind bars?

pip08456 18-03-2024 17:35

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172209)
His ego and his mouth getting him into trouble again.

but it's a rediculous figure, that he was probably never expected to achieve and a rediculous malicious case that's been brought against him.

---------- Post added at 16:09 ---------- Previous post was at 16:08 ----------



OK, we disagree then.

Glad to see we disagree. Looks like Trumps money pit has closed, wonder why he just doesn't ask Putin for the money. Or is that just another conspiracy theoery?

Quote:

"The presumptive @GOP nominee for President is desperate for $464M (and counting) which he cannot personally access," Casten posted on X. "That fact alone makes him a massive national security risk; any foreign adversary seeking to buy a President knows the price."

1andrew1 18-03-2024 17:53

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172209)
OK, we disagree then.

Why are you not in favour of an upper limit? Particularly as you believe that at least one elderly US politician is suffering from cognitive issues.

Paul 18-03-2024 18:00

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Well he did say ;
Quote:

Capability should though, and Biden is clearly incapable.
I agree, your ability should be a factor, not your age.

1andrew1 18-03-2024 20:58

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36172219)
Well he did say ;


I agree, your ability should be a factor, not your age.

Would that work in the US? We saw what Trump's doctor said about him! There would be litigation after litigation.

An age cut-off would be a clean way of managing things.

Pierre 18-03-2024 21:53

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36172228)
Would that work in the US? We saw what Trump's doctor said about him! There would be litigation after litigation.

An age cut-off would be a clean way of managing things.

The 25th amendment covers it,…somewhat. But is not specific.

1andrew1 18-03-2024 22:17

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172231)
The 25th amendment covers it,…somewhat. But is not specific.

Yup, doesn't cut the mustard. Age does. A few snowflakes may complain it's unfair but it actually works.

Hugh 22-03-2024 14:13

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Two weeks ago - Shot

https://www.npr.org/2024/03/02/12355...-pay-his-legal

Quote:

we appreciate the fact that the Trump campaign did issue a statement, and they said that they will not use RNC funds to pay any of President Trump's legal bills.

Today - Chaser

https://apnews.com/article/trump-cam...7e13a3462e5790

Quote:

Donald Trump’s new joint fundraising agreement with the Republican National Committee directs donations to his campaign and a political action committee that pays the former president’s legal bills before the RNC gets a cut, according to a fundraising invitation obtained by The Associated Press.

The unorthodox diversion of funds to the Save America PAC makes it more likely that Republican donors could see their money go to Trump’s lawyers, who have received at least $76 million over the last two years to defend him against four felony indictments and multiple civil cases. Some Republicans are already troubled that Trump’s takeover of the RNC could shortchange the cash-strapped party.

Trump has invited high-dollar donors to Palm Beach, Florida, for an April 6 fundraiser that comes as his fundraising is well behind President Joe Biden and national Democrats. The invitation’s fine print says donations to the Trump 47 Committee will first be used to give the maximum amount allowed under federal law to Trump’s campaign. Anything left over from the donation next goes toward a maximum contribution to Save America, and then anything left from there goes to the RNC and then to state political parties.

Pierre 22-03-2024 15:01

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172381)

He's not using any RNC funds. In fact if I have read that correctly he is adding to RNC funds.

Hugh 25-03-2024 16:53

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
https://wapo.st/3PB2eFC

Quote:

An appeals court panel said Monday that former president Donald Trump would be allowed to post a $175 million bond to stave off enforcement of a nearly half-billion dollar civil judgement against him and his business.

The order on Monday morning was a significant win for Trump, who was otherwise facing a massive cash crunch and the prospect of New York Attorney General Letitia James seizing some of his assets as soon as this week.

The appeals panel gave Trump 10 days to come up with the reduced bond of $175 million.
---------- Post added at 16:53 ---------- Previous post was at 15:40 ----------

Looks like the first Criminal trial could be underway on the 15th April 2024.

https://wapo.st/495PA8t

Quote:

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan said Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial would begin April 15, rejecting calls from Trump’s legal team to delay the case.

Trump’s lawyers had argued that a late release of more than 100,000 pages of potential evidence should postpone the trial significantly, and they asked that the prosecutors be sanctioned. Merchan, raising his voice at times, admonished Trump’s attorneys for making what he called very serious allegations without legal backup. He also questioned why the defense did not seek the records from federal officials sooner.

Pierre 25-03-2024 16:56

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172483)

The whole thing is a joke.

A supposed crime, with no victim.

A deliberately unpayable bond.

everyone can see it, and they're just making the public sympathise with Trump.

Canadian Millionaire Business man, Kevin O'Leary, from the US version of Dragons Den, who is not a Trump supporter as far as I can tell, is saying it looks bad on America and New York.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court...s-not-america/

Damien 25-03-2024 22:21

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172491)
The whole thing is a joke.

A supposed crime, with no victim.

That is the Trump supporter line but fraud is a real crime. If you lied to a bank to get a lower mortgage rate you could be done as well. Mortgage fraud is a thing here as well.

Pierre 26-03-2024 05:51

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36172513)
That is the Trump supporter line but fraud is a real crime. If you lied to a bank to get a lower mortgage rate you could be done as well. Mortgage fraud is a thing here as well.

Well when I ask the bank for a secured loan or mortgage, the bank looks at the property or item I’m securing the loan against and makes decision on whether their loan is secure or not.

If I went to Barclays and asked for a £550,000 mortgage to buy a 2up 2down mid-terrace house in Huddersfield, I’m pretty sure that would be looked into further.

Chris 26-03-2024 07:00

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36172520)
Well when I ask the bank for a secured loan or mortgage, the bank looks at the property or item I’m securing the loan against and makes decision on whether their loan is secure or not.

If I went to Barclays and asked for a £550,000 mortgage to buy a 2up 2down mid-terrace house in Huddersfield, I’m pretty sure that would be looked into further.

Yes, but then you haven’t spent most of your life carrying the reputation of a super-successful billionaire property mogul.

Let’s at least try to remember we’re talking about a court judgement here, arrived at through due process, and not merely something Trump has been accused of in some dank corner of the internet. And that ‘corrupt judges’ is another Trump campaign line rather than anything with substance to it.

Hugh 26-03-2024 11:42

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36172522)
Yes, but then you haven’t spent most of your life carrying the reputation of a super-successful billionaire property mogul.

Let’s at least try to remember we’re talking about a court judgement here, arrived at through due process, and not merely something Trump has been accused of in some dank corner of the internet. And that ‘corrupt judges’ is another Trump campaign line rather than anything with substance to it.

Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records, issuing false financial statements, conspiracy to commit insurance fraud and conspiracy to falsify business records.

Hugh 27-03-2024 14:29

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68670289

Quote:

A New York judge placed Donald Trump under a gag order ahead of his criminal hush money case that begins 15 April.

He is barred from making public statements about court staff, jurors, witnesses and lawyers in the district attorney's office - or their families.

The gag order does not apply to the district attorney.

The Trump campaign said the order, which is limited in some instances, violated his free speech rights.

In several instances, the order requires that the comments would have to be "made with the intent to materially interfere" with the case.

Justice Juan Merchan granted the limited gag order after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg requested it.

Earlier today, Mr Trump attacked Justice Merchan's daughter on his Truth Social account, and called the judge a "certified Trump hater"...

...In his order, Justice Merchan wrote that he had considered Mr Trump's constitutional free speech rights, but concluded that the former president's "extrajudicial statements went far beyond defending himself against 'attacks' by 'public figures'".

Instead, Justice Merchan said he had found Mr Trump's "statements were threatening, inflammatory, denigrating" and led to fear and increased security requirements for those targeted.

Pierre 27-03-2024 15:25

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172604)

If it prevents him saying anything that could prejudice his case then of course. It's not really a "gag order" then.

But anything else would probably violate his 1st amendment rights.

pip08456 27-03-2024 16:17

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172604)

The gag order covers

Quote:

Donald Trump gets hits with terrible news as the judge in his criminal hush money trial slaps him with a crushing gag order — blocking him from making his usual inflammatory statements about witnesses.

But it gets even better...

Judge Juan Merchan also ruled that Trump can't make or influence others to speak publicly about attorneys, court staff, or the families of prosecutors or lawyers tied to the case in such a way as to interfere with it. Not only is Trump muzzled — so are his MAGA minions.

Similarly, Trump is barred from attacking any potential or actual jurors involved. The criminal trial, which could sink Trump for good given the mountains of evidence and witnesses, begins on April 15.

Trump has been charged with a staggering 34 counts of falsifying business records tied to the illegal hush money he allegedly funneled through his then-fixer Michael Cohen to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

TheDaddy 27-03-2024 17:39

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36172614)
The gag order covers

Meh, he's already broken it...

Hugh 27-03-2024 17:55

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36172619)
Meh, he's already broken it...

Not sure if he has - the Truth Social post attacked the Judge and his daughter, and the jury (see what I did there ;)) is out on whether they are covered by the Gag Order…

Mr K 27-03-2024 20:03

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
It would have to be a very big gag.

He's immune from anything and above the law. Everyone in the US courts that matter is too scared/biased/politicised. A sad state of affairs. Him and buddy Putin with a free hand doesn't bare thinking about. But it seems to be coming.

Even George Orwell wouldn't have thought this dark of our future.

pip08456 28-03-2024 07:58

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172623)
Not sure if he has - the Truth Social post attacked the Judge and his daughter, and the jury (see what I did there ;)) is out on whether they are covered by the Gag Order…

You're right Hugh. Neither the Judge, his family nor the D.A. are covered by the gag order. whether the Judge may now rectify it remains to be seen.

Mick 29-03-2024 14:04

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36172167)
I think he is deliberately vague, with the intent of being misinterpreted by his supporters to incite their anger (stochastic terrorism) and to then lash out at the mainstream media for taking a different interpretation. He frequently changes subject mid-sentence, causing confusion about what he’s talking about - deliberately or not, not sure…

Who uses "bloodbath" in reference to the auto industry?

“Bloodbath” has been used many times in the media talking about dire situations, bad market or political situations, exhibit A:

https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/17...j84UokTCANDtnw

But as per usual, when Trump does it, he’s super bad inciting violence. :rolleyes:

Not that the pathetic & corrupt Democrats have never incited violence Hugh, like Maxine Waters telling her supporters if you see Republicans in the street, “you got to fight like hell”.

Hugh 29-03-2024 15:44

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
It was Trump who said "'We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore.'" on January 6th…

What Maxine Walter’s said (in reference to the Walter Chauvin trial) was "Well, we gotta stay on the street. And we've got to get more active. We've got to get more confrontational. We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business".

Context is all - Walters was calling for justice for someone who had been murdered by a policeman, and Trump was calling for the Election results to be overturned.

Hugh 30-03-2024 12:26

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.republicworld.com/world-...urfaces-watch/

Quote:

Donald Trump Posts Image of Joe Biden Tied-Up in Pick-Up Truck
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1711801574

Hugh 31-03-2024 21:55

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1711918510

Paul 31-03-2024 23:15

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Whatever he is smoking is still working.

GrimUpNorth 01-04-2024 11:56

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Sounds like someone left him alone with a cheap bottle of cooking wine.

TheDaddy 01-04-2024 14:20

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36172826)
Sounds like someone left him alone with a cheap bottle of cooking wine.

He doesn't drink, his big brother drank himself to death brcause his family are so toxic, simplist solution is that he's lost the plot cognitively and no amout of getting person, woman, grab, camera, tv, in the right order hides that decline, what a country, those two are the best they could come up with, still without them this country might be the worlds laughing stock

1andrew1 03-04-2024 13:08

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Move along please, nothing to see here folks!

Quote:

Trump Media saved in 2022 by Russian-American under criminal investigation

Trump’s social media company went public relying partly on loans from trust managed by person of interest to prosecutors

But Trump Media almost did not make it to the merger after regulators opened a securities investigation into the merger in 2021 and caused the company to burn through cash at an extraordinary rate as it waited to get the green light for its stock market debut.

The situation led Trump Media to take emergency loans, including from an entity called ES Family Trust, which opened an account with Paxum Bank, a small bank registered on the Caribbean island of Dominica that is best known for providing financial services to the porn industry.

Through leaked documents, the Guardian has learned that ES Family Trust operated like a shell company for a Russian-American businessman named Anton Postolnikov, who co-owns Paxum Bank and has been a subject of a years-long joint federal criminal investigation by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) into the Trump Media merger.

Postolnikov, the nephew of Aleksandr Smirnov, an ally of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, has not been charged with a crime. In response to an email to Postolnikov seeking comment, a lawyer in Dominica representing Paxum Bank warned of legal action for reporting the contents of the leaked documents.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ust-2022-loans

TheDaddy 04-04-2024 02:47

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Think the court has rejected donnies bond, Mr Hankey didn't fill his forms in right and no that's not Mr Hankey the Christmas poo although he probably is a bit of a shit, anyone who makes money from usury generally is

Itshim 06-04-2024 21:06

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
His greatest victory could also be his biggest vote loser , getting a right wing supreme court , could cost him a lot of votes . Clue Wade v Roe and younger women's vote. Just a thought

Hugh 06-05-2024 17:32

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
https://wapo.st/3wy9o7f

Quote:

Donald Trump was threatened with jail for any future violations of a limited gag order imposed in his falsifying business records case.

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan made it clear to Trump that his 10th gag order violation — which he ruled on at the start of Monday’s court session — was going to be the last that would result in only a fine.

“The last thing I want to do is put you in jail,” Merchan said. “You are the former president of the United States and possibly the next president as well.”

The judge noted that jailing Trump would require a monumental effort involving several law enforcement agencies including the Secret Service and New York’s corrections department.

“To take that step would be disruptive to these proceedings,” Merchan added.

Last week, Merchan held Trump in contempt of court for violating the gag order nine times, fined him $9,000 — $1,000 per each violation — and warned him that he could go to jail if he keeps breaking the court’s rules.

Dude111 07-05-2024 22:23

I notice how they dont want Donny to speak..... I wonder why?? :D

1andrew1 07-05-2024 23:53

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 36174664)
I notice how they dont want Donny to speak..... I wonder why?? :D

Possibly because there's a law against intimidating jurors and witnesses and commenting on them could be seen as intimidation?

Hugh 08-05-2024 09:24

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 36174664)
I notice how they dont want Donny to speak..... I wonder why?? :D

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...case-109937362

Quote:

Virtually every day of his hush money criminal trial, former President Donald Trump talks about how he can’t talk about the case.

A gag order bars Trump from commenting publicly on witnesses, jurors and some others connected to the matter. The New York judge already has found that Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, repeatedly violated the order, fined him $9,000 and warning that jail could follow if he doesn't comply.

But the order doesn't stop Trump from talking about the allegations against him or commenting on the judge or the elected top prosecutor. And despite a recent Trump remark, it doesn't stop him from testifying in court if he chooses.

As he fights the felony charges against him while running for president, Trump has at times stirred confusion about what he can and can't do in the case. He has pleaded not guilty.

So what does the order do, what doesn't it and where did it come from?

Generally speaking, a gag order is a judge's directive prohibiting someone or people involved in a court case from publicly commenting about some or all aspects of it. In Trump’s case, it’s titled an “Order Restricting Extrajudicial Statements,” with “extrajudicial” meaning outside of court.

Gag orders, particularly in high-profile cases, are intended to prevent information presented outside a courtroom from affecting what happens inside.
Quote:

Initially imposed March 26, the gag order bars Trump from making or directing others to make public statements about any juror and about any “reasonably foreseeable" witness' participation in the investigation or the trial.

It also bars any statements about lawyers in the case, court staffers, prosecution aides and relatives of all of the above, to the extent that the statements are intended to “materially interfere with, or to cause others to materially interfere with” their work on the case “or with the knowledge that such interference is likely to result.”

The order doesn’t apply to Judge Juan M. Merchan or to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose office is bringing the case. It does apply to comments about their family members, however. Merchan added that provision on April 1 after Trump lashed out on social media at the judge’s daughter, a Democratic political consultant, and made a claim about her that was later repudiated by court officials.

Trump is also allowed to talk about his political opponents, as Merchan made clear on Thursday.

Dude111 08-05-2024 19:45

Ah that explains it.......

Thats Hugh :)

Itshim 19-05-2024 14:01

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36174673)
Possibly because there's a law against intimidating jurors and witnesses and commenting on them could be seen as intimidation?

Thought lawyers do it all the time in court :shocked:

1andrew1 19-05-2024 14:27

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36175285)
Thought lawyers do it all the time in court :shocked:

Much as I agree, I don't think it matches the legal definition of intimidating witnesses.

Itshim 19-05-2024 17:33

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36175290)
Much as I agree, I don't think it matches the legal definition of intimidating witnesses.

Of cause not ,who in reality created the laws in the first place. Do as I say not as I do. Would be interesting to see how MPs are connected to the law. :D

Chris 21-05-2024 15:30

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
1 Attachment(s)
Posted to the “Orange Turd”’s* Truth Social account and then hastily removed, a MAGA campaign video with the phrase ‘Creation of a unified Reich’ almost subliminally placed beneath the final few seconds.

https://x.com/7veritas4/status/17928...56-Kgau3lzowJw

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1716301719

*In testimony offered under oath earlier this month …

Hugh 28-05-2024 14:40

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
3 Attachment(s)
Yesterday was Memorial Day in the USA, a federal holiday for honoring and mourning the U.S. military personnel who died while serving in the United States Armed Forces.

Here are the messages for that day from the last 3 Presidents…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1716903554

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...6&d=1716903554

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1716903554

Stephen 28-05-2024 15:09

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 
So Memorial day...something something, oh poor me me me!

Typical Trump.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum