![]() |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
I assume we have moved on from the EBA which was formed as a regulatory body after the global financial crisis to increase transparency and perform stress tests of the banking system.
I fail to see how this is an EU guilt trip action here. The EU said it couldn’t have EU agencies in non-EU countries in the event of Brexit and now it won’t. Job done, 1000+ high end jobs gone. It’s what we voted for |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/n...ment-than-ever Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Remember when the Brexit press called the loss of the Medicines Agency and the European Banking Authority to Europe Project Fear? It was all fake and gloom they told us. David Davis' Brexit department even added that the fate of the agencies is still up for negotiation. That was back in April.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/334805...nment-insists/ Well, it's Project Reality now. "Amsterdam, Paris are new homes for the agencies which will be moving from London" https://www.wsj.com/articles/amsterd...ove-1511200612 |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Very interesting article on the lead-in to the confrontation between the EU and UK next month. A very long article but really worth reading.
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Saw this idea on Twitter. Perfect!
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Ahh that red bus argument that it was a suggestion rears it’s ugly head again. Get over it FFS! :rolleyes:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
My focus is pretty much on the EMA as it is relevant to my job (banking is not my thing) Medicines regulation is a highly specialised and highly paid role. Losing employees with that knowledge from this country constitutes a 'brain drain' just when we need to be thinking about bringing these skills 'in house'. Employees of agencies like the EMA come from the pharmaceutical industry and vice versa. My second point is, would we as a country be better off not being in the EMA? Almost certainly no but. as I said before, will be be willing to pay for access and accept ECJ rulings in this area? The press release on inward investment is indeed great news. 2% growth in investment is steady but positive. I hope that the fact that 40% of the FDI was from the EU will not be affected down the line (source of number - https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/natio...t-and-industry) |
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit discussion
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum