![]() |
Re: smoking and the pub
OB - I didn't think you were allowed to smoke in shops as it would set off the fire alarms? or are they not ionisation systems??
Because thinking about it, I've never seen anyone smoking in a shop... Also - the fact that wetherspoons isnt the best pub ever doesn't detract from the fact that its hugely sucessful - (smokers want cheap booze too!) The food is not made from scratch on site, but they have appropriate kitchen facilities and the food is not pre packaged as such - meat cooked properly on site etc. Food in wetherspoons accounts for 25% of all their sales, as opposed to 5% in 1992, they believe this increase in sales to be directly linked to their addition of non-smoking pubs. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
A lot of non-smokers, like myself, go into a smoking pub because we have friends who smoke and enjoy their company. Now, if they all get corralled into a segregated smoking area which is sealed off, in order to spend time with them, I'd have to also go into that sealed off area, along with anyone else who also wants to spend time with their smoking friends. Unless you think that non-smokers should be banned from going into the smoking area? Don't even thinking about saying "but you can wait for them outside" why the hell should I? Don't you know how many promotions and business deals are done in company smoking sheds? Hundreds of non-smokers miss out on promotions simply because they aren't able to spend time with smokers while they smoke due to space constraints. |
Re: smoking and the pub
OK one last go it must be getting a bit smoky in here, and I've been accused - falsely I feel - of diversionary tactics but does it not feel a bit back to front of our Government to be putting so much time and effort into a ban that may save 54 bar workers a year but very little on the estimated 39,000 deaths caused by vehicle emissions?
Are non-smokers happy to go into a smoke free pub but not get out of thier cars? ;) |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
People should be able to make an informed descision on what they will and won't do. Some jobs are riskier than others. Some lifestyles are riskier than others. Let people decide. People should be encouraged to avoid/quit altogether smoking, not having it forced upon them by an opressive government. I like atm having the opportunity to choose wether I sit with smokers or non-smokers. I resent having that basic human right of freedom of choice restricted. Of course, choice, which is what free market capitalism allows for doesn't go down with with your average socialist (i.e. oppressive and authoritiarian) government. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Don't get into free market definitions of choice or this thread will never end ;)
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
....BEGGERS BELIEF! |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Something else I've said before is to draw the parallel with road traffic law. Do you resent the curtailment of your right to choose to drive at 90mph through a built-up area while steaming drunk, or do you agree that it is acceptable to curtail freedom of choice when there are larger health and safety issues at stake? |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
|
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
But the point I was making wa smore concerned with Government priority. |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
Why? Some smokers drive, some smokers don't. Same goes for non smokers. 'They' may like their cars. BUT if you want to get all stereotypical- non smokers who are fit may actually prefer to walk- to keep fit. Same way as some smokers might not drive because they can't afford to as they buy 20 fags every day.:D |
Re: smoking and the pub
Quote:
__________________ Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum