![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
hmm, conflicting ICO statements are starting to appear it seems!
http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com...rmProtest.html "The test is being closely watched by the ICO (Information Commissioners Office.) "We believe that it is only by allowing their technology to be subject to detailed scrutiny by independent technical experts that they will be able to prove their assertions regarding privacy," commented a spokesperson for the ICO. " |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
im more interested in why the spokesperson for the ICO said that quote, im assuming at least that part is word accurate!
and the "be able to prove their assertions" now its they BT/Phorm need to prove they are telling the truth... they have had independent technical experts look at it and say its unlawful, yet i assume another seperate ICO spokesman says they will take no action [at this time].... []the classic get out clause later. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Phormscum shares at 900 pennies now. Quote:
Quote:
4.2 million CCTV cameras at a cost of £500 million, wiretapping by BT and the ICO/Police/Homeoffice put Nelsons patch on the good eye??? So what the hell is going on in the UK? Has someone read the 1984 book and thought "GREAT! a template" |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
What's the matter with them, are they ashamed to give their names? Or perhaps they're afraid to be personally associated to the comments when they are eventuall proven to be crap? See.. i'm actually starting to get very agitated by all this now. The only name gleaned form the dozens of press releases is a Phorm spokesman, Alex Laity, who said... "We are confident that we are fully compliant with all relevant laws," he said. "We did go to the ICO before launch, we did go to the Home Office before launch, we did do due diligence to make sure what we did is fully compliant with the law." @BT You keep spouting "BT sought expert legal advice before commencing the trial." Well, how about disclosing who these 'experts' were? and disclosing the advice you were given? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:58 ---------- Previous post was at 15:49 ---------- Quote:
I'm utterly stunned. :shocked: Maybe David Davis should replace the ICO and that other Davis. It's about time someone had the guts to confront this insidious piece by piece dismantelling of privacy and personal freedom by a handful of *******s with an agenda. Wake up citizens your forefathers died to get King John to sign the Magna Charta. That's nearly a thousand years of struggle by ordinary people to become free just to be crapped upon by the likes of K~nt Ertugrul and his gang of criminals taking the p!ss with technology. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
"Although we are supposed to be an independent regulator, and should be conducting an independent analysis of Phorm... we're quite prepared to sit on our thumbs and let the public do our work for us because we're too damn lazy to conduct a technical inquiry for ourselves. And when independent technologists present concerns to us? We'll ignore them because we'd far rather take the free lunches, and champagne we get from Phorm and BT." Sorry. Had to get that off my chest. Richard Thomas, resign now, your organisation is a complete waste of taxpayers money. Every single function ICO perform could be achieved with an identical chocolate fireguard. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2008/06/7.png |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Can you imagine someone with integrity like Shami Chakrabarti (director of Liberty) doing the same as what Simon Davies and Richard Thomas has done with Phorm? Can you? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I've just had an e-mail from my MPs office regarding the copies of e-mails to BT she's been receiving, regarding my contempt for them wanting to profile my site.
The office manager has replied on her behalf stating that "she will understand them as little as I do" and asking if there's anything she can do. I have replied pointing out that if they find it hard to follow, what percentage of the general population can be expected to give informed consent as required by the Home Office. My MPs e-mail address is also a btinternet.com address so I pointed out that she may end up having all her browing intercepted and profiled. Lastly I asked to find out who should be investigating the system itself and the previous trials pointing out that ICO, HO, OFCOM and the police have been steadfastly refusing to do anything. Here's hoping. Unfortunately I missed the shadow Home Secretary resigning until after I'd sent the mail. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Phorm shares close at...
950.00 Perhaps someone could ask David Davis what he is doing on July 16th? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
... Delaware innit? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
@BT, How can you tell when a lawyer is lying? See if his lips are moving. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Looks like Phorm closed below £10 - google says £9.50 and closed.
About £200K sold today :D |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Alexander Hanff |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum