![]() |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Brexit MPs voted against it, because of the non-temporary nature of the backstop. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Come on, Andrew, I'm sure you know the advantages Brexiteers see in leaving and I repeat, Labour's vision simply does not deliver. Dress it up as you want. You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a bloody pig! |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
ERG would've have voted for it, if the backstop had a defined end-date, rather than continue with the nonsense of it ending only if the EU says so. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
The backstop is dependent on a deal being reached with the UK, not one side or the other calling it off. As the EU has the most trade deals of any trading bloc and the UK is a close and rich partner with close ties, a deal would invariably happen. ---------- Post added at 23:52 ---------- Previous post was at 23:48 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Are you forgetting that a lot more Remainer MPs rejected this crap deal?? The ERG are certainly not cowards. They are standing tall, voting against something which does not deliver on the referendum result, it was an absolute shoddy deal. Well done on them for voting against an absolutely shit deal. Quote:
Quote:
..Paltry benefits, when we can get them anyway, living by self determination, that is my right as a citizen to live in a truly independent country, instead we're tethered to a corrupted and cancerous EU. ---------- Post added at 00:03 ---------- Previous post was at 00:00 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
I know that the Brexiter Boris Johnson said "F--ck business" but the business fundamentals remain: If you're negotiating with large countries like China and India, being a 65m country is not an advantage compared to being a 500m person trading bloc. So there is no Brexy bonus here, Old Boy. By not being in a trading bloc, we will have to be a rule-taker. It's all a compromise. You can either be in the club and influence the rules as we have done so on many occasions, or you can sit outside them and accept them. Even then, you can't pick and choose the particular trading bloc's rules you accept as trade is done largely with the countries closest to you, your options are limited. The closest rules a country has to others, the cheaper that goods and services can be provided. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
I am calling the ERG cowards because they want it to happen but don’t want any drawbacks to leaving on their hands and want to blame everyone else if Brexit doesn’t live up to their plan. Nothing is ever their fault. They never seem to take any responsibility. It doesn’t matter what happened or what will happen it will never, ever, be down to them. That’s why they’re cowards. ---------- Post added at 07:18 ---------- Previous post was at 06:59 ---------- Quote:
May had the task of actually doing it. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Would love to know of an example where the Remain side has done anything to help Brexit and reach an acceptable deal with the EU. They put the EU in driving seat, safe in knowledge they will get whatever they ask for. If the mantra of "No Deal is better than a Bad Deal" had been stuck to, the EU would've had to be more amenable. No Deal isn't good for the EU either.
There is talk of delaying things for just 2 months. That is the margin by which the Remain have stalled everything. Without them there wouldn't need to be a possibility of any delay. Everything would've been in place long before now. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Perhaps if May had reached out for cross party talks a few months earlier she could of cobbled together something that got a deal through (although i doubt it) Saying there will be a delay of a couple of months is just daft, we're in deep doo doo and no one has an idea on how to navigate a course through it. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum