Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36184676)

i used to think no one would ever be able to cook as bad as my mrs ,but then they invented pot noodle :shrug:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36184528)

In what way is helping to protect children 'wasting money'?

Which money are you talking about?

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36184676)

i used to think no one would ever be able to cook as bad as my mrs ,but then they invented pot noodle :shrug:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36184676)

i used to think no one would ever be able to cook as bad as my mrs ,but then they invented pot noodle :shrug:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36184668)

As efforts to protect children continue, from next year websites will be required to assess the risk that their content may be harmful to children.

Steps include filtering out the material or downranking it, so it doesn't appear in children's feeds.

Ofcom chief Dame Melanie Dawes said it was the responsibility of the firms - not parents or children - to make sure people were safe online.

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36184679)

Bringing him from Finland , need I expand further. :confused: Taxpayers money who else , really you need to think, before posting

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36184692)

What on Earth are you talking about? It's you who needs to be clear about what it is you want to say before posting.

Also, what taxpayers money are you talking about? Ofcom nor Instagram are funded by general taxation, but even if it was, i'm sure that most right thinking people would support initiatives to help to keep children safe online.

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36184688)

Just more bureaucracy that will make little actual difference - apart from costs and wasted time.

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36184725)

You appear to want to charge the guy in Finland, or did I misread your post. Were you thinking that ofcom could do it? Whom do you think pays in the end for any quango. I've news for you. You do :shocked: think about it :dunce:

---------- Post added at 17:34 ---------- Previous post was at 17:32 ----------



Very true , but it keeps the simptons of the world happy :dozey:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36184744)

Again, what are you talking about?

<removed>

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36184744)

Again, what are you talking about?

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36184773)

Instagram is a private company and Ofcom are funded by the fees that they set.

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36184775)

And whom do you think pays Instagram and the like. The tooth fairy ?:rolleyes: Anything that makes money pays tax , agreed. Who do they get the money off. Ego the public( you and l )directly or indirectly . However that is raised it ,in the end comes from us.

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36184779)

You can tell the woke police to stand down now.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36184780)

Instagram is paid for out of ad revenue