Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

Pierre 23-11-2023 23:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36164850)
There are some people like you maybe who voted Leave on ideological terms disregarding any negative consequences, of which there were many. Maybe you are wealthy enough not to care about the impact on you personally? Maybe you did not care about the harm to the country or the effect on children & grandchildren whose birth right has been literally removed and who cannot live & work in the EU as they might had wished.

There is so much harm caused by the few to the many, not only financial but societal as well. Without Brexit, we would not have had Johnson and his right wing cult, no Patel, no Braverman, etc. So enjoy your pyrrhic victory .. for a while. As the old Leave voters die off and the younger generation replace them, return to the EU in some form is inevitable.

Well, I’m intelligent. I voted remain. Since then I’ve digested and assessed everything and if there was a referendum tomorrow I would vote stay out.

1andrew1 24-11-2023 00:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36164853)
Well, I’m intelligent. I voted remain. Since then I’ve digested and assessed everything and if there was a referendum tomorrow I would vote stay out.

There won't be another referendum for at least 10 years. By then, I'm sure you will have flipped to the option closer to Rejoin.

Dave42 24-11-2023 00:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36164834)
To take back control of our borders to reduce migration. :D
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1700761744

aye another mega big brexit lie :LOL:

Hugh 24-11-2023 00:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Cruella Braverman is going off on one about these figures.

If only we knew who was in charge of the Home Office when this happened…

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 00:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36164855)
There won't be another referendum for at least 10 years. By then, I'm sure you will have flipped to the option closer to Rejoin.


By then, the EU might have imploded.


denphone 24-11-2023 03:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36164834)
To take back control of our borders to reduce migration. :D
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1700761744

The biggest surge in immigration in British history came *after* Brexit from people outside the EU.;)

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 08:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

But at least we are not under Brussels' control.

The immigration issue is a failure of government policy.

denphone 24-11-2023 09:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164866)

But at least we are not under Brussels' control.

The immigration issue is a failure of government policy.

Indeed but so much for the government looking after their own as the only people they are looking after are their own corrupted cronies and powerful media friends.

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 10:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36164868)
Indeed but so much for the government looking after their own as the only people they are looking after are their own corrupted cronies and powerful media friends.

What’s that got to do with Brexit? That said, it’s easy to see why the Government is seen in the light you’ve painted. But solid evidence is another matter.

What we’re seeing here is failure of government policy. You might call, it corrupt that a cheap labour for profit mechanism (as we have seen) applies, but it is not government policy. You might think that government is corrupt because they have been lobbied for this; but there is no such evidence.

Far more likely is that the government just let it go on a mistaken premise that cheap labour in a high employment economy is good.

Had we remained in the EU, that would have been the same situation as in Eastern European workers.

denphone 24-11-2023 10:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164872)
What’s that got to do with Brexit? That said, it’s easy to see why the Government is seen in the light you’ve painted. But solid evidence is another matter.

What we’re seeing here is failure of government policy. You might call, it corrupt that a cheap labour for profit mechanism (as we have seen) applies, but it is not government policy. You might think that government is corrupt because they have been lobbied for this; but there is no such evidence.

Far more likely is that the government just let it go on a mistaken premise that cheap labour in a high employment economy is good.

Had we remained in the EU, that would have been the same situation as in Eastern European workers.

It all ties in with the huge plethora of lies they told the public.

Unless you have not noticed, nothing is working anymore, public services are in deep never ending crisis, the NHS, social care and community primary services are incredibly hard to access, etc, etc, etc.

You can have your sovereignty but it does not make this a better country for the vast majority of its population.

Hugh 24-11-2023 10:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164831)
What like we'd have sovereignty? We won't be governed by Brussels?

Could you provide some tangible examples where this Sovereignty has benefited the British people, please?

Chris 24-11-2023 11:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36164875)
Could you provide some tangible examples where this Sovereignty has benefited the British people, please?

That’s the wrong question. The correct question is whether it is right, on a point of principle, for certain legislative decisions to be taken by a supra-national body over which we have (had) extremely limited democratic influence.

Your question speaks to the competence (or otherwise) of those who have held re-patriated powers for the past 3 years (give or take), which is an interesting, but quite different, party political discussion.

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 13:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36164873)
It all ties in with the huge plethora of lies they told the public.

Unless you have not noticed, nothing is working anymore, public services are in deep never ending crisis, the NHS, social care and community primary services are incredibly hard to access, etc, etc, etc.

You can have your sovereignty but it does not make this a better country for the vast majority of its population.

True we are outside the EU. True you are describing Britain correctly.

But your anti-Brexit rant is the same old whingeing rubbish that remaining would not have avoided.


---------- Post added at 12:09 ---------- Previous post was at 12:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36164875)
Could you provide some tangible examples where this Sovereignty has benefited the British people, please?

It's a principle. No need to translate that into any tangible benefit other than we no longer take orders from Brussels. All we need now is a government that can take the UK forward

denphone 24-11-2023 13:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164887)
True we are outside the EU. True you are describing Britain correctly.

But your anti-Brexit rant is the same old whingeing rubbish that remaining would not have avoided.


---------- Post added at 12:09 ---------- Previous post was at 12:05 ----------



It's a principle. No need to translate that into any tangible benefit other than we no longer take orders from Brussels. All we need now is a government that can take the UK forward

No not a rant, but the plain old truth...

TheDaddy 24-11-2023 13:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36164853)
Well, I’m intelligent. I voted remain. Since then I’ve digested and assessed everything and if there was a referendum tomorrow I would vote stay out.

So would I, the country has gone through all this only to go back in with our tail between our legs tomorrow, no thanks, I'll just retain the right criticise it at every opportunity

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164858)
By then, the EU might have imploded.

Blimey, some people have been waiting/relying/wishing for that for 30 odd years and counting

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164872)
What’s that got to do with Brexit? That said, it’s easy to see why the Government is seen in the light you’ve painted. But solid evidence is another matter.

Had we remained in the EU, that would have been the same situation as in Eastern European workers.

Oh yes nothing to do with brexit, I mean it's not like we had the right to return illegals to the country they entered from under it or return EU citizens who committed crime or were work shy, they were cheap labour and I was actually a committed kipper in the 90's when all the lower end jobs were minimum wage because of them but things had changed, they didn't want to live 6 to a house and do 300 hours a month anymore from what I could tell and because of it the wages were going up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36164877)
That’s the wrong question. The correct question is whether it is right, on a point of principle, for certain legislative decisions to be taken by a supra-national body over which we have (had) extremely limited democratic influence.

Yeah I'm not sure it's been worth it for a point of principle.

Hugh 24-11-2023 14:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36164875)
Could you provide some tangible examples where this Sovereignty has benefited the British people, please?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164887)
True we are outside the EU. True you are describing Britain correctly.

But your anti-Brexit rant is the same old whingeing rubbish that remaining would not have avoided.


---------- Post added at 12:09 ---------- Previous post was at 12:05 ----------



It's a principle. No need to translate that into any tangible benefit other than we no longer take orders from Brussels. All we need now is a government that can take the UK forward


That’s a "NO”, then…

1andrew1 24-11-2023 14:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164872)

Had we remained in the EU, that would have been the same situation as in Eastern European workers.

I doubt it. Countries like Poland are now catching up with us economically. With a lack of house-building in the UK under the Conservatives driving housing costs upwards, the attraction of relocating to the UK from the EU has reduced. And no, Turkey hasn't joined the EU despite what Nige may have suggested.

---------- Post added at 13:10 ---------- Previous post was at 13:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36164893)
That’s a "NO”, then…

Yeah but blue passports. :D

Ms NTL 24-11-2023 14:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Can we take some orders from Belgium ASAP? Our banks are leaking information to USA and EU.

https://news.bloombergtax.com/daily-...americans-data

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 15:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36164899)
Can we take some orders from Belgium ASAP? Our banks are leaking information to USA and EU.

https://news.bloombergtax.com/daily-...americans-data

UK GDPR protects bank customers from disclosure of their personal information.

Where is the evidence of UK banks breaching these customer rights?


ianch99 24-11-2023 16:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36164877)
That’s the wrong question. The correct question is whether it is right, on a point of principle, for certain legislative decisions to be taken by a supra-national body over which we have (had) extremely limited democratic influence.

Your question speaks to the competence (or otherwise) of those who have held re-patriated powers for the past 3 years (give or take), which is an interesting, but quite different, party political discussion.

What you are doing, like Seph before you, is celebrating the questionably advantageous gain in sovereignty without the context of said gain against a backdrop of massive damage to the country.

The merit or not of said gain can only be valued when you look at the entire journey. History will judge that there is no advantageous gain, quite the opposite.

---------- Post added at 15:03 ---------- Previous post was at 15:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36164889)
No not a rant, but the plain old truth...

I'd ignore him, he only cares about the ideology, nothing more.

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 16:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36164903)
What you are doing, like Seph before you, is celebrating the questionably advantageous gain in sovereignty without the context of said gain against a backdrop of massive damage to the country.

The merit or not of said gain can only be valued when you look at the entire journey. History will judge that there is no advantageous gain, quite the opposite.

What 'massive damage to the country' has been caused by Brexit as distinct from the well-known government shitshow?

Ms NTL 24-11-2023 16:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164901)
UK GDPR protects bank customers from disclosure of their personal information.

Where is the evidence of UK banks breaching these customer rights?


My son. He was born in Indiana, USA.

Santander leaked the info.

Try to create a fake account with Santander with a USA birthday address. They will report it to IRS.

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 16:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36164909)
My son. He was born in Indiana, USA.

Santander leaked the info.

Try to create a fake account with Santander with a USA birthday address. They will tell you that they will report it to IRS.

Presumably your son has reported Santander to the ICO.
Right?

1andrew1 24-11-2023 16:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164907)
What 'massive damage to the country' has been caused by Brexit as distinct from the well-known government shitshow?

This November 2023 paper by the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy looks at the impact of Brexit on UK import prices and finds the “referendum outcome raised UK import prices by 11 per cent..."

And last week the National Institute of Economic and Social Research published an updated estimate of the Brexit hit, which it said “Our estimates indicate that the negative impact of Brexit gradually escalates, reaching some 5-6 per cent of GDP or about £2,300 per capita by 2035. The reduction in real incomes resulting from the fall in the UK terms of trade associated with changes in trading relations with the European Union and the fall in productivity are the largest contributors to the estimated reduction in real GDP, with each accounting for over 2.5 percentage points."

And Tesla and BYD ruled out investing in new car plants in the UK due to Brexit.

We've been fortunate that existing manufacturers have reinvested but the possibility of future divergence is acting as an investment constraint.

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 17:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Is that 'massive'? The referenced article said (and you didn't) that the impact on consumers was 0.6%.

Quote:

We estimate the referendum outcome raised UK import prices by 11% and consumer prices by 0.6% through trade policy uncertainty alone.
And might that not be part of the price of sovereignty? You Remainers seem to see everything Brexit in the light of economics.

Covid & Ukraine have completely eclipsed the economic effects of Brexit.


1andrew1 24-11-2023 17:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164914)
Is that 'massive'? The referenced article said (and you didn't) that the impact on consumers was 0.6%.

You should be concerned by an 11% increase in costs making British companies less competitive. They're the country's future.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164914)
And might that not be part of the price of sovereignty? You Remainers seem to see everything Brexit in the light of economics.

There's always a trade-off in sovereignty v global influence and prosperity. I think if this trade off had been acknowledged at the time by Brexiters, the economics would not need pointing out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164914)
Covid & Ukraine have completely eclipsed the economic effects of Brexit.

I'm afraid those two situations don't give you a get out of jail free card for Brexit.

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 18:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36164921)
You should be concerned by an 11% increase in costs making British companies less competitive. They're the country's future.

There's always a trade-off in sovereignty v global influence and prosperity. I think if this trade off had been acknowledged at the time by Brexiters, the economics would not need pointing out.


I'm afraid those two situations don't give you a get out of jail free card for Brexit.

Well, it does. I said 'eclipse'. Since we cannot say what would have happened had Covid/Ukraine not happened, we have a new baseline from which to grow.

As to your expected comment that British companies were made 'less competitive' by the 11%, I don't see that. I think you mean that imported goods cost them more than before for the reasons given by the professor. At worst, the profits of British business might have taken a hit, but the consumer appears not to have felt that. In other words, competitiveness held retail prices down. British business will find ways of increasing profit and that was always going to be the case.

We are a sovereign country now. The squabbling between EU countries will continue and we surely wouldn't want to be part of that any more.


1andrew1 24-11-2023 18:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164926)
Well, it does. I said 'eclipse'. Since we cannot say what would have happened had Covid/Ukraine not happened, we have a new baseline from which to grow.

As to your expected comment that British companies were made 'less competitive' by the 11%, I don't see that. I think you mean that imported goods cost them more than before for the reasons given by the professor. At worst, the profits of British business might have taken a hit, but the consumer appears not to have felt that. In other words, competitiveness held retail prices down. British business will find ways of increasing profit and that was always going to be the case.

We are a sovereign country now. The squabbling between EU countries will continue and we surely wouldn't want to be part of that any more.


There are reliable ways of modelling how the UK would have fared without Brexit.

Consumers and share prices have all felt it. There's no magic trick to increase profitability in a globally competitive market.

Nothing wrong with robust discussions in forums and between countries. It's what keeps us all so young on Cable Forum. :)

Sephiroth 24-11-2023 18:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36164932)
There are reliable ways of modelling how the UK would have fared without Brexit.

Consumers and share prices have all felt it. There's no magic trick to increase profitability in a globally competitive market.

Nothing wrong with robust discussions in forums and between countries. It's what keeps us all so young on Cable Forum. :)

I was impressed with the analysis made by the professor that you referenced.

None of that makes it a bad thing in the round to have left the EU and be free of diktat from Brussels (a topic you and your Remainer cohort can't counter).

The 'magic trick' to increase productivity is innovation leading to sales growth. For that to succeed, we need an investment friendly government rather than the shitshow on current offer.

Ms NTL 24-11-2023 20:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36164911)
Presumably your son has reported Santander to the ICO.
Right?


Nope. Thanks. I told him to do so.

Hugh 25-11-2023 10:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...latest-updates

Quote:

2d ago

16.42 GMT

Rees-Mogg suggests, if farmers can't produce fruit without foreign pickers, UK should just import it instead

Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, the former business secretary, told Radio 4’s The World at One that he was “embarrassed” as a Conservative by today’s net migration figures, which show the party is failing to keep the promise it made at the 2019 election. (See 11.33am.) He said:

This is a phenomenally high level with economic consequences … I’m embarrassed that we haven’t achieved what we set out to achieve.
Rees-Mogg said the level of legal migration was a more serious problem than people crossing the Channel on small boats. “In terms of the numbers, the small boats is a distraction,” he said.

Asked if he agreed with Suella Braverman’s call for a cap on net migration numbers (see 4.06pm), Rees-Mogg said that this would be one way of reducing the numbers.

And when it was put to him that the UK needed to allow foreign workers to come to the country to pick fruit, he said he didn’t agree. He explained:

We don’t need fruit pickers. If fruit can be grown more cheaply and more economically in foreign countries, we should import fruit and focus on our competitive advantage.


jfman 25-11-2023 10:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Rees-Mogg said the level of legal migration was a more serious problem than people crossing the Channel on small boats. “In terms of the numbers, the small boats is a distraction,” he said.
If migration is a problem, he’s right about this bit.

denphone 25-11-2023 10:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36164958)
If migration is a problem, he’s right about this bit.

And many of those legal migrants work in the NHS and Social Care services where there are still chronic staff shortages across both sectors.

Sephiroth 25-11-2023 10:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36164958)
If migration is a problem, he’s right about this bit.

You're right too ... but -

There is a principle involved with the boats.

The people coming here are refugees from France, interested either on what they can get/take here, or on committing crimes. In principle, they must be stopped. A competent government could have done that.


---------- Post added at 09:56 ---------- Previous post was at 09:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36164959)
And many of those legal migrants work in the NHS and Social Care services where there are still chronic staff shortages across both sectors.

I can't dispute that - these professions are a good case for managed immigration. Just needs a government that can manage this.

OLD BOY 25-11-2023 11:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:


We don’t need fruit pickers. If fruit can be grown more cheaply and more economically in foreign countries, we should import fruit and focus on our competitive advantage.
That is a sensible position to take as a matter of principle, but not where food is concerned. We are dangerously exposed if we rely on imports for food.

jfman 25-11-2023 11:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36164964)
That is a sensible position to take as a matter of principle, but not where food is concerned. We are dangerously exposed if we rely on imports for food.

It’s a dangerous position to take as a “matter of principle”.

If something can be made cheaper in another country ignores the fact someone, or a company, making it here pays income tax and other taxes. The people involved spend money in our towns and communities.

Hugh 25-11-2023 13:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Interesting interview with the new Home Secretary in the Times today - he seems more interested in process and results than in headlines.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/9...ec87667577eaaa

On a related note, he seems to have "joined up" thinking, rather than just dog-whistling - for instance, Braverman’s proposal to raise the required job salary level for potential immigrants to £40 would have detrimentally affected the Social Care and Health sectors, and her proposal to limit University Visas would have impacted U.K. students, as Overseas students fees subsidise U.K. students (as their £9,250 fees do not, on average, cover the cost of their tuition).

TheDaddy 25-11-2023 13:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36164964)
That is a sensible position to take as a matter of principle, but not where food is concerned. We are dangerously exposed if we rely on imports for food.

To bad, we were warned brexit would destroy British farming by Patrick bloody Minford of all people amongst others and voted for it anyway, we'll just have to suck it up but remember, nothing reeks of sovereignty more than relying on other countries for your food

Sephiroth 25-11-2023 17:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

A very interesting article by Kuenssberg explaining the political dilemma of immigration, blending various opinions given in this forum.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67530919

Quote:

Questions politicians can't seem to answer on immigration

First few paragraphs below.

Politicians all seem very cross about the numbers of people from around the world making the UK their home. And they nearly all seem to agree that old chestnut, that "something must be done".

Just wait until they look in the mirror and realise who came up with the new immigration system under which the levels have risen so much (and witness the former prime minister, Boris Johnson, raging in his newspaper column at the folly of the system that he himself introduced).

But the outrage in the last few days, real or not, is no substitute for answers to a set of questions that politicians must confront if they really want change - and many of them are difficult to answer.
She's absolutely right. Heads you lose; tails you don't win.




1andrew1 26-11-2023 11:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36164969)
To bad, we were warned brexit would destroy British farming by Patrick bloody Minford of all people amongst others and voted for it anyway, we'll just have to suck it up but remember, nothing reeks of sovereignty more than relying on other countries for your food


Indeed

- Reduced food self-sufficiency - tick
- Everyone on average worse off by £2k+ pa - tick
- Inability to return unlawful migrants to France - tick
- Decreased productivity - tick
- Lowest economic growth in Europe except Germany - tick

But in fairness, we do have Polish-printed blue passports so it's not all bad!

Dave42 26-11-2023 19:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165013)

Indeed

- Reduced food self-sufficiency - tick
- Everyone on average worse off by £2k+ pa - tick
- Inability to return unlawful migrants to France - tick
- Decreased productivity - tick
- Lowest economic growth in Europe except Germany - tick

But in fairness, we do have Polish-printed blue passports so it's not all bad!

and according to the OBR the all great CPTTP deal is even worse than first though now at 0.04 after 15 years

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ought-obr-says

TheDaddy 26-11-2023 21:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Just been reading about tory run, brexit supporting Cornwell, they received 1 billion in funding from the EU from the year 2000 and was going to receive 350 million more after 2020, instead they've got 18 million quid and the beaches are covered in shit, good job they knew what they were voting for...

Pierre 26-11-2023 23:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Just in case you were all under some disillusionment, we’re not going back in.


Such wasted energy bitching like little spoilt bitches.


Carry on…..by all means, if you like whinging and bitching and moaning while achieving nothing apart from whinging, bitching and moaning ……crack on.

Hugh 26-11-2023 23:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36165076)
Just in case you were all under some disillusionment, we’re not going back in.


Such wasted energy bitching like little spoilt bitches.


Carry on…..by all means, if you like whinging and bitching and moaning while achieving nothing apart from whinging, bitching and moaning ……crack on.

Mate, put either beer or the keyboard down - they’re not compatible after a few…

Sephiroth 26-11-2023 23:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36165065)
Just been reading about tory run, brexit supporting Cornwell, they received 1 billion in funding from the EU from the year 2000 and was going to receive 350 million more after 2020, instead they've got 18 million quid and the beaches are covered in shit, good job they knew what they were voting for...

From where did you get this data (the £18 million)?

Are you sure that the £18 million is not a different fund rather than the SPF (Shared Prosperity Fund) that the UK government is funding since leaving the EU?

Another usual Remoaner whinge from you.

Hugh 27-11-2023 00:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165080)
From where did you get this data (the £18 million)?

Are you sure that the £18 million is not a different fund rather than the SPF (Shared Prosperity Fund) that the UK government is funding since leaving the EU?

Another usual Remoaner whinge from you.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1701039630

https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/council-...funding-award/

Another usual ad-hominem attack from you - rather than rebut, you insult…

Sephiroth 27-11-2023 00:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36165082)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1701039630

https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/council-...funding-award/

Another usual ad-hominem attack from you - rather than rebut, you insult

I got it right. The TOWN DEAL (your link, and which I knew about) is not the SPF.



Pierre 27-11-2023 00:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36165078)
Mate, put either beer or the keyboard down - they’re not compatible after a few…

I do like a beer, but on a Sunday / school night. Best to not get too intoxicated……..mate…..which you are not.

That little outburst is just getting off my chest…because I’m bored of it, and it is also accurate.

“Remainers” which is a poor term, Anti-UK is much better and more accurate.

All they do is bitch and moan, 7 yrs down the line, thank god I’m not married to one… maaaate….

---------- Post added at 23:21 ---------- Previous post was at 23:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36165078)
Mate, put either beer or the keyboard down - they’re not compatible after a few…

Another ad-hominem attack from you. Rather than rebut you insult.

Hugh 27-11-2023 00:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Another ad-hominem attack from you. Rather than rebut you insult.
Oh, the irony….

Quote:

"Remainers” which is a poor term, Anti-UK is much better and more accurate.

All they do is bitch and moan, 7 yrs down the line
Methinks you may being economical with the actuality re the keyboard/alcohol interface scenario

TheDaddy 27-11-2023 02:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165080)
From where did you get this data (the £18 million)?

Are you sure that the £18 million is not a different fund rather than the SPF (Shared Prosperity Fund) that the UK government is funding since leaving the EU?

Another usual Remoaner whinge from you.

Have I got it wrong, they got the £300 million then? That's something positive, I was always very sceptical about the matching funding...

---------- Post added at 01:07 ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36165076)
Just in case you were all under some disillusionment, we’re not going back in.


Such wasted energy bitching like little spoilt bitches.


Carry on…..by all means, if you like whinging and bitching and moaning while achieving nothing apart from whinging, bitching and moaning ……crack on.

You okay hun

1andrew1 27-11-2023 09:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
If people don't like Remainers and Leavers being challenged over previous statements they have made v how things turned out, then they should probably not follow this thread.

denphone 27-11-2023 09:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165106)
If people don't like Remainers and Leavers being challenged over previous statements they have made v how things turned out, then they should probably not follow this thread.

Indeed as its a discussion forum with differing points of view.:)

Sephiroth 27-11-2023 11:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165106)
If people don't like Remainers and Leavers being challenged over previous statements they have made v how things turned out, then they should probably not follow this thread.


Why did you bother saying that, Andrew? Surely you knew it could be picked to pieces.

Things haven’t turned out yet in terms of Brexit outcomes. Covid has intervened (and that was a fair old vaccine ding-dong).

But things are beginning to evolve satisfactorily. The Nissan investment for electric cars in Sunderland is an important example. We have a free trade deal with the EU and it hasn’t stopped Nissan exporting cars to Europe.

I’ve always said that the transition takes time and British business needs (and is) to get into gear.

But the Remainers are indeed Remoaners - every opportunity is taken to bitch about leaving that wretched hegemonistic EU, pulling together also sorts of checklists containing irrelevant facts, especially Andrew’s

Quote:

- Reduced food self-sufficiency - tick
- Everyone on average worse off by £2k+ pa - tick
- Inability to return unlawful migrants to France - tick
- Decreased productivity - tick
- Lowest economic growth in Europe except Germany - tick
In the above list, the only item attributable to Brexit is the unlawful migrants line. The rest have nothing to do with Brexit and mainly to do with bad government.



ianch99 27-11-2023 12:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165080)
From where did you get this data (the £18 million)?

Are you sure that the £18 million is not a different fund rather than the SPF (Shared Prosperity Fund) that the UK government is funding since leaving the EU?

Another usual Remoaner whinge from you.

Public Service Announcement:

Replace the phrase "remoaner whinge" (or similar) with the term "objective reality" to clarify understanding. :)

---------- Post added at 11:06 ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165106)
If people don't like Remainers and Leavers being challenged over previous statements they have made v how things turned out, then they should probably not follow this thread.

That's a fair point Andrew. What is interesting is how much of the reality of the damage that Brexit has done to the country is invisible to the faithful. That's fine I suppose as they must rationalise the ideology that drove the agenda in some way.

What is more sinister is the move to referring to people who call out the lies and damage done in 2016 as "Anti-UK". The irony here is, of course, the decision in 2016 was anti-UK i.e. against the country's short, medium and long term interests.

Once you start invoking the nationalist trope, you are leaving your UKIP camp and well on the way to EDL and beyond.

Sephiroth 27-11-2023 12:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36165128)
Public Service Announcement:

Replace the phrase "remoaner whinge" (or similar) with the term "objective reality" to clarify understanding. :)

---------- Post added at 11:06 ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 ----------

That's a fair point Andrew. What is interesting is how much of the reality of the damage that Brexit has done to the country is invisible to the faithful. That's fine I suppose as they must rationalise the ideology that drove the agenda in some way.

What is more sinister is the move to referring to people who call out the lies and damage done in 2016 as "Anti-UK". The irony here is, of course, the decision in 2016 was anti-UK i.e. against the country's short, medium and long term interests.

Once you start invoking the nationalist trope, you are leaving your UKIP camp and well on the way to EDL and beyond.


Your ‘i.e.’ does not excuse the crassness of your remark. How can a democratic vote in the UK be ‘anti-UK’? It is certainly anti-EU.

None of you Remoaners has been able to provide a realistic list damage to the UK caused by Brexit.

Also, please tell me whether the EU aim of pulling sovereignty into Brussels (ever growing Union) has your full-hearted approval? That’s what we voted against.

People want a better life and business wants to maintain profit. The two go hand in hand and only needs a non-shitshow government to make faster progress on this front.



ianch99 27-11-2023 12:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165130)

Your ‘i.e.’ does not excuse the crassness of your remark. How can a democratic vote in the UK be ‘anti-UK’? It is certainly anti-EU.

None of you Remoaners has been able to provide a realistic list damage to the UK caused by Brexit.

Also, please tell me whether the EU aim of pulling sovereignty into Brussels (ever growing Union) has your full-hearted approval? That’s what we voted against.

People want a better life and business wants to maintain profit. The two go hand in hand and only needs a non-shitshow government to make faster progress on this front.



Seph, people have posted countless examples of the damage done to the country by leaving the EU. We're wasting our time giving you yet more. Just Google it!

Sometimes people (the 37%) get it wrong. They listen to the lies and enough people are fooled. It happens ..

Damien 27-11-2023 13:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36165085)
I do like a beer, but on a Sunday / school night. Best to not get too intoxicated……..mate…..which you are not.

That little outburst is just getting off my chest…because I’m bored of it, and it is also accurate.

“Remainers” which is a poor term, Anti-UK is much better and more accurate.

All they do is bitch and moan, 7 yrs down the line, thank god I’m not married to one… maaaate….

I also get bored of it too, but that's why I just don't comment much in this thread.

ianch99 27-11-2023 14:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36165144)
I also get bored of it too, but that's why I just don't comment much in this thread.

But what are you actually bored of? The discussion of the ongoing damage done to the country and the necessity to hold the people responsible to account? Why would this "bore" you? Do you think this should be all whitewashed and swept under the carpet?

Should we just watch these people continue with their maligned policies and say nothing? Just watch the excrement pumped into the sea & rivers and stay silent? Should we just watch them erode our freedoms and enjoy the race to the bottom?

Chris 27-11-2023 15:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36165147)
But what are you actually bored of? The discussion of the ongoing damage done to the country and the necessity to hold the people responsible to account? Why would this "bore" you? Do you think this should be all whitewashed and swept under the carpet?

Should we just watch these people continue with their maligned policies and say nothing? Just watch the excrement pumped into the sea & rivers and stay silent? Should we just watch them erode our freedoms and enjoy the race to the bottom?

I wouldn’t expect someone who passionately believes we should be in the EU to shut up about it, any more than I shut up about wanting us out of it my entire adult life. Such is the nature of campaigning for constitutional change.

However, what we have achieved is indeed a constitutional change, not a simple legislative one, and it will take time, perhaps considerable time, for the opportunities afforded to be taken full advantage of. Complaints about each individual perceived disadvantage, lacking as they do the deep perspective of time required to fully evaluate a constitutional change, just become white noise after a while.

Sephiroth 27-11-2023 15:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36165136)
Seph, people have posted countless examples of the damage done to the country by leaving the EU. We're wasting our time giving you yet more. Just Google it!

Sometimes people (the 37%) get it wrong. They listen to the lies and enough people are fooled. It happens ..

You can't get out of it like that.

Andrew's list, for example, was reduced to just one piece of damage due to Brexit. You've not produced a valid multiple list either - by 'list' I mean detriment that really matters to everybody.

Plus you have called the referendum decision 'anti-UK', which is perverse - but I note you haven't come back on that point.



---------- Post added at 14:34 ---------- Previous post was at 14:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36165147)
But what are you actually bored of? The discussion of the ongoing damage done to the country and the necessity to hold the people responsible to account? Why would this "bore" you? Do you think this should be all whitewashed and swept under the carpet?

Should we just watch these people continue with their maligned policies and say nothing? Just watch the excrement pumped into the sea & rivers and stay silent? Should we just watch them erode our freedoms and enjoy the race to the bottom?

What 'ongoing damage' due to Brexit?

'Excrement pumped into the sea' - really? Down to Brexit?

Damien 27-11-2023 17:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36165147)
But what are you actually bored of? The discussion of the ongoing damage done to the country and the necessity to hold the people responsible to account? Why would this "bore" you? Do you think this should be all whitewashed and swept under the carpet?

I am bored of the discussion on here that goes around in circles. I voted to Remain, I would still vote to Remain, if we had the exact same terms offered to us (i.e. minus the Euro) then I would probably vote to rejoin. I still think our leaving has been a big mistake that has cost us economically.

But I could have said that last year, the year before that and the year before that. Everything else is just variations on a theme until there is a realistic chance this might change.

So I don't come on this thread that much other than a cursory glance once in a while and I suggested that Pierre do the same. You don't enter a discussion to declare your disinterest in it (other than me doing it right now obviously).

Sephiroth 27-11-2023 17:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I'm not bored at all. It's fun!

My Leave vote was a marginal decision. What did it was France and the sneaky way they got the WTD changed from veto-able to a H&S issue. True our opt-out mechanism had the same result as no WTD for those who did not want the imposition. But France wields unfair power within the EU and if you couple this with ever closer union, I knew what my vote had to be.

Then to see certain Remoaners on here bleating wildly about how Brexit is a disaster for the UK inspires me to fight back.

1andrew1 27-11-2023 17:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165149)
You can't get out of it like that.

Andrew's list, for example, was reduced to just one piece of damage due to Brexit. You've not produced a valid multiple list either - by 'list' I mean detriment that really matters to everybody.

The list was valid when I posted it and remains so. The points have been detailed in the preceding couple of pages. Unfortunately, wishful thinking can't wish them away.

Sephiroth 27-11-2023 17:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165166)
The list was valid when I posted it and remains so. The points have been detailed in the preceding couple of pages. Unfortunately, wishful thinking can't wish them away.

Apart from the one, the list was not due to Brexit but were due to non-Brexit factors.

1andrew1 27-11-2023 18:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165167)
Apart from the one, the list was not due to Brexit but were due to non-Brexit factors.

Wishful thinking. Understandable in the circumstances but nonetheless, wishful thinking.

- Reduced food self-sufficiency -I believe Rees-Mogg has acknowledged this.

- Everyone on average worse off by £2k+ pa - tick - see the report I cited.

- Inability to return unlawful migrants to France - I think you've acknowledged this point.

- Decreased productivity - see the report I cited of 2.5% reduction in Brexit. Previously cited but here

Replacement of existing models at Nissan is welcome news but should be a given. Where are the new factories? Tesla and BYD have ruled the UK out due to Brexit.
https://www.just-auto.com/news/brexi...plant-reports/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-t...idUKKBN1XN1HW/


As Ian notes, Covid and Ukraine aren't just UK problem but I acknowledge that they will have impacted countries differently.

ianch99 27-11-2023 18:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165164)
I'm not bored at all. It's fun!

My Leave vote was a marginal decision. What did it was France and the sneaky way they got the WTD changed from veto-able to a H&S issue. True our opt-out mechanism had the same result as no WTD for those who did not want the imposition. But France wields unfair power within the EU and if you couple this with ever closer union, I knew what my vote had to be.

Then to see certain Remoaners on here bleating wildly about how Brexit is a disaster for the UK inspires me to fight back.

Seph, you are just trolling to wind people up. Get a grip man! :)

The serious point is the successful project to change macro economic & societal direction of the country using lies & misinformation, delivered by an undemocratic 37% of the electorate. No country's destiny should be changed so significantly on such a woeful majority. A supermajority was essential here.

Here's some bedtime reading since you are unware of any harmful effects of Brexit:

Economic effects of Brexit

Quote:

Long-term impact on the UK economy

There was overwhelming or near-unanimous agreement among economists that leaving the European Union would adversely affect the British economy in the medium- and long-term. Surveys of economists in 2016 showed overwhelming agreement that Brexit would likely reduce the UK's real per-capita income level. 2017 and 2019 surveys of existing academic research found that the credible estimates ranged between GDP losses of 1.2–4.5% for the UK, and a cost of between 1 and 10% of the UK's income per capita. These estimates varied depending on whether the UK left via a 'hard' or 'soft' Brexit. In January 2018, the UK government's own Brexit analysis was leaked; it showed that UK economic growth would be stunted by 2–8% for at least 15 years following Brexit, depending on the leave scenario

Sephiroth 27-11-2023 21:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

The pre-Brexit dip was inevitable because of uncertainty. Now that the FTA is in force, things are operating with certainty and British business will recover the economy. It has to, so it will.

As I have already said, the economy is not what it's all about. Not having our independence taken away Brussels is right up there. It just needs a competent government.


1andrew1 27-11-2023 22:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165191)
It has to, so it will.

That's a law of economics I've not come across before! :D

jfman 27-11-2023 22:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165206)
That's a law of economics I've not come across before! :D

Keynes, Mill, Marx… Old Boy?

1andrew1 27-11-2023 23:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36165211)
Keynes, Mill, Marx… Old Boy?

Sephonomics. It has to, so it will. A niche economic theory based on the supposition that British business will overcome economic reality based on the 20th century doctrine of British exceptionalism. :D

Sephiroth 27-11-2023 23:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165206)
That's a law of economics I've not come across before! :D

It has to, so it will.

Akin to 'needs must'.


Hugh 27-11-2023 23:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Or to quote it in full

"Needs must when the devil drives…"

ianch99 28-11-2023 00:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165219)
Sephonomics. It has to, so it will. A niche economic theory based on the supposition that British business will overcome economic reality based on the 20th century doctrine of British exceptionalism. :D

Nicely put Andrew. A variation on King Canute if you will :D

1andrew1 28-11-2023 09:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36165233)
Nicely put Andrew. A variation on King Canute if you will :D

Saint Jude was working overtime last night! ;)

Sephiroth 28-11-2023 10:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
You are both being very silly.

As I’ve already said, the baseline was reset by Covid. Had we remained in the EU, we would be no better off economically than we are now. There is no mutual ‘pull’ there - they’re all looking after themselves. Germany is in the deep doldrums, France remains totally up itself, Holland and Italy are in political turmoil, Poland seems to be doing well, etc.

Because people want to better themselves (=need) and business must make profit to survive (=must), so it will. This has happened before and requires the government to create an investment friendly business regime - which they haven’t properly done.

Had we remained in the EU, we would have had the same stupid government, no independence of action but maybe fewer boat people.

1andrew1 28-11-2023 10:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165240)
You are both being very silly.

As I’ve already said, the baseline was reset by Covid. Had we remained in the EU, we would be no better off economically than we are now. There is no mutual ‘pull’ there - they’re all looking after themselves. Germany is in the deep doldrums, France remains totally up itself, Holland and Italy are in political turmoil, Poland seems to be doing well, etc.

Because people want to better themselves (=need) and business must make profit to survive (=must), so it will. This has happened before and requires the government to create an investment friendly business regime - which they haven’t properly done.

Had we remained in the EU, we would have had the same stupid government, no independence of action but maybe fewer boat people.

You're again conveniently overlooking all the extra ongoing costs and missed inward opportunities like Tesla going to Germany and not the UK. It's great that Stellantis and Nissan have remained in the UK but to grow we need new investment not new red tape. "Three years on from Brexit and the impact to retailers and consumers has been relatively limited. However, in many ways, the most difficult bit is yet to come, says British Retail Consortium’s Andrew Opie."

That difficult bit is more red tape further denting the UK's Brexit-induced declining productivity.

Sephiroth 28-11-2023 11:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165244)
You're again conveniently overlooking all the extra ongoing costs and missed inward opportunities like Tesla going to Germany and not the UK. It's great that Stellantis and Nissan have remained in the UK but to grow we need new investment not new red tape. "Three years on from Brexit and the impact to retailers and consumers has been relatively limited. However, in many ways, the most difficult bit is yet to come, says British Retail Consortium’s Andrew Opie."

That difficult bit is more red tape further denting the UK's Brexit-induced declining productivity.

The bit I've highlighted' is a caution we must heed. That's why I call for a useful government that will deal with red tape, encourage investment etc. There is no 'Brexit induced decline in productivity'. The Tesla thing is a red herring; who's to say the investment would have come here had we remained in the EU?

1andrew1 28-11-2023 12:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165248)
The bit I've highlighted' is a caution we must heed. That's why I call for a useful government that will deal with red tape, encourage investment etc. There is no 'Brexit induced decline in productivity'. The Tesla thing is a red herring; who's to say the investment would have come here had we remained in the EU?

Dealing with red tape = implementing UK bureaucracy which reduces our productivity.

You know that Brexit has caused a reduction in productivity? I've previously referenced the relevant reports.

Tesla and BYD are not red herrings. We had a chance of winning their factories if we were in the EU. We have zero chance being out of the EU per those companies.

1andrew1 28-11-2023 15:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Another part of Brexit is set to be completed.
Quote:

Spain ready to sign a deal with Britain on Gibraltar as early as Wednesday - minister

Spain is ready to sign a deal on the post-Brexit status of Gibraltar as early as Wednesday, Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares said, before setting off to meet newly appointed British Foreign Minister David Cameron in Brussels.

Albares said he spoken with Cameron on Monday on the telephone and both men agreed to meet in Brussels to further discuss the status of Gibraltar there.

"Spain put on the table, several months ago, a balanced and generous agreement," Albares said in a Tuesday interview with Spanish TV station Telecinco.

He said he was due to fly to Brussels later on Tuesday, adding: "Spain wants this agreement to be signed tomorrow."

The status of Gibraltar, an enclave at the southern tip of Spain under British rule since the 18th century, and how to police the border with Spain, has been a point of contention since Britain's 2016 vote to leave the European Union.

The enclave was excluded from the exit deal reached between Britain and the EU.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...66250d2b&ei=18

Sephiroth 28-11-2023 15:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Spain might be ready to sign something. But is the UK? And what are the terms?

1andrew1 28-11-2023 19:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165269)
Spain might be ready to sign something. But is the UK? And what are the terms?

Don't worry, Seph! We hold all the cards and the deal's oven ready!

Hugh 28-11-2023 20:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165269)
Spain might be ready to sign something. But is the UK? And what are the terms?

It has to, so it will…

1andrew1 28-11-2023 20:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36165284)
It has to, so it will…

:D

1andrew1 01-12-2023 19:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
A snowflake whinger loses his court case in a victory for free speech. I wonder if the Daily Mirror's sister publication the Br'Express will cover this?
Quote:

Sir James Dyson has lost his libel battle against the publisher of the Daily Mirror over an article that branded the billionaire a hypocrite for supporting Brexit before moving his head office to Singapore.

The industrialist, who made his fortune from bagless vacuum cleaners, sued over the column that claimed children would draw the lesson from Dyson that they could “talk the talk, then screw your country”.

But London’s High Court dismissed the inventor’s claim in a ruling handed down on Friday.

The judge, Mr Justice Jay, found the publication amounted to “honest opinion”, one of the defences to defamation in English law. He also said that Dyson had failed to demonstrate “serious harm”.
https://www.ft.com/content/0cde470a-...e-64980de68f39

1andrew1 02-12-2023 00:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
"Some form" is a tad vague but we'll definitely have a closer relationship in the coming years.
Quote:

UK could rejoin the EU ‘in some form’, ex-Tory manifesto author says
The UK could rejoin the European Union “in some form” as a result of shifting geopolitical fault lines and changing attitudes among Brits, the author of the 2019 Tory manifesto has said.

Rachel Wolf, who co-wrote the Conservatives’ election blueprint four years ago, suggested that the major global upheavals in recent years could change the make-up of the EU as well as the UK’s relationship with the bloc.

It came as Labour peer Lord Mandelson suggested that an alternative trading relationship between the UK and the EU was the more likely outcome after the bitter Brexit years.

Speaking exclusively to i’s new podcast, Labour’s Plan for Power, Ms Wolf, who is co-founder of the political strategy firm Public First, also highlighted the heavily pro-Europe views of younger generations, which could affect the UK’s relationship with the Continent.

“Even since the 2019 election, we’ve had Covid, and we’ve had two major wars. We’re on the verge of, potentially, wars – or at least proxy wars – between China and the US. The whole kind of world order is rearranging itself,” Ms Wolf said.

“And I think in that context, you can imagine the EU itself completely changing what it means to be in the EU completely changing. And I think it’s perfectly possible that we would have to form a different kind of relationship or new relationship or go back in in some form, because I think we’re in an era of radical uncertainty and change.”
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...7cf4c28b&ei=14

Sephiroth 02-12-2023 00:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I've no serious objections to "some form of joining the EU", but I seriously object to "re-joining". What we left was a bad egg.

The "some form" would need to be:

1. Retention of national veto (their Parliament wants to abolish this).

2. No possibility of federalisation (ever-closer union).


Hugh 02-12-2023 01:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165521)
A snowflake whinger loses his court case in a victory for free speech. I wonder if the Daily Mirror's sister publication the Br'Express will cover this?

Quote:

Sir James Dyson has lost his libel battle against the publisher of the Daily Mirror over an article that branded the billionaire a hypocrite for supporting Brexit before moving his head office to Singapore.

The industrialist, who made his fortune from bagless vacuum cleaners, sued over the column that claimed children would draw the lesson from Dyson that they could “talk the talk, then screw your country”.

But London’s High Court dismissed the inventor’s claim in a ruling handed down on Friday.

The judge, Mr Justice Jay, found the publication amounted to “honest opinion”, one of the defences to defamation in English law. He also said that Dyson had failed to demonstrate “serious harm”.
https://www.ft.com/content/0cde470a-...e-64980de68f39

He’ll just have to suck it up…

GrimUpNorth 02-12-2023 09:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165541)
I've no serious objections to "some form of joining the EU", but I seriously object to "re-joining". What we left was a bad egg.

The "some form" would need to be:

1. Retention of national veto (their Parliament wants to abolish this).

2. No possibility of federalisation (ever-closer union).


I think you'll find those 2 points would be non negotiable for 'new' members, and to be fair if we had to rejoin on the EU's terms it would serve us right. We gave up our grandfather rights when we left and we're never getting them back.

Hugh 02-12-2023 09:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
https://x.com/pritipatel/status/1730...Fx9lsEXWlOa1jg

Quote:

Priti Patel MP
@pritipatel

This Christmas, wonderful produce made in Essex will be enjoyed by people across Britain and around the world. That's why I have called on the government to reduce the trade barriers on exporters so that Britian’s finest produce can be enjoyed all across the globe.

15:17 30/11/2023

Sephiroth 02-12-2023 11:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36165553)
I think you'll find those 2 points would be non negotiable for 'new' members, and to be fair if we had to rejoin on the EU's terms it would serve us right. We gave up our grandfather rights when we left and we're never getting them back.

You’re right about REJOIN. But my playbook excludes rejoin. I’m looking forward to the re-aligned EU that may arise at implosion point. Unlikely? Prolly.

1andrew1 02-12-2023 11:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165541)
I've no serious objections to "some form of joining the EU", but I seriously object to "re-joining". What we left was a bad egg.

The "some form" would need to be:

1. Retention of national veto (their Parliament wants to abolish this).

2. No possibility of federalisation (ever-closer union).


Would you not want to add retain £ to that list?

Sephiroth 02-12-2023 11:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165562)
Would you not want to add retain £ to that list?

S’pose. I took that as given based on the 1 & 2.

Paddy1 02-12-2023 18:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36165554)

Gaslighting or does she really not understand how trade barriers work?

Hugh 02-12-2023 19:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paddy1 (Post 36165575)
Gaslighting or does she really not understand how trade barriers work?

Both?

roughbeast 04-12-2023 22:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36064472)
So, now we have left the European Union. What now? How do we navigate our way ahead? How do we make the decision of the electorate work in practice?

Frankly, I am looking forward to making deals with all these other trading blocs around the world that are purely arrangements about trade and that don’t try to force you into some sort of political union.

Does anyone have any views on what our priorities should be? Personally, I think the next big deal should be with the US, and we need to bring in those free ports that the PM referred to a few months ago as soon as possible.

Should our farmers be gearing up to produce more now that we are free of the wasteful CAP? Which new markets should we be exploiting after the US?

So many questions...so many opportunities.

I have never been clear on what Brexit meant. Before the vote we were sold a variety of options. Farage tried to tempt wavering Leavers with a Norway-style Brexit, others with a customs union Brexit, or just have us as members of the EEA, keeping us effectively in the Single Market. There was some talk about a No Deal Brexit with us being on the really complex WTO rules and trade tariffs. So, people casted their vote to Remain or Leave. Those who voted Leave had a number of possible Brexits in mind, but we are told that cutting immigration was a driving force. (That went well! :erm:) As it turned out, as soon as Leave won, folk like Farage, Richard Tice and Johnson insisted that Leave Means Leave and that meant 'No Deal'

What has never been explained to me by any Leaver, least of all Farage, Tice and Johnson is what a No Deal Brexit would look like in terms of the NI border, the GFA and what international free trade deals we would have to replace the loss in EU trade we would have if we were to be on WTO trade tariffs. I picked up from Farage and Rees-Mogg that they thought the EU would be so desperate for trade with us they would be clamouring to do a free-trade deal with us asap and that we would be able to call the shots. Moggy explained after the vote that we might not see the full Brexit benefit for 50 years after an initial rough ride. I wish he had said that before the vote.

As it turned out, May then Johnson did deals that pleased nobody. Johnson won an election on the basis of getting Brexit done and then proceeded to do a hard Brexit deal, with the UK as a third country, in an all out attempt to be rid of EU rules we had helped make in better days. The EU, contrary to Leave expectations, played hard ball. It turns out, based on the existing trade set up with the EU and other economies that we stand to lose 5% GDP annually over the next 15 years. This doesn't take into account the delayed introduction of full trade regulations that are now due in the spring. Neither does it take into account possible trade deals with the USA and India, although these are unlikely to replace even 1% of trade we have already lost with the EU. It also turns out that universally Johnson's deal is thought to be a bit of a dog's breakfast. Farage hates it as do farmers, fishermen and the owners of SME's across the land.

So, help me guys, what does a proper Brexit look like? How would a good Brexit turn out in 5 years, 10 years, 20 years or Moggy's 50 years?

Pierre 05-12-2023 00:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
We’re out, stay out……for at least a generation, say 30yrs.

Then assess, where we are.

jfman 05-12-2023 06:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36165766)
We’re out, stay out……for at least a generation, say 30yrs.

Then assess, where we are.

Condemn another generation to mediocrity.

1andrew1 05-12-2023 08:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36165766)
We’re out, stay out……for at least a generation, say 30yrs.

Then assess, where we are.

That's not really answering roughɓeast's question though.

roughbeast 05-12-2023 08:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165772)
That's not really answering roughɓeast's question though.

I really would like an answer to my question. There must be Leavers out there who know what a good Brexit looks like and what it has given us and will give us. I particularly want to know the benefits for ordinary people in the street for their daily lives. Have we seen any benefits yet? Control of borders and increased sovereignty I understand as concepts, but what does that mean for Jo and Josephine Soap?

Sephiroth 05-12-2023 10:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36165770)
Condemn another generation to mediocrity.

Save another generation from Brussels.

To answer Roughie's question:

Brexit is defined for me as gaining sovereignty so as not to be governed by a foreign entity.

Then, an investment friendly government can help industry to build prosperity.

Definition is very simple; execution needs competence.



---------- Post added at 09:04 ---------- Previous post was at 09:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36165772)
That's not really answering roughɓeast's question though.

... your answer being? ...


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum