![]() |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Besides giving 'back' the Chagos Islands is one thing. Spending billions is nuts when we're not being compelled to do so. If keeping the American base is so important to us that we're willing to fork over £9-18bn then why abide by a decision that isn't apparently binding? |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Am I the only one who's never previously heard of these Islands?
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
I had heard of them because the base being there was been an issue for a while, but it's obviously become a much bigger deal since.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
The Chagos have never really belonged to Mauritius. The only connection is that they were both once "owned" by France.
Seychelles, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and India are all nearer than Mauritius. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum