Re: The existence of God
 

B.Sc in psychology and you do not speak for me. Ever, in any subject.

Re: The existence of God
 

its amazing what they put in cornflake boxes these days ;)

Re: The existence of God
 

That "special" frosting.

Oh so tasty, and gives you that extra "zing" to help you get through the day with a sparkle in your eye, a spring in your step, and a perforation in your septum.

Re: The existence of God
 

And THAT'S your reply to the following.

Genius .... well done.:rofl:

Re: The existence of God
 

excuse me, but whom are you quoting and how does it relate to the thread topic?

In my opinion using either the Bible or 'science' to try to prove the existence of God aren't necessarily relevant ?

- the Bible is based on man's interpretation of the experience of God, science is based on man's interpretation of the experience of man.

- there will be instances where these interpretations coincide, but neither 'proves' or 'disproves' the other.

Science doesn't deal in 'facts' any more than religion does, especially as was previously pointed out when quantum theory is factored in - the uncertainty principle & theory of entanglement prevents such thinking, in my opinion.

One 'fact' is immutable - we are here - we think, we breathe, we fornicate - getting too bogged down in explaining 'how' that happened could spoil the fun of it - whatever anyone believes, that won't change as far as I'm concerned. :shrug:

Re: The existence of God
 

I'm quoting Russ B's PROOF that dinosaurs existed. Apparently one day before man.:dunce:

Re: The existence of God
 

I think Russ and some of us are also waiting to see the maker of straw men provide an answer to Russ.

Re: The existence of God
 

Now you see, again you're putting words in my mouth and changing what I said to suit your increasingly weakening argument.

Just so you don't miss it for a 4th time, I'll post this in bold.

What I was asked for, and what I posted was proof that dinosaurs are mentioned in the bible.

Re: The existence of God
 

In fairness, the 'evidence' on that page is pretty ropey though :) :angel:

Re: The existence of God
 

There's not much to go on seeing as the word 'dinosaur' wasn't invented until the 1800s but reading the description of the creatures, it's nothing like any animal that's around today.

Re: The existence of God
 

True, but elephants, and mythical animals like dragons fit the bill equally well. That's not to say it's not possible it refers to dinosaurs, but it's a bit of a stretch (imo) to claim it must be dinosaurs.

Re: The existence of God
 

Elephants don't have tails that hang 'like a cedar'....

edit....unless they evolved! Evolution IS mentioned in the bible!! See?? ;) :D

Re: The existence of God
 

Perhaps the 'tail' was meant metaphorically. Have you ever seen an aroused elephant? :Yikes:

Re: The existence of God
 

I've actually never thought of putting that in Google. is it worse than an horse?

Re: The existence of God
 

The bible does mention great beasts . The 7 days are not literal 7 days in time as we know it its time in reference to God who is immortal.

Hypothetically speaking though. If there is a God and therefore Satan and Satan is trying to turn mankind away from God then what better trick than to plant the remains of animals in the earth to be descovered.

As I said before in different threads. The greatest trick Satan has performed is making us believe he does not exist