![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
---------- Post added at 00:36 ---------- Previous post was at 00:31 ---------- Quote:
Its disgraceful, the HO willing to completely violate Human Rights, and this is the proof. :mad: Ive sent you an email Pete. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Someone remind me, why are we fighting a war on terrorism again? It was about protecting something or other. I forget what it was now. Couldn't have been important. Anyway, I'm pleased the HO claim there is no link to Phorm. This will become evident when they hand over dossiers and dossiers of evidence to the EC Commissioners, and prosecute British Telecom without mercy, or further delay for abusing EU Privacy Rights and EC Communications Directives. Or will they side with the industry on this human rights challenge, and lob the evidence in the Thames? Watch this space eh? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Hi all,
I've been lurking for a couple of months but I had to sign up because you have to see this... http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle4137799.ece about half way down the page <snip> BT – where the latest trial of the technology begins this week </snip> zwade |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Ok, so it goes like this, I Log-on to Facebook, browse a little, and then decide to check the mail.... what do I find?
Hi Samuel, I'm a writer for the Christian Science Monitor, doing a piece on Information Law and the questionably legality of British Telecom's trial of Phorm on its clients without their knowledge. I was wondering if you'd like to comment on your experience and what has made you join this group for me. I have opinions from industry insiders, but I think it is important for users air their takes on the issue as well. I can cite you by name or anonymously, whichever you prefer. These are my questions: 1. What about the idea of targeted marketing, ie, an internet service provider taking your "non-personal" data including search history to deliver ads relevant to your interests, is off-putting to you? 2. Some industry professionals and web enthusiasts think that targeted marketing is an inevitable and essential part of Web 2.0, and that getting ads targeted to your interests is actually a good thing. Do you see that side of the argument? Thanks so much for your time, and please get back to me if you're interested. Best, Nida http://features.csmonitor.com/innova...e-with-others/ |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
All dont forget that lots of newspapers have vested interest in phorm hence little to no coverage in the dailies about all the huff and puff that phorm do, i thought we lived in a democracy where we are free to pick and choose what we do and dont like and can say so freely without getting things forced upon us.
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
---------- Post added at 10:48 ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I have accepted all comments I saw to be non abusive (which I am glad to say was most of them) and argued my points back. I will continue to do so in the spirit of an open debate to any comments on my own site. I am particularly interested in Alexander Hanff's comment regards the legalities because I'm no lawyer and I'm assuming he is based on his comments. I did however research the technology before making my post. My interest is not "to get more work" for myself as someone commented - I have plenty to do already. It is to put my view across and get the opposing view back. It is important for the online industry as a whole that people like myself give our point of view because the way I see it all of our futures rely on it. A balance between what is fair and transparent needs to be struck. I already took the stance that BT were appalling in how they handled this and I stand by that. They have frightened a lot of folks and that is not a good thing for the industry as a whole. I do however have doubts that what they're doing is illegal although certainly their ethics are in question. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
121 media a.k.a phorm have no ethics its been proven in the past and its going to bite them back, if all these pro researchers cant see it by phorms history we'll then you have to start thinking who can you trust anymore and you end up with the state of paranoid people and no one trusts anyone anymore.
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Quote:
The European Commissioner for Information Society and Media has already stated, in letters you'll find posted earlier in this thread, that it's breaching the european convention on human rights and the EU charter of human rights. How much more do you need? Oh yeah, the system as it is relies on a cookie placed on your computer that claims to have been placed by a different website - that's fraudulent misrepresentation, and is illegal under the fraud act. It's also illegal under the computer misuse act. The system also relies on making an unauthorised copy of the page requested for analysis and financial gain. That's copyright theft, and I know several webmasters prepared to take legal action against this system if it ever rolls out. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Could be some work for you in Phorm and the like. Sorry I don't agree with what you say. My gut feelings are that your could be somebody who is touting for work in this area or that you could already in K*ts pocket. I also see many holes in your replied comments on your site. I would suggest to all we keep our debate on this site and the others we feed off and not Google-boost this another site in the discussions. Lets not fall into any possible traps. He is obviously an expert in data analysis and certainly will know how to boost his site in the Phorm debate rankings by our visits. If Blackbeak wishes to debate here by all means he can do so. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I've been seeing occasional format anomalies on some pages this week, apart from the spell where other posters were reporting blank pages before a Site loaded. It may be that Phorm were looking for a way to hide the UID in so called "white space", which would probably cause such anomalies. Since 121Media were very good at this, I would recommend some kind of MD5 checksum analysis, if BT actually announce a trial. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Frankly I haven't got the time to check every post in this thread to see if this has already been posted so here you are apologies if already posted -
Channel 4 news article on Phorm - Even their paid expert can't agree with them on the opt in / opt out debate. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum